THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM LEVER ACTION RIFLE FORUM

Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
1886 with Lyman 66WB question
 Login/Join
 
one of us
posted
Also asked this q over on leverguns do you need a taller front sight when you fit a Lyman 66WB?
 
Posts: 787 | Location: Melbourne, Australia | Registered: 15 January 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of arkypete
posted Hide Post
I'm having the same site put on my 1886. I've pondered the same question.
I'm betting that it depends on the bullet weight and velocity that that your ammo generates.
Jim
 
Posts: 6173 | Location: Richmond, Virginia | Registered: 17 September 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Arky I had a reply by user MikeD on leverguns he said he has got a 1886el and did not have to change the front sight.
 
Posts: 787 | Location: Melbourne, Australia | Registered: 15 January 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of arkypete
posted Hide Post
I'm not planning on changing the front site, if I have to change the site it's no big deal.
When I installed a Smith ladder/Buckhorn on my model 92 I needed to install a higher front site or shoot at things at 150 yards only. I ordered in a couple different heights and installed the lower one.
The guys at Brownell's were very helpful even for a piddling sale like two front sites.
Jim
 
Posts: 6173 | Location: Richmond, Virginia | Registered: 17 September 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
arkypete,

Do you like that Smith ladder sight?

I am going back and forth between the Smith and a Marble Tang for my 1886. I am wanting enough elevation for real long range shooting. I have enough with the factory rear for 200 yards, but for fun, I like shooting at big rocks at a lot farther than 200...
 
Posts: 426 | Location: Alpine, WY | Registered: 01 November 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of arkypete
posted Hide Post
Trapdoor
I like the Smith ladder sight for the Winchester 92. The buckhorn part is very thick so it's easier to use the usual thin buckhorns.
I doubt that I'd ever take a shot with the 92 45 Colt much beyond 100 yards, considering I'm using a 300 grain cast bullet.
The Smith sight is very well made and hardened. The metal in the sight is harder then the steel in your barrel. I got a buddy to drill and tap for an Allen headed set screw to hold the sight in place.
Jim
 
Posts: 6173 | Location: Richmond, Virginia | Registered: 17 September 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of MADDOG
posted Hide Post
Arkypete, What is your 300 gr. load your talking about here. I am working with some 300 cast in 45LC and need a good bit of info. Thanks maddog


Joshua 24:15
www.teamfaithfull.net /
My granddaughter
"Multitudes loose the sight of that which is, by setting their eyes on that which is not".
 
Posts: 1899 | Location: Alaska | Registered: 03 May 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Jim Z.
posted Hide Post
I have a Lyman 66WB on my 1886. The front sight is fine. I'm having a Williams FP-71 installed on my 1886 SRC. I'll let you know how that works. It may fit the 1886 better than the Lyman,



*we band of 45-70ers*
Whiskey for my men & beer for my horses!



Malon Labe!
 
Posts: 235 | Location: Oregon Territory | Registered: 16 November 2007Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of arkypete
posted Hide Post
0
quote:
Originally posted by MADDOG:
Arkypete, What is your 300 gr. load your talking about here. I am working with some 300 cast in 45LC and need a good bit of info. Thanks maddog


Maddog
I'm using Saeco 300 gas checked bullets.
I'm very happy with 20 grains of H110.
I think of this load as 45-70 lite.

Jim


"Whensoever the General Government assumes undelegated powers, its acts are unauthoritative, void, and of no force." --Thomas Jefferson

 
Posts: 6173 | Location: Richmond, Virginia | Registered: 17 September 2000Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia