THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM SINGLE SHOT PISTOLS FORUM


Moderators: Paul H
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Ordered the Simmons 8-32x44 from CDNN
 Login/Join
 
one of us
posted
I'll be mounting it on a contender 15" 222Rem bull barrel. I have a Leupold Duel Dovetail mount on it but I only have med high rings. Will the high rings work or do I need to get super high?
 
Posts: 1902 | Location: Va. Beach,Va. | Registered: 10 March 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Sean VHA #60013
posted Hide Post
Jules,

I'd say you will need the super high if you are mounting it on a bull barrel.

My Simmons/Blazer 8-32x44mm uses Leupold QRW extra high rings in order to clear the 14" 22mag Bellm rechamber.

 -
 
Posts: 830 | Location: Virginia, USA | Registered: 08 March 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Nashcat
posted Hide Post
Jules,
I finally got to shoot my 222 with the 8x24 Tasco, last week. I had to go with high rings on the 40MM scope, so you will probably have to go with extra high. I didn't get a black eye, but I did develop a flinch after about 15 rounds. The scope was brushing my nose or forehead each time I touched off a round and I was getting worried that sooner or later, it would draw blood. This was after I added 8 ounces of lead to the forearm. When I tried a tight grip, the scope didn�t hit me, but the accuracy went all to hell. It seems that my Contender likes a very light grip. It sure was nice to be able to see the target with the higher power scope. Maybe I can find a rifle scope with more eye relief, or add more weight to keep it out of my face. The quest for a �one hole� group goes on!

Nashcat
 
Posts: 331 | Location: MiddleTennessee | Registered: 26 May 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Nashcat
posted Hide Post
Here's a picture of the lead that I added to the forearm. I drilled 3/4" holes in the barrel channel, then I drilled more holes in a scrap piece of wood to use as a mold to cast the weights. The slugs were about 5/8" long. I held them in with blue silicon RTV. The weight really holds it on the sandbags, but it's a little much to carry on a hunt.

Nashcat  -
 
Posts: 331 | Location: MiddleTennessee | Registered: 26 May 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Magnum Mike
posted Hide Post
Nash, Think we outta try a forearm made from a cinder block, that would keep the muzzle down. [Wink]
 
Posts: 1574 | Location: Western Pennsylvania | Registered: 12 September 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Sean VHA #60013
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Nashcat:
Here's a picture of the lead that I added to the forearm. I drilled 3/4" holes in the barrel channel, then I drilled more holes in a scrap piece of wood to use as a mold to cast the weights. The slugs were about 5/8" long. I held them in with blue silicon RTV. The weight really holds it on the sandbags, but it's a little much to carry on a hunt.

Nashcat,

Do you find such a heavy forend loosens the dovetail locks on your barrel?

In my forend expiramentations, I have found that there is a point of diminishing returns on the heavier recoiling calibers as far as weighted forends go, but have not established a particular limit on the milder recoiling calibers, and on the rimfires anything seems to go [Big Grin]
 
Posts: 830 | Location: Virginia, USA | Registered: 08 March 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Nashcat
posted Hide Post
Sean,
I didn't notice any change in the dovetail locks after using the weighted forend. I fired about 40 rounds of 222 with it and then tried it with my 35 Rem barrel. I fired 50 hot rounds through the 35, and couldn't see any change in the locks. The extra weight did seem to calm the recoil with the 35. Also, the point of impact was 6" lower at 100 yds, with the added weight, than without it. I guess it cut down on muzzle flip while the bullet was still in the bore.

Nashcat
 
Posts: 331 | Location: MiddleTennessee | Registered: 26 May 2002Reply With Quote
<SD Handgunner>
posted
Jules, you've got mail. I measured the largest part of the Objective Bell (the knurling on the AO), and it measures 2.240". I have my Simmons 800116 on a Ruger K77/22VBZ, and had to get the highest Rings Ruger offers to get it to clear the barrel.

Larry
 
Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by SD Handgunner:
Jules, you've got mail. I measured the largest part of the Objective Bell (the knurling on the AO), and it measures 2.240". I have my Simmons 800116 on a Ruger K77/22VBZ, and had to get the highest Rings Ruger offers to get it to clear the barrel.

Larry

Thanks Larry, That's what I needed to know. Looks like the super high rings will work. [Wink]
 
Posts: 1902 | Location: Va. Beach,Va. | Registered: 10 March 2002Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia