THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM GUNSMITHING FORUM


Moderators: jeffeosso
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
U.S.Model of 1917 EDDYSTONE good/bad Ser# range?
 Login/Join
 
one of us
posted
I was just given a U.S.Model of 1917 EDDYSTONE ser# 300xxx in verry good shape. When were the double heat treat problems? Or was that Springfield?
Thanks in advance
 
Posts: 2362 | Location: KENAI, ALASKA | Registered: 10 November 2001Reply With Quote
Moderator
Picture of jeffeosso
posted Hide Post
no heat threat problems, other than HARD.....
you will need to relieve the barrel to turn it out, as these are going to be VERY hard...

i posted some pics on exactly that a couple months ago.

have a ball


opinions vary band of bubbas and STC hunting Club

Information on Ammoguide about
the416AR, 458AR, 470AR, 500AR
What is an AR round? Case Drawings 416-458-470AR and 500AR.
476AR,
http://www.weaponsmith.com
 
Posts: 40232 | Location: Conroe, TX | Registered: 01 June 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of El Deguello
posted Hide Post
That was 1903 Springfields (and early 1903's made at Rock Island). Double-heat-treated ones are the BEST of the Springfields. And all '03's made at SA after 800,00 and Rock Island above 285,507 are all "high-number" rifles.


"Bitte, trinks du nicht das Wasser. Dahin haben die Kuhen gesheissen."
 
Posts: 4386 | Location: New Woodstock, Madison County, Central NY | Registered: 04 January 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Thanks Guys, for clearing that up!!
 
Posts: 2362 | Location: KENAI, ALASKA | Registered: 10 November 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Eddystones under 120,000 range were reported to be rather crude and...

After Remington took over running the plant, IIRC, there are no flies on them, and esthetically superior to the Winchesters with their "koi ponds".

Rich
DRSS
 
Posts: 23062 | Location: SW Idaho | Registered: 19 December 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Idaho Sharpshooter:
Eddystones under 120,000 range were reported to be rather crude and...

After Remington took over running the plant, IIRC, there are no flies on them, and esthetically superior to the Winchesters with their "koi ponds".

Rich
DRSS


Eddystone Arsenal was a subsidiary of Remington.
 
Posts: 583 | Registered: 28 May 2007Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Barrel has been off, re-contured and chamberd to 30-338.(L/H twist & some mill markings) Has a pretty decent piece of walnut also. Took a week to get the copper out! Has not been shot since "71" I need to shoot it and see how it does.
 
Posts: 2362 | Location: KENAI, ALASKA | Registered: 10 November 2001Reply With Quote
Moderator
Picture of jeffeosso
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by rem721:
quote:
Originally posted by Idaho Sharpshooter:
Eddystones under 120,000 range were reported to be rather crude and...

After Remington took over running the plant, IIRC, there are no flies on them, and esthetically superior to the Winchesters with their "koi ponds".

Rich
DRSS


Eddystone Arsenal was a subsidiary of Remington.

yep, right after remington bought them, right after they took over the plant,,,,


opinions vary band of bubbas and STC hunting Club

Information on Ammoguide about
the416AR, 458AR, 470AR, 500AR
What is an AR round? Case Drawings 416-458-470AR and 500AR.
476AR,
http://www.weaponsmith.com
 
Posts: 40232 | Location: Conroe, TX | Registered: 01 June 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Westpac
posted Hide Post
During World War I, Remington Arms "opened" the Eddystone Ammunition Works, which produced the Pattern 1914 rifle and M1917 Enfield rifle.


_______________________________________________________________________________
This is my rifle, there are many like it but this one is mine. My rifle is my best friend, it is my life.
 
Posts: 3171 | Location: SLC, Utah | Registered: 23 February 2007Reply With Quote
Moderator
Picture of jeffeosso
posted Hide Post
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pattern_14_Rifle
Eddystone (a subsidiary of Remington set up principally to manufacture the P14) to produce the P14 for the British before the US entered the war in 1917. However, each factory produced parts from their own designs, leading to interchangeability issues;


Malm,
You are right.. Eddystone Corp opened the EAW. Eddystoe corp was SEPERATE company of remington... corporate shells, as "remington" making military weapons at the time would have violated US neutraility... but "eddystone" wasn't "remington" and therefore didn't, until the US entired the war, then there was no reason for pretent


opinions vary band of bubbas and STC hunting Club

Information on Ammoguide about
the416AR, 458AR, 470AR, 500AR
What is an AR round? Case Drawings 416-458-470AR and 500AR.
476AR,
http://www.weaponsmith.com
 
Posts: 40232 | Location: Conroe, TX | Registered: 01 June 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Westpac
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by jeffeosso:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pattern_14_Rifle
Eddystone (a subsidiary of Remington set up principally to manufacture the P14) to produce the P14 for the British before the US entered the war in 1917. However, each factory produced parts from their own designs, leading to interchangeability issues;


Malm,
You are right.. Eddystone Corp opened the EAW. Eddystoe corp was SEPERATE company of remington... corporate shells, as "remington" making military weapons at the time would have violated US neutraility... but "eddystone" wasn't "remington" and therefore didn't, until the US entired the war, then there was no reason for pretent


Here's the story. http://www.scott-duff.com/Eddystone.htm


_______________________________________________________________________________
This is my rifle, there are many like it but this one is mine. My rifle is my best friend, it is my life.
 
Posts: 3171 | Location: SLC, Utah | Registered: 23 February 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Westpac,
Thanks for the straight scoop. Good to have someone who knows which way is up.


Chic Worthing
"Life is Too Short To Hunt With An Ugly Gun"
http://webpages.charter.net/cworthing/
 
Posts: 4917 | Location: Wenatchee, WA, USA | Registered: 17 December 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Of the three manufacturers of 1917 Enfields, Winchester, REmington and Eddystone, the Eddystones were traditionally considered the least desirable for conversion into sporting rifles. Supposedly the actions were overhardened. Another theory was that the barrels were screwed in mechanically so tight that receiver rings cracked. I do not know what is true and what is BS, but for my part I would not own an Eddystone sporter.
 
Posts: 1233 | Registered: 25 November 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
I do not know what is true and what is BS, but for my part I would not own an Eddystone sporter.


Good! Send them my way lol
 
Posts: 2362 | Location: KENAI, ALASKA | Registered: 10 November 2001Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia