PC I would avoid the Warnes as I tried fitting a new set to my Ruger 77 on the weekend. The tongue on the front ring would not fit into the slot in the receiver. then when removing the rings the torw head screw on the base stripped. I was only using an Allen key tool which came with the mounts. So I was not exerting a lot of force. Very diappointing. Mark
Posts: 277 | Location: melbourne, australia | Registered: 19 October 2002
I have had only great experiences with Warne rings and bases, especially with the Premier line. Brownells has the best selection but I am not sure about the shipping issue.
If you click on the "scope parts" under the "more info" portion it brings up a screen that talks about export issues and such. I would contact Warne or Brownells directly and see if there are any issues at all involved with shipping to you.
William Berger
True courage is being scared to death but saddling up anyway. - John Wayne
The courageous may not live forever, but the timid do not live at all.
Posts: 3155 | Location: Rigby, ID | Registered: 20 March 2004
Originally posted by mark smith: PC I would avoid the Warnes as I tried fitting a new set to my Ruger 77 on the weekend. The tongue on the front ring would not fit into the slot in the receiver. then when removing the rings the torw head screw on the base stripped. I was only using an Allen key tool which came with the mounts. So I was not exerting a lot of force. Very diappointing. Mark
Funny, my experience with their Maxima QD rings for both the CZ dovetailed base and the Weaver/US MIL-STD-1913 base has been completely opposite of yours.
