THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM SMALL CALIBER FORUM

Page 1 2 

Moderators: Paul H
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Any love for the 260?
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
posted Hide Post
It's still between them. ;-)
 
Posts: 66 | Location: Port Crane, NY | Registered: 11 February 2018Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Actually it goes from 22 to 416 and I have a barrel/rifle in all of those cals except for the 375 which I used the 8mm case and the 416 which I designed a case for a Marlin 336 Lever action but never found the round toit to do it. There was also a 23 cal, half way between the 22 and 24 cal, that someone did way back. Good thing the net wasn't available then...the poor guy(or girl) would be flayed alive and all the other modern day vilification's.

Doesn't matter tho'...the 6mm's and 6.5's have been killing things internationally since they first came out and my "little" 6mm FB originally and now 6 BR will take deer just as effectively as a 22LR IF you put the bullet where it belongs...

NOT to take this weenee roast down another road. offtopic Big Grin hammering rotflmo I'm pretty sure there is a 6.5 FB out there somewhere possibly, I KNOW there is a 6.5 TC/U AKA 6.5x223 Cool and some of those "cartridges were knocking over steel plates out to 500 yds...WAY BACK in the day.

Good Hunting tu2 beer
 
Posts: 1211 | Registered: 25 January 2014Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by kjjm4:
I like the idea of the .260, but I'll never buy one because I have been shooting a 6.5x55 since before the .260 was invented, so I never saw the point.


Amen.... same applies to the 6.5 Creedmore also.


Shoot Safe,
Mike

NRA Endowment Member

 
Posts: 1003 | Location: Middle Georgia | Registered: 06 February 2011Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I like the idea of the .260, but I'll never buy one because I have been shooting a 6.5x55 since before the .260 was invented, so I never saw the point.

Amen.... same applies to the 6.5 Creedmore also.[/quote]


right... if you have a .260 rem. you don't need a 6.5 creed
 
Posts: 1137 | Location: SouthCarolina | Registered: 07 July 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I am fixing to buy another 260 Remington.I.have barrels of 308 brass to.make my 260 brass from.Always remember the ammo brass shortage of the oboma days it's coming again next demirat !
 
Posts: 2543 | Registered: 21 December 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by James Yoder:
I had a successful Pa deer season using the 260. I have a Ruger M77 MkII dad got me for Christmas in 2003. I had read about it in a gun magazine, and thought it was so cool. I have had probably 15-20 deer fall to that gun, anywhere from 20-250 yards. This year I used it to shoot a doe at 40 yards through the front of the chest as she was facing me. Blew apart the lungs and exited. She went 40 yards and collapsed. A week later I used it to shoot my best buck. It was an 8 point, only 15 1/2 inside spread, but long tines and good mass. Tines were almost 10 inches long, mass was 5 1/8 on the base, giving him a rough score of 126 or 127.I would post a pic, but have no idea how. He was 75 yards quartered hard away. Slipped one into the boiler room. Again, 30-40 yards and he was done.
This is what I have come to expect with this gun. Right now I m shooting 140 grain Accubonds under a charge of Reloader 19 for a MV of 2650. Have not played with much else. Think for next season I will experiment with some others. The 100 or 120 TTSX seem like a good option, or the 125 partitions. I have complete faith in that gun. The hard part will be when I get my 358 Winchester built, I will not know which to take...I guess flip a coin!!1


Lipsey's just listed a special run of Ruger 77 RSI (full stock) with 18 1/2" barrel in .260.
 
Posts: 114 | Registered: 05 January 2018Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I have a lot of 260s, 20+ IIRC. I jumped on the 260 in 10/97, before factory ammo was on the shelves, and have killed numerous animals with them.

Depending on the rifle and the intended use, I've loaded a lot of different bullets, makes and styles, for the 260 and have decided that for me, I like the following:

100 grain BT and Partition
120 grain BT
129 grain Hornady, matching bullet style to target
130 grain AB
140 grain Partition if the ROT is fast enough

If I was limited to one bullet weight and style it would be the 130 grain AB, as it does everything that I need a bullet to do when fired from a 260.

I have a 3-rifle set of Ruger 77 Hawkeyes in 223, 6.5 Creedmoor, and 338 Federal that I have set up with McMillan Hunter style stocks. If the 6.5 Creedmoor hadn't come along, I would have opted for a stainless 77 MK2 in 260.
 
Posts: 993 | Location: Omaha, NE, USA | Registered: 11 May 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 260remguy:
I have a lot of 260s, 20+ IIRC. I jumped on the 260 in 10/97, before factory ammo was on the shelves, and have killed numerous animals with them.

Depending on the rifle and the intended use, I've loaded a lot of different bullets, makes and styles, for the 260 and have decided that for me, I like the following:

100 grain BT and Partition
120 grain BT
129 grain Hornady, matching bullet style to target
130 grain AB
140 grain Partition if the ROT is fast enough

If I was limited to one bullet weight and style it would be the 130 grain AB, as it does everything that I need a bullet to do when fired from a 260.

I have a 3-rifle set of Ruger 77 Hawkeyes in 223, 6.5 Creedmoor, and 338 Federal that I have set up with McMillan Hunter style stocks. If the 6.5 Creedmoor hadn't come along, I would have opted for a stainless 77 MK2 in 260.


That's good stuff right there. We're going to start loading for my son's Tikka CTR in 260. I hope those 130 AB's are as accurate in his 260 as they are my 6.5CM. I have those, the 140 partition, and 129 LRAB to try first. Any load data you wish to share would be welcome (PM if you'd rather). Thanks.
 
Posts: 2276 | Location: West Texas | Registered: 07 December 2011Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of vapodog
posted Hide Post
Being a lover of the M-70 rifle and it wasn't available in the .260 Remington cartridge, I purchased one in .243, removed and sold off the barrel and barreled it to the .260 Remington.

Truth be, it didn't kill deer any better than my 6.5 X 55 Swede built on a VZ-24 and actually didn't prove inadequate compared to my .264 Magnum....it's a very fine round for sure.

As to the Creedmoor.......I have little doubt that it too will get the job done......that said....I'll never understand the (apparent) hysteria for it.....have we created an entire generation of couch commandos?


///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery."
Winston Churchill
 
Posts: 28849 | Location: western Nebraska | Registered: 27 May 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
the Creedmore is the result of a fantastic advertising campaign and a hungry public..Something new has been the golden egg in the firearms industry for years, but that's a good thing, not bad..Gives up more toys..

Bottom line of this thread is they are equal in every respect, despite all the pros and cons and tech experts...they bot almost equal the 250-3000 of yesteryear! stir sofa tu2


Ray Atkinson
Atkinson Hunting Adventures
10 Ward Lane,
Filer, Idaho, 83328
208-731-4120

rayatkinsonhunting@gmail.com
 
Posts: 42309 | Location: Twin Falls, Idaho | Registered: 04 June 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by vapodog:
Being a lover of the M-70 rifle and it wasn't available in the .260 Remington cartridge, I purchased one in .243, removed and sold off the barrel and barreled it to the .260 Remington.

Truth be, it didn't kill deer any better than my 6.5 X 55 Swede built on a VZ-24 and actually didn't prove inadequate compared to my .264 Magnum....it's a very fine round for sure.

As to the Creedmoor.......I have little doubt that it too will get the job done......that said....I'll never understand the (apparent) hysteria for it.....have we created an entire generation of couch commandos?


Here are 3 things that have contributed to the 6.5 Creedmoor's rapid popularity:

1. The 6.5 Creedmoor's short case allows for longer/heavier VLD bullets to work in all popular short action magazines better than the 260.

2. 6.5 Creedmoor rifles were made with 1-8" ROT barrels from the start, so there weren't any problems stabilizing those longer/heavier VLD that the 1-9" 260s had.

3. There are more factory loaded ammo options for the 6.5 Creedmoor than for the 260, it is often less expensive, and more widely available, even at many Wal-Mart stores.

4. I have several rifles chambered in 6.5 Creedmoor and don't think that it is a better option than the 260 if a person loads his/her own ammo and can select a component bullet that work through the rifle's magazine and stabilizes in the rifles ROT.

Remington did a terrible job of launching the 260 back in 1997 and it never overcame the poor start. The product launch was so poorly done that I have long wondered if somebody at Remington purposely sabotaged it.
 
Posts: 993 | Location: Omaha, NE, USA | Registered: 11 May 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Dead Eye
posted Hide Post
^^There weren't as many wannabe long range snipers in 1997 as there are now.
More and more I'm liking a 24" barrel 270 win.
 
Posts: 395 | Location: Canada | Registered: 06 March 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Bottom line of this thread is they are equal in every respect, despite all the pros and cons and tech experts...they bot almost equal the 250-3000 of yesteryear! stir sofa tu2


A nice cartridge for sure; but what speed does the .250 Savage drive a 140 gr bullet to. ;-)

And what does it spit that delivers 2,200 ft lbs of energy at 300 yards?
 
Posts: 66 | Location: Port Crane, NY | Registered: 11 February 2018Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of vapodog
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Charlie P.(NY):
quote:
Bottom line of this thread is they are equal in every respect, despite all the pros and cons and tech experts...they bot almost equal the 250-3000 of yesteryear! stir sofa tu2


A nice cartridge for sure; but what speed does the .250 Savage drive a 140 gr bullet to. ;-)

And what does it spit that delivers 2,200 ft lbs of energy at 300 yards?


Well, yes, true, all valid points, but I went to the dictionary and didn't find definitions of the words deader or deadest. It seems there is only dead. Cool


///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery."
Winston Churchill
 
Posts: 28849 | Location: western Nebraska | Registered: 27 May 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I think people miss the boat on the why and how of the 6.5 Creedmoor or any other cartridge in this class.

First and foremost it was designed as a competition cartridge and a very specific competition at that. The competition of long range shooting

Given a blank page and a request to fulfill a specific requirement in terms what is the most desirable traits of a long range competition cartridge this option ticks of many of the boxes if not all of the boxes. The name of the game can be summarized in one single word and that is
statistical precision.


From a internal ballistics cycle perspective little more that can be designed into a cartridge other than perhaps a small rifle primer as standard feature and not a large rifle primer as it is currently offered. ( Lapua did change their brass offering to this spec )

There are many 6.5s out there, some new some old and ballistically they are not the same !

Whilst they are loaded with the very same bullet and may be launched in the same velocity range the statistical variance in real time ballistic conditions at time of the bullet egress from the barrel is where they differ and ultimately is important when ranges exceed 600 m.
 
Posts: 7857 | Registered: 16 August 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Dead Eye
posted Hide Post
The Creedmore is 4-500 yard deer gun. Or good for punching paper.
Nothing special. But don't tell Hornady that.
 
Posts: 395 | Location: Canada | Registered: 06 March 2010Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia