One of Us
| That was me; I wanted to duplicate what Remington did on the M720. I guess it makes the receiver weaker, theoretically. I ain't worried about it. Remington did not seem to think it mattered. |
| | |
new member
| Would a higher pressure round change your mind? |
| | | Posts: 19 | Location: Missouri | Registered: 20 June 2012 | 
IP
|
|
One of Us
| Are we talking about the bulge on the right side, like the 1903 has? What's this for anyhow? |
| | | Posts: 1138 | Location: Washington State | Registered: 07 September 2005 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| quote: Originally posted by montea6b:
Are we talking about the bulge on the right side, like the 1903 has? What's this for anyhow?
To thicken the side for the extractor cut out. ADam
______________________
Ammo, you always need more.
|
| | | Posts: 463 | Location: Dresden, Ohio | Registered: 09 January 2012 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| A higher pressure round? It was a 375 H&H. No concern to me. What round do you want to put on one? |
| | |
one of us
| OK. Not that I would have that done to a M-1917 or an 03' Springfield!!!! At the risk of being severely flamed, M-1898's don't have the "bulge" I think we are referring to!!!l
May the wind be in your face and the sun at your back.
P. Mark Stark
|
| | | Posts: 1323 | Location: San Antonio, Texas | Registered: 04 March 2003 |
IP
|
|
One of Us
| The 98 Mauser ring is big all over; remember it was the 93 Mauser that we copied for the Springfield.
I figured that if Remington did it on the 720, it was ok to do. Which it was. |
| | |
One of Us
| No flaming from me, I was thinking the same thing. And it's not even on the left side... |
| | | Posts: 1138 | Location: Washington State | Registered: 07 September 2005 |
IP
|
|
