THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM FORUMS


Moderators: Mark
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
IMR 7828/Re22..?
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
posted
IMR 7828 vs Re22

Similar burn rates?
 
Posts: 3430 | Registered: 24 February 2007Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of ramrod340
posted Hide Post
Yep with 7828 listed as being a touch slower. I used both in a 7stw and could hardly tell the difference.


As usual just my $.02
Paul K
 
Posts: 12881 | Location: Mexico, MO | Registered: 02 April 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Thanks Paul right on tu2
 
Posts: 3430 | Registered: 24 February 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of vapodog
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by ramrod340:
Yep with 7828 listed as being a touch slower. I used both in a 7stw and could hardly tell the difference.

104 Alliant Reloder 22

105 Vihtavouri N560

106 Vihtavouri N165

107 IMR, Co IMR7828

You got that right....very little difference.


///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery."
Winston Churchill
 
Posts: 28849 | Location: western Nebraska | Registered: 27 May 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I was just searching for loads with imr7828(single base powder) instead of useing r22(double base) for a 6.5x55 load. Dont hear much about imr7828 and never thought before of trying it. I like IMR powders
 
Posts: 1845 | Registered: 01 November 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by JD Miller:
I was just searching for loads with imr7828(single base powder) instead of useing r22(double base) for a 6.5x55 load. Dont hear much about imr7828 and never thought before of trying it. I like IMR powders


Well that will lead me to another question to post...LOL
 
Posts: 3430 | Registered: 24 February 2007Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Both Re22 and IMR-7828 are very good powders and have very similar applications. As to which is "faster", it depends on which lot of Re22 you're working with (and to some extent, the size of the case and bore of the gun, as powder burning characteristics do vary with these factors). This powder has a reputation for very significant lot-to-lot variations. Some of them are demonstrably faster than 7828 and some of them seem to be nearly as slow as the Re-22 stablemate, Re-25.

IMR-7828, on the other hand, has a reputation for being very consistent lot-to-lot. This is not to say that one is a "good" powder and one is a "bad" powder, it is just to say that you can't fully depend on paper comparisons between their relative performances.

You'll have to adjust your load both to your gun and to the particular lot of powder you are using with either powder, but perhaps moreso with Re-22. When using either, I would suggest buying plenty of a single lot to last you for quite a spell. This will avoid having to re-work your load when buying a fresh lot of powder.
 
Posts: 13235 | Location: Henly, TX, USA | Registered: 04 April 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Thanks S I appreciate that info tu2
 
Posts: 3430 | Registered: 24 February 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Both shoot excellent groups in my 25-06 with 115 to 120 gn bullets.

Don




 
Posts: 5798 | Registered: 10 July 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by DMB:
Both shoot excellent groups in my 25-06 with 115 to 120 gn bullets.

Don



Don-

I am planning to use it just for that purpose too!

I've heard only great things in using both of these powders in the 25-06...I'll be giving Re22 the first-at-bat... Big Grin

Hornady 117gr SBT gets the call... tu2
 
Posts: 3430 | Registered: 24 February 2007Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Stonecreek hit the nail on the head. I shoot several pounds of each powder yearly. Both do extremely well for the magnum chamberings. I keep on hand at least 16 pounds of each at any one time. I am presently shooting the IMR-7828 SSC, it meters very nicely. For me both powders are magical in their performance. I shoot the one that is most accurate in the rifle I am working with. Good shooting.


phurley
 
Posts: 2349 | Location: KY | Registered: 22 September 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of fredj338
posted Hide Post
For me, 7828 has been more accurate in th calibers I shoot it in; 260ai, 280 & 7mm Dakota. When I ahd a 7renmmag, it was that rifles fav as well for 150-160gr bullets.


LIFE IS NOT A SPECTATOR'S SPORT!
 
Posts: 7752 | Location: kalif.,usa | Registered: 08 March 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Dear Late Bloomer:

In my 7x57 AI Douglas air-gauged barrel mounted on a 1908 Brazilian Mauser action, I found Re-22 to be a bit slower than IMR-7828. Although the IMR-7828 SSC which I experimented with also, seemed faster than Re-22.

Re-22 worked better with the 140-150 grain bullets, and IMR-7828 worked better (but maxed out the case) with the 160-175 grain bullets.

For this 7x57 AI case, I will probably use Re-22, because I don't have to compress it, whereas I had to compress the top loaded 160 and 175 grain loadings.

On the other hand, the extreme spread and standard deviation was noticeably better with the IMR-7828 loads.

On paper, I saw no difference in the group size.

Sincerely,

Chris Bemis
 
Posts: 2594 | Location: Pennsylvania | Registered: 30 July 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Thank ya gents for the comments tu2
 
Posts: 3430 | Registered: 24 February 2007Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Howzit Bradda Ro if da Re22 no work for you and you like try 7828 lemme know I get. I'll be trying Re17 in my 25-06 here shortly once I get the 6x47 Lapua loads squared away. I will let you know, from what ive seen and read its looking good.

Aloha,
Dom


Hunting its not a Hobby its My Way of Life!!!
 
Posts: 449 | Location: Kaneohe,Hawaii | Registered: 20 September 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by UltraMag:
Howzit Bradda Ro if da Re22 no work for you and you like try 7828 lemme know I get. I'll be trying Re17 in my 25-06 here shortly once I get the 6x47 Lapua loads squared away. I will let you know, from what ive seen and read its looking good.

Aloha,
Dom




Thank ya Bradda Dom Big Grin

I'll let you know!!!
 
Posts: 3430 | Registered: 24 February 2007Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia