THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM GUNSMITHING FORUM


Moderators: jeffeosso
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Go/no go guage question
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
posted
I have been seaching for this info but can't find it. I am curious, what is the difference in length between a go, no go, and field gauge for a 7x57 or .257?
 
Posts: 417 | Location: TX panhandle | Registered: 08 November 2005Reply With Quote
Moderator
Picture of jeffeosso
posted Hide Post
hmm, i don't know .. is the 257 remington roberts shoulder angle different than the 7x57? the 7, 8, 9, and 9,3x57 are all the same datum, but i don't know on the bob


#dumptrump

opinions vary band of bubbas and STC hunting Club

Information on Ammoguide about
the416AR, 458AR, 470AR, 500AR
What is an AR round? Case Drawings 416-458-470AR and 500AR.
476AR,
http://www.weaponsmith.com
 
Posts: 38613 | Location: Conroe, TX | Registered: 01 June 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Westpac
posted Hide Post
The 7x57 and .257 Roberts use the same gauge. There is a difference of .004 between the go and no-go. I don't know what a field reject gauge would be, but typically they are in the neighborhood of .004 beyond the no-go.


_______________________________________________________________________________
This is my rifle, there are many like it but this one is mine. My rifle is my best friend, it is my life.
 
Posts: 3171 | Location: SLC, Utah | Registered: 23 February 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Thanks Westpac, that is about what I was thinking. Not a big deal, I was just wondering. I appreciate the info.
 
Posts: 417 | Location: TX panhandle | Registered: 08 November 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of kcstott
posted Hide Post
Typical difference is .004" per step ie go would be right on the money. No go would be +.004" and a field reject +.008 (all dimensions give or take and your results may vary)

Having never served in the military I've read and heard rumor that a field reject gage was the "worst case scenario" and a rifle was still fieldable if the bolt would not close on the field gage.

Keep in mind that this was for service rifles and not a commercial arm or any sort.


www.KLStottlemyer.com

Deport the Homeless and Give the Illegals citizenship. AT LEAST THE ILLEGALS WILL WORK
 
Posts: 2534 | Location: National City CA | Registered: 15 December 2008Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Toomany Tools
posted Hide Post
Apparently there's no standard for "field" gauges, at least not for .223 Remington. Yesterday a local Sergeant from the SWAT brought two rifles that had bolts closing on his "field" gauge from Forester. Turns out my "field" gauge from Clymer is .004" longer than the Forester gauge, and those bolts did not close on my gauge. His "field" gauge was .006" longer than the "GO" and my "field" gauge is .010" longer.


John Farner

If you haven't, please join the NRA!
 
Posts: 2939 | Location: Corrales, NM, USA | Registered: 07 February 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of kcstott
posted Hide Post
Were the rifle chambered in .223 or 5.56 nato. As there is a difference Albeit not much but there is a difference none the less.


www.KLStottlemyer.com

Deport the Homeless and Give the Illegals citizenship. AT LEAST THE ILLEGALS WILL WORK
 
Posts: 2534 | Location: National City CA | Registered: 15 December 2008Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Toomany Tools
posted Hide Post
That could account for a difference but all gauges used were marked ".223 Rem"


John Farner

If you haven't, please join the NRA!
 
Posts: 2939 | Location: Corrales, NM, USA | Registered: 07 February 2001Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia