The Accurate Reloading Forums
Re-barrel question of Browning Lo Wall

This topic can be found at:
https://forums.accuratereloading.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/9411043/m/9551093561

28 October 2011, 07:16
Cliff Lyle
Re-barrel question of Browning Lo Wall
A re-barrel project on a Lo Wall from .45-70 to .257 Roberts or .260 Rem.

There is a change in case head diameter. Does this present any problems?
28 October 2011, 08:17
ssdave
Will have to get a different extractor from browning. Going from rimmed to rimless will require change.

The .45-70 should be on a high wall action instead of low wall, as should the .257 and .260.

dave
28 October 2011, 08:34
Cliff Lyle
High wall opposed to low walls, due to pressures?
28 October 2011, 08:41
ssdave
Due to bolt thrust, because the low wall breech block is not fully supported by the action walls behind the cartridge. Bolt thrust is the product of pressure times cartridge base area, so both pressure and case head size count.

Browning, I believe, did not make .45-70 on low wall. I don't know what the ultimate strength of the low wall action is, but generally larger and higher pressure cartridges they built on high wall, smaller and lower pressure ones on low walls.

dave
28 October 2011, 16:37
Cliff Lyle
I misspoke and called it a low wall. Thanks for the good info.
I have learned the .260 was offered as a low wall, as was the .243 but your point was a good one.