Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
One of Us |
There are at least a couple of ways to read this response. One is to assume when Doc says "it was manufactured by..." that he is referring to the stock. That is not the way I read it. I read it that Doc started off by saying "The story is obviously false." Then he is talking about the STORY AND THE PICTURE, not the stock, when he says "it (the story & pic) was manufactured by...". And that is why I say that IF, for whatever motivation, a guy wants to bad mouth his former employer who canned him, it is not beyond reason to anticipate he can or did falsify the picture by using something like photoshop. No conspiracy, no huge plot, just one sour bad ass creating another urban myth at someone else's expense. And maybe doing all he rest of us a considerable dis-service at the same time by misleading us. My country gal's just a moonshiner's daughter, but I love her still. | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata | Page 1 2 |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia