THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM CANADIAN HUNTING FORUM

Page 1 2 

Moderators: Canuck
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Hand Gun Hunting
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
posted Hide Post
You had a decent post going Dewey, up until that last sentence.

What the various handgun "games" do is increase the number of handgun owners in Canada considerably.
You forget that if it wasn't for the shooting sports, the CSSA, there would be no legally owned handguns in Canada.

An attitude like yours is why this country will never have different handgun laws.
United we stand,divided we fall.
 
Posts: 99 | Location: SK,Canada | Registered: 25 March 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I agree with Dewey. Canadians are certainly entitled to their own laws on handguns and wildlife resources and everything else Canadian.

If Canada does not want handgun hunting that is Canada's right as a soverign nation to do so.

And if Canada wants to allow more licenses to foreign hunters than their own hunters, than that is Canada's right as a soverign nation to do so.

But I feel sorry for the law abiding Canadian citizens who would like to hunt with a handgun. And I feel sorry for the law abiding Canadian hunters who would like to hunt big game every year but cannot get a license becasue some foreign guy got one.
Probably becasue I would not like to live under those limits myself.

But Dewey, you gotta take it easy when you hear something you don't like from one guy from America. Take it easy or your going to have a stroke.

Where does this fight stand? Is any progress being made on these issues? Or are they issues only to a few as compared to the entire population of Canada.
 
Posts: 7090 | Registered: 11 January 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
This is what I like about AR you can say what you feel. Sorry I asked this Question.
To generalize about a Nation ( American's )
is not thinking Clearly. Blame us because of the laws set fourth in Canada is apionated to say the least.
I have been lucky enough to hnt Canada 5 times never met a Canadian that I did't like
including the Edmond Chaper of the Hells Angles
( Another Story). I went thru a Corse of Fire Arm Safty for Canada and was issued a Fires acustion License, Back ground Check and Finger Printing thats how I get my fire arms across into Canada. I do want the law say You Can't You Can't.
 
Posts: 1462 | Location: maryland / Clayton Delaware | Registered: 16 December 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Blaser93, I gave you a simple and correct reply to assist you and prevent your coming to Canada and inadvertently breaking our laws. I did so as a gesture of one shooter/hunter helping another and THEN the comments started.

I have not, do not and will not say that "Americans" ARE responsible for our current firearms legislation here in Canada. What I HAVE said is very simply that it will NOT help our situation to have foreign interference in it, American or even Martian.

Unless, you have lived here extensively, you will not understand the very major differences between Canadian and American culture and our respective understandings of "freedom". So, it is both pointless and intrusive for an American to lecture us on "freedom" as it also is for a Canadian to do that to you.

Generalizing about Canada by Americans happens on AR constantly, far more than any Canuck comments upon the USA. So, relax, your query brought out some valid and useful comments and these may prevent an American from losing a valued handgun at the border.

I don't like the laws here anymore than other posters do, BUT, it IS Canadian LAW and must be respected.
 
Posts: 2366 | Location: "Land OF Shining Mountains"- British Columbia, Canada | Registered: 20 August 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I must say, after talking to several Canadian IPSC competitors, and IDPA types, there is quite a bit of this up north there.

I will state up front that I will obey any and all rules of a nation that I am visiting, even if I feel they are pretty ridiculous.

Having said that, as a US citizen (BTW one of my pet peeves is the near universal use of American to perjoratively identify US citizens... Canadians are Americans too...) WE are worse than the Canadians, Mexicans, and darn near any of the African nations about letting a law abiding foreign national bring a gun into the US. I have had less hassle with bringing a high cap pistol into Canada that I likely would have (with similar law enforcement contact) bringing one into California or NYC.

I may also point out that Canada has been giving the US a lot of pretty good inhabitants as well (I personally know 10 Canadian MD's here, of which, only one is a pain.)

Dewey, perhaps you would like to explain to me why so many of your fellow citizens who get a good education leave as soon as they can arrange a US Green Card? Is it because we are a bunch of selfish, egotistical POA's who cannot be trusted to know what is fair?
 
Posts: 11283 | Location: Minnesota USA | Registered: 15 June 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I am not certain exactly what you are on about; what does the exchange of medical doctors between the USA and Canada have to do with this issue? It seems that your concern here has little to do with shooting and is concerned with an attempt to "one up" me for my political position on Canadian gun legislation.....yawn.

As to the term, "American", see the Second Edition, The New Oxford AMERICAN Dictionary, pp.50, on the left side of the columns. I suggest reading this VERY carefully and THEN, take up your specious argument with them.

I have no idea as to what a ...POA... is, so, you will have to answer that one for yourself.
 
Posts: 2366 | Location: "Land OF Shining Mountains"- British Columbia, Canada | Registered: 20 August 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Dewey:


I have no idea as to what a ...POA... is, so, you will have to answer that one for yourself.


POA- The letter "A" is very close to the letter "S" on a keyboard, ie. POS. I'm sure you know what that stands for, probably been called that more than once. Smiler
 
Posts: 99 | Location: SK,Canada | Registered: 25 March 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Goes to show I shouldn't post while trying to do multiple things. Sorry.

My point is that both sides here are being pretty bullheaded.

I have brought a handgun in to Canada. Yes it was to shoot a pistol match, not handgun hunting, but it shows that you don't know your own laws all that well, Dewey. The Canadian authorities were very friendly, and did not treat me like some sort of leper. If you follow their rules, it really goes pretty easily. This was pre- 9/11, so it may have changed since. The US side was even easier, as they just waved me through, at that time. I do know that Canadian citizens trying to do the same thing to the US generally do not have as easy a time of it, especially with the permit process. Maybe the Canadian government is more efficient than the US, I guess.

As to the use of American, I understand fully that in common usage, American means US, but that is the same way that all kinds of things in the language are done (Clips vs magazines, bullets vs cartridges...etc.) Once upon a time, people considered their words carefully and selected them with due course. Obviously, I am not one of them, even though I try.

My point regarding the Canadian MD's is that you keep saying various vicious things about "Americans" (Fine, I will use your term...) and seem to indicate that a substantial portion of Canadians think like you. If that is the case, why do so many of your countrymen voluntarily associate with such a cesspool? Honestly, I know that most Canadians don't have as much dislike of their southern cousins (thank god) as you do.

Honestly answer the point, which is worse, a vicious hatred of another country, or plain ignorance. I will grant that most "Americans" are quite ignorant of Canadian culture, and Canadian law. That's bad, but excusable. You seem to not be so ignorant of US law and customs, yet you spew venom at the US. While I have heard some of your arguments about things being done in Canada, and can see your point and why you are upset, (Governmental favoritism towards outfitters allowing out of country hunters, US protectionism on lumber, etc.) you really loose me when you start being anti-US, instead of anti politician.

I suspect that a lot of your "hated American hunters" probably have more in common with you than the majority of your fellow Canadian citizens (I suspect that the average guy from downtown Vancouver would tell you to go to you know where). At least they believe citizens should own firearms, hunt, and (at least the majority) believe that locals should have better access to government lands than foreigners (take a look at all the US states behavior towards "out of state" hunters). You would likely be getting some support from us if you didn't come across as some kind of Canadian or British Columbian version of a militant fascist.

As to POA, sprayandpray was right.

Canada is a great land and has a lot to be proud of. In may ways, they do things in just as good a way, if not better than many other countries. Canada has been a good ally to the US, at least when it was something they felt was in their own interest (as it should be) and sometimes even when it is not in their interest they have stepped up and helped the US anyway. I am grateful for what the Canadian people have done for us, and while I don't always agree with your country's politics, I will also state you collectively have the right to run Canada as you wish. I just hope, and suspect, that you are not typical of Canadians, Dewey.

If we shared a campfire, we would get along fine (at least until you announced your hatred of me for my country alone...)

Does this make more sense?
 
Posts: 11283 | Location: Minnesota USA | Registered: 15 June 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
No, it does not.

For the last time, I do not hate Americans or the USA, is that so difficult to comprehend? I DO find the American attitude toward Canada to be often unacceptable and believe we should govern our responses accordingly.

I have NO issue with ...US protectionism on lumber... and have never posted that I did; I DO have a very strong and negative reaction to the FACT that your nation BROKE THE TREATY you signed with us. The difference here should be obvious and, btw, I choose my words very carefully.

Now, here is the crux of this discussion and it is really quite simple. I DO NOT WANT American involvement in Canadian internal affairs, on guns or ANY issue. The attempts by Canadian firearms owners groups to involve the NRA in our struggle have "backfired" and given the "anti-gun" extremists here in Canada several opportunities to attack rational handgun ownership with considerable success; simply put, it is a tactical error to have US "gun groups" involved here, as I have tried to point out.

What you or any American thinks of me, as in POA, POS or any other slur, blatant or implied, means less than nothing to me. Your comments about people's opinions in Vancouver are baseless and false, I LIVE HERE, my family were among the early pioneers here (1884) and, frankly, I am quite conversant with public opinion here.

I often wonder WHY it is, that so many Americans ALWAYS try to tell other peoples how to do things in their own countries. This tends to alienate people and thus they may comment in rather brusque terms on America/Americans....no wonder. But, given the fascination with promoting their "culture" worldwide that Yankees have, I expect that we will suffer from this for quite some time to come......

There really is NO sound reason to allow Americans to carry guns in Canada and I am against any policy or law that favours this. The LAST thing we need in Canada is a bunch of Yankees packing guns and spewing even more of their typical braggadocio. This does not apply to legal hunting clients and their rifles and shotguns, who are here for only a short time.

Now, this discussion has, IMO, been thoroughly presented here and I have posted my opinions and am tired of it. There is very little more to say and I do not want to waste time in a fracas about the relative merits or lack thereof of Canada and the USA....BTDT.
 
Posts: 2366 | Location: "Land OF Shining Mountains"- British Columbia, Canada | Registered: 20 August 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of jb
posted Hide Post
see the poll I did here to see how many canadians agree with dewey.Note,the only one to completely agree with Dewey,was Dewey.

http://forums.accuratereloadin...7621043/m/2881074021


******************************************************************
SI VIS PACEM PARA BELLUM
***********



 
Posts: 2937 | Location: minnesota | Registered: 26 December 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Where on earth have you read this? Having gone through for a carry permit in recent history for work, the list of folks allowed to carry one for work is very short, and didn't include big game guides.


The guide/outfitter I work with, along with my best buddy, also a guide, have these 'carry' permits. A local member of the local Rod and Gun Club is the 'tester' for the Mounties on these permits. Both of these men are allowed to carry their .44's while tracking wounded game with the wierdly named German/Austrian tracking dogs they both use.


Daryl S.
 
Posts: 169 | Location: Central B.C. | Registered: 27 October 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Yes, I had a nice talk with a GO, MS a couple of weeks ago, on the phone and he mentioned having had the ATC. I would not bother myself, but, I certainly see no reason why a guide should not carry if he/she chooses to.

Daryl, do you work for MS and what is the name of those dogs? I am just getting my big boy Rottweiler into packing and tracking, a damm useful thing in BC hunting.
 
Posts: 2366 | Location: "Land OF Shining Mountains"- British Columbia, Canada | Registered: 20 August 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Daryl S.

The guide/outfitter I work with, along with my best buddy, also a guide, have these 'carry' permits. A local member of the local Rod and Gun Club is the 'tester' for the Mounties on these permits. Both of these men are allowed to carry their .44's while tracking wounded game with the wierdly named German/Austrian tracking dogs they both use.


Odd, as it is illegal to hunt an animal with a handgun.

Not that I'm against it in any way shape or form though.

I bet they have a hard time renewing those permits....One of the criteria now being that you have to have too much equipment to carry a long gun or it is difficult to carry one and require a much shorter firearm....And if you can wound a critter with a rifle, chances are you should be able to finish him with same (in the eyes of the CFC anyway).

But, more power to them if they manage to pull it off.
 
Posts: 38 | Location: Erickson, BC | Registered: 24 August 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Dewey:
No, it does not.

For the last time, I do not hate Americans or the USA, is that so difficult to comprehend? I DO find the American attitude toward Canada to be often unacceptable and believe we should govern our responses accordingly.

By reading your last several posts, I had gained that impression. If I'm wrong, I beg your pardon; but that reenforces my point- you are coming across in that manner. As to the US attitude towards Canada, you do have a point, but your desired response ( NOT all Canadians ) is likely to give you some undesired side effects. How well would some of these communities do with no American dollars in the community? Yes, your products have other markets open to them, and I suspect markets being what they are, if Canadians could get more from another country, they would- as they should.

I have NO issue with ...US protectionism on lumber... and have never posted that I did; I DO have a very strong and negative reaction to the FACT that your nation BROKE THE TREATY you signed with us. The difference here should be obvious and, btw, I choose my words very carefully.

Please tell me where/when we broke a treaty. I'm not saying we didn't, but please educate me, since you know- the name of the treaty, if nothing else so I can look it up.

Now, here is the crux of this discussion and it is really quite simple. I DO NOT WANT American involvement in Canadian internal affairs, on guns or ANY issue. The attempts by Canadian firearms owners groups to involve the NRA in our struggle have "backfired" and given the "anti-gun" extremists here in Canada several opportunities to attack rational handgun ownership with considerable success; simply put, it is a tactical error to have US "gun groups" involved here, as I have tried to point out.

Where did you point that out, sir? All I have read is you saying its illegal for someone to enter Canada with a pistol, which you have subsequently modified your answer, but still you seem to be telling Canadian pistol competitors to not invite anyone to come up and shoot there. I will agree having the US NRA is likely to work poorly in Canada, but if a Canadian organization was using the US NRA's grassroots activism model, it probably would work for you. Different than having the US NRA come up and run a Canadian organization.

What you or any American thinks of me, as in POA, POS or any other slur, blatant or implied, means less than nothing to me. Your comments about people's opinions in Vancouver are baseless and false, I LIVE HERE, my family were among the early pioneers here (1884) and, frankly, I am quite conversant with public opinion here.

Whoa there Tex. Re-read my comment. I called AMERICAN US CITIZENS POS's, not you. Please, if you are going to say I don't make sense, please read what I said. As to my comment on what people in Vancouver think, its like what the average person in LA or San Fransico thinks- its a rural vs. urban thing. I also am quite a bit more conversant in Canadian public opinion than you think I am. Please also read that carefully. I may be wrong in that the majority of Canadians are anti gun, but I know that your urban centers are by majority. If your comments about being in BC in the 1880's is supposed to impress me, it doesn't. Your grandfather might be able to make some statements about 1884, but neither you or I were there. My ancestors have been in the US since the Plymouth colony, and I would no more think I understand or know the mindset of people I don't associate every day in Minneapolis. Please, you need to take a step back and think for a second. Have I even once said that the Canadian people need to run their country as I see fit? Have I said that I have any say in how you vote? Have I said anything negative about Canadians?

I often wonder WHY it is, that so many Americans ALWAYS try to tell other peoples how to do things in their own countries. This tends to alienate people and thus they may comment in rather brusque terms on America/Americans....no wonder. But, given the fascination with promoting their "culture" worldwide that Yankees have, I expect that we will suffer from this for quite some time to come......

I don't think I said we should run your country any way, did I? Actually, you are right, Canada should run itself as the soverign nation it is... And, surprise! it does. What do you think about the Quebecois? Are they Canadian enough?

There really is NO sound reason to allow Americans to carry guns in Canada and I am against any policy or law that favours this. The LAST thing we need in Canada is a bunch of Yankees packing guns and spewing even more of their typical braggadocio. This does not apply to legal hunting clients and their rifles and shotguns, who are here for only a short time.

What do you mean by "carry guns?" I brought a pistol in to Cnada for the lawful, legal purpose of shooting a IPSC match, at the invitation of Canadian citizens, are you denying them the right to associate with others? Is foreign huters hunting in Canada illegal? Nope. I was invited to do that as well. If you are suggesting that a US citizen should not carry a gun for self defense, I could argue the point semantically, but as you have pointed out, its illegal in Canada to carry for self defense, except in some very limited sense. That's fine, I would not expect any right in Canada that a Canadian could not exercise. As I said in my initial post here, I WILL follow the law as it exists locally. Its only the polite thing to do as a guest. Your last sentence is the first time I have seen you admit (in several threads) that you might not refuse admission to the American sportsmen that come to Canada for a visit. Thanks for that change, but it disagrees with your above point- no Americans, no how. Again, have I said anywhere that you could not run your country as you (collectively) see fit? I would also point out that when you are saying that you and a majority of Canadians feel that the US people should stay out of Canada, last I saw, you are a democratic society...Why has it not happened yet?

Now, this discussion has, IMO, been thoroughly presented here and I have posted my opinions and am tired of it. There is very little more to say and I do not want to waste time in a fracas about the relative merits or lack thereof of Canada and the USA....BTDT.
 
Posts: 11283 | Location: Minnesota USA | Registered: 15 June 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Re-read my closing sentence and refrain from any more bullshit, this thread has run it's course. I am NOT interested in further comment on it.
 
Posts: 2366 | Location: "Land OF Shining Mountains"- British Columbia, Canada | Registered: 20 August 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of jb
posted Hide Post
Dewey doesnt have a leg to stand on,and he knows it,thats why he doesnt want to debate it. Roll Eyes


******************************************************************
SI VIS PACEM PARA BELLUM
***********



 
Posts: 2937 | Location: minnesota | Registered: 26 December 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Daryl, do you work for MS and what is the name of those dogs? I am just getting my big boy Rottweiler into packing and tracking, a damm useful thing in BC hunting.


I spent but 3 yrs. in the Force, 20 years in the Corrections Branch and in Forest Revenue since around '95 or 96 - memory's faint with numbers of no consequence. Currently with Foresty, on disability pension. That's me.

Anyway, the dogs have the same colouration as a Rotty or Doberman, but more fine-boned than a Rotty, more houndy than a Doberman. I'll get the name for you.

They are incredible dogs, train well and very instinctive in tracking. They will not track a non-lethally wounded animal - pisses off some of the lousey hunter shots. With arrows, if the wound is not fatal nor crippling, 'our' guides will not kill the animal for the hunter. We've later shot wounded animals, a week or 2 later with other hunters, that were perfectly healed. It's amazing how quickly lethal an arrow is with a proper hit, yet how quickly the animal heals if the arrow does not hit a vital organ. Not so with bullets, of course.


Daryl S.
 
Posts: 169 | Location: Central B.C. | Registered: 27 October 2009Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia