one of us
| The difference in terminal ballistics between the .404 and the .425 are purely academic. Both will drive a 400 +/- softnose or solid at 2350-2400 fps. The difference in bullet diameter is .011" so any allegation that one has superior frontal area is pure methane. In the original British factory loads, the .404 was loaded very gently, i.e., <2200 fps. This load is probably responsible for killing more heavy game than any other in Africa. However, today most us today prefer the German loads that basically equal the .416's. The .425 W-R has always done that. So, what is the "advantage" of the .425? Hardly anyone else has one, it's 'way cool, I want one, etc., etc., etc. Let us build and be merry.  |
| | | Posts: 2690 | Location: Lakewood, CA. USA | Registered: 07 January 2001 | 
IP
|
|
one of us
| Hey Alf, thanks for the great pics! Any chance that you have any pictures of the drop magazine box of the 425, hopefully some open. Trying to get a bette feeling for it. Wonder why I don't see that on more rifles, would seem like a good way to get extra rounds, but I guess a drob box ala Blackburn or somebody is considered to look better by most people. hmm.....
Red
PS
forgive the ignorance, but it looks like the 404 is more case capacity than the 425, do you know the difference? Is there a big difference in actual performance? |
| | | Posts: 4742 | Location: Fresno, CA | Registered: 21 March 2003 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| Alf WOW  It looks fantastic. I like the checkering around the pistol grip and the shape of the wood that surrounds the magazine. Very smooth looking rifle indeed. Who would be so foolish to part with that beauty? Cheers, Andr� |
| | | Posts: 2293 | Location: The Kingdom of Denmark | Registered: 13 January 2004 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| Sarge,
What is a 404 Whatinhell?
Sounds interresting, and I don't even know what it is.
Mike |
| | |
one of us
| read somewhere that W/R made just one (1) double rifle for the .425. |
| | |
one of us
| My ignorance will be revealed but what are the clips? Surely not stripper clips? |
| | |
one of us
| 425 WR fans/experts: Wondering what you gents saw/heard about Auction Arms# 6072108 that let it go so Cheap??  |
| | |
one of us
| So many guns, so little money, that's why! In my case, and this answers Art's email as well, my first goal is a Pedersoli conversion. I really want a double rifle but I don't want to pay for a double rifle. So, since the rechambering of the Pedersoli has proven so successful on so many occasions, that is goal one. Then, next year, I have more need of a light. I am embarrassed to admit this but I currently don't own any light rifles.  I have three (count them three DGR's but no light. Next year, unless one of you cheap types (excluding Johncharlienoak, gentleman and scholar that he is) decides to buy my buffalo crusher I will have four. This is dumb. Therefore next year's project will be a homebuilt 6.5x55. Only after that will I be in a position to buy a .425 'cause hardly anyone else has one, they're 'way cool, I want one, etc., etc., etc. Clearer now? |
| | | Posts: 2690 | Location: Lakewood, CA. USA | Registered: 07 January 2001 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| Quote:
So many guns, so little money, that's why! In my case, and this answers Art's email as well, my first goal is a Pedersoli conversion. I really want a double rifle but I don't want to pay for a double rifle. So, since the rechambering of the Pedersoli has proven so successful on so many occasions, that is goal one. Then, next year, I have more need of a light. I am embarrassed to admit this but I currently don't own any light rifles. I have three (count them three DGR's but no light. Next year, unless one of you cheap types (excluding Johncharlienoak, gentleman and scholar that he is) decides to buy my buffalo crusher I will have four. This is dumb. Therefore next year's project will be a homebuilt 6.5x55. Only after that will I be in a position to buy a .425 'cause hardly anyone else has one, they're 'way cool, I want one, etc., etc., etc. Clearer now?
Sarge,
I can hardly believe what I read  . How could you possibly go with the 6.5x55 for a light in preference to the 275 Rigby (or even the 256 Mannlicher) ? It's just not cricket ol' chap.
Jim |
| | |
