THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM DOUBLE RIFLES FORUM

Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Pre-War British Dbl Rifle?
 Login/Join
 
one of us
posted
Are Cutting Edge Solids and Northfork solids safe (i.e., won't damage the barrel) to shoot in a pre-War British made double rifle? Or should I stick with Woodleigh solids?

Thanks
 
Posts: 1361 | Location: Houston, Texas | Registered: 07 February 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of MikeBurke
posted Hide Post
I have shot both in my 450-400 Boswell. No issues. To me they would be easier on the barrel than a copper and steel jacketed lead bullet.
 
Posts: 2953 | Registered: 26 March 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Bill73
posted Hide Post
I would not hesitate to use North Fork's in any gun,just make sure the size is right for the gun.


DRSS
 
Posts: 2283 | Location: MI | Registered: 20 March 2007Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of MacD37
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Bill73:
I would not hesitate to use North Fork's in any gun,just make sure the size is right for the gun.


I agree with Bill, just slug the barrels of the rifle to make sure it is a standard bore & land before shooting them it the rifle. If it has a standard bore both are safe in the rifle!

..................................................................... tu2


....Mac >>>===(x)===> MacD37, ...and DUGABOY1
DRSS Charter member
"If I die today, I've had a life well spent, for I've been to see the Elephant, and smelled the smoke of Africa!"~ME 1982

Hands of Old Elmer Keith

 
Posts: 14634 | Location: TEXAS | Registered: 08 June 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Mike70560: To me they would be easier on the barrel than a copper and steel jacketed lead bullet.




This was my thought too.....just wanted to confirm it.

Thanks
 
Posts: 1361 | Location: Houston, Texas | Registered: 07 February 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Go to Michael458s B&M site or the Double Rifle Bullet of the Future thread and read about barrel strain tests he and I did. Make you own conclusions on which would be safer.
 
Posts: 2842 | Location: NC | Registered: 08 July 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of jorge
posted Hide Post
Without a doubt, CEBs will be easier on your barrels. Check the data as suggested.


USN (ret)
DRSS Verney-Carron 450NE
Cogswell & Harrison 375 Fl NE
Sabatti Big Five 375 FL Magnum NE
DSC Life Member
NRA Life Member

 
Posts: 7151 | Location: Orange Park, Florida. USA | Registered: 22 March 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by srose:
Go to Michael458s B&M site or the Double Rifle Bullet of the Future thread and read about barrel strain tests he and I did. Make you own conclusions on which would be safer.


Do you known on about which page for the barrel strain test info......there is almost 300 pages total. If not I can probably search it.

Thanks
 
Posts: 1361 | Location: Houston, Texas | Registered: 07 February 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of BrettAKSCI
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by MHC_TX:
Are Cutting Edge Solids and Northfork solids safe (i.e., won't damage the barrel) to shoot in a pre-War British made double rifle? Or should I stick with Woodleigh solids? It's kind of like someone telling me there's a better expanding bullet than a triple shock for my Alaskan rifles. Ok........so are the animals I killed any less dead?

Thanks


Why reinvent the wheel? Use Woodleighs and call it good. Dead is dead. Kynock/Woodleigh style bullets have killed more elephants than we can fathom over the last 100 years.

Brett


DRSS
Life Member SCI
Life Member NRA
Life Member WSF

Rhyme of the Sheep Hunter
May fordings never be too deep, And alders not too thick; May rock slides never be too steep And ridges not too slick.
And may your bullets shoot as swell As Fred Bear's arrow's flew; And may your nose work just as well As Jack O'Connor's too.
May winds be never at your tail When stalking down the steep; May bears be never on your trail When packing out your sheep.
May the hundred pounds upon you Not make you break or trip; And may the plane in which you flew Await you at the strip.
-Seth Peterson
 
Posts: 4551 | Location: Alaska | Registered: 21 February 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of cal pappas
posted Hide Post
quote:
Why reinvent the wheel? Use Woodleighs and call it good. Dead is dead. Kynock/Woodleigh style bullets have killed more elephants than we can fathom over the last 100 years.


Sound wisdom. Like father, like son.
Cal


_______________________________

Cal Pappas, Willow, Alaska
www.CalPappas.com
www.CalPappas.blogspot.com
1994 Zimbabwe
1997 Zimbabwe
1998 Zimbabwe
1999 Zimbabwe
1999 Namibia, Botswana, Zambia--vacation
2000 Australia
2002 South Africa
2003 South Africa
2003 Zimbabwe
2005 South Africa
2005 Zimbabwe
2006 Tanzania
2006 Zimbabwe--vacation
2007 Zimbabwe--vacation
2008 Zimbabwe
2012 Australia
2013 South Africa
2013 Zimbabwe
2013 Australia
2016 Zimbabwe
2017 Zimbabwe
2018 South Africa
2018 Zimbabwe--vacation
2019 South Africa
2019 Botswana
2019 Zimbabwe vacation
2021 South Africa
2021 South Africa (2nd hunt a month later)
______________________________
 
Posts: 7281 | Location: Willow, Alaska | Registered: 29 June 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by MHC_TX:
Are Cutting Edge Solids and Northfork solids safe (i.e., won't damage the barrel) to shoot in a pre-War British made double rifle? Or should I stick with Woodleigh solids?

Thanks


It's not .

Better you use FMJ bullets , and depending of the condition of your rifle , not too thick jacketed . The old DR are normally regulated with SP bullets , ---nickel coated bullets (!!?) .

For my old DR 577NE from 1909 i prefer to use the old FMJ Kynoch bullets . I have a lot of old cartridges .

For my 600NE from 1926 i am not sure that the very thick jacketed FMJ bullets from Woodleigh are safe .
 
Posts: 282 | Location: France / Germany  | Registered: 23 June 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of 470Evans
posted Hide Post
I've seen three vintage double rifles with overstressed rifling. One was extremely severe and the owner had shot quite a few early Barnes monometal bullets through it. I dabbled a little with Northforks in my doubles but finally settled on Woodleighs since they always shot well. I use the Woodleigh solids very sparingly to check regulation and when I shot elephant, other than that, I use the Woodleigh softs. I figure they work well so why tempt fate. I wouldn't be worried about the new bullets in a modern rifle.
 
Posts: 1312 | Location: Texas | Registered: 29 August 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I would go read the information posted by Michael458. This actual data collected using proper technique and real strain gages. If I was loading for a vintage rifle I would slug the bore and buy bullets that are the proper size. Many of the old rifles varied greatly from the listed specks. I would not hesitate to shoot one of their bullets in a vintage double as it will produce less strain on the rifle barrels.
Bill


Member DSC,DRSS,NRA,TSRA
A man who carries a cat by the tail learns something he can learn in no other way.
-Mark Twain
There ought to be one day - just one – when there is open season on Congressmen.
~Will Rogers~
 
Posts: 1132 | Location: Fort Worth, Texas | Registered: 09 May 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
When I shot original Kynoch projectiles out of my 450-400 they always printed lower than Woodleighs. I always attributed that to a thinner jacket thus less dwell time in the barrel that the thicker jackets of the Woodleighs. I shoot Woodleighs and CEB 13's now and love both.

Dutch
 
Posts: 2754 | Registered: 10 March 2006Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia