One of Us
| A |
| Posts: 109 | Location: BC, Canada | Registered: 20 July 2004 | 
IP
|
|
One of Us

| Yea, I am with Mike here, it is nice to see the full rifle together with closer details. Above, I would say the middle one is the least important one.
Bent Fossdal Reiso 5685 Uggdal Norway
|
| |
one of us
| Full length is critical to me. I like wood and I want to see the stock, preferably both sides unless space constrained, after that I'd like closer detail shots. Like Brent said, of the 3 above, the middle shot has BY FAR the least appeal to me, although I don't need to see background, the first full length pic could be margined just past the end of barrel and stock as far as I'm concerned which would also show a bit more detail. BTW, that's the first time I've seen such a sight set up on a Springfield, who did that one?
xxxxxxxxxx When considering US based operations of guides/outfitters, check and see if they are NRA members. If not, why support someone who doesn't support us? Consider spending your money elsewhere.
NEVER, EVER book a hunt with BLAIR WORLDWIDE HUNTING or JEFF BLAIR.
I have come to understand that in hunting, the goal is not the goal but the process.
|
| |
One of Us
| You have to have full length shots to get a feel for the overall lines, balance and proportions. |
| |
One of Us
| quote: Originally posted by GeoffM24: You have to have full length shots to get a feel for the overall lines, balance and proportions.
This I agree with. I am also an action nut so i have to see a close up of the top of the action if there is anything unique about it. In the case of your Springfield a close up of the Lyman cocking piece sight installation would be appreciated. |
| Posts: 13978 | Location: http://www.tarawaontheweb.org/tarawa2.jpg | Registered: 03 December 2008 | 
IP
|
|
One of Us
| I like the full body shots :-)
The price of knowledge is great but the price of ignorance is even greater.
|
| Posts: 777 | Location: Socialist Republic of California | Registered: 27 February 2005 | 
IP
|
|