THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM GUNSMITHING FORUM


Moderators: jeffeosso
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Mauser 98 bolt slop
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
posted
Over the years I have come across varying degrees of blot slop in 98s'.
I had an israel 308 that was like a grandfatherclock pendulem. 2 custom argentine 09,that were reasonable,and a brazilian 08 obendorf,that was superbly tight even at full bolt drawback. Even some of the premium new manufacture 98 that I looked at at SCI Reno,were rather sloppy,yet they claim superior tolerancing in their manufacture. If the 08 Oberndorf that I had ,had it good ,why not new ones these days,and how much clearnce is really needed between bolt and reciever to allow it to function reliably in field conditions. Do they really need to be so sloppy? are people having problems with R700,M70,Sako,etc,(which are much tighter) and Im just not hearing about it,or are manufactures of new 98 just unnecessarily following tradition too much?
 
Posts: 2134 | Registered: 12 May 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
It doesn't matter really how much slop there is at the back of the stroke, rather how much there is when the bolt is in the closed position.

Sure a better made gun will usually have less slop, but as far as function goes, there is no reason to worry about it, so the factories don't.

-Spencer
 
Posts: 1319 | Registered: 11 July 2003Reply With Quote
Moderator
Picture of jeffeosso
posted Hide Post
rear slop...

is there for a purpose, and also in all mil bolt guns...

this is to allow for junk to be in the action.

it matters how much it locks when in battery, imho, not how it rocks (and they will ALL rock eventually.. winnie, remmie, all) in the back

jeffe


opinions vary band of bubbas and STC hunting Club

Information on Ammoguide about
the416AR, 458AR, 470AR, 500AR
What is an AR round? Case Drawings 416-458-470AR and 500AR.
476AR,
http://www.weaponsmith.com
 
Posts: 39594 | Location: Conroe, TX | Registered: 01 June 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
It’s pretty hard to find a design that is smoother and tighter than a Krag...and even those have a bit of “wiggle†in the bolt when its fully retracted.

If things were so tightly fitted that there was no movement at all when drawn back the bolt would be a pain in the ass to operate.
 
Posts: 4574 | Location: Valencia, California | Registered: 16 March 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of vapodog
posted Hide Post
The '98 do seem to have a lot of slop in the fit as the bolt is totally retracted.....but they don't bind!!!!! It seems that unless there's some amount of slop they bind upon trying to close.

IMO you should learn to appreciate the slop.


///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery."
Winston Churchill
 
Posts: 28849 | Location: western Nebraska | Registered: 27 May 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Are you sure the 1908 Brazilian was an Oberndorf. Most were DWM. The 1935 Brazilians were Oberndorf.
 
Posts: 7090 | Registered: 11 January 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Thinking now ,I am not entirely sure if it was 08 or 1935,but it was Oberndorf, it was a few years ago,(10).
It was though a close tolerance action with absolute minimal bolt slop,it functioned perfectly, never gave any binding problems whatsoever.
 
Posts: 2134 | Registered: 12 May 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
i'll second that Vapodog!! Wink

Zubin


One shot..meat! Two shots...maybe...Three shots...heap shit! - Old Indian adage
 
Posts: 137 | Location: Pune, IN | Registered: 31 January 2005Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia