THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM SMALL CALIBER FORUM

Page 1 2 

Moderators: Paul H
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Elk! Small caliber opinions?
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
Picture of tc98
posted
Going to rifle hunt in Colorado this year, and would love to take a 257 R, or a 25-06. I am not limited to these, and do have what we all consider to be the "Elk Calibers", but really like the 25's. I certainly won't hunt irresponsibly, and would like to hear from some of you that have hunted Elk with good success, (or not) with the smaller Calibers.
Thanks
 
Posts: 250 | Location: Alabama | Registered: 07 December 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
coffee
 
Posts: 3460 | Location: Jemez Mountains, New Mexico | Registered: 09 February 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Crazyhorseconsulting
posted Hide Post
If you do your part and work within the limitations of the rifle you chose, the .257 Robert's will work, but the .25-06 will do a better job.

I would go with the heaviest for caliber bullet that your trifle will accurately shoot and stick with the .25-06 and try to get as close as possible.

Just my opinion given the parameters listed.


Even the rocks don't last forever.



 
Posts: 31014 | Location: Olney, Texas | Registered: 27 March 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of buffybr
posted Hide Post
I killed one of my best 6 point bulls with a 117 grain Sierra GameKing bullet from my .257 Ackley. It was about a 75 yard broadside shot placed in the crease behind his shoulder. The bullet hit a rib going in, shredded his lungs, and he fell dead in his tracks.

I have friends that have successfully used their .243 Win, .257 Roberts and .25-06 for many years for elk. These are not 500 yard plus, hit an elk anywhere and its dead cartridges.

Limit your shot distances and carefully place your shot, and small a caliber bullet can easily kill an elk.


NRA Endowment Life Member
 
Posts: 1640 | Location: Boz Angeles, MT | Registered: 14 February 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I would opt for the 115 grain barnes tsx.
But you still will need a broadsdide shot unless you can get the head.
My recomendation is a bigger bullet. A 7mm or bigger is simply a better tool for the job...tj3006
 
Posts: 605 | Location: OR | Registered: 28 March 2012Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I have shot deer with both of the 25 calibers.
I didn't have quite enough velocity with the Roberts to open the hornady 120 enough to impress me.
and the 25-06 opens most bullets too quickly for my tastes.
if I were gonna try it I'd use a premium bullet that has a controlled expansion as heavy as your rifle will shoot.

my personal thoughts are that the 25-06 is about the most perfect antelope round ever invented.
it does fair on deer if you match the bullet to the velocity correctly.
elk not so much, I'd rather use my 7x57.
 
Posts: 5003 | Location: soda springs,id | Registered: 02 April 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Bren7X64
posted Hide Post
I'm reading this thread with interest, since IIRC Boddington said that the toughest game he's ever encountered (apart from buff and such) are elk.

Considering the conventional wisdom in southern Africa is that wildebeest start out being sick and get just a tad healthier each time you shoot them wrong, I'd appreciate any insights you guys have ....


--
Promise me, when I die, don't let my wife sell my guns for what I told I her I paid for them.
 
Posts: 1048 | Location: Canberra, Australia | Registered: 03 August 2012Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I am a fan of the 25-06 and if I used it on elk I would use a premium bullet and 115 -120 grains.
However, I would use a bigger gun, like a 7MM if available.


NRA Patron member
 
Posts: 2653 | Location: Minnesota | Registered: 08 December 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
30 cal with 180 bullets or bigger. Don't want a wounded one getting away.


Pancho
LTC, USA, RET

"Participating in a gun buy-back program because you think that criminals have too many guns is like having yourself castrated because you think your neighbors have too many kids." Clint Eastwood

Give me Liberty or give me Corona.
 
Posts: 939 | Location: Roswell, NM | Registered: 02 December 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
The late Bob Milek used a 25/06 for his elk hunting, but he lived in elk country and could pass on any shot that wasn't perfect. If you are willing to do that I'd load the 25/06 with 115 gr Nosler Partitions and get after them.
 
Posts: 1230 | Location: Saugerties, New York | Registered: 12 March 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Slowpoke Slim
posted Hide Post
My 2 cents is "No". Just don't.

I have hunted elk too many times, and have too much respect for that grand creature to stunt shoot one with a sub par cartridge.

You never know what any animal will do once you shoot them. They could run off, lay down, stand there, or? I've seen elk hit with a 270 that was a solid killing hit, and the elk just walked along like it hadn't been touched, spraying blood out both sides of it's chest as it wandered along.

If that elk already has it's blood up, adrenaline loaded, when you shoot it, they can seem almost bullet proof.

I would take something larger, it already sounds like you have it. Why not take it?

All my "elk" rifles are/have been 30 cal and up. My preferred elk rifle was a 338 Win.


Si tantum EGO eram dimidium ut bonus ut EGO memor
 
Posts: 1147 | Location: Bismarck, ND | Registered: 31 August 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
When I was in Alaska, the 25-06 was still a wildcat. A neighbor had one built for his kids to use. This really makes no sense to me, which I'll get to later. Because it was a small cal, he thought using the best bullet available would help compensate. He chose Nosler Partitions in 120 grain. (Probably at the time they were the best--most expensive for sure). I was with his 12 year old son when he shot a smaller bull moose in the head. DRT. This man also had a daughter that took some caribou and I think some moose with it. The son I mentioned had already taken other moose and caribou with it, and more after that one. I do not know of any problems they ever had with it.
Now the reason it didn't really make sense to me despite the fact it worked well. When I think of a youth gun, I think of reduced recoil and reduced blast. This man was originally from Montana and had a .270Win mod 54 from the time he was 15 years old. He had taken numerous elk, grand slam on sheep and had hunted Alaska for many years with it taking numerous moose and caribou (and dall sheep). I fail to see where he would gain ANY reduction in blast or recoil with a 120 grain bullet in a 25-06 vs a 130 grain bullet in the .270. I may be wrong, but in my books, the 25-06 does nothing the .270 doesn't do better. Well, ok I do know. Dead is dead and a .270 doesn't kill em any deader. The 25-06 will work great on elk, it's like any other, bullet placement is the trump.
 
Posts: 3811 | Location: san angelo tx | Registered: 18 November 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
To put it in its proper perspective, you're gonna travel 1000+ miles, spend a sack full of money, and take a rifle that would be only effective under ideal circumstances. As posted, it isn't like you can say, oh well, I'll come back next week.
And too, are you dedicated enough that if a royal shows you his ass as he flees through the dark timber are you gonna give him a tip of your hat and watch him out of sight?


Aim for the exit hole
 
Posts: 4348 | Location: middle tenn | Registered: 09 December 2009Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by wasbeeman:
To put it in its proper perspective, you're gonna travel 1000+ miles, spend a sack full of money, and take a rifle that would be only effective under ideal circumstances.


This right here. Could not be stated better.

What is the allure of a self-imposed limitation on cartridge effectiveness? I get archery and black powder - different/longer season, etc. Also get someone might have a serious recoil issue.
 
Posts: 670 | Location: Dover-Foxcroft, ME | Registered: 25 May 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of tc98
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by wasbeeman:
To put it in its proper perspective, you're gonna travel 1000+ miles, spend a sack full of money, and take a rifle that would be only effective under ideal circumstances. As posted, it isn't like you can say, oh well, I'll come back next week.
And too, are you dedicated enough that if a royal shows you his ass as he flees through the dark timber are you gonna give him a tip of your hat and watch him out of sight?


This does make me laugh, but I understand that most, would not watch him flee. But to answer your question, I would pass any shot that would be more than me, or my rifle are capable of making. I love the hunt, and I would love to drop the hammer on a big one. But I will pass if the situation isn't right.
Just to be clear, I'm not saying I'll absolutely carry a 25. I'm asking for opinions from those that have experience hunting Elk with a small caliber, good or bad. I may indeed end up with my 280 AI, 7mm08, 300 WSM, or 338-06 AI.
The Kimber Montana 300 WSM will be hard to rule out. Light weight etc.
 
Posts: 250 | Location: Alabama | Registered: 07 December 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
tc98--I fully agree with you. If the shot isn't right, you pass and the animal won this time. I have NEVER passed a shot that I would have tried had I had a bigger rifle. If it aint right it aint right. If I wouldn't shoot a "royal" I'd pass on a spike too.
 
Posts: 3811 | Location: san angelo tx | Registered: 18 November 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of tc98
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by carpetman1:
tc98--I fully agree with you. If the shot isn't right, you pass and the animal won this time. I have NEVER passed a shot that I would have tried had I had a bigger rifle. If it aint right it aint right. If I wouldn't shoot a "royal" I'd pass on a spike too.


Amen!
That's just the way it is. tu2
 
Posts: 250 | Location: Alabama | Registered: 07 December 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
This does make me laugh, but I understand that most, would not watch him flee. But to answer your question, I would pass any shot that would be more than me, or my rifle are capable of making. I love the hunt, and I would love to drop the hammer on a big one. But I will pass if the situation isn't right.



Let me put it quite clearly: the only bull I ever shot I killed with a .270, but the bullet failed, and there was not a single drop of blood to tell where the bull went. Had my buddy not seen him start to topple, there is no way of knowing if we would have ever found him.

Add to that the fact that elk hunt success is somewhere between five and ten per cent across the board (drawn hunts, guided hunts, and DIY...), and the ante is upped significantly.

I can't think of anything worse than to mark up a 350-class bull and let him get away because that little 115-grain bullet failed and didn't come out.

My bull was far, far shy of 350; but other than the rack score, I have been there. If I ever get to go back, I will have my Whelen...
 
Posts: 4748 | Location: TX | Registered: 01 April 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Joe R. Lock
posted Hide Post
I think that if you want to use a .25 caliber and do not currently have one, you might consider the .257 Weatherby magnum. I know that lots of hunters have used it in Africa for some tough plains game and it worked just fine.
Joe
 
Posts: 236 | Location: Florida | Registered: 08 September 2012Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of bartsche
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Lamar:
I have shot deer with both of the 25 calibers.
I didn't have quite enough velocity with the Roberts to open the hornady 120 enough to impress me.
and the 25-06 opens most bullets too quickly for my tastes.
if I were gonna try it I'd use a premium bullet that has a controlled expansion as heavy as your rifle will shoot.


tu2 X2
old I've had personal bad experience with a 25-06 IMP and my 6mm x .270 IMP.on Mule deer and Elk.
Too much velocity not enough bullet integrity. The shots were well placed. Frownerroger


Old age is a high price to pay for maturity!!! Some never pay and some pay and never reap the reward. Wisdom comes with age! Sometimes age comes alone..
 
Posts: 10226 | Location: Temple City CA | Registered: 29 April 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of tc98
posted Hide Post
Thanks for the comments!
I'll probably load up something for my 338-06 AI. Need to carry it for sentiment. My dad made my custom model 98, and this will give me good reason, and heart felt desire to work up a good elk load for it. All the time he was building it, he called it his elk rifle.
Nuff said! tu2
Thanks
 
Posts: 250 | Location: Alabama | Registered: 07 December 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
good choice.
I live where I can hear elk during the rut.
and I can go back tomorrow, and every day until the season is over.
I don't carry my 25-06 elk hunting, and I have full faith in it placing the bullet exactly where I point the crosshairs out past 300 yds.

I will take my 7x57 Ackley, or even my 8 mauser.
and have no second thoughts about the matter.
my range becomes a bit shortened on the point and press aspect, but I know I will see a puff of dirt behind the animal when I pull the trigger.
and that second hole is the one that lets the liquid out.
 
Posts: 5003 | Location: soda springs,id | Registered: 02 April 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I had an aunt and uncle who lived in Eads, CO. for 35 years and hunted alot. They hunted elk every year for many years, he carrying a 257 Rob. and she a 243 Win. They had a good success rate. BUT; when he was able to afford it from the HUGE profits of dryland wheat farming in eastern CO. he moved up to the 7mm Rem. mag. and later to a 338 Win. mag. He often told me there was no better elk caliber than the 338. He also killed his biggest 6X6 with the 257. Go figure. If you need a howitzer, shoot a howitzer. If you want a sling and a stone, so be it. After all, it worked for David. Placement is everything after all. If I ever get the chance to go, I'm carrying a 300 Win. Mag. It's the biggest I have.
 
Posts: 217 | Location: SW of Dodge City | Registered: 18 September 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of ab_bentley
posted Hide Post
You know, and yes I know the 25cal was the specific topic, but I can't help but wonder where the 6.5x55 is in all of this.

Adam


______________________

Ammo, you always need more.
 
Posts: 463 | Location: Dresden, Ohio | Registered: 09 January 2012Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of tc98
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by jfromswk:
I had an aunt and uncle who lived in Eads, CO. for 35 years and hunted alot. They hunted elk every year for many years, he carrying a 257 Rob. and she a 243 Win. They had a good success rate. BUT; when he was able to afford it from the HUGE profits of dryland wheat farming in eastern CO. he moved up to the 7mm Rem. mag. and later to a 338 Win. mag. He often told me there was no better elk caliber than the 338. He also killed his biggest 6X6 with the 257. Go figure. If you need a howitzer, shoot a howitzer. If you want a sling and a stone, so be it. After all, it worked for David. Placement is everything after all. If I ever get the chance to go, I'm carrying a 300 Win. Mag. It's the biggest I have.


I hear ya! Most people that kill elk with .243, .257 etc. do so because that's what they have, or that's what they can borrow. I have been a fan of the .300 WSM, and .280 AI. But since the quarter bores have been on my place, I have really grown fond of them. Especially, a Dakota Arms model 10 257 Roberts.
I have the bigger guns, and common sense wins out once again. Since I have this great Model 98 .338-06 AI, I really need to get it dialed in, and use it. Great elk rnd.
Concerning the 6.5x55, I have one in a mod. 98. Haven't shot it, and haven't bought dies, or ammo yet. It's kind of a back burner gun at this time.
 
Posts: 250 | Location: Alabama | Registered: 07 December 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Well my friend you have hit on another point !
1st a Dakota model 10 in the Bob, sounds like a truly excellent DEER rifle.
But a single shot quarter bore for elk ?
No way man. Not me anyway.
I once helped butcher an elk that took 5 180 grain 06s 1 through the lungs 2 in the heart and two lesser hits. I was told the bull went 200 yards before falling over. ...tj3006
 
Posts: 605 | Location: OR | Registered: 28 March 2012Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of tc98
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by tjroberts:
Well my friend you have hit on another point !
1st a Dakota model 10 in the Bob, sounds like a truly excellent DEER rifle.
But a single shot quarter bore for elk ?
No way man. Not me anyway.
I once helped butcher an elk that took 5 180 grain 06s 1 through the lungs 2 in the heart and two lesser hits. I was told the bull went 200 yards before falling over. ...tj3006


I know, we never know what our circumstances will be, and we never know how an animal will react, or how murphy's law may kick in.
.338-06 gets the nod! I got it out last night, and now, I'm totally blown away by it. I'll put up pics soon, need to scope it first. I've got a 2.5-10 Leica that needs a home, or may opt for the Zeiss Conquest 3-9 x 40, stick with 1" rings etc. I'm really liking these Conquest scopes.
Oh well, thats what this board is for! Encouragment, or to be occasionally rebuked! tu2
Hope everyone has a great week!
 
Posts: 250 | Location: Alabama | Registered: 07 December 2007Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by tc98:
I know, we never know what our circumstances will be, and we never know how an animal will react, or how murphy's law may kick in.


You have come to what is certainly the best decision.

I struggled to politely express my concern earlier in the thread: "I would pass any shot that would be more than me, or my rifle are capable of making. I love the hunt, and I would love to drop the hammer on a big one. But I will pass if the situation isn't right."

The assumption here is all the chance elements are in the chase, and the shot is nothing more than a simple execution during which nothing can go wrong. Well, maybe. Maybe not. Most here could easily come up with some possible reasons why this might not be true......ranging from animal moves as sear is about to release to bipod or rest sags slightly at same moment, etc., etc.

You don't need to invoke a suboptimal presentation, or an element of desperation, to someday be very relieved you had some extra power and/or penetration and/or blood trail.

They say there's no drunk worse than a reformed drunk. Decades ago I was "into" seeing if I could get away with _________ (fill in the blank). Judgment comes from experience, but experience comes from bad judgment.
 
Posts: 670 | Location: Dover-Foxcroft, ME | Registered: 25 May 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
If you need a 338-06, I have one for $1,750 shipped with ammunition...an original A-Square in a Model 70 CRF action with the Appearance Package, shipped for $1,775.


 
Posts: 20175 | Location: Very NW NJ up in the Mountains | Registered: 14 June 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of tc98
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Samuel_Hoggson:
quote:
Originally posted by tc98:
I know, we never know what our circumstances will be, and we never know how an animal will react, or how murphy's law may kick in.


You have come to what is certainly the best decision.

I struggled to politely express my concern earlier in the thread: "I would pass any shot that would be more than me, or my rifle are capable of making. I love the hunt, and I would love to drop the hammer on a big one. But I will pass if the situation isn't right."

The assumption here is all the chance elements are in the chase, and the shot is nothing more than a simple execution during which nothing can go wrong. Well, maybe. Maybe not. Most here could easily come up with some possible reasons why this might not be true......ranging from animal moves as sear is about to release to bipod or rest sags slightly at same moment, etc., etc.

You don't need to invoke a suboptimal presentation, or an element of desperation, to someday be very relieved you had some extra power and/or penetration and/or blood trail.

They say there's no drunk worse than a reformed drunk. Decades ago I was "into" seeing if I could get away with _________ (fill in the blank). Judgment comes from experience, but experience comes from bad judgment.


I can agree with what you're saying somewhat! What you haven't said, is that this is hunting, and there are no guarantees. Just because you're carrying a .375 H&H doesn't give you immunity to the very same possibilities. A miss due to any of the things you've mentioned could result in an injured animal that becomes supper for the scavengers. Caliber has zip to do with miscues during the shot.
The reason for this discussion was to gather info. from guys that have been down this road.
59 years, and common sense, had this question 90% answered, but I wanted to hear from the small caliber guys that have done it.
I appreciate your comments. The question is now 100% answered. 338-06 AI it is. Bigger, equals better odds of a one shot success story. I'll take that!
Once again,
Thanks
 
Posts: 250 | Location: Alabama | Registered: 07 December 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of tc98
posted Hide Post
Beibs, I appreciate the offer, but I do have one. (Model 98 Mauser)
Your Model 70 A Square looks awesome,
Thanks
 
Posts: 250 | Location: Alabama | Registered: 07 December 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I knew an old gunsmith that hunted Colorado, for elk made 22 trips killed 19 elk, most were shot with a 6.5x55 Swede rifle that he modified for mountain hunting. It had a 18.5" barrel, would hold only 3 rounds in magazine, had a Weaver J 2.5 power scope on it. Talked to the rancher he hunted with, he said he saw him kill an elk at 600 yds with that rifle. Another old gunsmith, who had homestead Colorado, ask him about using a 6.5x55, and his reply was any bullet that would go from the ass end of an elk to the front was ok in his book.
 
Posts: 369 | Location: lee' summit missouri | Registered: 06 January 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
yeah, and I knew a little old lady in TN that shot her deer every year with a .22 single shot. She used her riding mower to drag it to the house for butchering.
But that doesn't mean I'm gonna suggest that you drive 1000 miles, with time constraints, and carry a .22 single shot to kill a deer.


Aim for the exit hole
 
Posts: 4348 | Location: middle tenn | Registered: 09 December 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
We worry about a 25-06 being enough and people take them with bows.
 
Posts: 3811 | Location: san angelo tx | Registered: 18 November 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of buffybr
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by carpetman1:
We worry about a 25-06 being enough and people take them with bows.

Bingo!!


NRA Endowment Life Member
 
Posts: 1640 | Location: Boz Angeles, MT | Registered: 14 February 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Slowpoke Slim
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by carpetman1:
We worry about a 25-06 being enough and people take them with bows.


Not. Everybody.


Si tantum EGO eram dimidium ut bonus ut EGO memor
 
Posts: 1147 | Location: Bismarck, ND | Registered: 31 August 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I think tc hit it on the head in his last sentence; "bigger equals better odds", PERIOD! But that comes with all kinds of caveats. If the rifle weighs too much, bigger is not always better, but it does keep you closer to camp. If it kicks more than you're comfortable with, bigger might mean wounded and running. Unless you're on an expensive lark, a 1000 miles away hunt should mean you want the ODDS to be in your favor as much as possible. Those going on that kind of hunt will probably research and invest the time and dollars to do it to the best of their ability and gun shooting prowess.
BUT there are umpteen bookoo number of plain ole deer hunters out there who are neither gun savvy or caliber knowledgeable beyond what works for them, and they are in the majority, just not here on AR. And the reason the industry sells 10 to 1 or whatever, of 270's to 338's, is the same reason most will take whatever they have to hunt elk as they hunt deer.

Some will not see an elk, some will get their elk, some will wound and not recover their elk, and some will not hunt more than a mile from camp after the first day's walk at 9000 ft. Hunting should involve much more than just the shooting, but that is what we seem to focus on here a great deal. Nothing wrong with that, but like all hunters in every genre, (including spear hunters again), we all like to increase the odds in our favor as much as possible.

"Bigger equals better odds". Shoot what you have, hunt like the dickens, get 75 yrds closer if you can, and put a big one in the boiler room and see what happens. Anything can happen. It's hunting.
 
Posts: 217 | Location: SW of Dodge City | Registered: 18 September 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of tc98
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by jfromswk:
I think tc hit it on the head in his last sentence; "bigger equals better odds", PERIOD! But that comes with all kinds of caveats. If the rifle weighs too much, bigger is not always better, but it does keep you closer to camp. If it kicks more than you're comfortable with, bigger might mean wounded and running. Unless you're on an expensive lark, a 1000 miles away hunt should mean you want the ODDS to be in your favor as much as possible. Those going on that kind of hunt will probably research and invest the time and dollars to do it to the best of their ability and gun shooting prowess.
BUT there are umpteen bookoo number of plain ole deer hunters out there who are neither gun savvy or caliber knowledgeable beyond what works for them, and they are in the majority, just not here on AR. And the reason the industry sells 10 to 1 or whatever, of 270's to 338's, is the same reason most will take whatever they have to hunt elk as they hunt deer.

Some will not see an elk, some will get their elk, some will wound and not recover their elk, and some will not hunt more than a mile from camp after the first day's walk at 9000 ft. Hunting should involve much more than just the shooting, but that is what we seem to focus on here a great deal. Nothing wrong with that, but like all hunters in every genre, (including spear hunters again), we all like to increase the odds in our favor as much as possible.

"Bigger equals better odds". Shoot what you have, hunt like the dickens, get 75 yrds closer if you can, and put a big one in the boiler room and see what happens. Anything can happen. It's hunting.


clap J from southwest Kansas gets it!
I must ask this question to all of you guys that have taken your wives, or daughters on an elk hunt. Did they go, armed with a 7 mag, .270, .30-06, 300 mag, or maybe a .243, .257 Roberts, or a 6 mm?
Just sayin, there's a lot of preaching sometimes, that is tossed out the window when the need arises. (Not intended, or directed at anyone), just curious.
Myself, I elk hunt often. Most of my hunting is done with a longbow, and a call. I certainly love to rifle hunt also though. I know, that far more elk have died due to small and medium caliber bullets being put in the right place vs large calibers. That said, I do advocate shooting the biggest/fastest round you can effectively handle, as long as you can carry it, shoulder it, and shoot it without flinching, or hurting. As stated before, bigger increases the odds, but some of these fine smaller calibers have put a lot of meat in the freezer. Hunting! Do the best you can, and use the best tools you can. In this case for me it will be a .280 or bigger. Got brass, and bullets ordered yesterday for the .338-06 AI. Hope that all goes well.
 
Posts: 250 | Location: Alabama | Registered: 07 December 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Slowpoke Slim
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by tc98:

I must ask this question to all of you guys that have taken your wives, or daughters on an elk hunt. Did they go, armed with a 7 mag, .270, .30-06, 300 mag, or maybe a .243, .257 Roberts, or a 6 mm?
Just sayin, there's a lot of preaching sometimes, that is tossed out the window when the need arises. (Not intended, or directed at anyone), just curious.


That would be a 308 win loaded with 165 gr Partitions in our case.


Si tantum EGO eram dimidium ut bonus ut EGO memor
 
Posts: 1147 | Location: Bismarck, ND | Registered: 31 August 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Crazyhorseconsulting
posted Hide Post
What happened to the concept of the shooter using the caliber/bullet combination they are most comfortable/confident with?


Even the rocks don't last forever.



 
Posts: 31014 | Location: Olney, Texas | Registered: 27 March 2006Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia