THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM GUNSMITHING FORUM


Moderators: jeffeosso
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Re-barrel question of Browning Lo Wall
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
Picture of Cliff Lyle
posted
A re-barrel project on a Lo Wall from .45-70 to .257 Roberts or .260 Rem.

There is a change in case head diameter. Does this present any problems?
 
Posts: 2155 | Location: Oklahoma | Registered: 03 October 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Will have to get a different extractor from browning. Going from rimmed to rimless will require change.

The .45-70 should be on a high wall action instead of low wall, as should the .257 and .260.

dave
 
Posts: 1126 | Location: Eastern Oregon | Registered: 02 December 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Cliff Lyle
posted Hide Post
High wall opposed to low walls, due to pressures?
 
Posts: 2155 | Location: Oklahoma | Registered: 03 October 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Due to bolt thrust, because the low wall breech block is not fully supported by the action walls behind the cartridge. Bolt thrust is the product of pressure times cartridge base area, so both pressure and case head size count.

Browning, I believe, did not make .45-70 on low wall. I don't know what the ultimate strength of the low wall action is, but generally larger and higher pressure cartridges they built on high wall, smaller and lower pressure ones on low walls.

dave
 
Posts: 1126 | Location: Eastern Oregon | Registered: 02 December 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Cliff Lyle
posted Hide Post
I misspoke and called it a low wall. Thanks for the good info.
I have learned the .260 was offered as a low wall, as was the .243 but your point was a good one.
 
Posts: 2155 | Location: Oklahoma | Registered: 03 October 2006Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia