THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM GUNSMITHING FORUM


Moderators: jeffeosso
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Cnverting Interarms Mark X 458 Win. to Lott
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
Picture of Labman
posted
I have an Interarms Mark X in 458 Win Mag. listed in the classifieds. A member asked if the action and mag box was long enough for the rifle to be converted to .458 Lott. Being a Mauser action similar to the CZ's I would think it's doable but I don't want to give out any incorrect information to a potential buyer.

What do the experts here think about the suitability of this rifle for such a conversion? Here's a link to the post. Scroll down to the end of the thread on page #2.

http://forums.accuratereloadin...1078981/m/5201071752


Tom Z

NRA Life Member
 
Posts: 2347 | Location: Pennsylvania | Registered: 07 January 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
The inside length on that MK10 magazine is 3.4". The OAL length of the .458 Lott is 3.6". Would have to make the ".375 H&H Conversion" to make it work.


 
Posts: 719 | Location: fly over America, also known as Oklahoma | Registered: 02 June 2013Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Bill73
posted Hide Post
What would you have to do to the magazine? can it be lengthened or does it have to be replaced?


DRSS
 
Posts: 2283 | Location: MI | Registered: 20 March 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of dpcd
posted Hide Post
Cut out the front mag box wall and weld in a new longer one; mill out the receiver to match. Just like making any Mauser work with a 375.
I prefer to remove as much as possible from the rear, however, to lessen the amount the needs to be cut from the lower locking surface web.
Not that hard.
 
Posts: 17442 | Location: USA | Registered: 02 August 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of sambarman338
posted Hide Post
I'm sure dpcd's advice is good but I'd be inclined to point out to the prospective buyer that the true merit in this rifle for dangerous-game hunters is that the shortness of the action reduces the chance of African shortstroke when under pressure.

Less is more when it comes to recoil and short loads in the 458WM still equal the ballistics of the old British db rifle calibres thought adequate for everything for many decades.
 
Posts: 5191 | Location: Melbourne, Australia | Registered: 31 March 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of dpcd
posted Hide Post
Absolutely true; I am in no way recommending the Lott; for me it is way too much of a good thing. I am just saying how it is done; not advocating using a Mauser either. There are better ways to go.
And too much recoil.
(Altering the action of a Mauser to accommodate a Lott does not increase the length of the bolt throw, however.) If you extend the mag at the front.
 
Posts: 17442 | Location: USA | Registered: 02 August 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I also had to increase the loading port to the rear by about .200 for positive ejection


Jim Kobe
10841 Oxborough Ave So
Bloomington MN 55437
952.884.6031
Professional member American Custom Gunmakers Guild

 
Posts: 5534 | Location: Minnesota | Registered: 10 July 2002Reply With Quote
Moderator
Picture of jeffeosso
posted Hide Post
there used to be lots of mk10 mag lengh bottommetal floating around -- last time i did one, i just cut it off the rear, extended and tig'ed it . took most of it out of the rear, as i don't like hitting the front until its time for feeding work.. though the lott tends to wrk well on the 458 ramp, just get the back of the rails right

though, honestly, if you do some work with tac/h335 you don't need to rechamber and rework ..


opinions vary band of bubbas and STC hunting Club

Information on Ammoguide about
the416AR, 458AR, 470AR, 500AR
What is an AR round? Case Drawings 416-458-470AR and 500AR.
476AR,
http://www.weaponsmith.com
 
Posts: 40232 | Location: Conroe, TX | Registered: 01 June 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of sambarman338
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by dpcd:
...
(Altering the action of a Mauser to accommodate a Lott does not increase the length of the bolt throw, however.) If you extend the mag at the front.


That's true, too. I don't suppose it adds any strength, though, for full-house loads if thought required.
 
Posts: 5191 | Location: Melbourne, Australia | Registered: 31 March 2009Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of tiggertate
posted Hide Post
That stock is also not (IMO) good for much more recoil. If I were going to a heavier cartridge I would want a better stock too. In fact, if you have a good fiberglass stock with plenty of glass fiber in the mag well area you can cut out the front of the mag box and leave it. When Clifton stocked my 375 Ackley MkX I added new bottom metal and there was none opened to the front like Interarms did for the 375. So that's what we did. That was circa 1989. and the rifle has been a 458 AccRel since Jeff created the round. It functions flawlessly with no battering of the front of the mag well.
 
Posts: 11143 | Location: Texas, USA | Registered: 22 September 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of crshelton
posted Hide Post
quote:
though, honestly, if you do some work with tac/h335 you don't need to rechamber and rework


A much more simple approach. Smiler


NRA Life Benefactor Member,
DRSS, DWWC, Whittington
Center,Android Reloading
Ballistics App at
http://www.xplat.net/
 
Posts: 2294 | Location: Republic of Texas | Registered: 25 May 2009Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia