one of us
| I cut my 45-70 to 22" to get a handier and lighter gun for hunting .I've never regreted it . Velocity loss is minimal with a low velocity round .Total weight W/scope and strap 8.5 lbs and 37". |
| |
one of us
| If you are sticking with iron sights, no question that 28" is the way I would go. If with a scope, total weight and balance would determine. I recently bought two Number 1's, a 9.3x74 and a 450/400. The extra two inches of barrel and heavier contour make the two balance and handle very differently. |
| Posts: 1238 | Location: Lexington, Kentucky, USA | Registered: 04 February 2003 | 
IP
|
|
one of us
| Thanks. The unfortunate thing is that the 28" barrel models are now gone from CDNN. And I'd convinced myself that a 28' bbl and 44.5" OAL were just the ticket. Now I'm back to considering whether or not to get a 22" one. On the other hand, I also picked up a No. 1 in 9.3x74R last year and the OAL is exactly the same as the 22" bbl 1885 (38.5"). So . . .  -WSJ |
| Posts: 300 | Location: Western New York | Registered: 03 January 2004 | 
IP
|
|
one of us
| "Considering," eh? Nah, bug had bit and I went straight to gunbroker and bought one with the 22" barrel. Karma. |
| Posts: 300 | Location: Western New York | Registered: 03 January 2004 | 
IP
|
|