Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
One of Us |
| ||
|
one of us |
I'm 1 of 347 no's and counting. xxxxxxxxxx When considering US based operations of guides/outfitters, check and see if they are NRA members. If not, why support someone who doesn't support us? Consider spending your money elsewhere. NEVER, EVER book a hunt with BLAIR WORLDWIDE HUNTING or JEFF BLAIR. I have come to understand that in hunting, the goal is not the goal but the process. | |||
|
Moderator |
75-25 in favor of no AWB endorsements. George | |||
|
One of Us |
I just put in my NO results 76.19% No vesus 23.81 Yes. Even the rocks don't last forever. | |||
|
One of Us |
Yes 20.78% (133 votes) No 79.22% (507 votes) Total Votes: 640 As of 436 P Central Robert If we can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people, under the pretense of taking care of them, they must become happy. Thomas Jefferson, 1802 | |||
|
One of Us |
82.26% NO Member: Orange Gunsite Family, NRA--Life, Varmint Hunters' Assn., ARTCA, and American Legion. "An armed society is a polite society" --Robert Heinlein via Col. Jeff Cooper, USMC Caveat Emptor: Don't trust *Cavery Grips* from Clayton, NC. He is a ripoff. | |||
|
One of Us |
I voted and passed it on by email to several buddies. Cold Zero | |||
|
One of Us |
Just voted no... Jim "Life's hard; it's harder if you're stupid" John Wayne | |||
|
one of us |
I was just wondering since I do not recall if there was such a big stink about the 3 shot limit that is imposed on waterfowl hunting or in some stated that limit 3 shot capacity for hunting. Seems to me if there was a need for large capacity it would be for putting food on the table, not shooting holes in paper targets??? NRA Life Member, ILL Rifle Assoc Life Member, Navy | |||
|
One of Us |
Raamw, The magazine limit for waterfowl hunting is for conservation reason. Waterfowl is actually some of the most expensive fowl you can eat, when considering ammo prices and gas. By comparison, chicken at 70 cents per pound is really alot cheaper. The issue I have with the waterfowl magazine limit is that it encouraged hunters to walk around with a round in the chamber. I believe that if they lifted the limit, more people would just load the magazine, hunting with an empty chamber. This would reduce accidents, and save lives. So you can say I'm against the waterfowl magazine limit because it kills people. | |||
|
one of us |
click on link and get a netflix popup. Not appreciated | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia