No more pictures of half naked women.
Next person who posts a picture of a naked woman gets banned.

No arguments.
No warning.

So let it be written, so let it be done!

Was that Yul Brynner?

Does that mean there were more naked women pictures and I missed them?

How naked were they?

quote:

No more pictures of half naked women.

Will a picture of a "half dressed" woman get you banned?

quote:

Originally posted by Walterhog:
No more pictures of half naked women.

Just trying to follow your rules big boy...

blackbearhunter and forestb have been suspended for one week.

No pictures of naked humans. No difference if it is your wife, your girlfriend or your boyfriend.

quote:

Originally posted by Walterhog:
blackbearhunter and forestb have been suspended for one week.

No pictures of naked humans. No difference if it is your wife, your girlfriend or your boyfriend.

Walter, that's a bit harsh.

Could you please define naked?

quote:

quote:
Originally posted by Walterhog:
blackbearhunter and forestb have been suspended for one week.

No pictures of naked humans. No difference if it is your wife, your girlfriend or your boyfriend.


Walter, that's a bit harsh.

Could you please define naked?

Why do y'all keep poking the bulldog? And then you act surprised when someone gets bit, sheesh.

Does this mean that we will NOT be subjetted to any more picrures of Walter, cross dressing????

Krith

Was it the pic of madona, Jaba the hut ape or the bear that got blackbearhunter banned?

I would like to point out that Madonna had clothes on and therefore I don't think she meets the naked human definition; Walter must just not like her.

Jabba the Hut and the bear were naked if you don't count the hair but they're not human.

ForrestB didn't post a photo of a naked woman and, I would argue the man, if indeed he is one, isn't naked either. There are swimming suits that cover less than what he has on.

Truly sad.......laughable, in fact. Shameful hypocrisy abounds.

Where is that picture of Walter sitting outside naked in a bathtub over top a fire ?

Wow !

quote:

Originally posted by Walterhog:
blackbearhunter and forestb have been suspended for one week.

No pictures of naked humans. No difference if it is your wife, your girlfriend or your boyfriend.

Walter,
Just because someone finds a pic of your life partner floating on the internet doesnt mean you should take it so personal and ban them for a week. have a sense of humor for cripes sake. Life is way to short to take it so seriously.

quote:

Originally posted by JD Miller:
Where is that picture of Walter sitting outside naked in a bathtub over top a fire ?

Wow !

You raise an interesting point.

I seem to remember seeing just such a picture.

Surely there are no double standards on AR.

quote:

Originally posted by John Frederick:

quote:

Originally posted by JD Miller:
Where is that picture of Walter sitting outside naked in a bathtub over top a fire ?

Wow !

You raise an interesting point.

I seem to remember seeing just such a picture.

Surely there are no double standards on AR.

Someone needs to find that one and post it.. the hypocrisy here is unbelievable at times.

So there are threads of foxy fifty year olds in bikinis
threads of brunettes ,
threads of blondes
threads of ravens,
threads of hot outdoor babes etc etc with a lot of them with hardly anything on or with nothing on at all but just turned in a position such as were nothing shows and someone gets banned for posting of a redneck in his underwear?

quote:

Originally posted by ted thorn:
So let it be written, so let it be done!

Was that Yul Brynner?

"Land o' Goshen!" -Charlton Hest- er, Moses.

quote:

Originally posted by Walterhog:
blackbearhunter and forestb have been suspended for one week.

No pictures of naked humans. No difference if it is your wife, your girlfriend or your boyfriend.

Underneath all these clothes I'm not wearing nothing.

quote:

Originally posted by Scottyboy:

quote:

Originally posted by John Frederick:

quote:

Originally posted by JD Miller:
Where is that picture of Walter sitting outside naked in a bathtub over top a fire ?

Wow !

You raise an interesting point.

I seem to remember seeing just such a picture.

Surely there are no double standards on AR.

Someone needs to find that one and post it.. the hypocrisy here is unbelievable at times.

Not so sure about that Scotty.

I've seen the hypocrisy on this sight and I guess I have to believe it, it's there for all to see.

Best keep them duds on there JD. Otherwise your shortcomings would really be apparent to the whole world, not just to those on AR.
GWB

I have restored ForrestB and blackbearhunter's right to post.

Please stop playing silly games with Walter.

We have agreed with him ANYONE posting irrelevant photos will get the chop from him.

quote:

No more pictures of half naked women.

So, fully naked would be OK? What constitutes "HALF" ???

quote:

Originally posted by Saeed:
I have restored ForrestB and blackbearhunter's right to post.

Please stop playing silly games with Walter.

We have agreed with him ANYONE posting irrelevant photos will get the chop from him.

How's about you restore Cane Rat, too?

quote:

Originally posted by Saeed:
I have restored ForrestB and blackbearhunter's right to post.

Please stop playing silly games with Walter.

We have agreed with him ANYONE posting irrelevant photos will get the chop from him.

How about Cane Rat Saeed?

Would you consider restoring him?

Best

Cool

quote:

Originally posted by J.D.Randell:

quote:

No more pictures of half naked women.

So, fully naked would be OK? What constitutes "HALF" ???

In case you missed it:

quote:

Saeed
Administrator

Posted 11 August 2010 16:11 Hide Post
I have restored ForrestB and blackbearhunter's right to post.

Please stop playing silly games with Walter.

We have agreed with him ANYONE posting irrelevant photos will get the chop from him.

Sooo, Cane Rat has gotton kicked out again?

Cane Rat got the ax for posting something someone else had already posted. Must be some good hash in the emirates, because this action has no reasonable basis whatsoever...

In my 68 years, rarely have I seen such arbitrary and unfair actions. No harm was done to anyone.

so, rat gets banned for somethng somene else had already posted? how about cutting him some slack and letting him off with a warning this time?

quote:

Originally posted by Saeed:
We have agreed with him ANYONE posting irrelevant photos will get the chop from him.

I seem to remember that you (Saeed) have made many irrelvant post in the African hunting forum. That have NOTHING to do with african hunting. (your person zoo and around the house)

I know that this is your site, but you should follow your own rules. Lead by exanple.

Keith

What Saeed does is his business. It is his website and he can do what he wishes.
You want to do whatever you want, start your own. On this forum, my farum, I do not want to see pictures of ugly human being has beens either.

I'm having trouble following this.

Did the Rat get banned for re-posting something that someone else posted and is still available for viewing?

Please tell me that is not the case.

If it is, some folks need to toughen up or find a sense of humour.

C'mon, let's not have a zero tolerance policy that goes this far.

Bring back Cane Rat, he's a good guy.

.

I believe there is a lot of misunderstanding here and I'm going to try to clear things up. If you look under the title of the farum, you will read, "do not expect any intelligent or reasonable answers" and to "enter at your own risk." So, consider yourself warned about entering this farum.

Now the farum is said to be a "general" one and I've seen various things posted from half naked to three quarters naked males and females; some ugly and some not. Discussions on wine, etc. have also taken place. The relation to hunting has been rather thready at times but it's a "general" farum.

You have all been warned, Walter does not want half naked or apparently any other degree of nudity of any type of human being and especially "ugly human being has beens" on his farum. I would say to be safe, if you're going to post a photo on Walter's farum, you must only post photos of any human if they're wearing a burga, a sack or some other object that COMPLETELY covers EVERY part of their body.

Just to help you gentlemen out, I'm posting a photo that I believe will be acceptable on this farum. It is of an ugly "has been" but it's clothed in feathers and I don't think it's human.

This one and its kind have been frequenting my farm to eat the eggs of birds nesting in the field and I got tired of it just as Walter has gotten tired of those toying with him. On the fateful day I collected this one, I saw two out on the grass playing with something. I got my Encore in 270 Winchester, assumed the prone position with the barrel sticking you my front door, aligned the cross hairs on my Swarovski 4-16X scope that cost about twice as much as the rifle on the crow and fired. There was a puff of black feathers as a 130 gr. Remington Core Lokt made the crow a "has been" from a distance of about 160 yards.

I was happy at the results but my wife Sweetsums wasn't so happy. She was sitting in the bedroom reading (she was, unfortunately, fully clothed) and allegedly the blast deafened her. In my defense, I had warned her I was going to shoot and I've shot braked handguns out of the back door and she didn't even wake up so how was I to know that a mere 270 Winchester was going to seem so loud through 2 or 3 walls.

She claimed that I shot from "inside" the house. I disagree since the muzzle was definitely out of the front door and I believe part of my body (mostly clothed by the way so nothing risque here) was outside the front door as well.

The item the crows had been playing with was a toad in a terminal state.

Grumulkin,
What about those sensitive types that worry about what the anti's think when observing a picture of a beastie that met his/her demise from other than natural causes. I'm sure they will be on you like stink on shit if they view that pix.
Just alerting you to be ready for a shit storm of protest.
GWB

quote:

Originally posted by Riverduck:
C'mon, let's not have a zero tolerance policy that goes this far.

Bring back Cane Rat, he's a good guy.

.

Couldn't agree more.

If the other two gentlemen have been re-instated why is the Rat still in exile?

I guess some folks take life a tad too seriously and are happy to live within the constraints of the increasingly politically correct world that is being forced upon us.

I have never been able to understand why some people are sooooo scared/threatened/afraid of nudity. I guess those same folks undress in the dark, avoid mirrors when exiting the shower and knock on the bathroom door before they enter, to avoid the shocking prospect of seeing their wife bending over to pick up the soap.

Then again, in many cases that might be a sight that is worth avoiding.

Isn't it ironic. If one was to "eat crow" one would first remove its feathers to "dress it" which must mean in it's present state it's undressed. So is the crow also naked?

Saeed said Walter would answer all questions on his farum so I await his answer.

I think I will just let someone else catch the heat over this one.

Rich
DRSS

I am just a guest here and will follow whatever rules the powers to be come up with. It would be helpful though to know exactly what those rules are.

465H&H