THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM CUSTOM RIFLE FORUM

Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Inletting issue- cracked wood
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
posted
I have up for sale a 338 Win.Mag. on the 'Classifieds' and mention finding a crack behind the magazine and trigger.....in the wood section that doesn't have a lot of wood. (please check out the rifle pictures-click on the 338 picture and more will appear.) How big of an issue is this? Of course it shouldn't happen but I recall someone saying some factory guns NOW don't have any wood in the area. I'd need to get a trusted guy to resolve this but I don't know any locals off the top of my head in Boise, Id.
 
Posts: 25 | Location: 2407 Regan Ave. Boise, Id. | Registered: 20 August 2012Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
My Sako L61R Finnbear .338 has been cracked through that section since before I got it in 1979. Shoots like a dream. I just re-barreled it to .375 AI and thought about fixing it while rebedding, but think I will just let it slide.
 
Posts: 179 | Location: South of Anchorage | Registered: 21 January 2012Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Well thanks, that's good to know but I'm too anal for my own good and thought the crack would be a minus to a buyer. Guess I leave it alone.
 
Posts: 25 | Location: 2407 Regan Ave. Boise, Id. | Registered: 20 August 2012Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Alberta Canuck
posted Hide Post
As with anything else, it depends on the buyer. Many buyers would consider the crack a definite minus....or they would at least tell you they do, to help in haggling the price down, if nothing else.

As you know it is there, though, I think that carries a moral obligation to tell all prospective buyers about it before taking their money.

Personally, I have had a couple of hunting rifles which split that area completely, so I just removed the split section and still continue to use them. They still seem to work fine and shoot as accurately as ever. If they were heavy recoiling rifles, I'd probably have put in a "through-bolt".

Some rifles were designed to have full contact between the back of the magazine and the stock...apparently to help distribute recoil absorption. Others are designed to have zero contact between the back of the magazine and the stock.

I've never seen the results of a scientifically controlled valid and reliable test to determine if either approach clearly and demonstrably works better.

(That doesn't mean I haven't read claims of superiority for one or the other. I have, for both. But claims aren't scientifically tested proof.)
 
Posts: 9685 | Location: Cave Creek 85331, USA | Registered: 17 August 2001Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia