The Accurate Reloading Forums
IMR 7828/Re22..?
20 May 2010, 08:36
TrophyShotPrintsIMR 7828/Re22..?
IMR 7828 vs Re22
Similar burn rates?
20 May 2010, 08:51
ramrod340Yep with 7828 listed as being a touch slower. I used both in a 7stw and could hardly tell the difference.
As usual just my $.02
Paul K
20 May 2010, 08:59
TrophyShotPrintsThanks Paul right on
20 May 2010, 09:25
vapodogquote:
Originally posted by ramrod340:
Yep with 7828 listed as being a touch slower. I used both in a 7stw and could hardly tell the difference.
104 Alliant Reloder 22
105 Vihtavouri N560
106 Vihtavouri N165
107 IMR, Co IMR7828
You got that right....very little difference.
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery."
Winston Churchill
20 May 2010, 09:31
JD MillerI was just searching for loads with imr7828(single base powder) instead of useing r22(double base) for a 6.5x55 load. Dont hear much about imr7828 and never thought before of trying it. I like IMR powders
20 May 2010, 10:47
TrophyShotPrintsquote:
Originally posted by JD Miller:
I was just searching for loads with imr7828(single base powder) instead of useing r22(double base) for a 6.5x55 load. Dont hear much about imr7828 and never thought before of trying it. I like IMR powders
Well that will lead me to another question to post...LOL
20 May 2010, 20:13
StonecreekBoth Re22 and IMR-7828 are very good powders and have very similar applications. As to which is "faster", it depends on which lot of Re22 you're working with (and to some extent, the size of the case and bore of the gun, as powder burning characteristics do vary with these factors). This powder has a reputation for very significant lot-to-lot variations. Some of them are demonstrably faster than 7828 and some of them seem to be nearly as slow as the Re-22 stablemate, Re-25.
IMR-7828, on the other hand, has a reputation for being very consistent lot-to-lot. This is not to say that one is a "good" powder and one is a "bad" powder, it is just to say that you can't fully depend on paper comparisons between their relative performances.
You'll have to adjust your load both to your gun and to the particular lot of powder you are using with either powder, but perhaps moreso with Re-22. When using either, I would suggest buying plenty of a single lot to last you for quite a spell. This will avoid having to re-work your load when buying a fresh lot of powder.
20 May 2010, 21:05
TrophyShotPrintsThanks S I appreciate that info
Both shoot excellent groups in my 25-06 with 115 to 120 gn bullets.
Don
20 May 2010, 23:21
TrophyShotPrintsquote:
Originally posted by DMB:
Both shoot excellent groups in my 25-06 with 115 to 120 gn bullets.
Don
Don-
I am planning to use it just for that purpose too!
I've heard only great things in using both of these powders in the 25-06...I'll be giving Re22 the first-at-bat...
Hornady 117gr SBT gets the call...
21 May 2010, 00:09
phurley5Stonecreek hit the nail on the head. I shoot several pounds of each powder yearly. Both do extremely well for the magnum chamberings. I keep on hand at least 16 pounds of each at any one time. I am presently shooting the IMR-7828 SSC, it meters very nicely. For me both powders are magical in their performance. I shoot the one that is most accurate in the rifle I am working with. Good shooting.
phurley
22 May 2010, 09:34
fredj338For me, 7828 has been more accurate in th calibers I shoot it in; 260ai, 280 & 7mm Dakota. When I ahd a 7renmmag, it was that rifles fav as well for 150-160gr bullets.
LIFE IS NOT A SPECTATOR'S SPORT!
Dear Late Bloomer:
In my 7x57 AI Douglas air-gauged barrel mounted on a 1908 Brazilian Mauser action, I found Re-22 to be a bit slower than IMR-7828. Although the IMR-7828 SSC which I experimented with also, seemed faster than Re-22.
Re-22 worked better with the 140-150 grain bullets, and IMR-7828 worked better (but maxed out the case) with the 160-175 grain bullets.
For this 7x57 AI case, I will probably use Re-22, because I don't have to compress it, whereas I had to compress the top loaded 160 and 175 grain loadings.
On the other hand, the extreme spread and standard deviation was noticeably better with the IMR-7828 loads.
On paper, I saw no difference in the group size.
Sincerely,
Chris Bemis
22 May 2010, 22:04
TrophyShotPrintsThank ya gents for the comments
31 May 2010, 06:34
UltraMagHowzit Bradda Ro if da Re22 no work for you and you like try 7828 lemme know I get. I'll be trying Re17 in my 25-06 here shortly once I get the 6x47 Lapua loads squared away. I will let you know, from what ive seen and read its looking good.
Aloha,
Dom
Hunting its not a Hobby its My Way of Life!!!
02 June 2010, 04:53
TrophyShotPrintsquote:
Originally posted by UltraMag:
Howzit Bradda Ro if da Re22 no work for you and you like try 7828 lemme know I get. I'll be trying Re17 in my 25-06 here shortly once I get the 6x47 Lapua loads squared away. I will let you know, from what ive seen and read its looking good.
Aloha,
Dom
Thank ya Bradda Dom
I'll let you know!!!