one of us
| Tom Burgess (Systeme98) can sure do it. He removed the "billboard" from my CZ550.
NRA Life Member, Band of Bubbas Charter Member, PGCA, DRSS. Shoot & hunt with vintage classics.
|
| Posts: 9487 | Location: Texas Hill Country | Registered: 11 January 2002 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| |
| |
One of Us
| Unlike the CZ550, that Daly action isn't worth the cost of removing the lettering. |
| |
One of Us
| Word to the wise...check with the BATF before you try to do this, or try to have it done.
Refer to Title 26, United States Code, Chapter 53(b), section #5842: “Identification of Firearms.†|
| Posts: 4574 | Location: Valencia, California | Registered: 16 March 2005 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| FLA 3006 's action was not a FIREARM. It was MECHANICALLY tested, ( as the old F.N. actions [only] were) Thus the legend on the lower L.H.side flat of Rec. 3800 bar. FN Claimed their mechanical proof of the action only( just the stripped bolt in the receiver) was subjected to 25 tonnes of pressure for some calibrated length of time and that this was equivalent to a 125K PSI proof load. The lug seats set back were close to the same in rifles as the receivers. Whoever puts a barrel on the action and FIRES it makes a firearm. It has then lost it's maidenhead and the Feds are rather certain that they can prove it. I have no ideas on the C Daly's. This is all about collecting the excise tax so that fish and wildlife can buy properties and commence lawsuits over things like snail darters or a 30 square mile island in the Pacific, during Pres Clinton regime.
Thos. M. Burgess
|
| Posts: 199 | Location: Kalispell MT. | Registered: 01 November 2002 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| quote: Originally posted by Poleax: Unlike the CZ550, that Daly action isn't worth the cost of removing the lettering.
Not this again... Thanks for adding so much to this post. |
| |
One of Us
| You're welcome! |
| |