THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM BIG BORE FORUMS

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Rifles  Hop To Forums  Big Bores    375 Holland and 416 Remington weights?
Page 1 2 

Moderators: jeffeosso
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
375 Holland and 416 Remington weights? Login/Join
 
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by chuck375:
Our Rem XCR II in 375 weighs 7 1/4 lbs with a 2-8x Leupold on it sans sling and unloaded. I know it's not a CRF, but it shoots great is corrosion resistant and the stock just seems to soak up recoil. It kicks less than the 9 lb CZ 550 in 375 H&H I used to own (that rifle has grown up to be an 11.25 lb 500 Jeffery).



How is that possible? Physics say the heavier rifle has to have less recoil, if the cartridge is the same.
 
Posts: 828 | Location: Whitecourt, Alberta | Registered: 10 July 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Big Wonderful Wyoming
posted Hide Post
Because Remington tupperware stocks flex considerably and give less recoil.

Tons of things influence recoil.

Some that aren't always thought of is stock material, stock design and then you get back into the normal stuff like bullet weight, bullet velocity, powder charge, cartridge, and rifle weight.
 
Posts: 7782 | Location: Das heimat! | Registered: 10 October 2012Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Big Wonderful Wyoming:
Because Remington tupperware stocks flex considerably and give less recoil.

Tons of things influence recoil.

Some that aren't always thought of is stock material, stock design and then you get back into the normal stuff like bullet weight, bullet velocity, powder charge, cartridge, and rifle weight.


Spot on.

Also a lighter rifle with better stock fit reduces felt recoil.
 
Posts: 492 | Location: Queensland, Australia | Registered: 26 August 2012Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I have several rifles in 375 H&H. Each weighs about 9 to 9 1/2 lbs w/ scope, sling, and full magazine. I have 1 rifle in 416 Rem that weighs a little over 10 lbs. It has a brake on it.
 
Posts: 78 | Location: Alaska  | Registered: 22 April 2015Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of chuck375
posted Hide Post
Whenever I feel like our 7.25 lb 375 Weatherby is kicking I just put 5 rounds down range with the 500 Jeffery. Then the 375 feels just like shooting a 30-06. Of course the recoil could be affecting my brain ...


Regards,

Chuck



"There's a saying in prize fighting, everyone's got a plan until they get hit"

Michael Douglas "The Ghost And The Darkness"
 
Posts: 4808 | Location: Colorado Springs | Registered: 01 January 2008Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
That flex affects accuracy in my experience. I can bend the stock by getting into a tight shooting position. I'll take the recoils with accuracy. No Tupperware for me
quote:
Originally posted by Big Wonderful Wyoming:
Because Remington tupperware stocks flex considerably and give less recoil.

Tons of things influence recoil.

Some that aren't always thought of is stock material, stock design and then you get back into the normal stuff like bullet weight, bullet velocity, powder charge, cartridge, and rifle weight.


White Mountains Arizona
 
Posts: 2863 | Registered: 31 December 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Big Wonderful Wyoming
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by chuck375:
Whenever I feel like our 7.25 lb 375 Weatherby is kicking I just put 5 rounds down range with the 500 Jeffery. Then the 375 feels just like shooting a 30-06. Of course the recoil could be affecting my brain ...


Masochist, hole crap that 500 sounds horrible. What do old boxers have? Water on the brain?
 
Posts: 7782 | Location: Das heimat! | Registered: 10 October 2012Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
A lighter object takes less energy to stop once in motion. Moves quicker at first, stops quicker. Less felt recoil,


There's a lot of truth in that, even if it seems counter intuitive. The light weight rifles recoil fast, and stops just as fast. The expected violence doesn't materialize. Sort of like a baseball pitcher throwing a bag of chips at you. My current .375 isn't much over 8 pounds, and doesn't need to weigh 10.

Back hunting again?
 
Posts: 1928 | Location: Saskatchewan, Canada | Registered: 30 November 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
That flex affects accuracy in my experience. I can bend the stock by getting into a tight shooting position. I'll take the recoils with accuracy. No Tupperware for me


And how many times can one get into a tight shooting position when hunting. The same can be said for barrel band sling swivels that are popular on big bores.
 
Posts: 19846 | Location: wis | Registered: 21 April 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by gunslinger55:
That flex affects accuracy in my experience. I can bend the stock by getting into a tight shooting position. I'll take the recoils with accuracy. No Tupperware for me
quote:
Originally posted by Big Wonderful Wyoming:
Because Remington tupperware stocks flex considerably and give less recoil.

Tons of things influence recoil.

Some that aren't always thought of is stock material, stock design and then you get back into the normal stuff like bullet weight, bullet velocity, powder charge, cartridge, and rifle weight.


Well if that is the case then my Rem 700 SPS 375 must be able to put 3 into a tight clover leaf instead of 3/4 of an inch at 100mts.
 
Posts: 492 | Location: Queensland, Australia | Registered: 26 August 2012Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Rule 303:
quote:
Originally posted by gunslinger55:
That flex affects accuracy in my experience. I can bend the stock by getting into a tight shooting position. I'll take the recoils with accuracy. No Tupperware for me
quote:
Originally posted by Big Wonderful Wyoming:
Because Remington tupperware stocks flex considerably and give less recoil.

Tons of things influence recoil.

Some that aren't always thought of is stock material, stock design and then you get back into the normal stuff like bullet weight, bullet velocity, powder charge, cartridge, and rifle weight.


Well if that is the case then my Rem 700 SPS 375 must be able to put 3 into a tight clover leaf instead of 3/4 of an inch at 100mts.


Maybe, maybe not. What you are likely to notice is that POI is less likely to shift between positions, be less sensitive to position on a rest, not have a major shift if you hang a bipod on it and less likely to be able to aim at a bench by bending the stock with thumb pressure.

Granted, none of that may matter at close range and some people can't shoot well enough to tell at any range.
 
Posts: 1928 | Location: Saskatchewan, Canada | Registered: 30 November 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of chuck375
posted Hide Post
Our 375 XCR II shoots 1/2" groups at 100 yards. Haven't seen any POI change with sling or without it. I shot my brown bear with it at 13 yards. Seems to work fine.


Regards,

Chuck



"There's a saying in prize fighting, everyone's got a plan until they get hit"

Michael Douglas "The Ghost And The Darkness"
 
Posts: 4808 | Location: Colorado Springs | Registered: 01 January 2008Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
If your mindset is right then weight really won't be a factor.


When did they start making shoulder replacement parts with a mindset?

Mindset is very important, but broken titanium rods and sockets will set you back $50,000.00

IF the mess can even be repaired.


 
Posts: 7158 | Location: Snake River | Registered: 02 February 2004Reply With Quote
Administrator
posted Hide Post
Stock shape has a lot to do with felt recoil!

A friend brought a 9.3x64 rifle with such a horrible stock, it felt much worse to me than a 460 Weatherby magnum!


www.accuratereloading.com
Instagram : ganyana2000
 
Posts: 69737 | Location: Dubai, UAE | Registered: 08 January 1998Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Cold Trigger Finger
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by chuck375:
Our 375 XCR II shoots 1/2" groups at 100 yards. Haven't seen any POI change with sling or without it. I shot my brown bear with it at 13 yards. Seems to work fine.



tu2


Phil Shoemaker : "I went to a .30-06 on a fine old Mauser action. That worked successfully for a few years until a wounded, vindictive brown bear taught me that precise bullet placement is not always possible in thick alders, at spitting distances and when time is measured in split seconds. Lucky to come out of that lesson alive, I decided to look for a more suitable rifle."
 
Posts: 1934 | Location: Eastern Central Alaska | Registered: 15 July 2014Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Recoil is an individual thing, and everyone should know their limit, to macho recoil is a sure-e-nuff way to ruin a great hunt with wounded animals..A 180 gr. 30-06 is damn deadly on about any animal if the bullet is stuck in the right spot, and a 500 NE in the guts is a gut shot, end of story...

I have shot big bores all my life until a recent very bad hand injury. If I practiced during the year and shot from time to time recoil bothered me not at all with any caliber, if I laid off for 3 or 4 months it always took me awhile to get back to shooting the big bores well...

Today the biggest thing I can shoot with this hand is the 9.3x62, 35 Whelen, or 338..The 375 pushes the limit and the 416 is a no no..The middle finger gets hit and I'm on my knees! barf 2020


Ray Atkinson
Atkinson Hunting Adventures
10 Ward Lane,
Filer, Idaho, 83328
208-731-4120

rayatkinsonhunting@gmail.com
 
Posts: 42321 | Location: Twin Falls, Idaho | Registered: 04 June 2000Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2  
 

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Rifles  Hop To Forums  Big Bores    375 Holland and 416 Remington weights?

Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia