THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM 4X4, ATV FORUM

Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 

Moderators: Saeed
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Holy cow Batman! Ford Ecoboost
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Wonder how your half ton truck hauling 12000 lbs would hold that load going down a mountain pass with the little motor?
 
Posts: 297 | Location: Clyde Park, MT | Registered: 29 December 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by DIs:
I would like to see how it does pulling 12000 lbs in the rocky mountains. Maybe I should sell my Diesel.


No comparison. The diesel in a full size compareable F250/350 would win every time. The diesel is also a lot more expensive to purchase and maintain.
Silly debate to be honest. The thread was about the Ecoboost, not how they compared to full sized diesel trucks.


My biggest fear is when I die my wife will sell my guns for what I told her they cost.
 
Posts: 6653 | Location: Wasilla, Alaska | Registered: 22 February 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Snowwolfe:
quote:
Originally posted by DIs:
I would like to see how it does pulling 12000 lbs in the rocky mountains. Maybe I should sell my Diesel.


No comparison. The diesel in a full size compareable F250/350 would win every time. The diesel is also a lot more expensive to purchase and maintain.
Silly debate to be honest. The thread was about the Ecoboost, not how they compared to full sized diesel trucks.


+1

I drove 2060 miles, 38:30 hrs, 20.5 mpg on my trip from Orlando to Houston and back.

I think the main criticism of the full size big 3 trucks is are they too expensive and too big to park. Technically they are great vechiles.

Mike
 
Posts: 13145 | Location: Cocoa Beach, Florida | Registered: 22 July 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Yes it is foolish to say that the half ton ecoboost is rated to haul 12000 lbs. That was my point.It isn't a big truck. I too will keep my diesel that gets almost 20 mpg and still able to pull 16000 lbs well.
 
Posts: 297 | Location: Clyde Park, MT | Registered: 29 December 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Have any of you ecoboost owners experienced any engine issues with your truck?


My biggest fear is when I die my wife will sell my guns for what I told her they cost.
 
Posts: 6653 | Location: Wasilla, Alaska | Registered: 22 February 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Snowwolfe,

I have a 2013, just turned 120,000 miles. No issues except for a blow off valve sensor with 25,000. But I'm also pretty anal with maintenance, oil changes and such. I tow a 5th wheel camper thats 10,000lbs loaded, for 20,000 of the total mileage and does fine with max tow package 3:73 gears, E rated Michelins, roadmaster active suspension. However, I know some have had problems with ecoboost, I think with all vehicles its a matter of being lucky and getting a good one from the start.
 
Posts: 33 | Registered: 02 August 2010Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
My nephew who has been a ford mechanic for 25 years told me that the ecoboost engine has been around for some time, it was used in the hi performance Taurus, they just tweaked it to be compatible to what a truck engine needs to do. As far as troubles mainly owner induced by improper maintenance.

I also read a comparison between what engine is better in the ford, the 5.0 litter V* or the eco boost. The test indicated the eco was better for towing and 5.0 was better for hauling heavier loads in the bed


NRA Life Member, ILL Rifle Assoc Life Member, Navy
 
Posts: 2300 | Location: Monee, Ill. USA | Registered: 11 April 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I wrestled on what engine to go with, the 3.5 eco or the V8. In the end the Eco won because it delivered all its torque around 2,500 rpm compared to the V8's 3,850 rpm. Plus the eco was rated about 3 miles higher in both city and highway driving.


My biggest fear is when I die my wife will sell my guns for what I told her they cost.
 
Posts: 6653 | Location: Wasilla, Alaska | Registered: 22 February 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of TCLouis
posted Hide Post
gsganzer
With that much gasoline in the oil it may be acting as a solvent as much as a lubricant.



Don't limit your challenges . . .
Challenge your limits


 
Posts: 4267 | Location: TN USA | Registered: 17 March 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
the main criticism of the full size big 3 trucks is are they too expensive and too big to park.



and there is absolutely NO reason they have to be that way.

Grizz


Indeed, no human being has yet lived under conditions which, considering the prevailing climates of the past, can be regarded as normal. John E Pfeiffer, The Emergence of Man

Those who can't skin, can hold a leg. Abraham Lincoln

Only one war at a time. Abe Again.
 
Posts: 4211 | Location: Alta. Canada | Registered: 06 November 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Well, 32,200 miles and my 2016 3.5 L Ecoboost started smoking this past Saturday... blue oil smoke. I'll be visiting the dealership where I bought it this week, anyone want to take bets on what they say it might be and how willing they are to repair it on their dime? A mechanic friend says he figures either the turbo is going bad or a ring is stuck. Pretty good truck otherwise.


Karl Evans

 
Posts: 2924 | Location: Emhouse, Tx | Registered: 03 February 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Looks like a bad motor in my truck and for those of you with the 2.7L motor, look up Ford TSB 17-0007. Lots of trucks affected by this TSB.


Karl Evans

 
Posts: 2924 | Location: Emhouse, Tx | Registered: 03 February 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of jdollar
posted Hide Post
So at that mileage, I assume it is under warranty?


Vote Trump- Putin’s best friend…
To quote a former AND CURRENT Trumpiteer - DUMP TRUMP
 
Posts: 13594 | Location: Georgia | Registered: 28 October 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by jdollar:
So at that mileage, I assume it is under warranty?

Yes, it is, but I suspect they will try to find a way to try and make me pay...their "engine internals specialist" is working on the problem. i imagine he is poring over all of the data in the computer trying to see if I over revved the motor or if it shows I towed more than the rated capacity, or used a tuner of some sort something like that. I'll see in a couple of days.


Karl Evans

 
Posts: 2924 | Location: Emhouse, Tx | Registered: 03 February 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Here is a little something for you ecoboost owners, enter your VIN and see if your particular vehicle is one of those that might be affected under the TSB.

https://owner.ford.com/tools/a...tenance/recalls.html


Karl Evans

 
Posts: 2924 | Location: Emhouse, Tx | Registered: 03 February 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of model7LSS
posted Hide Post
I've got a 13 ecoboost and love it. Only issue I've had was a coolant temp sensor, and then it started doing the ecoboost rattle that trucks built in 2012 until early 13 get after sitting overnight. Has to do with the cam phasers leaking down. I've done enough research on it to write a dissertation but still cannot decide how big of a deal I want to make of it. Blackstone oil analysis says my engine is one of the best 3.5 ecos they have in their database.

Boosted motors are going to have more blow by and fuel in the oil than NA motors. I installed a catch can on my ecoboost to help with this, and also to keep it from spraying sludge back into my motor and potentially caking on the back of the intake valves. It's pretty amazing what that thing pulls out.

I don't get the mileage I thought I would, but then again I drive it pretty hard. If I baby it I can get around 15 in town. 18-19 highway best case. However, I think I need to replace my upstream o2 sensors as I have had an intermittent CEL on the right bank. I have read that replacing o2 sensors and cleaning the three MAP sensors really helps restore MPG and performance if it drops. We will see.

I will definitely be buying another ecoboost.


Auburn University BS '09, DVM '17
 
Posts: 605 | Location: Selma, AL | Registered: 16 January 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of jdollar
posted Hide Post
That mileage is poor, especially for a product that used increased mileage over a V8 as a selling feature. Why pay an extra $750+ premium over a V8 to get at least 10-15% worse mileage?


Vote Trump- Putin’s best friend…
To quote a former AND CURRENT Trumpiteer - DUMP TRUMP
 
Posts: 13594 | Location: Georgia | Registered: 28 October 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by jdollar:
That mileage is poor, especially for a product that used increased mileage over a V8 as a selling feature. Why pay an extra $750+ premium over a V8 to get at least 10-15% worse mileage?


The in city traffic gas mileage is great with the eco boost and the acceleration is a blast. Highway gas mileage has been less than EPA - 21 mpg.

Mike
 
Posts: 13145 | Location: Cocoa Beach, Florida | Registered: 22 July 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of jdollar
posted Hide Post
The above poster has to baby it to get 15mpg in town and 18-19 highway. That sucks.


Vote Trump- Putin’s best friend…
To quote a former AND CURRENT Trumpiteer - DUMP TRUMP
 
Posts: 13594 | Location: Georgia | Registered: 28 October 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by jdollar:
The above poster has to baby it to get 15mpg in town and 18-19 highway. That sucks.


It's not the engine but the pre-aluminum truck that weighs 1000 pounds more.

The eco boost and New aluminum body go well together.

Mike
 
Posts: 13145 | Location: Cocoa Beach, Florida | Registered: 22 July 2010Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2 3 4 5 6  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia