THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM MEDIUM BORE RIFLE FORUM

Page 1 2 3 4 5 

Moderators: Paul H
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Let's talk about the 338-06
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by jsl3170:
d,

how is your's set up given where you live?


Mine is a AV Sako with a 25" match grade Kreiger barrel, and a Leupold 1.5-5 scope. English walnut stock built for my stocky stature. Is also the AI version.
 
Posts: 1324 | Location: Oregon rain forests | Registered: 30 December 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
this caliber would work in a mcmillan w/edge right?
 
Posts: 2267 | Location: Maine | Registered: 03 May 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
My first .338-06 was an old Ruger 77 30-06 that i had P.O.Ackley rebore for me. Parker did a wonderful job for me, and it shot very good.

At the time i was just getting started hunting brown bear more and more, and i wanted to see how the cartridge would work out for me compared to the 350 Rem. Mag. that i was then using. This was in the 70's.

I really liked the bullet performance, and the cartridge, on moose and big bears! So, i built another on a LH 700 Rem. action, Douglas bbl., and french walnut stock that fit me perfectly!

After killing more big bears, moose, caribou and much other big game, i really came to trust and like the cartridge.

Although i still have the rifle, it's over powered and unneeded for the deer i hunt, so it doesn't get fired much.

DM
 
Posts: 696 | Location: Upper Midwest, USA | Registered: 07 February 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
how did you load it?

it strikes me that one could duplicate the old tried and true 318 WR ballistics for short range hunting and use the 200-210 gr bullets and loads for open country hunting.
 
Posts: 2267 | Location: Maine | Registered: 03 May 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I tried many different bullet/loads in the .338-06's i've owned. I settled on two bullets, 275 Speers for big bears, and 250NP's for an all around bullet.

For my use, i didn't much care for any of the lighter bullets.

DM
 
Posts: 696 | Location: Upper Midwest, USA | Registered: 07 February 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
does the 250 np hit with noticeable authority vs the standard 30 06 in say 180 or 200 gr guise?
 
Posts: 2267 | Location: Maine | Registered: 03 May 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by jsl3170:
does the 250 np hit with noticeable authority vs the standard 30 06 in say 180 or 200 gr guise?


For what i used it for, yes...

Using the 30-06 for the biggest animals, i liked the 200NP's better than the 180NP's. I always carried 200NP's in my 30-06's.

DM
 
Posts: 696 | Location: Upper Midwest, USA | Registered: 07 February 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
what do you shoot with the 338-06 now?
 
Posts: 2267 | Location: Maine | Registered: 03 May 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
does anyone have pics of loaded 338-06 rounds to post compared against the std 06? rn or sp is fine.
 
Posts: 2267 | Location: Maine | Registered: 03 May 2007Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of fredj338
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Donald Nelson:
I envy all you folks who get to hunt critters larger than the deer and bear we have here in PA.
Here a 30-06 will do everything a big game hunter will ever need. However about 20 years ago I decided to buy a .300 Win mag. I hunt farms where hill side to hill side shooting is the norm so figured the added speed would be good plus if I ever had the chance to go for Elk I would be o.k.
That rifle has served me well but not until I added a muzzle brake. It was just to much rifle for me. Well a gun safe full of rifles later and I feel the need for something that will throw a bigger bullet just to have it. .338WM and another muzzle brake? I would rather not, so this thread has me looking at the 338-06. Do I need it? No not at all so a couple hundred fps will not matter but 225 grain bullets with greater frontal area than an 8x57 has with similar recoil would be nice in the mountains if I ever get a chance to shoot a blackie. So is this rifle for me? Much more recoil than a 30-06 is not my idea of fun.

Some will disagree, but IMO, the 338-06 is what the 06 should have been. Useable vel w/ big 250gr bullets & w/ 200-210gr bulelts, shoots flat enough to make 350yd shots. All in the same light rifle that can be had in 06 w/ manageable recoil, much more manageable than a 338wm that is 1# heavier. So my 280 fills the need for very light rifle w/ no recoil & can still take elk & the 338-06 for anything bigger than deer. Except for my M1, I have never really gotten into the 06.


LIFE IS NOT A SPECTATOR'S SPORT!
 
Posts: 7752 | Location: kalif.,usa | Registered: 08 March 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I have a .338-06 but if I could turn back time I'd just load 200gr Trophy Bonds and 240gr Woodleighs in a .30 cal.
 
Posts: 956 | Location: PNW | Registered: 27 April 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
is there a twist issue related to 240 gr bullets in the std 06?
 
Posts: 2267 | Location: Maine | Registered: 03 May 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Sorry to bump this thread but after reading it I see there is a great deal of support for the .338-06. I'm actually waiting on my own .338-06 to come back from Pac-Nor later this month.

I rebarreled one of Ruger M77 hawkeye rifles and I went with a Ruger factory contour so it would be a drop fit in my wood stock. I chose a 23" super match grade stainless barrel with 1:10 twist. I hope to shoot 200 Accubonds and the 210 Partition as my main hunting loads here in the US.

I haven't yet decided if I will leave it unfinished or just have it cerakoted to match the flat finish of my Ruger action. I'll be adding a Timney trigger as well.
 
Posts: 129 | Location: Birmingham, AL | Registered: 04 October 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of cobra
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Scott Spencer:
Sorry to bump this thread but after reading it I see there is a great deal of support for the .338-06. I'm actually waiting on my own .338-06 to come back from Pac-Nor later this month.

I rebarreled one of Ruger M77 hawkeye rifles and I went with a Ruger factory contour so it would be a drop fit in my wood stock. I chose a 23" super match grade stainless barrel with 1:10 twist. I hope to shoot 200 Accubonds and the 210 Partition as my main hunting loads here in the US.

I haven't yet decided if I will leave it unfinished or just have it cerakoted to match the flat finish of my Ruger action. I'll be adding a Timney trigger as well.


You can't go wrong with Pac-Nor and I agree with the 23" length. Nothing wrong with the 210 Partition but I really like the 225 grain A-Frames for this caliber, it really shines with RL-19. If it was me, I'd probably go with the Cerakoting too.


 
Posts: 8827 | Location: CANADA | Registered: 25 August 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
In 1948 I had P.O.Ackley make up a 333 on the short Ackley case, and a 333 on the improved magnum case. With these rifles and a 8mm-06 I went to Alaska in 1950. I gave the big 333 to my brother who was a much better shot than I was. We used 250 and 300 grain Barnes bullets. Each killed well, but the bigger case was better at longer ranges. In 1953 I got a 333 OKH, found that it killed well enough for me,was pleasnt to shoot and carry, and I gave up the smaller 333. I naver regretted the move. If two rifles kill an animal, it is difficult to determine which rifle was the better killer. I lent the 8mm-06 to a friend who took it to Kodiak and killed a bear, with a 250 grain Barnes. How times have changed.
 
Posts: 132 | Location: Kenai Peninsula,Alaska | Registered: 31 December 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I have read all of responses and learned alot.I am having my Win. 70 rebarreled to a .338-06,1:10 AI.It was/is a crappy 30-06 shooter,only likes 150 gr.bullets,it's a damn varmint gun !.Very excited to get started with the .338-06.great info. folks.Love how everybody here keeps each other honest.
 
Posts: 51 | Location: Buffalo WY | Registered: 06 October 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Welcome, Randy. Lots of neat folks here who can offer real world experience with this round. Beware, though, of the thread highjackers who will want to compare it with the 35 Whelen or the 9.3 x 62! This thread has maintained its integrity so far, thankfully.

Which flavor is your Winchester?

Jeff
 
Posts: 2267 | Location: Maine | Registered: 03 May 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Jeff,
My Win 70 is a Westener from the 80's.U.S. Reapeating Arms.It is a low budget Win.blind mag,matte bluing reciever and some kind of "hardwood" I don't think it is walnut.A fine canidate for rebarrel and a MacMillan stock.
Thank You for the nice welcome.I can't be talked out of the .338-06 I want one.
 
Posts: 51 | Location: Buffalo WY | Registered: 06 October 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Thinking about doing a serious bush Remington 7600 in 338-06

Why don't people put barrels on these rifles?
 
Posts: 1274 | Location: Saskatchewan, Canada.  | Registered: 22 August 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by robthom:
I would liken it's performance to a .30-06 mated with an oriental martial artist: it's terminal performance belies it's size. And it does this without the viscous kick of fast magnums or the stout kick of larger bore sizes.


I think the optimal bullet weight for .338-06, barring 'special' applications, is 210 grains. Below that weight I think you are better off with a .30-06.


Barnes new 185 TTSX with .432 B.C. warrants review of the above opinion.
 
Posts: 1274 | Location: Saskatchewan, Canada.  | Registered: 22 August 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by robthom:


I would go as far as to say I would prefer to shoot a bigger bear with a 225 grain .338-06 than say a 180 or 200 grain .300 Win Mag due to the 'bigger hole' syndrome (temporary and permanent cavitation promoting blood loss)


I also like the fact the rifle has greater capacity.

Weatherby Vanguard/Howa 1500 has 5 + 1 in 338-06
as opposed to 3 + 1 in magnums.

A person is not likely to get 6 rounds at a charging grizzly, yet on rare occasion there might be multiple bears around.
 
Posts: 1274 | Location: Saskatchewan, Canada.  | Registered: 22 August 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by boom stick:
With a factory gun in 338 RCM with a couple more grains capacity case I don't know what I would pick now.


I would pick the 338-06 on greater capacity.

I also like the idea of having more steel arounf the chamber area.

Short mag's make no sense; less steel around the chambers yet they push them super at 65,000 psi Roll Eyes
 
Posts: 1274 | Location: Saskatchewan, Canada.  | Registered: 22 August 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by ar corey:
quote:
Originally posted by robthom:


I would go as far as to say I would prefer to shoot a bigger bear with a 225 grain .338-06 than say a 180 or 200 grain .300 Win Mag due to the 'bigger hole' syndrome (temporary and permanent cavitation promoting blood loss)


I also like the fact the rifle has greater capacity.

Weatherby Vanguard/Howa 1500 has 5 + 1 in 338-06
as opposed to 3 + 1 in magnums.

A person is not likely to get 6 rounds at a charging grizzly, yet on rare occasion there might be multiple bears around.


This is much more fantasy than reality as Grizzlies are "apex predators" and hunt alone, with the exception of s sow-cubs family unit. There are usually a maximum of three bears in one of these and multiple bear group encounters are so rare that I have never known a person who has had this happen other than on salmon spawning streams where the bears are usually not aggressive to humans.

So......, I think that the capacity issue here is less crucial than the ability with a specific rifle-chambering-load combo to get a fast, accurate shot off and the reliablity factor is also more important.

I really, seriously considered a light .338-06 on a HVA action, light synthetic stock and sts. tube for a long time, but, my buddy had one built and then went to two simple P-64s in .338WM with the above parts. He just spent two weeks in the Yukon-northern BC and shot his winter Moose and he feels, as I do that the .338WM in his old 70s is a better hammer.

My custom HVAs are nice and light, but, almost impossible to find parts for and are NOT very much lighter than identical rifles I have built on P-64s, so, I just am not that keen on the .338-06.

That said, a nice 22" bbl's. .338-06 with 250 NPs or SAFs at 2500 or so, in a Brown, Lone Wolf,MPI or Bansner with a sts. tube and good irons, scope and QD mounts is a hell of a good rig for hunting here in BC and if a guy likes it, well, that's a big part of this whole game, eh?
 
Posts: 2366 | Location: "Land OF Shining Mountains"- British Columbia, Canada | Registered: 20 August 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Dewey, you saved the best for last.

Yeppers, the ole pre 64 fwt, 22" in Mickey with Leo 1.75X6 at 7.5lb+ did the job on my Alaskan brownie with those same 250 AFR at around that 2500 speed!

Gotta luv that 338-06!
 
Posts: 1324 | Registered: 17 February 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Dewey:
quote:
Originally posted by ar corey:
quote:
Originally posted by robthom:


I would go as far as to say I would prefer to shoot a bigger bear with a 225 grain .338-06 than say a 180 or 200 grain .300 Win Mag due to the 'bigger hole' syndrome (temporary and permanent cavitation promoting blood loss)


I also like the fact the rifle has greater capacity.

Weatherby Vanguard/Howa 1500 has 5 + 1 in 338-06
as opposed to 3 + 1 in magnums.

A person is not likely to get 6 rounds at a charging grizzly, yet on rare occasion there might be multiple bears around.


This is much more fantasy than reality as Grizzlies are "apex predators" and hunt alone, with the exception of s sow-cubs family unit. There are usually a maximum of three bears in one of these and multiple bear group encounters are so rare that I have never known a person who has had this happen other than on salmon spawning streams where the bears are usually not aggressive to humans.

So......, I think that the capacity issue here is less crucial than the ability with a specific rifle-chambering-load combo to get a fast, accurate shot off and the reliablity factor is also more important.

I really, seriously considered a light .338-06 on a HVA action, light synthetic stock and sts. tube for a long time, but, my buddy had one built and then went to two simple P-64s in .338WM with the above parts. He just spent two weeks in the Yukon-northern BC and shot his winter Moose and he feels, as I do that the .338WM in his old 70s is a better hammer.

My custom HVAs are nice and light, but, almost impossible to find parts for and are NOT very much lighter than identical rifles I have built on P-64s, so, I just am not that keen on the .338-06.

That said, a nice 22" bbl's. .338-06 with 250 NPs or SAFs at 2500 or so, in a Brown, Lone Wolf,MPI or Bansner with a sts. tube and good irons, scope and QD mounts is a hell of a good rig for hunting here in BC and if a guy likes it, well, that's a big part of this whole game, eh?


The only time in my hunting career that i was charged for no reason at all, (in the mountains) was when a HUGE sow with what i believe to be two grown cubs charged side by side at me and a friend. She charged my scent, and no there wasn't kill around either. SO, NEVER say never.

Having said that, forget the higher capacity bolt gun helping in that situation! You will be VERY lucky to get off two shots and i mean VERY lucky. Best rifle by far would be a double rifle!

I wish i had, had my Chapuis DR when i was heavy into hunting big bears!

DM
 
Posts: 696 | Location: Upper Midwest, USA | Registered: 07 February 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I did not say "never" as I have over 50 years of experience with Grizzlies here in BC. However. injurious and or lethal attacks by multiple bears as differentiated from rapid charges toward you that result in a bear(s) then "standing" to test the scentstream are fairly unusual and as you posted, very few hunters will get off a second properly aimed shot....often, not even a first.

I agree, somewhat on the DR and my "tool" for this is a customized Merkel drilling with two 12Ga. Brennekes plus a 9.3-286NP at 2400. But, these types of guns are a bit heavy and fragile for the really harsh mountain hunting we typically have here and I am most comfortable with a P-64 or Mauser with a Wisner, Lapour, Satterlee or Dakota safety, all of which I have and in various medium chamberings.

Still, a light DR with external hammers in .450/400-3" or 9.3x74R, would be one fine rifle for the dense brush of BC and I could "stand" having one in my gun safes......

So, what transpired when this old bitch came at you guys, did you have to shoot or did she suddenly stop, look, woof and then stalk away like she owned the world?
 
Posts: 2366 | Location: "Land OF Shining Mountains"- British Columbia, Canada | Registered: 20 August 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by DM:

Having said that, forget the higher capacity bolt gun helping in that situation! You will be VERY lucky to get off two shots and i mean VERY lucky. Best rifle by far would be a double rifle!

DM


Probably the best would be to carry bear spray quick access after 2-3 shots. a la' Dog the Bounty Hunter
 
Posts: 1274 | Location: Saskatchewan, Canada.  | Registered: 22 August 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Dewey:

Still, a light DR with external hammers in .450/400-3" or 9.3x74R, would be one fine rifle for the dense brush of BC and I could "stand" having one in my gun safes......



http://media.midwayusa.com/Pro...ges/Large/114648.jpg

Remington
MODEL SEVEN CDL CLASSIC DELUXE

350 Rem. Mag.: 20" magnum contour barrel with sights.

http://www.remington.com/produ...model-seven-cdl.aspx

200 gr: TSX FB

Powder (grains) (fps)

♦ TAC 64.0 2943!

http://www.barnesbullets.com/i...mingtonMagnumWeb.pdf

http://www.ramshot.com/powders/tac.php
 
Posts: 1274 | Location: Saskatchewan, Canada.  | Registered: 22 August 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Dewey:
I did not say "never" as I have over 50 years of experience with Grizzlies here in BC. However. injurious and or lethal attacks by multiple bears as differentiated from rapid charges toward you that result in a bear(s) then "standing" to test the scentstream are fairly unusual and as you posted, very few hunters will get off a second properly aimed shot....often, not even a first.

I agree, somewhat on the DR and my "tool" for this is a customized Merkel drilling with two 12Ga. Brennekes plus a 9.3-286NP at 2400. But, these types of guns are a bit heavy and fragile for the really harsh mountain hunting we typically have here and I am most comfortable with a P-64 or Mauser with a Wisner, Lapour, Satterlee or Dakota safety, all of which I have and in various medium chamberings.

Still, a light DR with external hammers in .450/400-3" or 9.3x74R, would be one fine rifle for the dense brush of BC and I could "stand" having one in my gun safes......

So, what transpired when this old bitch came at you guys, did you have to shoot or did she suddenly stop, look, woof and then stalk away like she owned the world?


I was in an mountainous area that i knew VERY well, and realized our scent was going up hill to her. I stood still, my drilling in my hand, intending on killing "her" as "she" was the one actually chargeing to us by out scent. I didn't believe i could easily kill all three, so intended to kill her first, thinking the others would mill around giving me time to deal with them. (the guy with me was froze up, and of no use to me, even though he had plenty of rifle in his hands)

I wanted them within 60 or so feet for the first shot, and she lost out scent just outside that range. She couldn't easily pick it up again, and in typical brown bear fashion, they got VERY nervous and moved off growling. I'd seen this behaviour before...

My drilling weighs 7 pounds, and i haven't found it fragile at all. It's been my "go to gun" for more than 25 years now. And, NO thanks to exposed hammers on a DR, i'll take my tang safety DR every time!

DM
 
Posts: 696 | Location: Upper Midwest, USA | Registered: 07 February 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
where in Maine, nugman? you would, though, make way for the 338-06 with heavier bullets, yes?

Jeff
 
Posts: 2267 | Location: Maine | Registered: 03 May 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by DM:
quote:
Originally posted by Dewey:
I did not say "never" as I have over 50 years of experience with Grizzlies here in BC. However. injurious and or lethal attacks by multiple bears as differentiated from rapid charges toward you that result in a bear(s) then "standing" to test the scentstream are fairly unusual and as you posted, very few hunters will get off a second properly aimed shot....often, not even a first.

I agree, somewhat on the DR and my "tool" for this is a customized Merkel drilling with two 12Ga. Brennekes plus a 9.3-286NP at 2400. But, these types of guns are a bit heavy and fragile for the really harsh mountain hunting we typically have here and I am most comfortable with a P-64 or Mauser with a Wisner, Lapour, Satterlee or Dakota safety, all of which I have and in various medium chamberings.

Still, a light DR with external hammers in .450/400-3" or 9.3x74R, would be one fine rifle for the dense brush of BC and I could "stand" having one in my gun safes......

So, what transpired when this old bitch came at you guys, did you have to shoot or did she suddenly stop, look, woof and then stalk away like she owned the world?


I was in an mountainous area that i knew VERY well, and realized our scent was going up hill to her. I stood still, my drilling in my hand, intending on killing "her" as "she" was the one actually chargeing to us by out scent. I didn't believe i could easily kill all three, so intended to kill her first, thinking the others would mill around giving me time to deal with them. (the guy with me was froze up, and of no use to me, even though he had plenty of rifle in his hands)

I wanted them within 60 or so feet for the first shot, and she lost out scent just outside that range. She couldn't easily pick it up again, and in typical brown bear fashion, they got VERY nervous and moved off growling. I'd seen this behaviour before...

My drilling weighs 7 pounds, and i haven't found it fragile at all. It's been my "go to gun" for more than 25 years now. And, NO thanks to exposed hammers on a DR, i'll take my tang safety DR every time!

DM



Grizzlies often, actually "usually" do this and are not really "charging" as such, although it is frightening and often causes people to "freeze" or try to run away. I have had these bears come to within ten yards of me and then slowly look me over and calmly saunter off, leaving me very relieved. They are not an animal to trifle with, for sure and I keep my eyes open for sign on every trip I take.

When, I refer to a drilling or a DR as "fragile", I mean in comparison with a Mauser or P-64 or Brno bolt rifle. I have seen drillings with splits in the wrist of the stock and a Merkel DR as well. They are not even close to as rugged as my purpose-built Grizzly defence rifles and my Merkel with custom Q-rib, adjustable benchmade "ghost and post" and QD rings weighs about the same as my .338WM. 9.6x62 CRF rifles, close to nine lbs. scoped.

I think that hammer DRs are stronger and less prone to malfunctions due to moisture and dirt than hammerless models and I like the underlever type for this reason. But, each to his own poison.

The other issue, for me, is that I can "fix" my P-64s in .338 and .375 with a few spare parts that I have with me and I cannot repair a malfunctioning drilling or DR. However, I choose from the basis of having used these rifles for working alone in the wilderness on the BC-AK border for extended periods over many years and a hunter's needs are a bit different that mine in that situation.

What drilling do you have?
 
Posts: 2366 | Location: "Land OF Shining Mountains"- British Columbia, Canada | Registered: 20 August 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I have been around and hunted big bears for many years, and i have no doubt she would have followed through, IF she could have seen us or sorted our scent out. I've seen many times before how they act to situations similar to this.

Anyway, i have a Krieghoff, and i've spent weeks at a time with it in the bush, over many years, traveling by horse, ATV's, boats/canoes, but mostly by bush plane. It's worked out perfectly for me, it's been one of the best buys i've ever made.

DM
 
Posts: 696 | Location: Upper Midwest, USA | Registered: 07 February 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
It's closer to 300 FPS difference. My pet load launches 200gr pills at 3150fps out of my 26" tube.


You are not comparing apples to apples.

In the real world it is a 100-150fps difference.

My pet 338-06 load is 2850fps with max load of Varget, 210gr TSX and a 22" barrel. What do think another 4" of barrel would add?

My guess would be about 100-150fps slower than your pet loaded 338 WM.

I own a Remington 7600 pump rebored to 338-06. Great rifle, fun, handy, has both peep and a 1.75-6 scope.

My next one is supposed to be a Model 70 classic FWT, but I made the mistake of shooting at the range with a bunch of 270 WCF loads I had laying around and 3 of the 5 shot sub MOA. No way can I justify a rebarrel on that rifle.

So I need to find another donor Model 70 Classic. It will get a stainless Shilen 1:12 twist 22" barrel.
 
Posts: 2034 | Location: Black Mining Hills of Dakota | Registered: 22 June 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I agree that the 200/210 grainers are kind of defeatist for this caliber. 225/250's make the most sense IMO. I am also of the opinion that the 1 in 10 twist is the better choice for the bigger bullets but 1 in 12 would be optimum for the lighter ones.


Captain Finlander
 
Posts: 480 | Registered: 03 September 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
From my experience a 210gr premium bullet will do anything you ask of it, save Africa's big five, and even then I am not so sure.

You can compare it to a 30-06 all you want, but you will never make up the diameter difference.
 
Posts: 2034 | Location: Black Mining Hills of Dakota | Registered: 22 June 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
My pet 338-06 load is 2850fps with max load of Varget, 210gr TSX and a 22" barrel.


That what Hodgdon's shows for varget with a 185gr bullet. I'd say that is a pretty stiff load. But then again, my 200 grainer at 3150 isn't exactly a wimp load either.
 
Posts: 3034 | Location: Colorado | Registered: 01 July 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
And Hodgdon's data is historically very conservative as is Nosler's.

Absoluteley zero pressure signs and cases on their 5th loading.
 
Posts: 2034 | Location: Black Mining Hills of Dakota | Registered: 22 June 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
not too far from me, nugman as i sit in east boothbay. i agree on the hunting in these parts - the 06 is fine. i put a nice bull moose down two years ago with an 06 slinging 220s. my interest with the caliber is partly based on historical lineage and partly based upon what appears to be a better use of the 06 case in terms of getting the most out of it and partly because it just kinda looks cool.

my father in law shoots a 9.3 x 62 and after making a mess out of an oryx this summer in NM now thinks he needs a smaller caliber. not sure on the thinking there but i think he needs to improve his shooting before he does anything else.
 
Posts: 2267 | Location: Maine | Registered: 03 May 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Finally got to shoot my .338-06 AI a couple days ago. Just fireforming cases proved it may be the single most accurate rifle I have owned.
Now in the load developement stage.
Powders and bullets are endless!
So far the Hornady 225 gr. SST seems to really shoot with IMR4320.
Next up is a 210 TSX and the line up of powders.
Favorite rifle/caliber combo to date.
 
Posts: 1324 | Location: Oregon rain forests | Registered: 30 December 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Loaned my .338-06 AI to an old bench rest shooter to try at the range yesterday while I was as work.
He came back with a target with the 250 gr. Hornady RNs of just under 3/4".
I figured under 3/4" at 100 yards was plenty exceptable. Then he tells me he does not shoot at the 100 yard range, only the 200!
Ya, I can live with that.
 
Posts: 1324 | Location: Oregon rain forests | Registered: 30 December 2007Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2 3 4 5  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia