Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
one of us |
Quote: Sure like to hear your rational for this, Mike. | ||
|
One of Us |
Wally If extractor groove diamter is too big the case won't slide up under the exractor. If it is too small the case falls out if the bolt is pulled back slowly. Ask Winchester Australia about the stainless M70s that came to Australia where there was a compound problem.....poor/variable extractor dimensions mixed up with variable brass. Mike | |||
|
one of us |
Quote: I will take ALL the accuracy I can get. I can only think of one gunsmith who uses Mod 70s - David Miller. All of the guys I have run across prefer custom actions which are invariably PFs. In one of his books Carmichel states that the PF Mod 70 was actually more accurate than the CRF model... | |||
|
One of Us |
AnotherAZWriter D'Arcy Echols is M70. I think you will find that virtually all very high end custom "hunting" style rifles are on either M70 or Mauser and/or M70/Mauser copies. However this will be a case of what is seen to be right. I for one would not even consider a PF for a very high end 375 H&H or 270 Winchester. On the other hand I would not consider a CRF for a 30/378, 300 Ultra or one of the Lazzeroni calibres. Not for mechanical reasons but rather just what seems "right" Undoubtedly "the lower end of the high end" is more than well represented by PFs with Nesika rifles, Lazzeroni, custom shop Weatherbys. Mike | |||
|
one of us |
Mike: Fair dinkum? Just kidding. I totally agree. On the high end custom rifle side, I would never build a M700 but a Mod 70. On the other hand, if I did that, I wouldn't expect it to be top of the heap in the accuracy world. I love my Mod 70 and it is quite accurate, but if I want the most accurate rifle, I go with a PF. | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia