THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM MEDIUM BORE RIFLE FORUM

Page 1 2 3 

Moderators: Paul H
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Battle of the 7mm cartridges
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
Picture of Tyler Kemp
posted
I want a new barrel for my Savage. With a 30" barrel, which cartridge will give me the best velocity with high BC bullets such as the 168 and 180 grain Bergers or the 200 grain Wildcat? (BC over .8!)

I'm thinking a 7mm STW or RUM...any other fast cartridges that I can get brass for?


Love shooting precision and long range. Big bores too!

Recent college grad, started a company called MK Machining where I'm developing a bullpup rifle chassis system.

 
Posts: 2598 | Location: Missouri | Registered: 29 March 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of GrosVentreGeorge
posted Hide Post
How about the lazzeroni firebird? I know Savage had a short term deal a while ago to chamber their rounds. A 160 grain is pushed to 3550 fps. Not my cup of tea but what ever floats your boat.


"I would rather have a German division in front of me than a French one behind me." -- General George S. Patton
 
Posts: 427 | Location: The Big Sky aka Dodson, MT | Registered: 22 May 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Tyler Kemp
posted Hide Post
Brass for the Lazzeroni calibers are insane. If someone happened to have a large stock of brass for cheap, maybe.


Love shooting precision and long range. Big bores too!

Recent college grad, started a company called MK Machining where I'm developing a bullpup rifle chassis system.

 
Posts: 2598 | Location: Missouri | Registered: 29 March 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
go with the RUM, no need for a belt in a rifle like this. all it is, is wasted powder space Big Grin


If you think every possible niche has been filled already, thank a wildcatter!
 
Posts: 2287 | Location: CO | Registered: 14 December 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Heat
posted Hide Post
If it's "scream" that you want, neck down the 30-378 Weatherby to 7mm... Dies are easy to order... Or of course you can just leave it as a 30-378 and shoot pills from 120 grains up to 250 grains, all at speeds that are IMPRESSIVE...

Ken....


"The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they are ignorant, but that they know so much that isn't so. " - Ronald Reagan
 
Posts: 5386 | Location: Phoenix Arizona | Registered: 16 May 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Tyler Kemp
posted Hide Post
What velocities could I get from a 7mm-378 Wby? Any pictures or diagrams of a case? Brass is sort of an issue with that caliber, but not near like a Lazzeroni. What do I gain over a RUM in this?

I see no need for a 30 caliber, more recoil and muzzleblast with bullets of a lower BC until you get to extreme weights.


Love shooting precision and long range. Big bores too!

Recent college grad, started a company called MK Machining where I'm developing a bullpup rifle chassis system.

 
Posts: 2598 | Location: Missouri | Registered: 29 March 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Heat
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Tyler Kemp:
What velocities could I get from a 7mm-378 Wby? Any pictures or diagrams of a case? Brass is sort of an issue with that caliber, but not near like a Lazzeroni. What do I gain over a RUM in this?

I see no need for a 30 caliber, more recoil and muzzleblast with bullets of a lower BC until you get to extreme weights.


Wish I could give you more info here but I've only heard of folks wildcatting this cartridge to 7mm... Make no mistake, when you are looking at 104 - 120 grains of powder you will be getting some SERIOUS speed from this setup.. However it is substantially overbore and I suspect a fairly short lived throat... If I find some details for this cartridge I'll certainly let you know...

Ken....


"The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they are ignorant, but that they know so much that isn't so. " - Ronald Reagan
 
Posts: 5386 | Location: Phoenix Arizona | Registered: 16 May 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Doc
posted Hide Post
7mm RUM

brass is easy to come by, it is a popular caliber now, and it will kill whatever you want

I cannot think of a more reasonable 7mm on the high end

However, fwiw, this cal and the stw can be picky on many bullets. "fussy" is the word I've seen used to describe them in some forums.

Folks like John Burns have gone back to the plain jane 7mm Rem Mag and 168 Berger VLDs

You can also talk to Kirby Allen and check into his 7mm Allen Mag. He frequents Longrangehunting.com

I do not know specs on his design for 7mm.


Ted Kennedy's car has killed more people than my guns
 
Posts: 7906 | Registered: 05 July 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I have the remington 7mm Mag with a 26" barrel
It is a great rifle.
 
Posts: 2209 | Location: Delaware | Registered: 20 December 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
i'm in process of building a 7mm stw


DEATH BEFORE DISHONOR
 
Posts: 1026 | Location: UPSTATE NY | Registered: 08 December 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Fjold
posted Hide Post
Savage chambered their guns in RUM by modifying the action cuts. Try to find one if those, so you don't have to open up the ejection and magazine areas.


Frank



"I don't know what there is about buffalo that frightens me so.....He looks like he hates you personally. He looks like you owe him money."
- Robert Ruark, Horn of the Hunter, 1953

NRA Life, SAF Life, CRPA Life, DRSS lite

 
Posts: 12826 | Location: Kentucky, USA | Registered: 30 December 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Tyler Kemp
posted Hide Post
I have talked to Kirby about his Allen Mag, but dies are expensive, and he has the reamers to do the barrel. Brass is very expensive for the 338 Lapua, although high quality. I hear he does excellent work, but with me not even being old enough to buy a rifle, I don't have the kind of funds needed. Someday I would like one of his rifles in 338 Allen Mag, 300 grainers well past 3300 fps. Big Grin

What would the difference in a 7mm RUM, 7mm STW and 7mm Rem Mag be in a 30" barrel with bullet weights 160+? Add the 7mm-378 Wby in there if anyone has ballistics or loads on it.


Love shooting precision and long range. Big bores too!

Recent college grad, started a company called MK Machining where I'm developing a bullpup rifle chassis system.

 
Posts: 2598 | Location: Missouri | Registered: 29 March 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of ted thorn
posted Hide Post
7 RUM for the speed...it realy shoots fast!
7 RUM for the cost...it is the cheapest


________________________________________________
Maker of The Frankenstud Sling Keeper
Proudly made in the USA
Acepting all forms of payment
 
Posts: 7361 | Location: South East Missouri | Registered: 23 November 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Doc
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Tyler Kemp:
What would the difference in a 7mm RUM, 7mm STW and 7mm Rem Mag be in a 30" barrel with bullet weights 160+? Add the 7mm-378 Wby in there if anyone has ballistics or loads on it.


The RUM and STW will be almost like twins. Either one will do what the other will on game. If you are going to use a 30" barrel, I'd certainly go with the regular ol 7mm Rem Mag. I have one and will NEVER part with it. It is easiest on the wallet and is a very accurate caliber. Very accurate.

The 7 rem mag will also be the slowest in terms of velocity, but my gut tells me that it will be the least fussy. Your call, easiest and cheapest vs. more velocity, maybe more finicky and more expensive.


Ted Kennedy's car has killed more people than my guns
 
Posts: 7906 | Registered: 05 July 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Tyler Kemp
posted Hide Post
I already have the 7mm Rem in 24" barrel, I like the cartridge, but I would like something more suited to heavier bullets. A 200 grain bullet with a BC over .8, going 3000 fps is amazing. A 180 grain Berger could meet 3100-3200 fps with a BC of .698. The 7mm Rem just can't achieve these velocities.

EDIT-And according to all the reloading data I see, neither can any other hot 7mms. How much do you guys go over maxes to achieve the 3500 fps from a 140 grainer? Is the STW like the 45-70 in that it is safe to go over listed maxes?(in certain cases) The RUM looks slower than I originally thought also, ammoguide lists 104 grain capacity, but it's velocities aren't that impressive for using so much powder. Is the STW really equal to the RUM with 10 grains less powder?


Love shooting precision and long range. Big bores too!

Recent college grad, started a company called MK Machining where I'm developing a bullpup rifle chassis system.

 
Posts: 2598 | Location: Missouri | Registered: 29 March 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of CZ 550
posted Hide Post
Another vote for the 7 RUM.


When you need it and don't have it you'll be singing a different tune.
 
Posts: 477 | Location: Olyphant Pennsylvania | Registered: 05 September 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of MickinColo
posted Hide Post
I fine it interesting how all these young guys (and a few old guys) cream their pants over the super 7s.

Just a question,,, But why?
 
Posts: 2650 | Location: Lakewood, CO | Registered: 15 February 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Tyler Kemp
posted Hide Post
Easier to shoot long ranges accurately, higher BC, more energy when it gets there, less kick than the 30's, good selection of bullets, good sectional density of bullets, factory rounds available most anywhere, does everything a high BC 338 bullet does with less authority, easily over 1000 ft lbs past 1000 yards, I like new stuff, high velocity is fun, and 7mms are cool!


Love shooting precision and long range. Big bores too!

Recent college grad, started a company called MK Machining where I'm developing a bullpup rifle chassis system.

 
Posts: 2598 | Location: Missouri | Registered: 29 March 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of MickinColo
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Tyler Kemp:
Easier to shoot long ranges accurately, higher BC, more energy when it gets there, less kick than the 30's, good selection of bullets, good sectional density of bullets, factory rounds available most anywhere, does everything a high BC 338 bullet does with less authority, easily over 1000 ft lbs past 1000 yards, I like new stuff, high velocity is fun, and 7mms are cool!

And you believe all that is relevant in the real world? I find that interesting.
 
Posts: 2650 | Location: Lakewood, CO | Registered: 15 February 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I would have chosen the 7mm RUM but I bought a 7mmSTW as I did not want a remington rifle, they had one sako 75 ss 7mm STW on special so I chose that.................I accepted a reduction in velocity for what I feel is the better gun over a rem 700 XCR.
 
Posts: 7505 | Location: Australia | Registered: 22 May 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Tyler Kemp
posted Hide Post
Alrighty Mick, say you have your trusty 308 with factory loads. You see a buck at 400 yards. Well, with your 150 grain factory loads from Remington, your bullet will be 33 inches low at 400 yards, and hit with 1117.3 ft lbs of energy when it gets there.

Same scenario, but lets say you have a 7mm-08, a better caliber in my opinion. You're still using Remington loads, but this time they are 140 grain. Only 30.4 inches of drop this time, and 1187.7 lbs of energy! Darn those 7mms! But 3 inches isn't relevant in the real world, nor is 80 ft lbs. Lets step it up.

This time, we're using a handloaded 7mm RUM or STW with 120 grain BTs at 3700 fps. At 400 yards, only 15.3 inches of drop, and this is assuming a 100 yard zero. You also get almost 2000 ft lbs of energy.

Now, lets use those 140 grain bullets, we'll say same calibers, but with a 140 grainer at 3600 fps, something most likely a 30" barrel can achieve. 15.4 inches low, and 2400 ft lbs of energy delivered!

Now, where the big 7s really shine, 168 grain VLD bullets at 3250 fps. At 400 yards 19 inches low, and almost 2600 ft lbs. I would prefer this over a smaller caliber any day. And at long ranges, a 180 or 200 grain bullets, that is more aerodynamic than most all 30 caliber projectiles will have better ballistics out to 1000 yards and further, if you care to shoot that far.

I myself am interested in long range shooting, and if you aren't that's fine, but 400 yards isn't all that far, and I would like to know I can take an animal every time off a solid rest. Heck, sight in at 300 yards, and you can hold on the animal past 400 yards with the hot 7mms. Not so with other cartridges. Past that, a couple clicks puts you dead on at longer ranges, compared to cranking the elevation dial for slower shells.


Love shooting precision and long range. Big bores too!

Recent college grad, started a company called MK Machining where I'm developing a bullpup rifle chassis system.

 
Posts: 2598 | Location: Missouri | Registered: 29 March 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I like the 7MM's own a few ;that said a 30/378 is much more impressive at all aspects .

Does an animal know if 2000 lb. of energy hit's it or 5500 lb. ? ,if it's dead it's dead .

If it's impressive you want build a .264 X 50MM now that's impressive numbers !.

Happy New Year. ... salute
 
Posts: 1738 | Location: Southern Calif. | Registered: 08 April 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of El Deguello
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Tyler Kemp:
Alrighty Mick, say you have your trusty 308 with factory loads. You see a buck at 400 yards. Well, with your 150 grain factory loads from Remington, your bullet will be 33 inches low at 400 yards, and hit with 1117.3 ft lbs of energy when it gets there.

Same scenario, but lets say you have a 7mm-08, a better caliber in my opinion. You're still using Remington loads, but this time they are 140 grain. Only 30.4 inches of drop this time, and 1187.7 lbs of energy! Darn those 7mms! But 3 inches isn't relevant in the real world, nor is 80 ft lbs. Lets step it up.

This time, we're using a handloaded 7mm RUM or STW with 120 grain BTs at 3700 fps. At 400 yards, only 15.3 inches of drop, and this is assuming a 100 yard zero. You also get almost 2000 ft lbs of energy.

Now, lets use those 140 grain bullets, we'll say same calibers, but with a 140 grainer at 3600 fps, something most likely a 30" barrel can achieve. 15.4 inches low, and 2400 ft lbs of energy delivered!

Now, where the big 7s really shine, 168 grain VLD bullets at 3250 fps. At 400 yards 19 inches low, and almost 2600 ft lbs. I would prefer this over a smaller caliber any day. And at long ranges, a 180 or 200 grain bullets, that is more aerodynamic than most all 30 caliber projectiles will have better ballistics out to 1000 yards and further, if you care to shoot that far.

I myself am interested in long range shooting, and if you aren't that's fine, but 400 yards isn't all that far, and I would like to know I can take an animal every time off a solid rest. Heck, sight in at 300 yards, and you can hold on the animal past 400 yards with the hot 7mms. Not so with other cartridges. Past that, a couple clicks puts you dead on at longer ranges, compared to cranking the elevation dial for slower shells.


All you've said is true, BUT: You don't get something for nothing - those large-capacity, small-bore cartridges are often very difficult to load to the performance levels you describe and retain anything resembling accuracy. IF you don't burn out your barrel finding a good load, you will burn it out shortly thereafter!

I think, in 7mm, it is better to use a round that holds no more powder that the 7mm Remington or 7mm Weatherby Magnums. Roy Weatherby was a real nut for high velocity - ever wonder why his 7mm does not have a bigger case??


"Bitte, trinks du nicht das Wasser. Dahin haben die Kuhen gesheissen."
 
Posts: 4386 | Location: New Woodstock, Madison County, Central NY | Registered: 04 January 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
It is certainly true that the big 7s have advantages and disadvantages and most have been pointed out already. Some years ago I was in the mood for a new rifle and stumbled upon a Sendero in 7mm Ultra. I wasn't really expecting much as I had heard the caliber was touchy to load for and hard on barrels. Anyway, I bought it. I will say that accuracy has just been ok - I have many rifles that shoot better groups. However, the Ultra shoots good groups and continues to hold those groups at very long ranges. Using 160 Accubonds and a scope with target turrets in a long range mount I have been able to make some of the longest shots ever. The rifle is not a general purpose item but for shooting accross canyons or beanfields it will get the job done and I really do like it.
 
Posts: 400 | Location: Murfreesboro,TN,USA | Registered: 16 January 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by El Deguello:


All you've said is true, BUT: You don't get something for nothing - those large-capacity, small-bore cartridges are often very difficult to load to the performance levels you describe and retain anything resembling accuracy. IF you don't burn out your barrel finding a good load, you will burn it out shortly thereafter!

I think, in 7mm, it is better to use a round that holds no more powder that the 7mm Remington or 7mm Weatherby Magnums. Roy Weatherby was a real nut for high velocity - ever wonder why his 7mm does not have a bigger case??


As often is the case, good, insightful intel from El Deguello.

Well said my man!
 
Posts: 3563 | Location: GA, USA | Registered: 02 August 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Doc
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Tyler Kemp:
Easier to shoot long ranges accurately....


Well, this is where some folks get themselves into trouble. You may just be fooling yourself. As I said before, look at John Burns. As experienced as he is at LRH/S, even he went back to the 7 rem mag for ACCURACY.

More over, you should realize that if you do decide to go with a 168 VLD style bullet, more often than not, (and in fact, closer to 100% of the time), you will now have a single shot rifle due to the nature of this bullet and it's best overall accuracy being achieved from starting very close to, at, or into the lands. Thus, loaded rounds usually will not fit into the magazine. I didn't know if you knew that or not.

There is certainly nothing wrong with the STW or RUM, nothing at all. Many are deadly accurate with good hunting bullets.

But I disagree that the bigger 7s make it easier to shoot long range more accurately. Flatter maybe, but accuracy is governed by more than powder charge.

Regardless, good luck with whatever you choose. thumb


Ted Kennedy's car has killed more people than my guns
 
Posts: 7906 | Registered: 05 July 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of seafire2
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Fjold:
Savage chambered their guns in RUM by modifying the action cuts. Try to find one if those, so you don't have to open up the ejection and magazine areas.


A local shop has a couple of brandnew Savage 116s without the accutrigger, chambered in 300 Rem Ultra Mag, for $299.00...

They can't seem to move them..


Life Member: The American Vast Right Wing Conspiracy

Jan 20, 2009.. Prisoner in Dumocrat 'Occupied America', Partisan in the 'Save America' Underground


Beavis..... James Beavis..... Of Her Majesty's Secret Service..... Spell Check Division



"Posterity — you will never know how much it has cost my generation to preserve your freedom. I hope you will make good use of it."
John Quincy Adams

A reporter did a human-interest piece on the Texas Rangers. The reporter recognized the Colt Model 1911 the Ranger was carrying and asked him "Why do you carry a 45?" The Ranger responded, "Because they don't make a 46."

Duhboy....Nuttier than Squirrel Poop...



 
Posts: 9316 | Location: Between Confusion and Lunacy ( Portland OR & San Francisco CA) | Registered: 12 September 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Tyler Kemp
posted Hide Post
Wow, $299...wish I lived near you, do they have a website?

I understand the gun being a single shot, unless I get the magazine well lengthened, but if I am shooting long ranges, I shouldn't need a quick second shot anyways. I also like the fact that there wouldn't be a chance of recoil messing up the seating of the bullets. I was actually thinking of a 180 or 200 grain bullet too, and as I burn out the throat on the rifle it would allow me to seat the extra long bullets further. With a 30" barrel I could probaly get 1000 shots of 1 MOA accuracy, then I could cut it back to 28" and do the same thing getting at least 500 more shots at MOA and slightly reduced velocity. I am just getting into my shooting and reloading life, I have a looong time to experiment with different cartridges and barrels, I'm glad I got into this site so early and you guys helped me start reloading.

I planned on using whichever hot 7mm I chose for hunting and little practice, then putting on a milder caliber, maybe the 7mm Rem barrel I already have, or the 6mm Ackley barrel I already have, or picking up a used .308, 7mm-08, 260 Rem, 223, anything with long barrel life to practice. I do not plan on going with a 30-378, I think the 7mms can do anything a 30 can with less recoil.


Love shooting precision and long range. Big bores too!

Recent college grad, started a company called MK Machining where I'm developing a bullpup rifle chassis system.

 
Posts: 2598 | Location: Missouri | Registered: 29 March 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
However, fwiw, this cal and the stw can be picky on many bullets. "fussy" is the word I've seen used to describe them in some forums.


I have owned three 7mmstw rifles and one 7mm ultramag.Not one of them was "fussy".All four rifles will easily do 3/4 moa with several loads and my two remaining 7mmstws will do 1/2 moa with their favorite loads.
My 7mmstws will produce about 3500fps with 140gr bullets,with 80gr of imr 7828 which is the maximum load in my hodgdons manual.Coincidently both also produce almost exactly the velocity listed in the manual.
My 7mmultramag adds 50fps to 75fps depending on the bullet weight.
If I had to pick one,it would be the 7mmstw since it gives up very little velocity but barrel life is better.
 
Posts: 3104 | Location: alberta,canada | Registered: 28 January 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Tyler Kemp
posted Hide Post
How much better barrel life? I recall you saying you do these velocities in a 26" barrel? How much should I gain with a 30" barrel? Also, where do you find these loads in manuals that are so fast? All I have seen is pretty anemic stuff. If you could, please send me some of the load data.


Love shooting precision and long range. Big bores too!

Recent college grad, started a company called MK Machining where I'm developing a bullpup rifle chassis system.

 
Posts: 2598 | Location: Missouri | Registered: 29 March 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
299 for a RUM Savage??? Dang, wish I lived by you too! I'd snatch one up in a heartbeat for a 404 Jeff conversion like the one on the classified forum!!


If you think every possible niche has been filled already, thank a wildcatter!
 
Posts: 2287 | Location: CO | Registered: 14 December 2007Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Try the Hodgdons 26th edition manual for 7mmstw loads.My case life is good,and my velocities match the listed velocities.I also have the Nosler number 4 manual,but the 7mmstw loads are pathetic.Then again that same Nosler manual has the 300win mag with a 24" barrel producing more maximum velocity with a 165gr bullet than the 300wby with a 26" barrel.Go figure.As for barrel life,I have put 1500 rounds through my first 7mmstw and the accuracy was still good.From what I have seen,most people don't see that with the 7mmRUM.With the 7mmx378,I wouldn't expect more than 800 rounds max before the throat is on the way out.
 
Posts: 3104 | Location: alberta,canada | Registered: 28 January 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Tyler Kemp
posted Hide Post
Ok, it's down to STW or RUM...tough decision, they seem pretty close, and except for the people who post their own loads, I haven't seen the RUM beat the STW yet.

I do not have the 26th manual, do you have a scanner so I could see some of the loads they have?


Love shooting precision and long range. Big bores too!

Recent college grad, started a company called MK Machining where I'm developing a bullpup rifle chassis system.

 
Posts: 2598 | Location: Missouri | Registered: 29 March 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
 
Posts: 3104 | Location: alberta,canada | Registered: 28 January 2002Reply With Quote
Moderator
Picture of jeffeosso
posted Hide Post
speed? 7 rum, without a doubt

for me? 280 rem, not ai, or 708


opinions vary band of bubbas and STC hunting Club

Information on Ammoguide about
the416AR, 458AR, 470AR, 500AR
What is an AR round? Case Drawings 416-458-470AR and 500AR.
476AR,
http://www.weaponsmith.com
 
Posts: 40234 | Location: Conroe, TX | Registered: 01 June 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
more data
 
Posts: 3104 | Location: alberta,canada | Registered: 28 January 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
last one
 
Posts: 3104 | Location: alberta,canada | Registered: 28 January 2002Reply With Quote
new member
posted Hide Post
i shoot 140 game kings in my stw it will shoot .5 moa all day long using h4831, h1000, retumbo, and imr7828ssc all over 3400 fps. thats out of a 28 inch shilen select match barrel
 
Posts: 20 | Registered: 26 March 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Tyler Kemp
posted Hide Post
Yes, the 7828ssc is supposed to let you go a couple grains more, I think 3600 fps is achievable. Thanks alot stubblejumper!


Love shooting precision and long range. Big bores too!

Recent college grad, started a company called MK Machining where I'm developing a bullpup rifle chassis system.

 
Posts: 2598 | Location: Missouri | Registered: 29 March 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Tyler Kemp
posted Hide Post
Has anyone tried the Vihtavouri High Energy powders? I heard a 10% increase in velocity over other maxes, that would be smoking!

"The Vihtavuori solution for driving heavy bullets
to long range, loading with these powders will provide increases of muzzle velocity
of up to 50 m/sec with outstanding accuracy and no pressure increase."

"Although these new powders have a higher energy content, they do not
cause greater wear to the gun. This is because the surface of the powder has been
treated with an agent designed to reduce barrel wear."

I can't find their 560 powder anywhere, it is for high capacity overbore magnums, and is supposed to give increased barrel life.


Love shooting precision and long range. Big bores too!

Recent college grad, started a company called MK Machining where I'm developing a bullpup rifle chassis system.

 
Posts: 2598 | Location: Missouri | Registered: 29 March 2006Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2 3  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia