Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
One of Us |
Oh My---now you have hurt my feelings lol! How many HOF points do you have? Have you ever won a 1K State Championship or set Range Reacords? Contrary to what some of the “Depends Set” think the knowledge of the undersigned is it more than adequate. You see it is more important to Actually Understand the cause and effect relationship of all of the processes, materials and procedures are so that when applied cumulatively and most importantly correctly will give a predictable result. Do the VAST majority of the folks on this internet chat forum do everything possible to obtain the ultimate accuracy level for every rifle they build-----we know the answer to that now don’t we? Some folks are driven to excellence others do not even know what the word means and I am not being ugly just telling the truth. As for your comment about Ralf you cannot find your proverbial rear with both hands because you know not of what you speak literally. Since you brought it up again which you clearly should not have why don’t you give Ralf a call and find out you old Curmudgeon because that matter has been settled to all parties satisfaction. Cheers—now can we be nice? | |||
|
One of Us |
Remachining is a broad term and can apply to almost any change made, while blueprinting could be described as remachining on steroids. We were taught in school that it was very desirable to remachine the receiver almost any time we rebarreled almost any rifle. AAMOF one of the very first operations they taught was the fabrication of various mandrels to aid in doing this. We were taught that THE BARE MINIMUM required that the receiver's front-surface-to-thread-CL relationship be checked and squared as necessary for full contact around the barrel shoulder. This is a far cry from blueprinting; blueprinting normally uses the bolt raceway CL as its Point of Beginning and then the receiver's threads, lugs, bolt face etc are all trued to that benchmark. Takes lots of time and money. I agree that 'blueprinting' is a waste on most rifles and most shooters. However it's also a known fact that a few basic 'remachining' operations can often cut group sizes in half or better on many sporting rifles. I have done it(remachining) as SOP on all my own rebarrel jobs since 1965. It's automatic, second nature, not even worth mentioning, like the pilot/aircraft and teamster/rig walkarounds before cranking up. If your smith doesn't at least CHECK the receiver surfaces then IMO you should find another smith. Regards, Joe __________________________ You can lead a human to logic but you can't make him think. NRA Life since 1976. God bless America! | |||
|
One of Us |
BigHatWithNoCattle, perhaps you'd care to show us some of the national records YOU'VE set, the award-winning rifles YOU'VE built, the books & articles YOU'VE written? So far all we've seen is cyber-claims and tasteless braggadocio and feeble attempts to trash anyone who doesn't agree with your opinion of yourself. Sorry Bubba, you gave yourself away when you didn't even recognize the fellow who basically 'invented' modern pillar bedding among other things. No (grin), Seeley didn't really invent pillar bedding but he WAS the one who really popularized it. The fact that you didn't know about Seeley indicates to me that you probably don't know very much else either, certainly not enough to be worth listening to. You have a good day now, y'hear? Joe __________________________ You can lead a human to logic but you can't make him think. NRA Life since 1976. God bless America! | |||
|
One of Us |
Sorry for not knowing who Seeley was but he is in the ground now along with many others who have helped this sport such as Pat McMillan and PO Ackley. There are accordingly folks out there who are building on the legacy that they built and as materials and processes including CNC equipment continue to proliferate the industry accuracy potential continues to improve. So go and change your depends and powder the chaffed areas and just put me on ignore. Have looked at some of your work from pictures you have posted and the term Blacksmith covers it nicely. Would shudder to think what one of your chambering jobs looks like! Have a nice day. There is no need to justify myself to you because quite frankly and this is not meant to hurt your feelings but you are not worth it to be honest. Your opinion of me is of no consequence however, it is good that you do enjoy your hobby and if it makes you happy then so be it. Here I am working on a Bolt Shroud and here is the Farley Silhouette Rifle we finished this past weekend in Trinidad---just have to get it painted. Also the Jewell triggers I use for competition are Blue Printed---that should give you something to think about. | |||
|
One of Us |
Wow! How would the rifle shoot if he hadn't got screwed? -Eron Eron Ahmer Sulphur Gulch Gunsmithing | |||
|
one of us |
Jim, He said in some cases such as my 700 that so little material was removed on the rethread that it did not require re threading the barrel. It did need to have the barrel reamed as an oversized recoil lug was used and he said when he squares the action with the barrel this is often the case. I have had him work on many rifles and some he has told me in the past to not true as I was wasting my money. Mostly with Model 70 Winchesters in large calibers. As I recall I told him to true this one as I do not like shipping rifles back and forth plus the cost of the shipping involved. He did not tell me to do it. He has built a 222, 223, 22-250 & 6BR for me. All of them shoot into one hole with the 222 and 6BR shooting often .200 groups. The 222 is an XP100 and the 6BR is a Hall action. Thanks for looking out for my best interest when suggesting I got "screwed" but I do not feel "screwed" by the work done on the gun or the cost. I am happy with the 270 and it shoots well with factory ammo what more could I want. Thnaks Again. BigB | |||
|
One of Us |
No, we will not ...be nice... as I do not waste my good humour on a jackass with a big mouth, large bald spot and ponderous paunch who gratuitously attacks others here without cause. I probably am older than you, certainly far more erudite and if that is your picture; I am also much more youthful in appearance and much fitter. This, may have to do with a lifetime spent in the mountains of BC where one soon learns about real hunting rifles. Frankly, my impression is that you struggle with basic English prose, attempting to appear literate; while trying to convince yourself that you are some hot sh!t by slagging others here. Ralf phoned me a couple of days after your totally unwarranted attack upon him here and I am well aware that he did you the courtesy of calling and sorting things out.My point was that you seem to attack first and THEN, when shown to be wrong, you post some drivel and expect others to accept it. I have never claimed to have set ...state... records, I am a Canadian and not very interested in American target shooting. I would point out, that this thread concerns HUNTING rifle accuracy and I am quite familiar with that, having just returned from my range with several targets with sub-moa groups from my P-64-Alaskans in .338WM, my Oberndorf Type B in 9.3x62 and my Merkel 12-12-9.3x74R, all with Nosler Pts. at max. safe loads. You may well be one hell of a machinist, but, you need to either learn some manners or grow up, maybe some of both, eh? | |||
|
One of Us |
You really do not understand do you? Being of French descent makes you rude as well as smelling bad so your personality issues are understandable. You really should do a little more thinking before you post as the accuracy requirement for a “hunting” rifle at the ranges you shoot are dinner plate size. Those rifles you listed are definitely 100 yard or 100 meter rifles as you say in Kanada. Even my short range rifles are zeroed for 300 yards not meters moi petite cochon. | |||
|
One of Us |
As the original poster I want to chime in: it absolutely pisses me off to no end when a thread goes totally off track from the original topic and winds up a pissing match. I'm glad to read opinions but at this time would everyone please go back to their corners? If we can't have an open discussion without hostility then perhaps we should stamp this thread closed. Thanks, Jeff | |||
|
One of Us |
Certainly, I typed a comment as you were posting and posted it; however, I have deleted it and will not further engage BH. Sorry, for disturbing your thread, probably should have just ignored him. | |||
|
One of Us |
Welcome to the AR board www.KLStottlemyer.com Deport the Homeless and Give the Illegals citizenship. AT LEAST THE ILLEGALS WILL WORK | |||
|
one of us |
Yep it is a shame but it will continue to happen. The ignore functions works great. As usual just my $.02 Paul K | |||
|
One of Us |
We are short a few horse heads. | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata | Page 1 2 |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia