THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM SMALL CALIBER FORUM


Moderators: Paul H
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Re: .204 thoughts
 Login/Join
 
one of us
posted
I'd opt for the .204 if not getting into the reloading deal! Probabably would opt for it if was reloading!! Just a little more "umph" when it gets there and the accuracy has been "utmost" during testing!! As far as pelt damage goes.....seems to me that "what goes in, stays in" on the big groundhogs! That's with the 32 grain VMAX's.....both factory and reloads. Never got the 40's (factory or reloads) to perform to my standards with the SAVAGE VLP I'm shooting. WIsh I could get about 5000 of the Hornady 33 grain VMAX's that they decided not to offer anymore!!! 1 silly grain!!! Just a little difference on bearing surface! They will shoot!!! The 32's shoot pretty good also but the 33's are definitely different!!! As far as the 17 goes...a heckuva little varmint getter!!! I'll just opt for 53% more mass at the same speed!!! Neglible barrel heat and did I mention accurracy????? DOn't any of you all take me wrong!!! I think the 17's are "downtown" for the varmints!! It's just that the 20's offer a bit more without the side affects!! Now some of you are going to jump in my doo-doo about that and say why not the .224's!!! 22-250........mst perfect cartridge ever invented unless it was the 25-06!!!!!! I don't think I want to set up in a dogtown with a 25-06 as my only option!!! If I had a 22-250 laying there also.....I'd have a 2 gun battery!!! Now if I had a .204 there also, I beleive I could shoot it about 3 times as much as the big dogs before getting worried about the barrel!! Just my thoughts!!! Hell, I live in VA!!! What do I know about varmint hunting!!???? GHD
 
Posts: 2495 | Location: SW. VA | Registered: 29 July 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Thanks for all of the responses. I traded my .221FB for a .204, same rifle: 527 American. Can't wait to shoot it, but it will be a week or so, with work and archery open. I'll post my results, thanks again.
 
Posts: 57 | Location: Leraysville, Pa. | Registered: 29 January 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of pdhntr1
posted Hide Post
Uplandr,

I have to agree with GeorgeS.

You mention this gun would be used �particularly for fox and coyote here in Pa.� And I will certainly not argue that your choices won�t kill either of them, but I am wondering if there might be a better choice given the circumstances. If I was going to purchase a gun, I would opt for a .223.

Everyone would like to think you can pull those fox and coyotes out into a field where you can get a nice standing, broadside shot. But in reality, in the timber or brush where you will get them to come in, I would want something that will anchor the animal regardless of the angle. You can run up against some big coyotes and they are hard to call in. You are going to work for every one. Hunting out west you often get to choose the shot, and if it goes bad for what ever reason, you often have another chance to hit them again. And if you screw one up (out west) it seems as though just down the road there is another one. A coyote that runs 75 or 100 yards (and then drops) out west is one thing, a coyote or fox that runs the same distance in the �brush� may not be found.

A .223 will give you an almost unlimited choice of bullets to use for all the varmints you want to shoot with out reloading. The .223 is so popular you likely know someone who loads for the .223 so you can tailor your loads to the gun and the game if you do have time.

Just my opinion, Uplandr, from hunting in both settings.

Later, pdhntr
 
Posts: 731 | Location: NoWis. | Registered: 04 May 2004Reply With Quote
Moderator
posted Hide Post
Forget all that .17 and .20 crap. Just rechamber your CZ to .223 Remington. There are dozens, perhaps scores of factory ammunition offerings, plus those offered by custom loading shops.

The .223 will kill every type of varmint you have in PA.

George
 
Posts: 14623 | Location: San Antonio, TX | Registered: 22 May 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
GHD, here goes my attempt at posting your picture, I stink at this by the way.





[image]http://outcast.homeunix.org/uploads/Charlie's .204 groups.jpg [/image] http://outcast.homeunix.org/uploads/Charlie's .204 groups.jpg
 
Posts: 1181 | Location: Bozeman Montana | Registered: 04 April 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
are easily attainable. I'm not sure what the pressures are that are being produced, but I have exceeded the advertised 32 gr. factory load speed with several different loads.

I use Remington 7 1/2 primers and have tried Varget, VVN540, Benchmark, H322, Reloder 10X, BL-C(2), H4895, and Win 748. My most accurate loads for the 32 gr. V-Max and the Berger 35 gr. FB HP are with H4895. I still haven't found a real good load for the 40 gr. V-Max, so I am going to try the 40 gr. Berger LTB bullets now.

I did pull a bullet out of a 32 gr. Hornady factory load and weigh the powder charge. If I remember right, I think the scale leveled off at 30.2 grains. I have several reloads I have shot that exceed that 4,225 fps speed with far less powder than 30.2 gr. The only powder I have run into any signs of real pressure was with Win 748 and that was most likely my fault. The last shot I fired with that particular load gave me a chronograph reading of 4,400 fps at 12 feet from the muzzle. Those four casings had primer pockets that were stretched so much that you could almost seat a primer in the pocket by pushing it in with your finger.

I have also shot 40 gr. V-Max bullets well above the velocity advertised by Hornady with their factory loads. I'm not saying all these loads are safe, but they have not shown any real signs of pressure, except for that Win 748 load with the 32 gr. bullets.
 
Posts: 192 | Location: Northwest North Dakota | Registered: 19 June 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of milanuk
posted Hide Post
Quote:


In all honesty I haven't shot this rifle at 1k yet. I haven't even started looking for a load to do it yet, so I probably shouldn't have mentioned it in my post. I've been too busy with other things (trying to get back into service rifle after a break of several years). However, my ballistics program (Sierra Infinity) tells me that 2500 will still be supersonic. Since they also list data pushing an 80 to 2600, I don't think the 75's will be a problem. But having not actually done it yet, it's all theoretical for me at this point. I do intend to try it though.





You might want to run a few more simulations on that data. Start varying the altitude and temperature. Things start getting wonky when going from high to low altitude and/or the temperatures drop off (say, a nasty match day in March/April). At least theoretically.

I'm not casting stones on this one; I've been too chicken so far to shoot my AR at distance, instead opt'ing for the 6.5-08. What I've been hearing from the guys who've built up dedicated .223 Palma rifles (NRA rules at least I think allow it now, if not International) is that while on paper a hot-loaded .223 w/ an 80 or 80gr VLD looks like it *should* hang right in there w/ a 155gr out of a .308, it's not showing on the ranges. Getting there supersonic is OK, hard on a barrel (pushing a .224 90gr VLD thru a barrel, even driven by a .223, is *hard* on it, period), but windage... somewhere the computer projections and reality are diverging. From what I've heard, anyway.

HTH,

Monte
 
Posts: 341 | Location: Wenatchee, WA | Registered: 27 February 2002Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia