Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
One of Us |
Steven, You said you don't care much for the belted magnums. You do realise that the .300 has one I assume. I share your distaste for the ultra mags. What we need is that .300 with the belt trimmed off. I think you are on track with what you need to do to make this work. I hunt the Middle Fork each year and there is some really open land in there also. Chic Worthing | |||
|
one of us |
That 300 with the belt trimmed off would of course be the 30 Newton which I keep hoping will be brought back. Regards, Bill. | |||
|
<eldeguello> |
Yeah, rechamber to .30 Gibbs!! Will give .300 mag ballistics with '06 cases and less powder!! | ||
<Don Martin29> |
Unless you are wealthy don't rebarrel a Ruger #1. It's much less expensive and less trouble just to buy another one in the caliber that you want. I don't know yet what #1 you have but if it has a 22" bbl then you have a handier rifle than the 26" models anyway so just keep the 30/06 and load it to it's full potential or sell it. Anyone have any feedback on new chamberings in the #1 ? I think the .300 WSM will catch on and Ruger may chamber it? I would wait for that. I predict that the .300 Win Mag will be old news soon with the .300 WSM stealing the new customers. | ||
one of us |
I would go to the .300 Dakota. It's not as big as the RUM's and a better bet than a WSM unless factory ammo is really important to you. I had a 7Rem mag. rechambered to 7 Dakota & am very pleased w/ the results (160gr NPs @ 3250fps w/ low pressures). DM is right though, if you just want a .300WM, sell the 06 & buy a new one. [This message has been edited by fredj338 (edited 04-23-2002).] | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia