THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM GUNSMITHING FORUM


Moderators: jeffeosso
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Re: Barrel wall thickness
 Login/Join
 
Will
one of us
Picture of Will
posted
A lot of the weight is in the barrel. I saved 1.25 lbs. going from the Win. Mod 70 stainless .375 factory barrel to a Douglas #3. I would think it is going to be tough to shave that much out of a stock and/or action.
 
Posts: 19320 | Location: Ocala Flats | Registered: 22 May 2002Reply With Quote
Scrollcutter
one of us
Picture of Scrollcutter
posted Hide Post
I was always told .100 was minimum per side. But, .125 per side is a more practical and realistic minimum.

Ottmar turned me onto .150 taper per foot for barrel dims. I believe he credited Burgess with this barrel taper for lightweight, but accurate sporter dimension. This rapid taper profile has always been aesthetically attractive to me.
 
Posts: 1631 | Location: Washington State | Registered: 29 December 2002Reply With Quote
Brad
One of Us
Picture of Brad
posted Hide Post
Don, I don't get you... you reccomend the old-style Featherweight barrel (which on the 358 Win was ridiculously thin), then proceed to put-down the idea of a modified featherweight barrel which would be substantially beefier than what you previously reccomended...
 
Posts: 3517 | Registered: 27 June 2000Reply With Quote
Savage99
one of us
posted Hide Post
Quote:

When building ultralight rifles, what is the minimum wall thickness for a chrome-moly barrel? The rifle in question will be a 358 Win. Thanks, Stoney





Brad,



I was answering this question. I am not really recommending it but answering the minimum wall thickness! My second comment was about Winchester Featherweight barrels.



I have no comment on a special Featherweight contour to a heavier muzzle.



There is more weight in a heavier barrel of course but those barrels are so thin that I would go to a cored stock and light action and put some meat on the barrel. Perhaps Brad's idea is the way to go to do it.



One of the higher ups at Kimber likes the .358 Win cartridge so there is a chance that they may chamber for it someday. I don't think that I would buy one however as I like my 99's more and I have a M70 in that cartridge.
 
Posts: 5543 | Registered: 09 December 2002Reply With Quote
Savage99
one of us
posted Hide Post
Here is a M70 Featherweight in .358 Win. Now that I got it out and looked at it I like it as is.



 
Posts: 5543 | Registered: 09 December 2002Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia