Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
One of Us |
Hi what is the thread diameter in small ring mauser rifles. like fn or zastava made actions? kind regards YES Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy; its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery. | ||
|
Moderator |
,980x12tpi opinions vary band of bubbas and STC hunting Club Information on Ammoguide about the416AR, 458AR, 470AR, 500AR What is an AR round? Case Drawings 416-458-470AR and 500AR. 476AR, http://www.weaponsmith.com | |||
|
One of Us |
mucho thanks for the reply. is it the same as metric system 25 mm x 2 mm deep? yes Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy; its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery. | |||
|
one of us |
The only small ring FN made was the 93, and Zastava didn't make any. Are you thinking of Large Rings like the FN commercial and it's clone made by Zastava? Those are 1.100"x12tpi Aut vincere aut mori | |||
|
One of Us |
There were some "smaller" ring versions of the FN Supreme used by Browning for .308W-.243W rifles prior to buying Sako actions for medium cartridges. These are not plentiful, but, I have seen and handled about a half dozen over the years. I don't know any specific dimensions, but, they seemed about the same as the early "roundtop" Brno 21/22 actions. | |||
|
one of us |
didn't Browning have a intermediate length small ring for their 243/308 made by FN for a very short time ? | |||
|
one of us |
Thanks Dewey | |||
|
One of Us |
I have a Browning Safari .308 on an FN mauser action, and externally it does have a small ring receiver. I believe that they are std. large ring actions ground to Sm. ring contour, but I have also read somewhere that they are true small ring actions. I have not pulled the barrel to check, but I would love to know for sure. I do know, however, that it is a std. length action, because I have 1909 botton metal on it. | |||
|
one of us |
I would think that you could remove the bolt and look at the right raceway in the front ring through the rear bridge. If it is small ring/large thread the receiver would be pretty thin adjacent to the raceway(I believe). But keep in mind, I rarely know what I am talking about...... Jason "You're not hard-core, unless you live hard-core." _______________________ Hunting in Africa is an adventure. The number of variables involved preclude the possibility of a perfect hunt. Some problems will arise. How you decide to handle them will determine how much you enjoy your hunt. Just tell yourself, "it's all part of the adventure." Remember, if Robert Ruark had gotten upset every time problems with Harry Selby's flat bed truck delayed the safari, Horn of the Hunter would have read like an indictment of Selby. But Ruark rolled with the punches, poured some gin, and enjoyed the adventure. -Jason Brown | |||
|
one of us |
The best known of the small ring 98 mausers is the G33/40, but others are the mexican model 1910 and 1935's, the ZF43? (not sure I have that one right) and I believe that there are others. These are true 98 mauser actions, but built with a smaller front receiver ring and barrel thread. I wouldn't try to make a full length H&H belted magnum cartridge fit, but for 2.5" belted magnum, 30/06, x57 mauser or 308 based cartridges they work well. They are great for lighter weight rifles as they are a half a pound lighter than the large ring actions, and the stock can also be slimmed for more weight reduction due to the actions smaller profile. | |||
|
one of us |
I don't know how accurate my postal scale is, but, several complete 1910 Mexican actions weighed 44 oz. As a comparison, the average weight of 10 complete standard length 98 mauser actions averaged 46 oz. The Turks averaged 47 oz. As a further comparison, 1 example of a complete 1898 Krag action weighed 50 oz. and several comlete Winchester P14 Enfield actions weighed 55 oz. I think that most of the weight savings in the small ring mausers is the ability to build a scaled down rifle like you pointed out. | |||
|
One of Us |
Hi Jason, I looked at the Browning .308, a G.33/40 and a 1909 Argentine. The receiver ring thickness at the extractor raceway looks to be the same on the Browning SR as it does on the G.33/40. But I am not sure that really is an indication of the barrel shank diameter. Looking on past the raceway at the portion of the barrel breech that shows at the 'C' ring extractor cut, the Browning shank looks like the 1909, and the G.33/40 shank looks smaller. So based on that, I would hazard a guess that it (the Browning .308) is a small ring (externally), large thread (internally) action. I wish that I could convince myself otherwise, though.... Ken | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia