THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM GUNSMITHING FORUM


Moderators: jeffeosso
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Poll for gunsmiths' opinions
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
Picture of Alberta Canuck
posted
I read in another thread where one poster says many gunsmiths will not rebarrel Ruger rifles because their actions are investment cast.

I have never run into any gunsmith who has said that to me, so I am asking those of you here who do commercial re-barreling...

Question:
"Would you refuse to rebarrel a Ruger because it has an investment cast action? (Your comments are also welcome.)

Choices:
Yes
No
Depends on chambering desired
Depends on something else (specify what that "else " is)

 
 
Posts: 9685 | Location: Cave Creek 85331, USA | Registered: 17 August 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Westpac
posted Hide Post
Those who refuse to rebarrel a Ruger receiver because they are investment cast are probably not familiar with the rebarreling process, or, they are poupon eating snobs, who feel it is beneath them to consider such work. That's okay though as there are plenty of Ruger receivers crying for barrels and plenty of gunsmiths willing to install them.


_______________________________________________________________________________
This is my rifle, there are many like it but this one is mine. My rifle is my best friend, it is my life.
 
Posts: 3171 | Location: SLC, Utah | Registered: 23 February 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Look...I'm just repeating a story. The late, great Monte Kennedy was asked by some guy how he would go about re-stocking a Ruger..his answer...(I was there) "I don't; lifes too short to work on s...like that!"

Yeah, there's a lot of work to done to fine guns, one can't help but understand Monte's comments.....There's nothing inherently wrong with cast:

Some fine makers use cast and then machine all surfaces to really make a nice tight unit (The single shot Hagn is a prime example)
 
Posts: 2221 | Location: Tacoma, WA | Registered: 31 October 2003Reply With Quote
new member
posted Hide Post
There is absolutely nothing "Wrong" with investment cast receivers this is a precieved opinion that only "milled receivers are acceptable" This process, while not as "pretty" is just as strong In my opinion.
 
Posts: 17 | Location: Texas Hill Country | Registered: 04 May 2009Reply With Quote
Moderator
Picture of jeffeosso
posted Hide Post
Duane, there's a HELL of a lot of difference from the local gunsmith and an artist like yourself. the comparison isn't even funny.

there's nothing wrong with a ruger, and a gunsmith that makes it by, via barrel plumbing, would be somewhat foolish to turn his nose up in snobbery over a paying customer

his choice, of course


opinions vary band of bubbas and STC hunting Club

Information on Ammoguide about
the416AR, 458AR, 470AR, 500AR
What is an AR round? Case Drawings 416-458-470AR and 500AR.
476AR,
http://www.weaponsmith.com
 
Posts: 39924 | Location: Conroe, TX | Registered: 01 June 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
IMO it would be extremely difficult to find a stronger action than the cast Ruger No 1. Can't speak for the 77, but the No 1 is stronger than any other single shot action I've worked with. Anyone who says cast is weaker is either ignorant or a fool.

Now, Monte could possibly have been thinking about the stocking/accuracy issues with the 77 instead of the perceived weakness, I don't know since I wasn't there. But I DO know that opinions are exactly that, just opinions, and even the experts are wrong sometimes. And even an acknowledged expert can make a foolish statement in the heat of 'discussion' with his buds!(VBG)
Regards, Joe


__________________________
You can lead a human to logic but you can't make him think.
NRA Life since 1976. God bless America!
 
Posts: 2756 | Location: deep South | Registered: 09 December 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Masterifleman
posted Hide Post
I don't know about now but, the Post 64 Model 70 was a cast receiver and I haven't heard any such controversy over them.


"I ask, sir, what is the Militia? It is the whole people. To disarm the people is the best and most effective way to enslave them" - George Mason, co-author of the Second Amendment during the Virginia convention to ratify the Constitution
 
Posts: 1699 | Location: San Antonio, TX | Registered: 14 April 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I was at a gunstore when the gunsmith came in to pick up work and drop work off.

The ones he was dropping off that he didn't want to work on, he wold say, "Tell them to shoot it the way it is."

He was a grumpy old man that lived way up in the woods by himself. He is probably dead now. Thinking back, that guy was cool.
 
Posts: 9043 | Location: on the rock | Registered: 16 July 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by jeffeosso:
Duane, there's a HELL of a lot of difference from the local gunsmith and an artist like yourself. the comparison isn't even funny.

there's nothing wrong with a ruger, and a gunsmith that makes it by, via barrel plumbing, would be somewhat foolish to turn his nose up in snobbery over a paying customer

his choice, of course


Jeez: it's just a freaking story! and...I've restocked a couple 77's!
 
Posts: 2221 | Location: Tacoma, WA | Registered: 31 October 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I'm quite sure Martin Hagn would never have rebarreled a Ruger 77 or restocked one. He wouldn't do a Remington either. Naturally, his objection was not that it was cast but that it was, to him, ugly.
There are many modern gunsmiths who avoid Model 70's because they have to make an extractor cut. These same guys have never cut a square thread or barreled a lever action.
I am personally perfectly happy rebarreling Rugers and have even rebarreled a Mossberg 810. You don't get much lower class than that! Of course, I've never claimed to be a classy guy.
I believe the post 64 Winchesters were made from a forging; not a casting. Regards, Bill.
 
Posts: 3828 | Location: Elko, B.C. Canada | Registered: 19 June 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Hey AC, Some folks who claim to be Gun Smiths are not really Gun Smiths. Surely they have another, more properly descriptive name for themselves - perhaps Artistes.

I look "down on" their Artistic Work, with the same nose-in-the-air disdain they give to the typical guy who needs a problem with his firearm problem resolved. They may make things pretty, but if they can't(or won't) repair a fiream they are not Gun Smiths.
 
Posts: 9920 | Location: Carolinas, USA | Registered: 22 April 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I sincerely doubt that any competent artist or real gunsmith would turn down the job of re barreling

any weapon . Provided there is a financial gain from doing so .

Perhaps a better analogy if there is enough money in the job , then a quality gunsmith can

turn a stool sample into a Faberge Egg !. He may not enjoy doing so but financial reward is a

mighty powerful motivator . archer
 
Posts: 4485 | Location: Planet Earth | Registered: 17 October 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Alberta Canuck
posted Hide Post
As far as I am concerned, the votes are sufficiently in for me to conclude that although A FEW "gunsmiths" say they wouldn't barrel a Ruger BECAUSE it has a cast action, that is not true of the vast majority.

I also note that I have no way of knowing for sure that any of the four who have said that so far really are gunsmiths, as none has stated why that concerns him, what his experience is that leads him to that policy, or even identified himself.


Thanks to all the 'smiths for your participation.
 
Posts: 9685 | Location: Cave Creek 85331, USA | Registered: 17 August 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Well AC you know I'm not one . So it was a personal observation over 50 years of dealing with gunsmiths .

Money was and I suspect always will be a strong motivator .

Westpac and Duane Wiebe are definitely smiths . An opinion from Toomany tools ( John )

as well as Jim Kobe would satisfy me just fine .

I venture only a guess that if there were something critical in re barreling a investment cast action

pertaining too the weakness of the metal , we surely would have heard about it by now .


Least wise one would SURLY HOPE SO !!!. archer archer archer
 
Posts: 4485 | Location: Planet Earth | Registered: 17 October 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Alberta Canuck
posted Hide Post
Heaven knows I appreciate the comments from the folks you mentioned, and trust them completely. I also happen to agree with them. I would agree in a heart-beat to barrel a Ruger M77 if I was still doing any barreling.

I was just surprised to get even 4 "yes" answers, ithout any of them identifying himself and explaining why he holds that position. I wasn't dumping on them...just thought if they have had some bad experiences with cast actions, perhaps I could learn something from their experiences.
 
Posts: 9685 | Location: Cave Creek 85331, USA | Registered: 17 August 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Toomany Tools
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Alberta Canuck:
...poster says many gunsmiths will not rebarrel Ruger rifles because their actions are investment cast.


I'm sorry to be so blunt (maybe not) but that is just stupid. The Ruger 77 is a very strong and durable action and any "gunsmith" that would not rebarrel one probably doesn't have a pipe wrench big enough to fit it.


John Farner

If you haven't, please join the NRA!
 
Posts: 2946 | Location: Corrales, NM, USA | Registered: 07 February 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Fjold
posted Hide Post
I'm not a gunsmith, when I work on guns my gunsmith's kids go to better colleges.

I do work with investment castings a lot and IMHO a lot of the opinions that we see about cast parts are based on the technology and more importantly attitudes of 50 years ago.

People tend to think of castings as stuff like fire hydrants and cast iron lawn ornaments but investment casting is used to make precision parts like the turbine blades used in all commercial and military gas turbine (jet) engines. These blades are made with very thin blade thicknesses, very low weight and with intricate internal cooling passages that have to stand up to enormous amounts of stress.


Frank



"I don't know what there is about buffalo that frightens me so.....He looks like he hates you personally. He looks like you owe him money."
- Robert Ruark, Horn of the Hunter, 1953

NRA Life, SAF Life, CRPA Life, DRSS lite

 
Posts: 12740 | Location: Kentucky, USA | Registered: 30 December 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I sure like the accuracy I get from two Ruger 77's. The balance isn't too shabby either. And, I like the Leonard Brownell stocks too; great lines...
Beyond that, I have nothing to contribute here. Big Grin




 
Posts: 5798 | Registered: 10 July 2004Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia