THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM AFRICAN HUNTING FORUM

Page 1 2 

Moderators: Saeed
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Rejoin SCI or not?
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
posted
Guys,
I am struggling with SCI. I like the premise of the organization but really abhor the "participation trophy" aspect of it (and Grand Slam Club as well for the sheep guys). On the other hand, they are active in "fighting for hunters". I am not convinced of the effectiveness but the name is well known and they seem to get in the fight at times.

So, I am asking an opinion in the form of a poll - do I rejoin or not and at what level?

I am a life member of NRA and Wild Sheep Foundation, I am a member of Dallas Safari Club and Rocky Mountian Elk Foundation.

Question:
Re-jion SCI?
Re-join at a higher level?
What say you??

Choices:
Re-join SCI as a yearly member?
Re-join SCI as a life member?
Keep my money and up my membership to Life at DSC?
Join or upgrade elswhere? Suggest one!

 
 
Posts: 10436 | Location: Texas... time to secede!! | Registered: 12 February 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
FACT - SCI is the biggest game in town as far as hunters go. Are they perfect NO, but who is! So why not support them? Hunters need to band together now more than ever before and there is strength in numbers.

Same thing goes for joining NRA.
 
Posts: 2585 | Location: New York, USA | Registered: 13 March 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I agree precisely with what Arjun said but I can smell another SCI bashing coming. thumbdown

Mark


MARK H. YOUNG
MARK'S EXCLUSIVE ADVENTURES
7094 Oakleigh Dr. Las Vegas, NV 89110
Office 702-848-1693
Cell, Whats App, Signal 307-250-1156 PREFERRED
E-mail markttc@msn.com
Website: myexclusiveadventures.com
Skype: markhyhunter
Check us out on https://www.facebook.com/pages...ures/627027353990716
 
Posts: 13091 | Location: LAS VEGAS, NV USA | Registered: 04 August 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Those awards and some of their actions aggravate me to no end. They also serve to dilute some of the good that they do. There is a lot of good and at times it is not publicized.

I am hanging in there . This does not mean that I agree with everything they do.
 
Posts: 12134 | Location: Orlando, FL | Registered: 26 January 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Singleshot03
posted Hide Post
Most members I know have not entered their trophies in the record books. I like them for a couple of major reasons:
1. Biologist and lobbyists in the Capitol.
2. AWLS program which teaches teachers how to incorporate hunting conservation in their classrooms - that is the future of hunting.
Local Chapters that keep most of their profits for local support of 4H clubs, humanitarian projects, financially assist the Department of Natural Resources, support youth & disable vets hunting and shooting programs...

JIm
 
Posts: 1493 | Location: Cincinnati  | Registered: 28 May 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Steve Ahrenberg
posted Hide Post
Mark,

I don't see it necessarily as a SCI bashing thread.

I am in the same boat, I did a 12 year stint as a BOD member on the Phoenix chapter. I was continually disappointed with the actions on the Executives only. The rank and file were good, like minded people.

I let my membership lapse, only rejoined to go to the convention a couple years ago to see two of my mounts my Taxidermist had on display.

I'm at a crossroads right now. Some of the other local guys and I have been contemplating coming back to re-build the Chapter. It's difficult to watch something we put so much effort and passion into, decline.

When we left (all of us) our annual fundraisers were attended by 375-425 people. We were NETTING in the area of 35-40K. Their last event was 125-130 folks and lost money, from what I am being told.

We had several profitable events yearly; The fundraiser, a big bore shoot and my favorite event, The "Trophy Room Tour." They changed the big bore shoot into an air gun shoot and haven't had a Trophy Room Tour since I and others left.

So my feelings about the organization are generally optimistic aside from the SOP of the Executives. Being in Phoenix, we had much contact with the HDQ in Tucson.

Steve


Formerly "Nganga"
 
Posts: 3656 | Location: Phoenix, Arizona | Registered: 26 April 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
For the millions they take in, they don't seem to do a lot of protecting wildlife or habitat or even hunting rights. They claim to spend a lot of it educating politicians - I thought that is what the voting booth was for.

At the end of the day if it makes you feel good, then do it. You get a nice bumper sticker out of the exchange.


___________________

Just Remember, We ALL Told You So.
 
Posts: 22445 | Location: Occupying Little Minds Rent Free | Registered: 04 October 2012Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Frostbit
posted Hide Post
I didn't vote in the poll because my choice was not available.

Rejoin for one year if you plan to go to the convention.

After my present three year membership is up I will only join if we plan to attend the convention.


______________________
DRSS
______________________
Hunt Reports

2015 His & Her Leopards with Derek Littleton of Luwire Safaris - http://forums.accuratereloadin...6321043/m/2971090112
2015 Trophy Bull Elephant with CMS http://forums.accuratereloadin...6321043/m/1651069012
DIY Brooks Range Sheep Hunt 2013 - http://forums.accuratereloadin...901038191#9901038191
Zambia June/July 2012 with Andrew Baldry - Royal Kafue http://forums.accuratereloadin...6321043/m/7971064771
Zambia Sept 2010- Muchinga Safaris http://forums.accuratereloadin...6321043/m/4211096141
Namibia Sept 2010 - ARUB Safaris http://forums.accuratereloadin...6321043/m/6781076141
 
Posts: 7626 | Location: Alaska | Registered: 05 February 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by MARK H. YOUNG:
I agree precisely with what Arjun said but I can smell another SCI bashing coming. thumbdown

Mark


This is hopefully not going to lead to SCI bashing, just want to hear from those with more experience than me on SCI.
 
Posts: 10436 | Location: Texas... time to secede!! | Registered: 12 February 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Steve Ahrenberg:
Mark,

I don't see it necessarily as a SCI bashing thread.

I am in the same boat, I did a 12 year stint as a BOD member on the Phoenix chapter. I was continually disappointed with the actions on the Executives only. The rank and file were good, like minded people.

I let my membership lapse, only rejoined to go to the convention a couple years ago to see two of my mounts my Taxidermist had on display.

I'm at a crossroads right now. Some of the other local guys and I have been contemplating coming back to re-build the Chapter. It's difficult to watch something we put so much effort and passion into, decline.

When we left (all of us) our annual fundraisers were attended by 375-425 people. We were NETTING in the area of 35-40K. Their last event was 125-130 folks and lost money, from what I am being told.

We had several profitable events yearly; The fundraiser, a big bore shoot and my favorite event, The "Trophy Room Tour." They changed the big bore shoot into an air gun shoot and haven't had a Trophy Room Tour since I and others left.

So my feelings about the organization are generally optimistic aside from the SOP of the Executives. Being in Phoenix, we had much contact with the HDQ in Tucson.

Steve


Steve,
Thanks for your opinion. I have never been involved and you more experience here than about anyone.
 
Posts: 10436 | Location: Texas... time to secede!! | Registered: 12 February 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Everything I need for my meager hunting I can get at DSC. For me SCI is irrelevant.

Mike
 
Posts: 13145 | Location: Cocoa Beach, Florida | Registered: 22 July 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of boarkiller
posted Hide Post
Support and political clout is what I like from SCI.
Convention is great place for to get away from cold and snow and see friends and all
I'm a member of local chapter as well
To me, it's the least I can do besides being fervent supporter of NRA


" Until the day breaks and the nights shadows flee away " Big ivory for my pillow and 2.5% of Neanderthal DNA flowing thru my veins.
When I'm ready to go, pack a bag of gunpowder up my ass and strike a fire to my pecker, until I squeal like a boar.
Yours truly , Milan The Boarkiller - World according to Milan
PS I have big boar on my floor...but it ain't dead, just scared to move...

Man should be happy and in good humor until the day he dies...
Only fools hope to live forever
“ Hávamál”
 
Posts: 13376 | Location: In mountains behind my house hunting or drinking beer in Blacksmith Brewery in Stevensville MT or holed up in Lochsa | Registered: 27 December 2012Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by larryshores:
Those awards and some of their actions aggravate me to no end. They also serve to dilute some of the good that they do. There is a lot of good and at times it is not publicized.

I am hanging in there . This does not mean that I agree with everything they do.


+1!
 
Posts: 6080 | Location: New York City "The Concrete Jungle" | Registered: 04 May 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of MacD37
posted Hide Post
I've been a member almost since it's beginning, so I will re-up every year. I will not buy a life membership because I want the option to leave if I want and put the money elsewhere!

................................................................Just one mans opinion! old


....Mac >>>===(x)===> MacD37, ...and DUGABOY1
DRSS Charter member
"If I die today, I've had a life well spent, for I've been to see the Elephant, and smelled the smoke of Africa!"~ME 1982

Hands of Old Elmer Keith

 
Posts: 14634 | Location: TEXAS | Registered: 08 June 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of MJines
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by MacD37:
I've been a member almost since it's beginning, so I will re-up every year. I will not buy a life membership because I want the option to leave if I want and put the money elsewhere!

................................................................Just one mans opinion! old


+1, and I think the Chapters generally do damn good work in their local communities through humanitarian endeavors, youth events and the like.


Mike
 
Posts: 21869 | Registered: 03 January 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
In the 6 years I was a member, I was very unimpressed with most everything about it. Some of the support they gave various programs was a good thing, but the negatives outweighed the positives by a wide, wide margin IME. I'm not the least bit interested anymore in SCI.
 
Posts: 2276 | Location: West Texas | Registered: 07 December 2011Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of LionHunter
posted Hide Post
I've been a member for 22 years, was an active chapter BoD member and attended a national meeting in D.C. and met many of the national officers and past presidents - didn't care for some of them. I entered over 50 African species in the book and have qualified for many of the awards (as have many here, including Steve). I stopped entering animals and became inactive in the chapter after serving as the chapter president. I was burnt out and tired of only a few members actively working to support a chapter of many hundred members, but this is part of any volunteer organization. Sound familiar Steve?

Like all charitable (501c3) organizations, SCI has its problems, but they do good for the American hunter in D.C. - they have been active in law suits to protect hunters rights, including the Elephant and Lion issues.

By paying annual dues you support SCI efforts around the world, but particularly here in the US. Chapters retain 80% of their local fundraising dollars. Unless you have volunteered or served on the BoD of a local chapter, you really have no idea what SCI does - and you are NOT required to enter trophies into the record book, although the book serves many valuable uses and is not simply an "I like me" project.

I am sick to death of the anti-SCI comments on AR and stopped responding to them many years ago. Most on AR are good folks but there are some haters who never miss a chance to express negative comments, although most, if not all of them, have virtually no personal experience at the SCI chapter level. Conservation projects, education grants to teachers, D.C. and state representation, world record book maintenance...pick a cause and get involved!


Mike
______________
DSC
DRSS (again)
SCI Life
NRA Life
Sables Life
Mzuri
IPHA

"To be a Marine is enough."
 
Posts: 3577 | Location: Silicon Valley | Registered: 19 November 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of MJines
posted Hide Post
. . . through the money raised by the SCI Houston Chapter (annual banquet, raffles, etc.) the chapter has supported causes like Wounded Warriors, Hunts for Heroes, Operation Orphans, Sam Houston Area Council Boy Scouts, Star of Hope Homeless Mission, Dande Anti-Poaching Unit, Rifa Conservation Education Camp and a host of others. Pretty simple, get involved or get out of the way.


Mike
 
Posts: 21869 | Registered: 03 January 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of LionHunter
posted Hide Post
Exactly right! The local chapters are the heart of SCI and simply paying annual dues to national doesn't provide even a remote idea of what SCI does. Join a local chapter and become an active member, and if you don't have a local chapter, get your hunting buddies together and national will help you form one!


Mike
______________
DSC
DRSS (again)
SCI Life
NRA Life
Sables Life
Mzuri
IPHA

"To be a Marine is enough."
 
Posts: 3577 | Location: Silicon Valley | Registered: 19 November 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Todd Williams
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by LionHunter:
I've been a member for 22 years, was an active chapter BoD member and attended a national meeting in D.C. and met many of the national officers and past presidents - didn't care for some of them. I entered over 50 African species in the book and have qualified for many of the awards (as have many here, including Steve). I stopped entering animals and became inactive in the chapter after serving as the chapter president. I was burnt out and tired of only a few members actively working to support a chapter of many hundred members, but this is part of any volunteer organization. Sound familiar Steve?

Like all charitable (501c3) organizations, SCI has its problems, but they do good for the American hunter in D.C. - they have been active in law suits to protect hunters rights, including the Elephant and Lion issues.

By paying annual dues you support SCI efforts around the world, but particularly here in the US. Chapters retain 80% of their local fundraising dollars. Unless you have volunteered or served on the BoD of a local chapter, you really have no idea what SCI does - and you are NOT required to enter trophies into the record book, although the book serves many valuable uses and is not simply an "I like me" project.

I am sick to death of the anti-SCI comments on AR and stopped responding to them many years ago. Most on AR are good folks but there are some haters who never miss a chance to express negative comments, although most, if not all of them, have virtually no personal experience at the SCI chapter level. Conservation projects, education grants to teachers, D.C. and state representation, world record book maintenance...pick a cause and get involved!



tu2
 
Posts: 8533 | Registered: 09 January 2011Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Steve Ahrenberg
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by LionHunter:
I've been a member for 22 years, was an active chapter BoD member and attended a national meeting in D.C. and met many of the national officers and past presidents - didn't care for some of them. I entered over 50 African species in the book and have qualified for many of the awards (as have many here, including Steve). I stopped entering animals and became inactive in the chapter after serving as the chapter president. I was burnt out and tired of only a few members actively working to support a chapter of many hundred members, but this is part of any volunteer organization. Sound familiar Steve?

Like all charitable (501c3) organizations, SCI has its problems, but they do good for the American hunter in D.C. - they have been active in law suits to protect hunters rights, including the Elephant and Lion issues.

By paying annual dues you support SCI efforts around the world, but particularly here in the US. Chapters retain 80% of their local fundraising dollars. Unless you have volunteered or served on the BoD of a local chapter, you really have no idea what SCI does - and you are NOT required to enter trophies into the record book, although the book serves many valuable uses and is not simply an "I like me" project.

I am sick to death of the anti-SCI comments on AR and stopped responding to them many years ago. Most on AR are good folks but there are some haters who never miss a chance to express negative comments, although most, if not all of them, have virtually no personal experience at the SCI chapter level. Conservation projects, education grants to teachers, D.C. and state representation, world record book maintenance...pick a cause and get involved!


Great post Mike. Except I've never entered anything into the book. I had my Taxidermist score a few that he (we) thought were exceptional, never put them into the book.

I saw no point in it. I killed a Western Roan in CAR that was 5 or 6 and it killed Erik Mararv that I didn't bother to enter it.

My issue, and most likely don't know with the records department is that it is a stand alone "channel" and must maintain it's own profitability to continue to exist. The guy in charge back then (Doug Luger) was a member of our BOD as well. He was always soliciting donations from us for his department as well.

He was a constant drum beat to enter stuff to all of us. I can't remember if any of us did. The exception being the guy that took over in a hostile takeover. He was a ring and tuxedo guy, entered 100% of his kills.


Formerly "Nganga"
 
Posts: 3656 | Location: Phoenix, Arizona | Registered: 26 April 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of LionHunter
posted Hide Post
Hey Steve,

I recalled you saying you had completed the African 29 and so thought you had entered, but note that I only said you had "qualified" not entered. I also have completed it, although, like you, I have never applied for it. The African 29 was a yardstick I used to measure my personal African experience.

As you know, it may well be the most difficult and least accomplished category in SCI as it requires many countries and more than a few safaris to complete. It actually took me approximately 20 safaris over as many years in 8 countries to complete. Admittedly I wasn't purposefully hunting for it but rather using it as a guide. My 2013 Roan with Karl in Namibia finally did it for me. Think I went from 2005 until 2013 needing only to get that Roan, so you can tell the completion wasn't my "guiding light". Smiler

I hope you will get back involved with your chapter and try to return it to its former status. As you know, these things are often cyclical in nature when volunteerism is involved, and are dependent directly upon the commitment of the players.

BTW, I knew Doug and worked with him on some projects. He was a good guy but I think he fell under the influence of some of the "ring & tux" guys at national.


Mike
______________
DSC
DRSS (again)
SCI Life
NRA Life
Sables Life
Mzuri
IPHA

"To be a Marine is enough."
 
Posts: 3577 | Location: Silicon Valley | Registered: 19 November 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I also am a Life member of SCI. I can see some of the negatives in that they are not responsive enough, and like the NRA, they do spend more time fund raising than anything else it seems at times... Nevertheless, they are the biggest concerted voice for hunting at this time.

I would join, annual or life...and you can always quit if you don't support it in general. Even a life member could resign their membership in protest, I would think.

Get involved if you want to change the course.

After all, you don't need to play the rings and circles games unless you want to. If you look at the money it takes to play that game, you can see why they still are around.

Personally, I see value in the record book, but have not done the awards protocols.
 
Posts: 11200 | Location: Minnesota USA | Registered: 15 June 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Grumulkin
posted Hide Post
The lost me when the fee to attend the annual banquet at my local chapter became exhorbitant for not so good food.
 
Posts: 2911 | Location: Ohio, U.S.A. | Registered: 31 March 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Steve Ahrenberg
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by LionHunter:
Hey Steve,

I recalled you saying you had completed the African 29 and so thought you had entered, but note that I only said you had "qualified" not entered. I also have completed it, although, like you, I have never applied for it. The African 29 was a yardstick I used to measure my personal African experience.

As you know, it may well be the most difficult and least accomplished category in SCI as it requires many countries and more than a few safaris to complete. It actually took me approximately 20 safaris over as many years in 8 countries to complete. Admittedly I wasn't purposefully hunting for it but rather using it as a guide. My 2013 Roan with Karl in Namibia finally did it for me. Think I went from 2005 until 2013 needing only to get that Roan, so you can tell the completion wasn't my "guiding light". Smiler

I hope you will get back involved with your chapter and try to return it to its former status. As you know, these things are often cyclical in nature when volunteerism is involved, and are dependent directly upon the commitment of the players.

BTW, I knew Doug and worked with him on some projects. He was a good guy but I think he fell under the influence of some of the "ring & tux" guys at national.


I'm in 100 percent agreement about the African 29. I too used it for nothing more than a "roadmap" of direction, rather than simply aimlessly wandering throughout Africa. And I agree, I think the 29 is a very, very significant hunting accomplishment. One I am very proud of.

It makes you think, it makes you plan and admittedly will take you outside of your comfort zone. I know it made me grow as an adult and gave me views of many other cultures and parts of Africa typically not hunted, seen or visited.

Even now as I have completed it, I still refer back to it to look at other species. I'm in the process of booking next year to complete "all the Elands" and an East African Sitatunga. Mine is a Zambezi from Tondwa in Zambia.

I will likely return to the Chapter. The "hostile take over" guys have cycled through and the Chapter needs some direction, focus and mostly, experience. I had a real passion for the "Wish Kid Hunts." As I think you know I have a handicapped son whom will likely never hunt Africa with me. He's been twice but never hunted. It was my way of sharing my passion with the youth of America and kids who's future might not be so reassuring.

It became a fight to get these things voted on. And if the Chapter wasn't getting a ROI, they were voted down. I had to continually remind them all we are largely a philanthropic organization and are simply doing it because it is the right thing to do and completely consistent with our bylaws.


Formerly "Nganga"
 
Posts: 3656 | Location: Phoenix, Arizona | Registered: 26 April 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I want to bring up a recent event.

Who here would have known about the antis trying to get the information on those of us who had trophy shipments if it were not for SCI? I know I would not have .
 
Posts: 12134 | Location: Orlando, FL | Registered: 26 January 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Steve Ahrenberg
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by larryshores:
I want to bring up a recent event.

Who here would have known about the antis trying to get the information on those of us who had trophy shipments if it were not for SCI? I know I would not have .


Would USFWS have that info as well? I would think they can be considered a hostile entity to hunters?


Formerly "Nganga"
 
Posts: 3656 | Location: Phoenix, Arizona | Registered: 26 April 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Sure they have it but were they going to make us aware of it? I think the answer is no.
 
Posts: 12134 | Location: Orlando, FL | Registered: 26 January 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of LionHunter
posted Hide Post
I have considered USF&W a hostile to hunters organization for almost 20 years. Ask me about what they did to the Roosevelt Elk and Kaybab Mule Deer on the Channel Islands!!! An absolute disgrace! And what's even worse is that less than 10% of the islands will ever be utilized by the public in the CI Nat'l Park! ARGH! killpc BOOM


Mike
______________
DSC
DRSS (again)
SCI Life
NRA Life
Sables Life
Mzuri
IPHA

"To be a Marine is enough."
 
Posts: 3577 | Location: Silicon Valley | Registered: 19 November 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Michael Robinson
posted Hide Post
Much to criticize about SCI, but also much to praise.


Mike

Wilderness is my cathedral, and hunting is my prayer.
 
Posts: 13766 | Location: New England | Registered: 06 June 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Steve Ahrenberg
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Michael Robinson:
Much to criticize about SCI, but also much to praise.


Agree, and everyone (include myself)leaving isn't going to fix the bad parts. It requires persistence and leadership.


Formerly "Nganga"
 
Posts: 3656 | Location: Phoenix, Arizona | Registered: 26 April 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Use Enough Gun
posted Hide Post
I just returned from an NRA-ILA 2016 Firearms Law and The Second Amendment Symposium here in Las Vegas. Both the NRA and SCI were represented there and both are indeed fighting in the Courts and in Congress for your rights to own firearms and to hunt. I wish that all of you SCI naysayers could have been there. For all of the so-called "bad" that SCI supposedly does, it is greatly outweighed by the tremendous legal efforts that they are making for us. A full time litigation division headed by SCI legal counsel Anna Seidman is working very hard to keep all of us in the fight over the second amendment and hunting, as is the NRA. The cost of an SCI or NRA membership is well worth it for just that alone, believe me. tu2 If your'e serious about saving your second amendment rights and your privilege to hunt, it goes well beyond merely attending a convention for shits and giggles.
 
Posts: 18581 | Registered: 04 April 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
just what would Option B be...?
 
Posts: 23062 | Location: SW Idaho | Registered: 19 December 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Skyline
posted Hide Post
Think I would make up my own mind on what I am going to belong to.......... sure as hell don't need to go on a forum and start a poll about it.

Good grief man, get a grip on it. coffee


______________________________________________

The power of accurate observation is frequently called cynicism by those who are bereft of that gift.



 
Posts: 1857 | Location: Northern Rockies, BC | Registered: 21 July 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Skyline,
You are missing the point.
I don't need help making decision. What I was asking was what others are thinking about SCI rather than read a series of posts from the anti-SCI group. The reason for the poll is that it an anonymous way to offer an opinion without inciting anyone on AR.

I have a better "grip" than what it may appear.
 
Posts: 10436 | Location: Texas... time to secede!! | Registered: 12 February 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Blacktailer
posted Hide Post
I joined as a life member several years ago. Figured it was worth it if I was going to be in it very long. My local chapter closed about 10 years ago so the closest chapters are 150-200 miles away. Only entered 1 animal in the record book because it was #1 and I wanted to give the outfitter the support. Don't care for the inner circle BS but think they do some good in their legislative/lobbying efforts.
It's up to each individual to decide if it's worth it or not. I think it is. JMHO.


Have gun- Will travel
The value of a trophy is computed directly in terms of personal investment in its acquisition. Robert Ruark
 
Posts: 3831 | Location: Cave Creek, AZ | Registered: 09 August 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Skyline:
Think I would make up my own mind on what I am going to belong to.......... sure as hell don't need to go on a forum and start a poll about it.

Good grief man, get a grip on it. coffee


+1
 
Posts: 11651 | Location: Montreal | Registered: 07 November 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I voted for DSC because I couldn't choose two. I continue to be an annual member of SCI. Not delighted with SCI but it's better than nothing. Very pleased with DSC's efforts.
 
Posts: 10491 | Location: Houston, Texas | Registered: 26 December 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Wesheltonj
posted Hide Post
I belong to both DSC and SCI. Personally, I would join DSC as a life member and SCI yearly. Being in Texas, DSC is more convenient for me. That said, I will continue to be a member of SCI for the following reasons (1) lawyers in DC suing on our behalf (2) a better gun insurance program. Now if DCS matched SCI, there would be no reason for me to continue SCI.

With regard to the record book. I really wish they would sell that business off to Rowland Ward. (This would be a great time to sell, not that Rowland Ward is back in USA hands, {Safari Press/Sports Afield}). Yes, I have records in both, but the record book and all the slams and other "awards" hurt the image of SCI outside of hunting circles. Personally, I have no other interest in any other awards/slams (and Slams is an horrible word) other then "medals" for each animal
 
Posts: 782 | Location: Texas Hill Country | Registered: 13 April 2016Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Singleshot03:
Most members I know have not entered their trophies in the record books. I like them for a couple of major reasons:
1. Biologist and lobbyists in the Capitol.
2. AWLS program which teaches teachers how to incorporate hunting conservation in their classrooms - that is the future of hunting.
Local Chapters that keep most of their profits for local support of 4H clubs, humanitarian projects, financially assist the Department of Natural Resources, support youth & disable vets hunting and shooting programs...

JIm

If you don't like the "participation trophys", don't participate. The awards program is a small part of SCI overall.


Pancho
LTC, USA, RET

"Participating in a gun buy-back program because you think that criminals have too many guns is like having yourself castrated because you think your neighbors have too many kids." Clint Eastwood

Give me Liberty or give me Corona.
 
Posts: 941 | Location: Roswell, NM | Registered: 02 December 2002Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia

Since January 8 1998 you are visitor #: