Please vote in this poll

The Accurate Reloading Forums

This topic can be found at:
https://forums.accuratereloading.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/6011036801/m/3491037771

24 July 2012, 19:39

Antelope Sniper

Please vote in this poll

http://www.nj.com/hudson/voice...ld_presidential.html

24 July 2012, 20:45

Gatogordo

I'm 1 of 347 no's and counting.

xxxxxxxxxx
When considering US based operations of guides/outfitters, check and see if they are NRA members. If not, why support someone who doesn't support us? Consider spending your money elsewhere.

NEVER, EVER book a hunt with BLAIR WORLDWIDE HUNTING or JEFF BLAIR.

I have come to understand that in hunting, the goal is not the goal but the process.

24 July 2012, 21:41

GeorgeS

75-25 in favor of no AWB endorsements.

George

24 July 2012, 22:47

Crazyhorseconsulting

I just put in my NO results 76.19% No vesus 23.81 Yes.

25 July 2012, 02:36

RVL III

Yes 20.78% (133 votes)

No 79.22% (507 votes)

Total Votes: 640

As of 436 P Central

Robert

If we can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people, under the pretense of taking care of them, they must become happy. Thomas Jefferson, 1802

25 July 2012, 16:39

Kevin Rohrer

82.26% NO

Member:
Orange Gunsite Family, NRA--Life, Varmint Hunters' Assn., ARTCA, and American Legion.

"An armed society is a polite society" --Robert Heinlein via Col. Jeff Cooper, USMC

Caveat Emptor: Don't trust *Cavery Grips* from Clayton, NC. He is a ripoff.

26 July 2012, 17:17

Cold Zero

I voted and passed it on by email to several buddies.

27 July 2012, 05:58

capoward

Just voted no...

27 July 2012, 22:26

raamw

I was just wondering since I do not recall if there was such a big stink about the 3 shot limit that is imposed on waterfowl hunting or in some stated that limit 3 shot capacity for hunting. Seems to me if there was a need for large capacity it would be for putting food on the table, not shooting holes in paper targets???

28 July 2012, 02:20

Antelope Sniper

Raamw,

The magazine limit for waterfowl hunting is for conservation reason. Waterfowl is actually some of the most expensive fowl you can eat, when considering ammo prices and gas. By comparison, chicken at 70 cents per pound is really alot cheaper.

The issue I have with the waterfowl magazine limit is that it encouraged hunters to walk around with a round in the chamber. I believe that if they lifted the limit, more people would just load the magazine, hunting with an empty chamber. This would reduce accidents, and save lives.

So you can say I'm against the waterfowl magazine limit because it kills people.