THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM MILITARY FORUM

Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
FAREWELL MA DUCE! WELCOME LW50MG!
 Login/Join
 
COOL
One of Us
posted
quote:
http://defense-update.com/news.../news1505_lw05mg.htm

General Dynamics Armament and Technical Products (GDATP) received a $9 million U.S. Army contract to develop a lightweight .50 Caliber (12.7mm) machine gun (LW50MG) weapon system. The new lightweight weapon will end the 75 years era dominated by the Browning M2HB heavy machine gun (nicknamed 'Ma Duce') crew served weapon, used for vehicle, ship, aircraft and portable applications. The new weapon is different from the XM312 which was previously evaluated by the Army. It is significantly lighter and has less recoil than the current M2HB.



The new machine gun is expected to weigh about 53 pounds (with ground mount system) - 75 pounds less than a combat-ready 'Ma Duce' (128 lbs). The LW50MG has 70 percent less recoil, which enables Soldiers to use weapon magnification sights they can put their eyes on, which was unthinkable and potentially painful, with the M2. Therefore, the new weapon is expected to be more accurate and lethal in combat.

The newcrew served weapon will be produced at the company's Saco facility. Once the LW50MG is deployed, all vehicles that mount the M2 will be able to mount the new system. Tests have been successfully conducted mounting the system to the Stryker Combat Vehicle and the Common Remotely Operated Weapon Station (CROWS). "Our Lightweight .50 Caliber machine gun represents a new generation of weapon systems," said Robert Cavoretto, senior program manager at GDATP.

The Army has recently issued a requirement for a lightweight .50 caliber machine gun. The Special Operations Command (SOCOM) also has a vehicle requirement for a lightweight/ low recoil weapon, but is also looking to expand use of the weapon for dismounted units. The LW50MG will not replace all M2HBs in service, but will offer a potential alternative to satisfy the needs of those three services in one package. The new weapon is expected to be ready for fielding by the end of Fiscal Year 2012, or sooner based on Army funding priorities. Light units, such as the 82nd Airborne Division, the 101st Airborne Division (Air Assault) and SOCOM forces are likely to be first to receive the LW50MG.



 
Posts: 56912 | Location: GUNSHINE STATE | Registered: 05 October 2003Reply With Quote
Rub Line
One of Us
Picture of Rub Line
posted Hide Post
Interesting. Barrel looks like a 1919 barrel, pretty skinny for a 50 cal automatic. I guess I never considered the ma'duce to have excessive recoil either,(when mounted on a tripod). I'm sure the new weapon is great, but I hardly consider the M2 to be broken, heavy as it is.


-----------------------------------------------------


Do not answer a fool according to his folly, or you yourself will be just like him. Proverbs 26-4


National Rifle Association Life Member

 
Posts: 1992 | Location: WI | Registered: 28 September 2007Reply With Quote
buckeyeshooter
one of us
Picture of buckeyeshooter
posted Hide Post
Hard to replace a battle proven piece of history. The deuce is still tops in my book.
 
Posts: 5728 | Location: Ohio | Registered: 02 April 2003Reply With Quote
mstarling
one of us
posted Hide Post
We'll see how this one holds up in real life. There are lots of M2s around, and I doubt that we'll forget how to make them if the new fella is found to have weaknesses!

Them's mighty damn big shoes to fill!


Mike

--------------
DRSS, Womper's Club, NRA Life Member/Charter Member NRA Golden Eagles ...
Knifemaker, http://www.mstarling.com
 
Posts: 6199 | Location: Charleston, WV | Registered: 31 August 2002Reply With Quote
homebrewer
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Somethin' tells me it just ain't gonna hold up. Kids is gonna die because of this thing...
 
Posts: 16534 | Location: Between my computer and the head... | Registered: 03 March 2008Reply With Quote
anukpuk
One of Us
posted Hide Post
must have a carbon fiber bbl, does it use the same cartridge?


If your gonna be dumb, you gotta be tuff.
 
Posts: 399 | Location: S.E. Alaska | Registered: 01 January 2007Reply With Quote
enfieldspares
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Somethin' tells me it just ain't gonna hold up. Kids is gonna die because of this thing..


That rear 'scope device looks as if it'll get bent or knocked pretty quickly!

US machine gun design is pretty rubbish if the M60 is anything to go by that's for sure!

And how exactly do you change zero on optical sights mounted on the rear of the gun when you change barrels?

Same problem as the M60 not having the ability to zero each individual barrel on the foresight?

Either the No 2 has got to remember and apply the correct zero when the barrel is changed...or you end up with a "one size fits all barrel changes" zero.

Which rather negates the point of having an optical sight in the first place?
 
Posts: 6824 | Location: United Kingdom | Registered: 18 November 2007Reply With Quote
Eric
One of Us
Picture of Eric
posted Hide Post
We still have plenty of "Ma Duces" made by AC Spark Plug and other contractors during WW II. The majority of the problem is stupid soldiers that won't learn their weapon and properly adjust the head space and timing.

This is typical of the Army of today. Instead of training soldiers correctly, they would rather spend money for another "disposable" weapons system.

Eric

COB Adder, Iraq


"We must all hang together, or assuredly we shall all hang separately."
Benjamin Franklin, July 4 1776
Lost once in the shuffle, member since 2000.
 
Posts: 199 | Location: Northwest Oregon | Registered: 05 January 2004Reply With Quote
buckshot
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Eric:
We still have plenty of "Ma Duces" made by AC Spark Plug and other contractors during WW II. The majority of the problem is stupid soldiers that won't learn their weapon and properly adjust the head space and timing.

This is typical of the Army of today. Instead of training soldiers correctly, they would rather spend money for another "disposable" weapons system.

Eric

COB Adder, Iraq


You are 100% correct. There is a report out there with my name on it stating exactly that (except for the disposable part). I also blasted them for being too stingy with ammo and excessively dependent upon video training substitutes. Yeah, nothing like showing kids what a blown up weapon could do before actually conducting range training! Anyway, I concluded that there was nothing wrong with a weapon system that had a proven track record dating back 75 years and that the easy fix was in fact internal and minimal in cost. For my efforts I was presented with another training video for all to see and sent back to work.

P.S. I had people who were using 90wt gear lube to lubricate their M2 as well as others who would use nothing as it made for easy cleaning after convoy ops. 66% of our weapon "problems" were due to maintenance, or lack thereof as it were.
P.S.S. Do you remember the withdrawal of older lots of Mk19 ammunition? Same shit, different story...
 
Posts: 3889 | Registered: 12 May 2005Reply With Quote
homebrewer
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Looking at it again, I see the top cover looks cheaply made, too...
 
Posts: 16534 | Location: Between my computer and the head... | Registered: 03 March 2008Reply With Quote
impingement
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
P.S. I had people who were using 90wt gear lube to lubricate their M2 as well as others who would use nothing as it made for easy cleaning after convoy ops. 66% of our weapon "problems" were due to maintenance, or lack thereof as it were.


I agree, Don't forget the ever popular patch stuck down the muzzle to keep the road dust out. The only thing worse than poor maintenance and training was the occasional individual that could F...up an anvil with a rubber mallet. There is just no way to allow for troops of that caliber. The phrase "Preventative Maintenance Checks and Services" (PMCS) quickly changed to "Poorly Maintained Crappy Stuff" when the unit's leadership was more worried about making life easy and looking good than being prepared to actually perform their mission. Silly me, I thought they actually wrote those manuals to help us learn!
 
Posts: 222 | Location: Central Iowa | Registered: 16 May 2009Reply With Quote
tendrams
One of Us
Picture of tendrams
posted Hide Post
quote:
It is significantly lighter and has less recoil than the current M2HB.



Well ain't that just a miracle of physics!

Roll Eyes
 
Posts: 2472 | Registered: 06 July 2008Reply With Quote
Matt Norman
one of us
Picture of Matt Norman
posted Hide Post
There were those who resisted the replacement of the single shot trapdoors for the 'wasteful' '03 Springfields. And the USMC resisted the conversion to the MI Garands into the early WWII years. Then came the M-14's, and the various M-16's (back in the mid 1960's).

I'm an Army Dad and my son is at the pointy end of the spear. WIA for that matter (2003). Not all changes are good but I'm glad that they are at least attempting to equip and fight the next war, not the last one.

I'm glad he's not packing a '03-A3. And I recall him saying headspacing a Ma-Deuce is a pain. Hopefully they have addressed that.

And he's heard a number of round fired in anger and made his bones.
 
Posts: 3301 | Location: Western Slope Colorado, USA | Registered: 17 August 2001Reply With Quote
crbutler
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Isn't the reason behind the variable headspace on the M2HB more to deal with ammo inconsistencies and having play in the mechanism for overall optimal reliability in the weapon system?

I worry that we will have the new MG which will have problems, and the Army will refuse to admit it. Look how long it took and how many men were killed before they got the M16 to work as well as it does? Even the M1903 had a bunch of issues (rod bayonet?) Not even considering the M60. If the cartridge has not made a change, I'm not sure the weapon changing will come up with any real improvement. I hope I'm wrong, but I'm not sure.

I am a bit suspicious about anything that our politically invested high command comes up with. The XM25 looks like a boondoggle, the replacement of a 50 mg to make it lighter, when it seems that we need to make the standard infantry weapon a better performer (a better performer with FMJ than a .223 can't be hard to come up with, although I will admit it all depends on what we are looking for) and whoever decided a 9X19 should replace the 1911 was a disgrace- everyone admits that it was a decision made for political reasons.
 
Posts: 11323 | Location: Minnesota USA | Registered: 15 June 2007Reply With Quote
<Andrew cempa>
posted
Every M2 gunner and a-gunner should know each barrel and it's respective headspace setting. Timing is done as a matter of pre-fire checks, then left alone until major maintenance is required. A solid NCO taught our whole company (c 1983) how to sort barrels among guns so that each gun had barrels that were as identical in HS as possible, then even timing was quite a moot point once you set it for your barrel(s) Of course, marking barrels to guns was a given.

Ref. change of zero-remember the MG is an area weapon, fired with "burst on target" control methods. The optic is more for observing impact than sniping a turd, but in SS mode, an optic is very nice!

The M2HB will be around in our units for a long time to come. I recently saw an improved carrier that eliminated manual HS adjustments for the ol' gal as well.
 
Reply With Quote
brad may
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Saw a Thia merc one night open up with a 50 that wasn't pinned to the mount on an ACAV. Abought beat him to death when it came unglued. He couldn't let go and it kept beating him in the chest. Broke all his ribs but he lived, don't know how.
 
Posts: 408 | Location: morgan city, LA | Registered: 26 February 2005Reply With Quote
Dark Continent
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by crbutler:
whoever decided a 9X19 should replace the 1911 was a disgrace- everyone admits that it was a decision made for political reasons.


My thoughts exactly and just what this reminds me of. Sounds like nothing more than a boondoggle for GD at taxpayer expense.
 
Posts: 307 | Registered: 23 December 2009Reply With Quote
homebrewer
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Matt Norman says
quote:
I'm an Army Dad and my son is at the pointy end of the spear.

May God protect him and bring him home soon, safe and sound...
 
Posts: 16534 | Location: Between my computer and the head... | Registered: 03 March 2008Reply With Quote
Rodney H.{500Jeffery}
One of Us
posted Hide Post
From the picture the LW50MG appears to be lightly constructed, guess thats the point. My concerns are how well is it going to take the heat of continued, steady use in a dirty environment. Is it built tough enough to be dropped from the side of a vehicle and still be useable. The M2 is/was considered the heavy machine gun and used in more applications than I can think of at the moment. As mentioned in the article above the military is looking at a lighter alternative for light forces or maybe they should have said non-mechanized units. The M2HBMG will be a tough one to fully replace.
Rodney.



 
Posts: 1049 | Location: Cut-n-Shoot, Texas USA | Registered: 15 January 2006Reply With Quote
ddrhook
One of Us
posted Hide Post
It appears to be made of alloys or composits. kinda look plastic?? I have my hope it better than most gverment improvements bewildered
 
Posts: 3818 | Location: kenya, tanzania,RSA,Uganda or Ethophia depending on day of the week | Registered: 27 May 2009Reply With Quote
Phil N
One of Us
Picture of Phil N
posted Hide Post
This is the same Saco factory that is now making M2s. They should be ashamed at their quality control.

Parts that don't fit and are FORCED in at the factory. Pieces are too tight, too loose or break quickly under normal operations.

Yeah! I want THAT company building a new weapons system that our soldiers' lives depend on. Mad

edited for spelling and grammar.


US Army 1977-1998
 
Posts: 82 | Location: Carthage, NY | Registered: 23 August 2008Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia

 

image linking to 100 Top Hunting Sites