THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM SMALL CALIBER FORUM

Page 1 2 

Moderators: Paul H
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Down side of WSM?
 Login/Join
 
one of us
posted
I am referring to the 404 Jeffrey case at 2.1†for use in short action. It seems available in 270, 7mm, 300 and 325.
I am contemplating a custom 6.5 WSM with thick barrel and heavy glass fibre stock. The whole setup to be sturdy enough to shoot in the same place with and without silencer. I need it for springbok, blesbok and jackal in distance.
The gun maker says he will neck down some 270 or 7mm brass for me. Someone said that Lee makes a 6.5 die?
I am a layman when comes to specials like this, so please give me the good and especially bad news about this option.
Thanx
Lochi


Hunters pay for conservation. Without funds from hunting the African game cannot survive.
www.affordableafricanhunting.com
 
Posts: 240 | Location: Johannesburg, South Africa | Registered: 07 March 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Dr. Lou
posted Hide Post
Lochi, I am not much of a WSM fan but I am a 6.5 fan. I don't have anything to add, however, I am curious to see how the 6.5 WSM round works for you. I have been thinking of doing something in a sporter. The only problem I have with the WSM is you can't fit as many rounds in the mag. I don't know what improvement it offers over the 264 Win. Lou


****************
NRA Life Benefactor Member
 
Posts: 3316 | Location: USA | Registered: 15 November 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
The 7MM-WSM has a different shoulder angle then the other three.
 
Posts: 1205 | Location: Minnesota | Registered: 07 February 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
One disadvantage of the WSM is that they are difficult to get to feed properly. I have several WSM's and i have converted two of them to single shots. They just dont feed easily. Other than that I suppose they are as good as any other cartridge. I will probably never build another rifles on the WSM or WSSM design.



6x NFR Qualifier
NFR Champion
Reserve World Champion Bareback Rider
PRCA Million Dollar Club
02' Salt Lake Olympic Qualifier
and an all around good guy!
 
Posts: 354 | Location: Fort Worth, TX | Registered: 12 April 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of prof242
posted Hide Post
Concur on the comments listed above. However...
I have a 6.5WSM as does my hunting partner (we also have .338WSMs). Both guns, with light barrels, shoot very well. For the 6.5s we use .270WSM brass and the .338s, use .325 brass.
To correct the feeding problem, try different magazines and followers. This cured our feeding problems in Rem700 short actions. Also, our 'smith modified them slightly to accept cartridges up to 3.1" long.
Having had a .264 Mag, I'd have to say the 6.5WSM isn't as hard to find a good load for. Velocities are a little lower, but that is the price you have to pay.
Yes, the fatter cartridges reduce your magazine capacity by one. We've skeletonized ours, but that just allowed easier loading. We figure two in the magazine and one up the spout is enough for our hunting needs.


.395 Family Member
DRSS, po' boy member
Political correctness is nothing but liberal enforced censorship
 
Posts: 3490 | Location: Colorado Springs, CO | Registered: 04 April 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Question should have been "What is the up side". Why suffer with a short action, fat dumpy cartridge at all? Just a dumb fad people jumped on.


Leftists are intellectually vacant, but there is no greater pleasure than tormenting the irrational.
 
Posts: 2899 | Registered: 24 November 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of prof242
posted Hide Post
I do it for the fish
You know, The Halibut! Wink


.395 Family Member
DRSS, po' boy member
Political correctness is nothing but liberal enforced censorship
 
Posts: 3490 | Location: Colorado Springs, CO | Registered: 04 April 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
There is no down side, really.
 
Posts: 409 | Location: Alaska | Registered: 06 February 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
If there is no down side then there can be no upside, is that correct? how far have we gotten with no up or down?
 
Posts: 1096 | Location: UNITED STATES of AMERTCA | Registered: 29 June 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of woods
posted Hide Post
To me a downside would be the lack of reloading dies and brass.

You can get dies and brass for the 6.5-06, 6.5x284 and the 6.5 rem mag and get the same performance. The 6.5-06 is a long action but you will get at least one if not 2 more loads in the mag and no feeding problems. There are a lot of benchrest shooters who swear by the 6.5x284 for long range and so there is a big future and lots of info on it. The 6.5 rem mag will push a 140 gr bullet at 3000 fps and the 130 gr bullet at 3100 fps with ease and it is commercially loaded (although like the 264 win mag not with any loads worth a damn).

So to me I would let someone else solve the problems with a new case and use a proven caliber. JMHO


____________________________________
There are those who would misteach us that to stick in a rut is consistency - and a virtue, and that to climb out of the rut is inconsistency - and a vice.
- Mark Twain |

Chinese Proverb: When someone shares something of value with you and you benefit from it, you have a moral obligation to share it with others.

___________________________________
 
Posts: 2750 | Location: Houston, Tx | Registered: 17 January 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Jon2
posted Hide Post
If you buy a Sako you have no feeding problems and no capacity issues (4 in the magazine).
 
Posts: 596 | Location: Cheshire, England | Registered: 06 March 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
hi guys
Quote
"rickt30 Question should have been "What is the up side". Why suffer with a short action, fat dumpy cartridge at all? Just a dumb fad people jumped on. "

WTF are you talking about!! have you not heard of the 6BR or the 6PPC those two "fat dumpy cartridges" hold more records than youve had shits! Not to mention the 22BR 30BR the list goes on and on my friend, in essence a WSM is a BR on steroids, they rule!!

I think a 270WSM would be perhaps close enough.
Just read a report from a guy who shot a Eland with his Tikka T3 270WSM amongst other plainsgame using 150 gr pills.
Food for thought!

Regards Runas


War is inevitable, if idiots are in charge of countries
 
Posts: 162 | Location: New Zealand | Registered: 15 March 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by prof242:
I do it for the fish
You know, The Halibut! Wink
rotflmo
 
Posts: 9920 | Location: Carolinas, USA | Registered: 22 April 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of seafire2
posted Hide Post
This thread could be a lot shorter, if you had posted it as the "UPSIDE of WSM"....


Life Member: The American Vast Right Wing Conspiracy

Jan 20, 2009.. Prisoner in Dumocrat 'Occupied America', Partisan in the 'Save America' Underground


Beavis..... James Beavis..... Of Her Majesty's Secret Service..... Spell Check Division



"Posterity — you will never know how much it has cost my generation to preserve your freedom. I hope you will make good use of it."
John Quincy Adams

A reporter did a human-interest piece on the Texas Rangers. The reporter recognized the Colt Model 1911 the Ranger was carrying and asked him "Why do you carry a 45?" The Ranger responded, "Because they don't make a 46."

Duhboy....Nuttier than Squirrel Poop...



 
Posts: 9316 | Location: Between Confusion and Lunacy ( Portland OR & San Francisco CA) | Registered: 12 September 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by seafire2:
This thread could be a lot shorter, if you had posted it as the "UPSIDE of WSM"....


Big Grin rotflmo


Verbera!, Iugula!, Iugula!!!

Blair.

 
Posts: 8808 | Location: Sydney, Australia. | Registered: 21 March 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I think the WSMs are pretty much only dislike by older people.
 
Posts: 409 | Location: Alaska | Registered: 06 February 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of GrosVentreGeorge
posted Hide Post
Personally I love my 270 wsm and I am quite fond of my 300 wsm. I agree that they are a young person's and or a true gun nut's round. In my personal experience, everybody that I know who dislikes the wsm's is generally against anything new all together.

Having said that I think the 6.5 rem mag would fit your bill at a much lower price. Cheaper dies, brass, and established performance with published reloading charts put it ahead in my book. If used with a longer short action like the M1999 where the bullets (i.e. 130-140 grains) can be seated out farther, it will really shine.


"I would rather have a German division in front of me than a French one behind me." -- General George S. Patton
 
Posts: 427 | Location: The Big Sky aka Dodson, MT | Registered: 22 May 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
WSMs are mint. i had a 300wsm a year ago but didnt like the rifle so i sold it. If i get another i think ill go the 6.5WSM route...but i also like the idea of a 6.5-06 and a 6.5X55... hell why dont i just get all 3?

i really want a 6.5 for reasons unknown to me.

anyway i really liked the look of the WSM case, looked beautiful with 190gr vlds stickin out of it! you know you want to build the WSM so stop wasting time and get onto it.
 
Posts: 735 | Location: New Zealand | Registered: 17 August 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
maybe some of you would like to share your 6.5WSM loads... thanks
Montero
 
Posts: 874 | Location: Madrid-Spain | Registered: 03 July 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Nothing wrong with the WSM but if you are spending lots of money there are better choices.


Free men should not be subjected to permits, paperwork and taxation in order to carry any firearm. NRA Benefactor
 
Posts: 1652 | Location: Deer Park, Texas | Registered: 08 June 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of talentrec
posted Hide Post
I've been using my 6.5 WSM for deer and antelope for the past few years and love it. It's a great round if your shots tend to be on the far side of 300 yards.

There are a few drawbacks though. I've found that when working up loads you need to be really careful, as pressure seems to increase dramatically with very little change in charge (1-2 grains makes a big difference). I've tried H4831, RL22, RL25 and Retumbo in mine; the best accuracty and performance have been with RL25 and Retumbo. I also found that going with standard vs. magnum primers doesn't effect velocity that much, increased accuracy and kept pressure down. If your magazine box permits it, you can also bore the throat out a bit and gain quite a bit of case capacity by seating the bullets way out.

The load I've settled on is:

130 gr. accubond
Norma 270 WSM Case
Fed 210 Primer
61 gr. Retumbo
Velocity: 3275 fps

While I love this cartridge, if I were to do it again, I'd probably just go with a 270 WSM. It would have been a lot less work!
 
Posts: 812 | Location: Minnesota | Registered: 26 July 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
thanks, talentrec.

I am surprised that only 61gr of Retuimbo can produce such a high speed, though.

montero
 
Posts: 874 | Location: Madrid-Spain | Registered: 03 July 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Thanx alot guys!
Appreciated.
Lochi
Smiler


Hunters pay for conservation. Without funds from hunting the African game cannot survive.
www.affordableafricanhunting.com
 
Posts: 240 | Location: Johannesburg, South Africa | Registered: 07 March 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of seafire2
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Moose-Hunter:
I think the WSMs are pretty much only dislike by older people.


Yeah because they have enough experience to know that the WSM don't bring anything new to the table except marking hype.....

Nothing new, different box...


Life Member: The American Vast Right Wing Conspiracy

Jan 20, 2009.. Prisoner in Dumocrat 'Occupied America', Partisan in the 'Save America' Underground


Beavis..... James Beavis..... Of Her Majesty's Secret Service..... Spell Check Division



"Posterity — you will never know how much it has cost my generation to preserve your freedom. I hope you will make good use of it."
John Quincy Adams

A reporter did a human-interest piece on the Texas Rangers. The reporter recognized the Colt Model 1911 the Ranger was carrying and asked him "Why do you carry a 45?" The Ranger responded, "Because they don't make a 46."

Duhboy....Nuttier than Squirrel Poop...



 
Posts: 9316 | Location: Between Confusion and Lunacy ( Portland OR & San Francisco CA) | Registered: 12 September 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
300WSM feeds great in my Winchester 1885
 
Posts: 231 | Registered: 04 December 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Dies happen to be readily available from RCBS, and I know several folks who have 330 WSM/6.5's

Most all of them would just do a .270 WSM if they were to do it again. The rifles shoot beautifully, and give them the 6.5 bullet they were after.

I can't see where you gain that much, but it is all for fun, a person is pretty much ruling out factory ammo with this decision, so I say go for it if you have other standard rigs....if you only have a couple of rigs I'd probably make it a stock .270 WSM, if not a .270 Wink
 
Posts: 3563 | Location: GA, USA | Registered: 02 August 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Sure carefully tuned up match cartridges in single shot rifles have shown a trend toward better accuracy. However bullets have improved a lot since the 222 was the king of the hill as has barrel quality. The PPC cartridges have the benefit of almost perfect brass. In a hunting rifle the WSM's show no improvement over many older cartridges.


Leftists are intellectually vacant, but there is no greater pleasure than tormenting the irrational.
 
Posts: 2899 | Registered: 24 November 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by seafire2:
quote:
Originally posted by Moose-Hunter:
I think the WSMs are pretty much only dislike by older people.


Yeah because they have enough experience to know that the WSM don't bring anything new to the table except marking hype.....

Nothing new, different box...


Or lack thereof...
 
Posts: 409 | Location: Alaska | Registered: 06 February 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Considering the WSM's in 270 and 300 offered nothing you couldn't get in High Energy or light magnum loading in the 270 and 30-06 they certainly brought nothing new to the table. Other than less magazine capacity and ugly brass maybe.


Leftists are intellectually vacant, but there is no greater pleasure than tormenting the irrational.
 
Posts: 2899 | Registered: 24 November 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I imagine that if the internet was around back when the .308 was introduced, all you '06 toaters would be having the same argument. "These new fangled shells are so small I loose them in my breeches"

The fact is you do get slightly better performance than their counterpart with factory loads, slightly faster and flatter. Plus you have the option of a lighter more compact rifle. I have never had a problem with the "fat brass" getting hung up during a follow up shot. Come to think of it, I have never had to make a follow-up shot. If you are new to rifles a WSM is a great option.
 
Posts: 551 | Location: utah | Registered: 17 December 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I detect that some people here are having envy over the size of their brass!! rotflmo



6x NFR Qualifier
NFR Champion
Reserve World Champion Bareback Rider
PRCA Million Dollar Club
02' Salt Lake Olympic Qualifier
and an all around good guy!
 
Posts: 354 | Location: Fort Worth, TX | Registered: 12 April 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
WTF are you talking about!! have you not heard of the 6BR or the 6PPC those two "fat dumpy cartridges" hold more records than youve had shits! Not to mention the 22BR 30BR the list goes on and on my friend, in essence a WSM is a BR on steroids, they rule!!


Both the 6BR and 6PPC are small cartridges used in single shot bench rest competition. Yeah they share the same length to width proportions. But they are much smaller cartridges.
 
Posts: 9207 | Registered: 22 November 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Jon Beutler:
I imagine that if the internet was around back when the .308 was introduced, all you '06 toaters would be having the same argument. "These new fangled shells are so small I loose them in my breeches"

The fact is you do get slightly better performance than their counterpart with factory loads, slightly faster and flatter. Plus you have the option of a lighter more compact rifle. I have never had a problem with the "fat brass" getting hung up during a follow up shot. Come to think of it, I have never had to make a follow-up shot. If you are new to rifles a WSM is a great option.


In the end you are talking about selling new products because most shooter already have the earlier rounds. All the improvements are slight....if any.
Of course if you want to get even slightly better why not use a super short magnum.
 
Posts: 9207 | Registered: 22 November 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by silwane:
I detect that some people here are having envy over the size of their brass!! rotflmo


Actually, IMHO its only those people who do not own a WSM that have 'brass envy' jumping

Its been in my experience that those who own the WSM can brush off the insults from non-WSM cause of lack of knowledge, or like you stated "envy".

For the record, I one a non-WSM an love it.
 
Posts: 551 | Location: utah | Registered: 17 December 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Cliff Lyle
posted Hide Post
I read many posts of shooters telling us why they don't like the WSM but not too many objectively discussing the downside of the family of calibers.
If you don't like a caliber (in this case, the WSM family) it appears to me it would be difficult in being objective while discussing its potential downside.
 
Posts: 2155 | Location: Oklahoma | Registered: 03 October 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Cliff Lyle:
I read many posts of shooters telling us why they don't like the WSM but not too many objectively discussing the downside of the family of calibers.
If you don't like a caliber (in this case, the WSM family) it appears to me it would be difficult in being objective while discussing its potential downside.


1. The fat brass takes up more storage space.
2. I don't have any of the fat brass and I have plenty of the earlier brass.
3. Fat brass with no rim would look really dumb in a Sharps.
4. Fat brass might not fit my funnel.
5. Fat brass will not fit my existing loading blocks.
6. I can't find short fats on the ground at the range.
7. I never buy anything that is going to depreciate a lot and fat brass rifles are going to depreciate.
8. The short fats are more difficult to load in a falling block single shot especially with large hands and a scope.
9. Short fats will not work in a Marlin 336.
10. Short fats are not available in large battle packs at a discount.
11. Shorts fats probably will not work with long skinny bullets. Can you imagine a 6.5 short fat with a 160 grn RN? It might be seated against the primer to get it in the magazine.
12. After the bullet leaves the barrel the case does not matter any more.
13. Do any of the short fats use black powder?
14. How about a short fat in a Contender?
15. Short fat in an Encore?
16. Short fat in anything really cheap like an SKS or a Mosin-Nagant?
17. How about building a custom short fat on a classic double square bridge Oberndorf Mauser?
18. Short fat in a double rifle?
19. Short fart in a Mannlicher Schoenauer?
21. No short fat combination guns or drillings?

The short fats do have some design limitations.
 
Posts: 9207 | Registered: 22 November 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Small caliber bullets with large, steep shoulders can make for feeding difficulties. They seem to be less pronounced with stacked magazines as opposed to staggered magazines. Original Browning and Winchester rifles used staggered magazines to hold 3 down and were plagued with feeding problems, especially the .270 WSM. The larger diameter bullet of the .300 helped it load a little more smoothly. This is about as good as it gets in the WSM lineup (albeit it's a wildcat and belongs in the Medium Bore forum):



Why this isn't commercially available is beyond me, it would probably take a big chunk out of the .325 WSM sales though. A bullet that big really offsets the steep shoulder and should feed quite nicely. IMO Winchester would have been better off with the .270, .300, and .350 as the WSM lineup. The 7mm is nowhere near as popular (I'm seeing markdowns in my local shops as they aren't selling well), and the .350 shooting 250's at 2700fps+ buries the .325.


________



"...And on the 8th day, God created beer so those crazy Canadians wouldn't take over the world..."
 
Posts: 539 | Location: Winnipeg, MB. | Registered: 04 January 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by MikeyB:
Small caliber bullets with large, steep shoulders can make for feeding difficulties. They seem to be less pronounced with stacked magazines as opposed to staggered magazines. Original Browning and Winchester rifles used staggered magazines to hold 3 down and were plagued with feeding problems, especially the .270 WSM. The larger diameter bullet of the .300 helped it load a little more smoothly. This is about as good as it gets in the WSM lineup (albeit it's a wildcat and belongs in the Medium Bore forum):



Why this isn't commercially available is beyond me, it would probably take a big chunk out of the .325 WSM sales though. A bullet that big really offsets the steep shoulder and should feed quite nicely. IMO Winchester would have been better off with the .270, .300, and .350 as the WSM lineup. The 7mm is nowhere near as popular (I'm seeing markdowns in my local shops as they aren't selling well), and the .350 shooting 250's at 2700fps+ buries the .325.


SWEET!!
 
Posts: 409 | Location: Alaska | Registered: 06 February 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
smoking lamp is lit. if you gottum, lite up.
 
Posts: 1096 | Location: UNITED STATES of AMERTCA | Registered: 29 June 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by ireload2:
quote:
Originally posted by Cliff Lyle:
I read many posts of shooters telling us why they don't like the WSM but not too many objectively discussing the downside of the family of calibers.
If you don't like a caliber (in this case, the WSM family) it appears to me it would be difficult in being objective while discussing its potential downside.




1. The fat brass takes up more storage space.
2. I don't have any of the fat brass and I have plenty of the earlier brass.
3. Fat brass with no rim would look really dumb in a Sharps.
4. Fat brass might not fit my funnel.
5. Fat brass will not fit my existing loading blocks.
6. I can't find short fats on the ground at the range.
7. I never buy anything that is going to depreciate a lot and fat brass rifles are going to depreciate.
8. The short fats are more difficult to load in a falling block single shot especially with large hands and a scope.
9. Short fats will not work in a Marlin 336.
10. Short fats are not available in large battle packs at a discount.
11. Shorts fats probably will not work with long skinny bullets. Can you imagine a 6.5 short fat with a 160 grn RN? It might be seated against the primer to get it in the magazine.
12. After the bullet leaves the barrel the case does not matter any more.
13. Do any of the short fats use black powder?
14. How about a short fat in a Contender?
15. Short fat in an Encore?
16. Short fat in anything really cheap like an SKS or a Mosin-Nagant?
17. How about building a custom short fat on a classic double square bridge Oberndorf Mauser?
18. Short fat in a double rifle?
19. Short fart in a Mannlicher Schoenauer?
21. No short fat combination guns or drillings?

The short fats do have some design limitations.


This is such a typical response from the "older" folks as mentioned above. I bought my first rifle last year after 25+ years of hunting big game in Utah. I bought a 300WSM in a Sako Finnlight. 1-21 from above dont mean jack to me in that I dont care about a fart in a mannlicher. I wanted a lightweight rifle in a .30 capable of handling elk. The 300WSM does that. IN FACT IT DOES THAT BETTER THAN ANY OTHER .30 IN A LIGHTWEIGHT RIFLE.
 
Posts: 551 | Location: utah | Registered: 17 December 2007Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia