one of us
| Know two hard core waterfowlers that are on their 3rd and 4th seasons with them. Very pleased. I still have some serious sticker shock but am tempted. You might check the Simms. You get a lot more mobility and a little less weight with a stocking foot/wading boot combo. I have the G4 zip front, 5th season, lots of Alaska miles. Pretty bombproof. Enough miles that I sent them in for new booties as they were showing abrasion in season 3. |
| |
One of Us
| Thanks, Crane. I've heard a lot of Simms, as well. How do you find the wading boots holding up for land travel? Comfortable? |
| Posts: 1457 | Location: New England | Registered: 22 February 2010 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| Their Flyweight Wading Boots are really good and durable. Have a Vibram sole. The laces are not durable so have a spare set. On the size, I go one up. I have one pair that is set up with the studs and cleats. You might ask your outfitter if this is needed. Tradeoff is a bit more noise and some folks don't want them in their boats, particularly fiberglass. But they sure are nice on the slick spots. |
| |
One of Us
| I would not get the Sitka waders. Why? I was at a duck camp last December and there were perhaps 2 dozen waders in the mud room - most different brands. Only two were leaky - Sitka. I had some Chinesium ones from Amazon for <$100. They were awesome. If you want premium, I'd get Simms. Caddis is a good option as well, value priced.
"Evil is powerless if the good are unafraid" -- Ronald Reagan
"Ignorance of The People gives strength to totalitarians."
Want to make just about anything work better? Keep the government as far away from it as possible, then step back and behold the wonderment and goodness.
|
| Posts: 3084 | Location: Austin, Texas | Registered: 05 April 2006 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| It depends on how much you value comfort Most pros choose Simms for a reason Patagonia are not bad either Anyone who claims the 30-06 is ineffective has either not tried one, or is unwittingly commenting on their own marksmanship Phil Shoemaker Alaska Master guide FAA Master pilot NRA Benefactor www.grizzlyskinsofalaska.com |
| Posts: 4224 | Location: Bristol Bay | Registered: 24 April 2004 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| Brandon I would stick with ankle fit Lacrosse hip waders, I would be way over heated if I wore chest waders on a hunt like yours, plus I just feel much more agile in hip waders. Hope you have a great hunt. |
| |
one of us
| Simms makes waist high waders. Which are no heavier or bulky than pants. Another option, if you are not worried about your butt getting wet, are Frogg Togg or Chota goretex hip waders. Anyone who claims the 30-06 is ineffective has either not tried one, or is unwittingly commenting on their own marksmanship Phil Shoemaker Alaska Master guide FAA Master pilot NRA Benefactor www.grizzlyskinsofalaska.com |
| Posts: 4224 | Location: Bristol Bay | Registered: 24 April 2004 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| Skip Sitka. Mine are 3 years old. I have worn them maybe 3 times. I store them indoors, hung properly. Put them on last week and got 2 wet feet. |
| Posts: 151 | Location: NC | Registered: 11 September 2007 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| Thank you all for the input. I'll take a look at the Simms pants and boots and the Lacrosse hip waders and discuss with the outfitter in Nashville in February. |
| Posts: 1457 | Location: New England | Registered: 22 February 2010 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| So, an interesting new bit of advice I got on this:
I purchased a pair of Simms G3 Guide stockingfoot waders this year. Prior to buying boots, I spoke with the outfitter at SCI and they suggested I buy a pair of XtraTuff boots 1 size too large, cut holes above the sole in the side of the rubber so they can drain, and wear those over the waders in place of wading boots. They claimed better traction on slippery rocks in the streams with the XtraTuffs over wading boots. Anyone have experience or thoughts on this? |
| Posts: 1457 | Location: New England | Registered: 22 February 2010 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| quote: Originally posted by M.Shy: How about take your skivvies off and toughened it up?
I'm not sure who you are or what rock you crawled out from under, but you seem to love spewing drivel all over this forum. Perhaps thinking you're humoring others? I'll patiently await reasonable and helpful responses from others I respect here. |
| Posts: 1457 | Location: New England | Registered: 22 February 2010 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| Don't know about Alaska but I have waded the Texas Gulf coast a lot. If there is sand on the bottom you do not want holes in your wading boots! You will end up with boots full of sand. Sand will eat holes in the wader booties! |
| Posts: 769 | Location: South Central Texas | Registered: 29 August 2014 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| Have seen the Xtras deployed as Brandon suggests. It's a good solution for traction. Can be a little hard to get them on and off. |
| |
One of Us
| Thanks, guys. Live Oak - I had the same concerns of stuff getting into the bottom of the boots and being at least uncomfortable if not wet.
I ordered a set of the XtraTuf's and I'm going to try them out this spring. Have a decent stream to cross on my usual turkey hunting property. I ordered them 2 sizes large, we'll see how much water they hold and if I can't sufficiently tip my feet/leg up enough to drain them without cutting holes in them. |
| Posts: 1457 | Location: New England | Registered: 22 February 2010 |
IP
|
|
one of us
| Another tip for the Extra Tuffs- you could spray a little PAM or facsimile on your foot before slipping the boots on. Works. |
| |