THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM MEDIUM BORE RIFLE FORUM

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Rifles  Hop To Forums  Medium Bore Rifles    Poll - Will current production Firearms last for 20 years?
Page 1 2 

Moderators: Paul H
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Poll - Will current production Firearms last for 20 years?
 Login/Join
 
one of us
posted
Had a buddy send me some quotes from a feature called the "Last Page" from the Mar/Apr/2010 Rifle Shooter gun rag, which is written by Terry Wieland. It is about most Gun Manufacturers going to CNC Manufacturing, including Holland & Holland and James Purdey & Sons.

I found the majority of the article interesting, though it simply states what we all know, that for any firearm manufacturer to remain in the business, they have to produce their products using advanced computer aided manufacturing methods. From what I've seen, as a great benefit to those of us purchasing firearms, they are better than they have ever been.

Wieland whines about, "The modern world has embraced the concept of disposability in virtually every realm. The shiny new car you buy today will be trade bait in three years and junk in six…"(Really??? bewildered)

I could smell the elitist attitude building as I continued to read, "Blah, blah, blah…"

Then I get to the following paragraph:
"Most of the guns and rifles produced today – probably 80 percent – are unlikely to still be functioning in 20 years, much less be passed down through several generations. But the remaining 20 percent will."

He goes on about the "nice rifle" that could become an heirloom and the cost associated with them. Looks to be that he is justifying the way to spend a lot of money on $$$HIGH$$$ firearms.

I see nothing at all wrong with that, if that is what anyone wants to do.

Question:
Do you believe 80% of current production firearms will be unable to function in 20 years?

Choices:
1. Yes, Wieland is absolutely correct.
2. No, Wieland is full-of-beans.
3. Other.

 
 
Posts: 9920 | Location: Carolinas, USA | Registered: 22 April 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
To me, that is a question about the attitude of the end user towards maintenance, not the mfg process. Taken care of properly, there is no reason the majority modern guns should not last 20 years. What I see more of though, is the mental attiude of many today that make it "throw away society." Folks in general just don't take care of things the way they used to. If it gets trashed, oh well, they just go buy another.
 
Posts: 417 | Location: TX panhandle | Registered: 08 November 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I agree with the maintenance perspective. We have more options these days that allow us more latitude with respect to maintenance. We have stainless guns with ceramic and teflon coatings that inhibit corrosion.
Our optical sighting systems have improved significantly and should be better that past offerings. Metalurgy has certainly advanced.
People may discard items if they desire a perceived better firearm. They may discard the old Rem 870 if they can afford and desire a nice SXS shotgun.
I will say the bombardment of current marketing techniques baits all of us.
Recent example; Parker shotguns. I own a vintage Parker and a reproduction. Parts are interchangeable. The reproduction has advanced metal technology for the application. It should in theory last longer than the vintage gun.

EZ
 
Posts: 3256 | Location: Texas | Registered: 06 January 2009Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Dr. Lou
posted Hide Post
Heck, I have underwear that's 20 years old! Now that I am mid 40s, 20 years is nothing. Unless you abuse your firearms, they should last for generations - even current production.


****************
NRA Life Benefactor Member
 
Posts: 3316 | Location: USA | Registered: 15 November 2001Reply With Quote
Moderator
Picture of jeffeosso
posted Hide Post
full of beans .. MOST firearms, civilian, are still servicable today .. or could be brought back into production ..

but guys buy 2-3 (or 20) guns a year ANYWAY ..
I bought (less than 10) guns last year ... a couple of them new ..

whine-land continues to be a stewed prune


opinions vary band of bubbas and STC hunting Club

Information on Ammoguide about
the416AR, 458AR, 470AR, 500AR
What is an AR round? Case Drawings 416-458-470AR and 500AR.
476AR,
http://www.weaponsmith.com
 
Posts: 39907 | Location: Conroe, TX | Registered: 01 June 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
That guy is 'smoking the crack'! I have a Remington model 721 that was my Dad's and before that his Dad's and it was manufactured around 1948-1950. It still shoots well, and I estimate there have been around 400 rounnds down the barrel. My Grandfather was a short stocky guy, and he cut the buttstock down with a regular old crosscut saw, pretty ugly result, the steel buttplate he screwed back into the factory holes overhung the toe of the stock by about 3/8".....This thing has never missed a beat though, and I say all that to say this:

Modern Remington 721's are made more precisely on better manufacturing equipment and are a hell of a value IMO. To say they won't last as long or longer than the rifle I have that was my Grandfather's is just ignorant. I know many folks long for the older rifles for one reason or another, i.e. the machined feed rails on the esteemed Model 70--a good reason to want one--OTOH, shit gas handling-- a good reason not to want one...my point is this though, regardless of their design refinements, the new rigs will damn well last long enough to become heirlooms, and many will do so from a functional standpoint for longer than previous generations of firearms. I have since replaced it, but the scope that my Grandfather had on the 721 was a Weaver K-4, I'm not sure how old it is, but my Dad said it was on the rifle when he first used it, in the 50's, it's damn old but still works fine, the crosshairs are thin as all get out, and the optics aren't that great, but at 100 yards, I can still shoot and inch or better with it on there!

Heck, I've got a Browning A-bolt--first centerfire rifle I personally bought, that is over 32 years old, and it is just spectacular in performance, and it is one of the much maligned rifles in our fraternity that is supposedly made with 'pot metal' and other substandard parts. Heck, if I had children, this thing could have easily been passed down and then to one of their kids in a few years--without question.
Modern manufacturing techniques allow greater precision and tighter tolerances, and there are simply finer quality rifles being produced today than ever before, Rolls Royce Engines are largely reputed as built by hand--meaning assembled by hand, but trust me, you don't want a fan turbine hand ground by anybody, or any of a number of other parts--CNC machining is good stuff for lots of reasons!
 
Posts: 3563 | Location: GA, USA | Registered: 02 August 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
If you take care of them and don't use them for a battle axe they will last longer than you.


Free men should not be subjected to permits, paperwork and taxation in order to carry any firearm. NRA Benefactor
 
Posts: 1652 | Location: Deer Park, Texas | Registered: 08 June 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Most hunting firearms don't get used much anyway! 30 rounds per year maybe. Now skeet, trap and other competitive sports like IPSC and IDPA, those guns do get used a lot, but those folks know how to take care of their firearms.
Peter.


Be without fear in the face of your enemies. Be brave and upright, that God may love thee. Speak the truth always, even if it leads to your death. Safeguard the helpless and do no wrong;
 
Posts: 10515 | Location: Jacksonville, Florida | Registered: 09 January 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
CRACK DON'T SMOKE ITSELF shocker
 
Posts: 969 | Registered: 13 October 2009Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Heck I hunt with an 1898 Krag some,,,,

Shoot a 1940s Garand as well,,,,,

My savage centerfires will be fine in 20-80 years if treated right


Location Western NC,,, via alot of other places,
One wife
Two kids
Three Glocks
and a couple cats.


 
Posts: 376 | Location: Western, NC, USA | Registered: 29 April 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Blacktailer
posted Hide Post
The only way our current production firearms will not be around in 20 years is if certain politicians get their way. And that's only if they can find them! GUNS? We aint got to show you no stinkin' guns!


Have gun- Will travel
The value of a trophy is computed directly in terms of personal investment in its acquisition. Robert Ruark
 
Posts: 3830 | Location: Cave Creek, AZ | Registered: 09 August 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Duckear
posted Hide Post
The only thing I see failing in 20 years MAY be certain polymers used in some firearms.

The plastic trigger assemblies in the newer 10/22's for example.

How will they do for 20+ yers?

Likely okay, but we'll find out.


Hunting: Exercising dominion over creation at 2800 fps.
 
Posts: 3113 | Location: Southern US | Registered: 21 July 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of citori
posted Hide Post
Let's think about this. They'made of steel and wood or plastic.

- better metalurgy
- better finishes (or the same blue)
- many in stainless
- plastic/composite stocks arguably last longer than wood.
- I don't think wood today is different than wood 100 years ago

I don't see what would reduce lonevity. I do see what may extend it.


Tanzania in 2006! Had 141 posts on prior forum as citori3.
 
Posts: 266 | Location: Northern Illinois | Registered: 14 January 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Clem
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by citori:
Let's think about this. They'made of steel and wood or plastic.

- better metalurgy
- better finishes (or the same blue)
- many in stainless
- plastic/composite stocks arguably last longer than wood.
- I don't think wood today is different than wood 100 years ago

I don't see what would reduce lonevity. I do see what may extend it.


+1

The only exception would be a lot of the AR type auto's. Not because they are junk but because they typically cycle so many rounds compared to other types.
 
Posts: 1292 | Location: I'm right here! | Registered: 01 July 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
wienieland is so full of shit his eyes are brown.
He's also a 'wanna'be" bigtimer hunter.
He spends a lot of time "sucking up" to the high priced end of gun manufacturers with the hope of repeating his thirty year product review DR test from Miller Rigby.

I guess the frigging moron hasn't had the concept of product liability explained to him yet.

I gave Rifle and Handloader magazines my opinion about him in the only way they can quantify it: I canceled both my subscriptions.
I have every Handloader in binders,as well as Rifle, and I reminded them how long I had been a subscriber.
The guy on the phone tried to tell me what a sterling member of the shooting fraternity TW is. I asked him to call Geoff Miller and repeat that statement. The gunrags have about run out of worthwhile things to write about.

Rich
 
Posts: 23062 | Location: SW Idaho | Registered: 19 December 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Dr. Lou:
Heck, I have underwear that's 20 years old!


That's funny, Doc. Have you ever washed it?? Big Grin
 
Posts: 1416 | Location: Texas | Registered: 02 May 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I have two safes full of Model 70 Winchesters, the oldest probably as old as Mr. Wieland, it will still be a functioning rifle when he and I are both gone, as will the newer editions. My best hunting buddy has a name for idiots that spouse nonsense, he calls them a "stupid f-----g jackoff, I would say it might fit here. Good shooting.


phurley
 
Posts: 2366 | Location: KY | Registered: 22 September 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Something to proudly pass on to your child.
link
 
Posts: 2659 | Location: Southwestern Alberta | Registered: 08 March 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
A syt stainless rifle /pistol will last hundreds of years and be in better shape then those made a 100 years ago.
 
Posts: 19669 | Location: wis | Registered: 21 April 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Duckear:
The only thing I see failing in 20 years MAY be certain polymers used in some firearms.

The plastic trigger assemblies in the newer 10/22's for example.

How will they do for 20+ yers?

Likely okay, but we'll find out.


I aggree about the polymers, excuse me - 'space age' polymers we are told bewildered. I know of some Steyrs that have crapped the bed with their plastic mags made in the 80's. So I would like to see where todays polymers parts are after 20 years of dedicated use.

However to assume that CNC maching won't last long??
How is CNC machined metal less durable than other forged parts or cast parts like on CZ's or Rugers???
 
Posts: 1274 | Location: Alberta (and RSA) | Registered: 16 October 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of ted thorn
posted Hide Post
This is funny. The cheapest, ugliest rifles IMO made are over 20 years old and are still around...Nylon 66


________________________________________________
Maker of The Frankenstud Sling Keeper
Proudly made in the USA
Acepting all forms of payment
 
Posts: 7361 | Location: South East Missouri | Registered: 23 November 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I have a CMP M1 Garand that I got in 2004, and a DS Arms SA58 (FN FAL clone) that I got in 2007, and I have not shot either one yet, so they should last me a long time at this rate...Wink
 
Posts: 454 | Location: Califon, NJ USA | Registered: 18 January 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Akshooter
posted Hide Post
I've become lazy and full of myself in my old age and don't much read the gun rags anymore so I really don't know anything about Terry Wieland.

Assumeing the above quote is true and no doubt it is, then he needs to imbrace the philosiphy where by it's better to be thought of a fool than to open your mouth and remove any doubt.

Realisticly you never could compare production guns to the high end custom ones except for the raw materials that they are made of and in both cases these guns are better and will outlast the ventage guns that have allready proven themselves and continue to do so.


DRSS
NRA life
AK Master Guide 124
 
Posts: 1562 | Location: Alaska | Registered: 05 February 2006Reply With Quote
Moderator
Picture of jeffeosso
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Idaho Sharpshooter:
I guess the frigging moron hasn't had the concept of product liability explained to him yet.
...Rich

that there is funny, i don't care who you are


opinions vary band of bubbas and STC hunting Club

Information on Ammoguide about
the416AR, 458AR, 470AR, 500AR
What is an AR round? Case Drawings 416-458-470AR and 500AR.
476AR,
http://www.weaponsmith.com
 
Posts: 39907 | Location: Conroe, TX | Registered: 01 June 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I've had any number of customers bring in their granddad's old 311 or 500 to get it cleaned up and checked out. These were guns from back when they were stamped parts and pressed checkering. They were no less valuable to these folks than a Merkel would have been to another. To familky members, it's the memories not the make.
It's hard to imagine that anyone would think that today's production firearms are not some of the best made and reasonably priced ever. They may not be all hand fitted, but the fit and finish is pretty nice and the prices are reasonable. I'd make an exception for some, but most are well made of durable materials. The production guns are not in the same group as high end stuff; never have been. Totally different products.
Bfly


Work hard and be nice, you never have enough time or friends.
 
Posts: 1195 | Location: Lake Nice, VA | Registered: 15 March 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I realize we are on a medium bore "rifle" forum. I hesitate to buy any more vintage shotguns. In the not so distant future we should anticipate more pressure to discontinue toxic shot (lead). Some of the less expensive non toxic alternatives may not be compatible with the barrels in older shotguns. Then I guess they will stay in the closet/safe/ or in the gun case.
New guns are designed to handle the alternative shot offerings.
Now, I may be dead by the time this happens???

EZ
 
Posts: 3256 | Location: Texas | Registered: 06 January 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I'm at a total loss to understand any link Mr. Terry Wieland sees between anyone's factory production and handmade English, et al, rifles and shotguns. A Remchester made next week will last at least as long as one made fifty - or a hundred fifty - years ago, regardless of the methods used by English gun makers then or now.

I also fail to see how a well fitted custom gun part done on a CNC machine is inferiour to one done by hand with a file. The quality is in the fit, not how it got that way; if it fits, it fits! Even if the hand made gun makers could sell guns at the prices they would have to charge there are precious few workman willing to endure the years of training it requires so the makers really don't have a choice do they?

It seems to me that Mr. Wieland would benefit from a better grip on reality and some reduction of his elitism.
 
Posts: 1615 | Location: South Western North Carolina | Registered: 16 September 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Idaho, I have concluded that I was correct many weeks ago on another thread when I suggested that Terry Wieland must have shot your dog.

That said, this time around you are exactly right and he is exactly wrong. Simply by way of example, take a close look at a Win M70, the newest iteration from FN. No matter what you look at, or how you look at it, you can only conclude that the quality, and thus reasonably projected longevity, is AT LEAST the equal of the sainted pre-64's. The metal fitting is probably better. There are plenty of other examples...many of them.

I think that Mr. Wieland (whose work I generally admire) is making a pretty good living as a professed curmudgeon.

Good hunting...hope very much all goes well in Africa next month.
 
Posts: 490 | Location: middle tennessee | Registered: 11 November 2009Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Dr. Lou
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by olarmy:
quote:
Originally posted by Dr. Lou:
Heck, I have underwear that's 20 years old!


That's funny, Doc. Have you ever washed it?? Big Grin


Only when my accuracy starts to fall off and I can't hit the target with my usual precision. The wife then forces
me to clean them. Wink


****************
NRA Life Benefactor Member
 
Posts: 3316 | Location: USA | Registered: 15 November 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
About 10 years ago I was visiting with a machinist friend who now does quality control work. I was telling him about my new Smiths and how well they shot. I gave him a model 25 from 95 and one of the "vintage Model 25s" from the 60s. He looked at both of them and held up the 90s gun. "This is the better pistol". His opinion was the fit and machining was superior-maybe not the finish. CNC machining doesn't vary.


Anything Worth Doing Is Worth Overdoing.
 
Posts: 1275 | Location: Fla | Registered: 16 March 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of fredj338
posted Hide Post
Yeah, Weiland is off his meds. WHile I would agree that CNC has removed much of the craftsmanship from gun manuf. it cetainly hasn't made them less durable. If anything, the better steels used to day will allow guns to be around a lot longer. Still, I refuse to buy a curetn S&W production revolver, not because of ho wit is made but because of the stupid safety lock.


LIFE IS NOT A SPECTATOR'S SPORT!
 
Posts: 7752 | Location: kalif.,usa | Registered: 08 March 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Steel and wood is one thing, "plastics" are another.

Also some of these new Aluminium baised alloys...

This stuff will not take 20 years of even moderate use, much less heavy.

Plastic framed revolvers???

Not for me.


DOUBLE RIFLE SHOOTERS SOCIETY
 
Posts: 16134 | Location: Texas | Registered: 06 April 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
There is no doubth that a weapon made on modern CNC mashines using high quality steel, and modern surfacetreating tekniques will hold way longer than any old handfiled and handfitted weapon.
On the other hand most new weapons perhaps is made on CNC, but often they are made of the cheapest and lowest materialquality that can work. Often you will see extremly poor surfacefinishes on modern 500$ rifles. This also reduce longlivity.
The whole debate about Plastic and "spaceage" syn. mat. Basicaly those materials is used because of COST, not quality and durability.
I dont know anything excactly about the lifetime of those materials, i guess nobody does, as they haven't been around for so long.
My impression is that most plastic materials has a tendence to get brittle over the years. This problems oftens accelerate when plastics is exposed to UV light. also contact with oil and several other chemicals.

Think about all the plasticparts used on elektroniks Do you find them to be same strength 10 years later.

Wood has a record of living more than 100 years if maintained reasonably, as many weapons produced 100-150 years ago still have the original woodstock. I dont think that many of the plasticstocks you see nowadays will last that long.
 
Posts: 571 | Registered: 16 June 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Well he's right about the cars. Chrysler products for sure.
Rifles, he's full of it.
I'll be willing off my CZ's

John coffee


Give me COFFEE and nobody gets hurt
 
Posts: 1608 | Location: San Antonio, Texas | Registered: 04 January 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by kayaker:
quote:
Originally posted by Duckear:
The only thing I see failing in 20 years MAY be certain polymers used in some firearms.

The plastic trigger assemblies in the newer 10/22's for example.

How will they do for 20+ yers?

Likely okay, but we'll find out.


I aggree about the polymers, excuse me - 'space age' polymers we are told bewildered. I know of some Steyrs that have crapped the bed with their plastic mags made in the 80's. So I would like to see where todays polymers parts are after 20 years of dedicated use.

However to assume that CNC maching won't last long??
How is CNC machined metal less durable than other forged parts or cast parts like on CZ's or Rugers???



polymers are not all the same. after 20+ yrs of glock 17 duty pistols we made the switch to glock 22 and 23 pistols a few years go. we never had any issues with the old or new for that matter. even most of the mag springs were original. goes to show ya...springs should be kept with constant tension or none at all.
 
Posts: 969 | Registered: 13 October 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by olarmy:
quote:
Originally posted by Dr. Lou:
Heck, I have underwear that's 20 years old!


That's funny, Doc. Have you ever washed it?? Big Grin


Doubt it. I've got some half that age that I can't catch Smiler.


...I say that hunters go into Paradise when they die, and live in this world more joyfully than any other men.
-Edward, Duke of York
 
Posts: 876 | Location: Halkirk Ab | Registered: 11 January 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
More bullshit from Mr. Weiland, I would think that any properly maintained firearm (except maybe some of the dime a dozen clunkers like the Remington 710/770) would last many decades, a gun that sits in the safe for 360 days of the year definitely isn't going to wear out as fast as one that gets ridden hard and put away wet, you just can't put a number to it.
 
Posts: 56 | Registered: 13 July 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Tapper2
posted Hide Post
Most of the guns made 100 or 80 years ago are dead and gone due to abuse and neglect. I always have people bringing me a gun that they found in the haymow on grampa's farm that they want restored because it was grampa's. Sometimes it is possible. These guns are never the high end guns that we talk about lasting. If these will make it, the guns made today will last a lot longer.

Had a customer bring me a Parker double that they found under the floor boards in a barn they were taking down. It had been rapped in rags. The wood was in worse condition than the metal. I was able to restore it to a reasonable condition. No one had a clue how long it had been there. The barn was over 100 years old so we guess something between 25 and 50 years. It is surprising how little care is actually needed sometimes.......Tom


SCI lifer
NRA Patron
DRSS
DSC
 
Posts: 654 | Location: Denver, Iowa | Registered: 10 June 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
The majority of firearms are not used enough to wear out in 20 years, let alone 100.
 
Posts: 3191 | Location: Victoria, Australia | Registered: 01 March 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Let's think about this. They'made of steel and wood or plastic.

- better metalurgy
- better finishes (or the same blue)
- many in stainless
- plastic/composite stocks arguably last longer than wood.
- I don't think wood today is different than wood 100 years ago

I don't see what would reduce lonevity. I do see what may extend it.

MY VIEW:

Better metallurgy - not necessarily so. Better quality steel is now available BUT if it isn't in the gun to start off with it won't be there for the shooter to get the benefit of. Too many guns now are made of metal that is does not wear as well compared with guns of old. On the other hand some guns of old were made to the cheapest possible metallurgy.

I don't think wood today is different than wood 100 years so - not so! I see wood on modern guns that one hundred years ago would never have been considered for use. Say what you like about thos old guns but you didn't get the frequency of stock problems that you do now.

More use. The more you use a gun the more you wear it out. Modern guns get more use.

Modern primers. The main reason why old guns went for scrap. At least today we have non-corrosive primers and a better understanding of cleaning and anti-corrosion regimes for guns.

Modern loading techniques. Again you could argue that modern loading where users always load "hot" will wear out guns faster than when only (relatively) moderate factory loads were available.
 
Posts: 6823 | Location: United Kingdom | Registered: 18 November 2007Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2  
 

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Rifles  Hop To Forums  Medium Bore Rifles    Poll - Will current production Firearms last for 20 years?

Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia