THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM HANDGUN HUNTING FORUM

Page 1 2 3 4 5 

Moderators: MS Hitman
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
J-Frame 38 Special Test
 Login/Join
 
one of us
Picture of Bobby Tomek
posted Hide Post
Anyone anxious to try busting through the thick hide, cartilage and fat with a .38 Spl. to get to the vitals of one of these guys? (No big bore backup allowed... Big Grin)








Bobby
Μολὼν λαβέ
The most important thing in life is not what we do but how and why we do it. - Nana Mouskouri

 
Posts: 9453 | Location: Shiner TX USA | Registered: 19 March 2002Reply With Quote
Moderator
Picture of Whitworth
posted Hide Post
We're talking deer, Bobby. I've taken my share of hogs with handguns and I again prefer a big-bore. A small hog would be doable, though.



"Ignorance you can correct, you can't fix stupid." JWP

If stupidity hurt, a lot of people would be walking around screaming.

Semper Fidelis

"Building Carpal Tunnel one round at a time"
 
Posts: 13440 | Location: Virginia | Registered: 10 July 2003Reply With Quote
Moderator
posted Hide Post
Alex,

Post what you like where you like. Disagreeing is fine, no one is asking you to buy in on this. You've made up your mind, that's dandy; no need to continue to defend your position. Just don't think I'm going to change my mind merely because you threaten to "expose" the fact a 36 caliber bullet will completely penetrate a deer on a broadside shot. Kinda like exposing the fact the sun rises in the east.

Remember, this all started because of a tongue in cheek remark about using a J frame for my next deer kill. That's fancy talk to say I was joking. Get it?



If ignorance is bliss; there are some blissful sonofaguns around here. We know who you are, so no reason to point yourselves out.
 
Posts: 2389 | Registered: 19 July 2002Reply With Quote
Moderator
posted Hide Post
Bobby,

I see at least you have those Encores strung properly.



If ignorance is bliss; there are some blissful sonofaguns around here. We know who you are, so no reason to point yourselves out.
 
Posts: 2389 | Registered: 19 July 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Redhawk1
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Whitworth:
quote:
Originally posted by Redhawk1:
MS Hitman, post your post on other Forums and see how many other people out there would think you are wrong. It is not just me, but I know a lot of people that would disagree with you.

You just have the same guys that agree with you on everything else backing you on this ludicrous notion you have of the 38 being a viable hunting round for big game. Better yet I will post it on other sites, and see what the consensus of other handgun hunters are.


Who cares what the other forums think? I don't see how this is relevant. I am not agreeing with Hitman to "back him up" as you suggest, rather he is more open minded and he is presenting a viable argument for the .38 special. I think you are repeatedly missing the point of the feasibilty of this round, or you are simply a contrarian. Go back and read what is being said. NO ONE, and I repeat NO ONE is suggesting that the .38 special should replace the big-bores in your arsenal -- only that loaded right it can be a reliable game getter.


Whitworth, it is not what other Forums think, it is what other handgun hunters think.

And having an open mind has nothing to do with this. If anyone disagrees with you or your buddy's here, we are closed minded. But if you agree with you we are open minded, how stupid does that sound.

What the hell is a 38 special have to do with being a reliable game getter, it is not, unless you are talking small game.

So Lighten up Francis!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


If you're going to make a hole, make it a big one.
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Member of the Delaware Destroyers
Member Reeders Misfits
NRA Life Member ENDOWMENT MEMBER
NAHC Life Member
DSA Life Member
 
Posts: 3142 | Location: Magnolia Delaware | Registered: 15 May 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Redhawk1
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by MS Hitman:
Alex,

Post what you like where you like. Disagreeing is fine, no one is asking you to buy in on this. You've made up your mind, that's dandy; no need to continue to defend your position. Just don't think I'm going to change my mind merely because you threaten to "expose" the fact a 36 caliber bullet will completely penetrate a deer on a broadside shot. Kinda like exposing the fact the sun rises in the east.

Remember, this all started because of a tongue in cheek remark about using a J frame for my next deer kill. That's fancy talk to say I was joking. Get it?



It may of started as tongue in cheek in another thread, not this one, but you sure are defending it now. And no need to be condescending with your get it comment. I understand what tongue in cheek means without you having to spell it out.


If you're going to make a hole, make it a big one.
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Member of the Delaware Destroyers
Member Reeders Misfits
NRA Life Member ENDOWMENT MEMBER
NAHC Life Member
DSA Life Member
 
Posts: 3142 | Location: Magnolia Delaware | Registered: 15 May 2004Reply With Quote
Moderator
posted Hide Post
Hell Alex, pick any subject and I can find people who don't agree with me. What are these other handgun hunters going to do to me: revoke my handgun hunting card, take away my special ballistics decoder ring, or make me string my Contenders backwards? Just step back and take a breathe, you're getting too worked up over this.



If ignorance is bliss; there are some blissful sonofaguns around here. We know who you are, so no reason to point yourselves out.
 
Posts: 2389 | Registered: 19 July 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of jwp475
posted Hide Post
According to Buffalo Bore the 158 grain LSWCHP from a, S&W Mt. Gun, 4 inch—1162 fps (474 ft. lbs.)


That should do in any Deer with a shot to the chest cavity


_____________________________________________________


A 9mm may expand to a larger diameter, but a 45 ain't going to shrink

Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had happened.
- Winston Churchill
 
Posts: 5077 | Location: USA | Registered: 11 March 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Redhawk1
posted Hide Post
MS Hitman it has nothing to do with being worked up, it has more to do with, you all suggesting and promoting a cartridge for deer hunting that is not one that should be considered as a hunting round for deer. In my opinion is it irresponsible and wrong to suggest it is.


If you're going to make a hole, make it a big one.
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Member of the Delaware Destroyers
Member Reeders Misfits
NRA Life Member ENDOWMENT MEMBER
NAHC Life Member
DSA Life Member
 
Posts: 3142 | Location: Magnolia Delaware | Registered: 15 May 2004Reply With Quote
Moderator
Picture of Whitworth
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Redhawk1:.

And having an open mind has nothing to do with this. If anyone disagrees with you or your buddy's here, we are closed minded. But if you agree with you we are open minded, how stupid does that sound.

What the hell is a 38 special have to do with being a reliable game getter, it is not, unless you are talking small game.

So Lighten up Francis!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


You make me sound like am an uneducated oaf. I learned a long time ago that imposing one's opinion on others is not generally well received anywhere in this world and I have travelled much of it. But you, Alex, seem to be unaware of the fact that your posts are very combative in tone. You can merely laugh and say you disagree.......try it, you will live longer.



"Ignorance you can correct, you can't fix stupid." JWP

If stupidity hurt, a lot of people would be walking around screaming.

Semper Fidelis

"Building Carpal Tunnel one round at a time"
 
Posts: 13440 | Location: Virginia | Registered: 10 July 2003Reply With Quote
Moderator
Picture of Whitworth
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Redhawk1:
MS Hitman it has nothing to do with being worked up, it has more to do with, you all suggesting and promoting a cartridge for deer hunting that is not one that should be considered as a hunting round for deer. In my opinion is it irresponsible and wrong to suggest it is.


You're just wrong, Alex. This is just a discussion that wasn't an arguement until you deftly turned it into one.



"Ignorance you can correct, you can't fix stupid." JWP

If stupidity hurt, a lot of people would be walking around screaming.

Semper Fidelis

"Building Carpal Tunnel one round at a time"
 
Posts: 13440 | Location: Virginia | Registered: 10 July 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of jwp475
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Redhawk1:
MS Hitman it has nothing to do with being worked up, it has more to do with, you all suggesting and promoting a cartridge for deer hunting that is not one that should be considered as a hunting round for deer. In my opinion is it irresponsible and wrong to suggest it is.


I wonder how the old timers killed Deer, before the super handgun cartridges appeared on the radar? The 32/20 was once a respected Deer round, I guess it will just bounce off today..
I have killed 1 hog with the 38 Specail. That was before Redhawk proclaimed it useless for taking game.


_____________________________________________________


A 9mm may expand to a larger diameter, but a 45 ain't going to shrink

Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had happened.
- Winston Churchill
 
Posts: 5077 | Location: USA | Registered: 11 March 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of jwp475
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Bobby Tomek:
Anyone anxious to try busting through the thick hide, cartilage and fat with a .38 Spl. to get to the vitals of one of these guys? (No big bore backup allowed... Big Grin)





That looks like a hog made to be taken with the 38 Special


_____________________________________________________


A 9mm may expand to a larger diameter, but a 45 ain't going to shrink

Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had happened.
- Winston Churchill
 
Posts: 5077 | Location: USA | Registered: 11 March 2005Reply With Quote
Moderator
Picture of Whitworth
posted Hide Post
I killed a chipmunk with one once. That was in my youth when I didn't realize the danger of my actions.



"Ignorance you can correct, you can't fix stupid." JWP

If stupidity hurt, a lot of people would be walking around screaming.

Semper Fidelis

"Building Carpal Tunnel one round at a time"
 
Posts: 13440 | Location: Virginia | Registered: 10 July 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Redhawk1
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Whitworth:
quote:
Originally posted by Redhawk1:
MS Hitman it has nothing to do with being worked up, it has more to do with, you all suggesting and promoting a cartridge for deer hunting that is not one that should be considered as a hunting round for deer. In my opinion is it irresponsible and wrong to suggest it is.


You're just wrong, Alex. This is just a discussion that wasn't an arguement until you deftly turned it into one.


No Whitworth, there are 4 guys on this handgun forum that think they know it all. You know everyone of them.
If anyone disagree with any of you, the others will show up and gang up on the one that disagrees with your little click.

If we have a different opinion than your's, all of you will attack, but when we reply back, we are arguing or not being open minded, why??? Because we don't agree with your little group.

Go back and look at every thread that went to pot, and see all the players in it. You may be surprised what you see, or not.


If you're going to make a hole, make it a big one.
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Member of the Delaware Destroyers
Member Reeders Misfits
NRA Life Member ENDOWMENT MEMBER
NAHC Life Member
DSA Life Member
 
Posts: 3142 | Location: Magnolia Delaware | Registered: 15 May 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of jwp475
posted Hide Post
quote:
Go back and look at every thread that went to pot, and see all the players in it. You may be surprised what you see, or not.



I was simple amazed you were in every one of them, consistent for sure


_____________________________________________________


A 9mm may expand to a larger diameter, but a 45 ain't going to shrink

Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had happened.
- Winston Churchill
 
Posts: 5077 | Location: USA | Registered: 11 March 2005Reply With Quote
Moderator
Picture of Whitworth
posted Hide Post
Wow, the pot calling the kettle black. I won't let you drag me down into the mud, Alex, I just won't.



"Ignorance you can correct, you can't fix stupid." JWP

If stupidity hurt, a lot of people would be walking around screaming.

Semper Fidelis

"Building Carpal Tunnel one round at a time"
 
Posts: 13440 | Location: Virginia | Registered: 10 July 2003Reply With Quote
Moderator
posted Hide Post
yes, but was your chipmunk strung backwards?



If ignorance is bliss; there are some blissful sonofaguns around here. We know who you are, so no reason to point yourselves out.
 
Posts: 2389 | Registered: 19 July 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Redhawk1
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Whitworth:
Wow, the pot calling the kettle black. I won't let you drag me down into the mud, Alex, I just won't.


Your already in it over your head....lol


If you're going to make a hole, make it a big one.
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Member of the Delaware Destroyers
Member Reeders Misfits
NRA Life Member ENDOWMENT MEMBER
NAHC Life Member
DSA Life Member
 
Posts: 3142 | Location: Magnolia Delaware | Registered: 15 May 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of jwp475
posted Hide Post
Tell me Redhawk, how many Deer have you shot with a 38 Special?

If the 38 Special is no good then what is your view on the 9mm?


_____________________________________________________


A 9mm may expand to a larger diameter, but a 45 ain't going to shrink

Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had happened.
- Winston Churchill
 
Posts: 5077 | Location: USA | Registered: 11 March 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I never said the .38 or .357 would not kill a deer or maybe even a larger animal. Of course they will but we all know how hard it is to have the perfect shot on any animal. And what happens when a big bone is hit?
My gripe is the choice of bullets that will be effective, the many variables just to hit a deer perfectly, the actual angle of the deer compared to our perception of the angle (Marko, you had that happen with your buck when you thought the exit hole was in the opposite shoulder when it was in the center of the neck.)
The reason I put the 45-70 in was to show even though I used WFN and had a big hole all the way through, the boolit was the wrong choice and did no work inside the deer. This should be the easiest gun to get to work but I was wrong and admit it. This was the fourth time I have had trouble with hard cast in it. Remember I used a Hornady bullet last season because I did not trust the WLN. I figured the WFN would correct it this time around---WRONG!
For me to look at .38 caliber boolits and tell everyone that such and such boolit will kill fast, then to have it fail over and over is something I am not going to do.
There is a point where a gun is in limbo. My 45-70 is there. If I shoot that same boolit at 2000 fps, it might be super and if I shoot it at 1100 to 1300 fps it will also be super. The thing is that my accuracy is at a little over 1600 fps and that is the limbo point for hard cast in my gun. It is now my job to find the perfect alloy or cast soft nose boolits. Lacking that it needs a jacketed hollow point.
Dropping to the .38 or .357 expands the limbo point and the only way to work around it is to shoot a lot of animals to find what works. You can't pull a boolit out of a hat and claim it will work.
Shooting an elk with the .357 does not prove that every elk shot with it will be found. Out in the more open land, it is easier to watch an animal for a long distance but hunt here in the thick and a deer is GONE in 2 seconds. If there is no blood trail, it is lost.
Ethics tells me to stay away from small guns.It also tells me to find a better boolit for the 45-70.
Marko, we are not talking rifles, but you have first hand experience when the young lady shot that nice doe with a .223 last season. A gun that CAN and DOES kill but is in limbo for deer recovery. It took me 4 years to talk them into a 30-30 because she had killed a deer with the toy once.
If you kill a deer with a .38 and then lose the next 2 or 4 or whatever, how long would it take me to talk you into a better gun?
Isn't there a point where you are just fooling around at the animal's expense?
 
Posts: 4068 | Location: Bakerton, WV | Registered: 01 September 2003Reply With Quote
Moderator
Picture of Whitworth
posted Hide Post
Not true, Alex. Not taking any shots at anyone, merely discussing........

Hitman, no, my chipmunk was strung correctly. Stringing one backwards wasn't an option in my household.



"Ignorance you can correct, you can't fix stupid." JWP

If stupidity hurt, a lot of people would be walking around screaming.

Semper Fidelis

"Building Carpal Tunnel one round at a time"
 
Posts: 13440 | Location: Virginia | Registered: 10 July 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Redhawk1
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by bfrshooter:
I never said the .38 or .357 would not kill a deer or maybe even a larger animal. Of course they will but we all know how hard it is to have the perfect shot on any animal. And what happens when a big bone is hit?
My gripe is the choice of bullets that will be effective, the many variables just to hit a deer perfectly, the actual angle of the deer compared to our perception of the angle (Marko, you had that happen with your buck when you thought the exit hole was in the opposite shoulder when it was in the center of the neck.)
The reason I put the 45-70 in was to show even though I used WFN and had a big hole all the way through, the boolit was the wrong choice and did no work inside the deer. This should be the easiest gun to get to work but I was wrong and admit it. This was the fourth time I have had trouble with hard cast in it. Remember I used a Hornady bullet last season because I did not trust the WLN. I figured the WFN would correct it this time around---WRONG!
For me to look at .38 caliber boolits and tell everyone that such and such boolit will kill fast, then to have it fail over and over is something I am not going to do.
There is a point where a gun is in limbo. My 45-70 is there. If I shoot that same boolit at 2000 fps, it might be super and if I shoot it at 1100 to 1300 fps it will also be super. The thing is that my accuracy is at a little over 1600 fps and that is the limbo point for hard cast in my gun. It is now my job to find the perfect alloy or cast soft nose boolits. Lacking that it needs a jacketed hollow point.
Dropping to the .38 or .357 expands the limbo point and the only way to work around it is to shoot a lot of animals to find what works. You can't pull a boolit out of a hat and claim it will work.
Shooting an elk with the .357 does not prove that every elk shot with it will be found. Out in the more open land, it is easier to watch an animal for a long distance but hunt here in the thick and a deer is GONE in 2 seconds. If there is no blood trail, it is lost.
Ethics tells me to stay away from small guns.It also tells me to find a better boolit for the 45-70.
Marko, we are not talking rifles, but you have first hand experience when the young lady shot that nice doe with a .223 last season. A gun that CAN and DOES kill but is in limbo for deer recovery. It took me 4 years to talk them into a 30-30 because she had killed a deer with the toy once.
If you kill a deer with a .38 and then lose the next 2 or 4 or whatever, how long would it take me to talk you into a better gun?
Isn't there a point where you are just fooling around at the animal's expense?


BFRshooter, that was a great post. I don't think anyone could dispute one word of it.

Very well written also, I just wish I could of conveyed my message as eloquently as you just did.


If you're going to make a hole, make it a big one.
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Member of the Delaware Destroyers
Member Reeders Misfits
NRA Life Member ENDOWMENT MEMBER
NAHC Life Member
DSA Life Member
 
Posts: 3142 | Location: Magnolia Delaware | Registered: 15 May 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of jwp475
posted Hide Post
quote:
What the hell is a 38 special have to do with being a reliable game getter, it is not, unless you are talking small game.



What about a 38 Special GNR, with physics and all


_____________________________________________________


A 9mm may expand to a larger diameter, but a 45 ain't going to shrink

Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had happened.
- Winston Churchill
 
Posts: 5077 | Location: USA | Registered: 11 March 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Scott found an 8 point dead, shot behind the shoulder with a rifle. He also found a dead doe. I talked to a neighbor today and he found a gut shot 8 point.
Some guys sit on stand and shoot at a deer that runs off. They MUST have missed! They stay put and shoot at another and another until one falls. They expect instant results because they have a big rifle with a scope.
I have read stories of this happening out west with long range shots on mule deer. It runs off so the jerk never checks and keeps hunting.
My question is, what side of the ethics fence are all of you standing on?
 
Posts: 4068 | Location: Bakerton, WV | Registered: 01 September 2003Reply With Quote
Moderator
Picture of Whitworth
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by bfrshooter:
Scott found an 8 point dead, shot behind the shoulder with a rifle. He also found a dead doe. I talked to a neighbor today and he found a gut shot 8 point.
Some guys sit on stand and shoot at a deer that runs off. They MUST have missed! They stay put and shoot at another and another until one falls. They expect instant results because they have a big rifle with a scope.
I have read stories of this happening out west with long range shots on mule deer. It runs off so the jerk never checks and keeps hunting.
My question is, what side of the ethics fence are all of you standing on?


So, by your own admission, are the rifles most deer hunters using inadequate? Nope. Placement is key and the individual animal's will to live. Again, no one said that a .38-anything is the end-all, be-all, but that a .38-caliber bullet put in the right place will kill a deer -- loaded properly of course.



"Ignorance you can correct, you can't fix stupid." JWP

If stupidity hurt, a lot of people would be walking around screaming.

Semper Fidelis

"Building Carpal Tunnel one round at a time"
 
Posts: 13440 | Location: Virginia | Registered: 10 July 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Bobby Tomek
posted Hide Post
MSHitman wrote:
quote:
Bobby,

I see at least you have those Encores strung properly



If you are going to post snide remarks, maybe you should at least get your facts straight.

The top photo includes an Encore. The others FOUR GUNS are Contenders. They are NOT one and the same.

But hey, I always get entertained by your type, especially when you find them selling a "Thompson Contender Encore" on gunbroker or one of the classifieds.


Bobby
Μολὼν λαβέ
The most important thing in life is not what we do but how and why we do it. - Nana Mouskouri

 
Posts: 9453 | Location: Shiner TX USA | Registered: 19 March 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Redhawk1
posted Hide Post
BFRshooter, when I take a shot on a deer or any animal, I see the reaction of the animal I just shot at. Any strange sign of a hit or how the animal runs off. I wait 30 minutes if the animal does not fall with in sight, and then go to the spot of the shot, if no sign is found, I go to the last place I saw the animal before in disappeared into the brush. I always do a good track job and find my animals.
I despise anyone that does not check and see if the animal was hit. I have seen a few of them hunters that assume if the animal does not drop right away, that they have missed. In my book they are slob hunters and unethical.


If you're going to make a hole, make it a big one.
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Member of the Delaware Destroyers
Member Reeders Misfits
NRA Life Member ENDOWMENT MEMBER
NAHC Life Member
DSA Life Member
 
Posts: 3142 | Location: Magnolia Delaware | Registered: 15 May 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Bobby Tomek
posted Hide Post
Whitworth wrote: " We're talking deer, Bobby."

Sorry, buddy, but you stand to be corrected.

The person who originated the thread -- jwp475 -- wrote about hogs in at least 3 of his replies. Therefore, we are not just talking about deer here.

Here is a refresher of what he wrote: "Now I have taken Deer with a 45 ACP and a lot of hogs with a 4 5/8" barreled 357 mag and never had a single problem...Years ago brfore that I found out that the 357 was ineffective on game I killed a lot of hogs up to about 200 to 225 pounds with the 357 and the ols Speer 160 Semi Wadcutter 1/2 jacket wiith a health dose of 2400. I never lost one nor did I have a problem put them down. The 357 mag work very well for me. Now the 9mm was another story, the hogs went 60 to 80 yards and were pretty much done but I put a finnisher in them any way...I have killed 1 hog with the 38 Specail."
------

Anyway, the reply with the hog photos was intended to inject a bit of humor into a thread which has grown rather stale.


Bobby
Μολὼν λαβέ
The most important thing in life is not what we do but how and why we do it. - Nana Mouskouri

 
Posts: 9453 | Location: Shiner TX USA | Registered: 19 March 2002Reply With Quote
Moderator
posted Hide Post
Yeah Bobby, I stand corrected. They are also carbines, so go string them on the single shot rifle forums bub. Don't give up the day gig for a career in comedy.



If ignorance is bliss; there are some blissful sonofaguns around here. We know who you are, so no reason to point yourselves out.
 
Posts: 2389 | Registered: 19 July 2002Reply With Quote
Moderator
Picture of Whitworth
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Bobby Tomek:
Whitworth wrote: " We're talking deer, Bobby."

Sorry, buddy, but you stand to be corrected.

The person who originated the thread -- jwp475 -- wrote about hogs in at least 3 of his replies. Therefore, we are not just talking about deer here.

Here is a refresher of what he wrote: "Now I have taken Deer with a 45 ACP and a lot of hogs with a 4 5/8" barreled 357 mag and never had a single problem...Years ago brfore that I found out that the 357 was ineffective on game I killed a lot of hogs up to about 200 to 225 pounds with the 357 and the ols Speer 160 Semi Wadcutter 1/2 jacket wiith a health dose of 2400. I never lost one nor did I have a problem put them down. The 357 mag work very well for me. Now the 9mm was another story, the hogs went 60 to 80 yards and were pretty much done but I put a finnisher in them any way...I have killed 1 hog with the 38 Specail."
------

Anyway, the reply with the hog photos was intended to inject a bit of humor into a thread which has grown rather stale.


Yes, and the original post started with a penetration test. But this current discussion was started by Hitman and it was about using a .38-caliber on deer.



"Ignorance you can correct, you can't fix stupid." JWP

If stupidity hurt, a lot of people would be walking around screaming.

Semper Fidelis

"Building Carpal Tunnel one round at a time"
 
Posts: 13440 | Location: Virginia | Registered: 10 July 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
OH,OH, we have jumped into the 6.5 stuff! dancing
I have a Swede and will only say it is proven that it kills WAY out of proportion to it's size. I love mine but had to quit using it because it is just too easy to hunt with! But it is the only rifle I will never sell even if it sits in the safe forever.
It is a strange caliber, not too fast, light bullets but so effective as to be hard to believe. Accuracy is also something to behold.
 
Posts: 4068 | Location: Bakerton, WV | Registered: 01 September 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Redhawk, that is the right thing to do. Check and check over and over to make sure you hit.
Now the funny thing is that the button buck I just shot with the .475 showed no reaction to the hit, it just ran. He did not jump or flinch at all. Just took off and ran into the ground.
Now there are hunters??? around here that would have thought it was a miss if the deer would have gone into thick cover, out of sight.
The best thing is to never base your actions on the deer's reaction or lack of it.
I hate the hunting shows where animals drop dead at the shot because a new beginning hunter will watch them and think that is what happens when the trigger is pulled.
They should explain with every shot like that, that it is not the real world, no animal always drops dead. They foster the misconception.
 
Posts: 4068 | Location: Bakerton, WV | Registered: 01 September 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of jwp475
posted Hide Post
The gentleman below took 2 Deer with the 38 Speciaal with 2 shots

From here;
http://www.go2gbo.com/forums/i...,158968.new.html#new

quote:
Used at bow range, or less, it does fine. Been there, done that. And yes, it is very legal. One with a 158gr LRN and the other 110gr SJHP. Both ran 40 or so yards and were very good eating. Just make sure deer is broadside to collapse both lungs and you're fine. Many, upon, many disagree but I don't have a problem with it if the hunter knows it's range and physiological limitations. Most "gunwriters" will disagree, but that is just marketing. How can the new .300 Express Super Duper Ballistic King Magnum sell guns, through gunwriters articles (advertisement) if old school rules. It's amazing what calibers some folks think it takes to put a whitetail down. The .32-20 was a deer killer in a rifle before gunwriters said it shouldn't be used, etc. Same goes for the .44-40. Each of us has our opinions of what we believe is "ethical" when it comes to harvesting game. Personally, I feel the .38 Special is fine, with the aboved mentioned considerations


_____________________________________________________


A 9mm may expand to a larger diameter, but a 45 ain't going to shrink

Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had happened.
- Winston Churchill
 
Posts: 5077 | Location: USA | Registered: 11 March 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Redhawk1
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by bfrshooter:
Redhawk, that is the right thing to do. Check and check over and over to make sure you hit.
Now the funny thing is that the button buck I just shot with the .475 showed no reaction to the hit, it just ran. He did not jump or flinch at all. Just took off and ran into the ground.
Now there are hunters??? around here that would have thought it was a miss if the deer would have gone into thick cover, out of sight.
The best thing is to never base your actions on the deer's reaction or lack of it.
I hate the hunting shows where animals drop dead at the shot because a new beginning hunter will watch them and think that is what happens when the trigger is pulled.
They should explain with every shot like that, that it is not the real world, no animal always drops dead. They foster the misconception.


BFRshooter, those of us that have hunted a long time usually know that when we shoot, we hit what we are arming for. To not check after every shot is not good. Even new hunters need to feel confident in there shooting ability to go and check for sign. Also if no sign is found, go to the last place the animal was seen and look for sign there.

Some times as you have said, you cannot tell if a animal was hit, due to lack of reaction from the animal. But as hunters we owe it to the animal to go look and look hard.

I get sick of hearing people say, I know I hit the deer and found blood, then only look for a short period of time and then give up. The shot is not the only part of hunting, the recovery of the animal shot is what the hunt is all about.

My saying is, always use enough gun.


If you're going to make a hole, make it a big one.
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Member of the Delaware Destroyers
Member Reeders Misfits
NRA Life Member ENDOWMENT MEMBER
NAHC Life Member
DSA Life Member
 
Posts: 3142 | Location: Magnolia Delaware | Registered: 15 May 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of jwp475
posted Hide Post
quote:
My saying is, always use enough gun.



Like a 38 Special

quote:
Redhawk1

If I only had a 38 special and I needed meat, I would use it on a deer. Yes proper shot placement and range, it will kill a deer.


_____________________________________________________


A 9mm may expand to a larger diameter, but a 45 ain't going to shrink

Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had happened.
- Winston Churchill
 
Posts: 5077 | Location: USA | Registered: 11 March 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Bobby Tomek
posted Hide Post
MS Hitman wrote:
quote:
They are also carbines,


Wrong again, pard. Barrels of 24" on the 6.5x55 and 26" 6.5x30-30AI (aka 6.5 BB ImP) are RIFLE-length barrels.

Let's see: You missed 4 out of 5 on identifying Encores vs. Contenders and 2 out of 3 in carbines vs. rifles.

That would give you the whopping good grade of a 25...... clap

Nice going...


Bobby
Μολὼν λαβέ
The most important thing in life is not what we do but how and why we do it. - Nana Mouskouri

 
Posts: 9453 | Location: Shiner TX USA | Registered: 19 March 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Redhawk1
posted Hide Post
This is what I posted on another site.

quote:
Graybeard, I won't say it cannot kill a deer, I am just saying it is not a viable cartridge for deer size game.
We all know a 22 L/R place in the right spot, it will kill a deer, but that does not make the 22 L/R the next deer round.

If I only had a 38 special and I needed meat, I would use it on a deer. Yes proper shot placement and range, it will kill a deer.
Is it a good choice for deer hunting..... I say no. JMHO.


No where in this whole thread did I say the 38 wound not kill a deer. I keep saying it is not a hunting cartridge. I would not us or recommend it for deer "hunting." So before anyone quotes me, (JWP) and only uses part of what I said to fit there agenda, get all the story, and quit looking like a dumb ass trying to prove a point!

If I had to feed my family and only had a 22 L/R, I would make it work to kill larger game. But I don't have to us an inferior round when I am hunting. I use enough gun to get the job done. Not a 38 special..


If you're going to make a hole, make it a big one.
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Member of the Delaware Destroyers
Member Reeders Misfits
NRA Life Member ENDOWMENT MEMBER
NAHC Life Member
DSA Life Member
 
Posts: 3142 | Location: Magnolia Delaware | Registered: 15 May 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of jwp475
posted Hide Post
quote:
No where in this whole thread did I say the 38 wound not kill a deer.
..



In Hunting we are intending on killing the animal is that not so? And you admitt that a 38 Special will kill Deer, therefore by your own admission it is viable


_____________________________________________________


A 9mm may expand to a larger diameter, but a 45 ain't going to shrink

Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had happened.
- Winston Churchill
 
Posts: 5077 | Location: USA | Registered: 11 March 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Sheese,The Energizer topic.Just keeps going and going. dancing
 
Posts: 4372 | Location: NE Wisconsin | Registered: 31 March 2007Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2 3 4 5  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia