The Accurate Reloading Forums
Enfield 1917 question

This topic can be found at:
https://forums.accuratereloading.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/7971019521/m/8541014702

15 January 2015, 03:06
cantshootalick
Enfield 1917 question
A couple years ago I saw an Enfield worked over by a custom riflesmith which had the boss on the front of the receiver ground away. Any thoughts on this practice?
15 January 2015, 03:36
dpcd
That was me; I wanted to duplicate what Remington did on the M720. I guess it makes the receiver weaker, theoretically. I ain't worried about it. Remington did not seem to think it mattered.
15 January 2015, 03:47
cantshootalick
Would a higher pressure round change your mind?
15 January 2015, 03:59
montea6b
Are we talking about the bulge on the right side, like the 1903 has? What's this for anyhow?
15 January 2015, 04:37
ab_bentley
quote:
Originally posted by montea6b:
Are we talking about the bulge on the right side, like the 1903 has? What's this for anyhow?


To thicken the side for the extractor cut out.

ADam


______________________

Ammo, you always need more.
15 January 2015, 05:27
dpcd
A higher pressure round? It was a 375 H&H. No concern to me. What round do you want to put on one?
15 January 2015, 05:27
30 Caliber Mag Fan
OK. Not that I would have that done to a M-1917 or an 03' Springfield!!!!

At the risk of being severely flamed, M-1898's don't have the "bulge" I think we are referring to!!!l


May the wind be in your face and the sun at your back.

P. Mark Stark
15 January 2015, 05:44
dpcd
The 98 Mauser ring is big all over; remember it was the 93 Mauser that we copied for the Springfield.
I figured that if Remington did it on the 720, it was ok to do. Which it was.
15 January 2015, 05:47
montea6b
No flaming from me, I was thinking the same thing. And it's not even on the left side...