THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM BIG BORE FORUMS

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Rifles  Hop To Forums  Big Bores    Best production rifle in .458 Lott

Moderators: jeffeosso
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Best production rifle in .458 Lott Login/Join
 
One of Us
posted
A good friend of mine, who is a active "PH", is interested to source a new, low cost (??) production .458 Lott to replace his H&H .577 sidelock Dominion Grade that is worth too much for him to keep. Any suggestions between the offerings of Messrs. Ruger, Winchester, CZ (nee Brno) et al??
 
Posts: 71 | Registered: 28 September 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I suggest that he get a good one built, such as at http://www.rbbigbores.com or http://www.johannsen-jagd.de/
 
Posts: 18352 | Location: Salt Lake City, Utah USA | Registered: 20 April 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Hog Killer
posted Hide Post
From the makers you listed, go with the Ruger. It is ready to use out of the box, cannot say the same for the CZ. That or the Win. Mod. 70, weould be the two I would choose from.


The only real reason to go with the CZ, is it's increased magazine capacty. But it will need to bed the action, cross bolted, barrel lug added, etc.

Hog Killer


IGNORE YOUR RIGHTS AND THEY'LL GO AWAY!!!
------------------------------------
We Band of Bubbas & STC Hunting Club, The Whomper Club
 
Posts: 4553 | Location: Walker Co.,Texas | Registered: 05 September 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of invader66
posted Hide Post
The Ruger IMHO is the best out of the box 458 Lott on the market today. Some find the saftey leaver to small and that is the only neg comment i have had. The action cleans with use, and i have had NO feeding or extraction issues. The CZ needs $$$$$ in stock work etc. I am verry happy with my RSM.


Semper Fi
WE BAND OF BUBBAS
STC Hunting Club
 
Posts: 1684 | Location: Walker Co,Texas | Registered: 27 August 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Brad Starcevich
posted Hide Post
Go with the Ruger. I have an RSM in 458 Lott and I love it. Best, Starcharvski
 
Posts: 135 | Location: St. Charles, IL USA | Registered: 17 February 2005Reply With Quote
Moderator
Picture of jeffeosso
posted Hide Post
I believe by cost being an issue that this gentleman wishes to keep his 577 and buy another rifle.

as others have said, this is nothing to compare, right out of the box, with a ruger RSM

you could spend 5 times that, and not have an all that much better rifle.


if the gentleman wishes a CZ, he should place his order through American Hunting Rifles and tell Ed Plummer to go through it, personally, and make 1000 times certain it functions.

On the CZ, he can replace the factory bottom metal with a wisner, and have an additional round down.

I have handled both.. and find the ruger to be right, right out of the box.

jeffe


opinions vary band of bubbas and STC hunting Club

Information on Ammoguide about
the416AR, 458AR, 470AR, 500AR
What is an AR round? Case Drawings 416-458-470AR and 500AR.
476AR,
http://www.weaponsmith.com
 
Posts: 40584 | Location: Conroe, TX | Registered: 01 June 2002Reply With Quote
One Of Us
Picture of new_guy
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by jeffeosso:
On the CZ, he can replace the factory bottom metal with a wisner, and have an additional round down.
jeffe


Is that a wisner floor-plate or complete magazine/trigger guard assembly?


www.heymusa.com


HSC Booth # 306
SCI Booth # 3947
 
Posts: 4026 | Registered: 28 May 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
jangili,
I have a Ruger 458 Lott and could not be more pleased. It is very accurate right out of the box.I didn't like the trigger so I cleaned it up. I don't think you can find a better 458 Lott for the money. everyone has an opinion and this is mine. CHEERS
 
Posts: 124 | Location: CA | Registered: 19 December 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Someplace I remember reading that there were two problems with the Ruger as a DGR. First,and most serious, if you cycle too fast the spring isn't strong enough for the shell to get into position before you start the bolt forward resulting in a jam. The second was minor, the action isn't smooth. The articel recommended the Winchester 70, but I don't remember if it comes in the Lott caliber.
 
Posts: 404 | Registered: 08 May 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I Bin Therbefor,
I have hunted DG twice in TZ with my Ruger 458 Lott and it preformed flawlessly. Don't believe every article you read. CHEERS
 
Posts: 124 | Location: CA | Registered: 19 December 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Charles_Helm
posted Hide Post
I believe tha tthe problem with ejection was primarily with the 436 Rigby and there was a recent post on the Africa Hunting forum indicating that Ruger had worked to resolve it.

The article is here. This is the thread in African Hunting.
 
Posts: 8773 | Location: Republic of Texas | Registered: 24 April 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Those are the articles.
 
Posts: 404 | Registered: 08 May 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I would go with the CZ. You will need to get the bedding done, and stock bolt fitted, but you will still come out way ahead cost wise over the Ruger.
Having said that, the Ruger is by far the nicer looking gun. On my 375H&H RSM, there were ejection problems until the 'smith polished up the ejector and installed a stronger spring, and the stock split under recoil (now ruger install an extra lug under the BBL), but once the problems were fixed, it was great.
However, if you have to do all that work anyway, you may as well get the CZ at about 1/3rd the price of the Ruger. The CZs are good, reliable rifles. If you don't believe me, ask Ganyana.

Cheers, Dave.
Non Illegitium Carborundum


Cheers, Dave.

Aut Inveniam Viam aut Faciam.
 
Posts: 6716 | Location: The Hunting State. | Registered: 08 March 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I don't think you can beat the Ruger RSM for the money. Mine has great iron sights, shoots great, looks good as well. I have no issues with my .416 ejecting or with any other Ruger i've owned. I did a trigger job myself, and it's ready to hunt with. My Rugers are all pretty damn smooth after a bit of shooting and will feed even the flat nose North Fork solids as well. The scope mounting seems to work, I've never had to change the scope after 300 full power rounds. The safety is a bit short, I just hunt with mine in the middle position when a shot is imminent and may need to take the safety off quickly. One of these days I'll have a gunsmith lengthen it a bit.


A shot not taken is always a miss
 
Posts: 2788 | Location: gallatin, mo usa | Registered: 10 March 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Hog Killer
posted Hide Post
Sambar, the CZs run about $850, and the Rugers list for around $1300. The CZs are not 1/3 the cost of a Ruger. Gunsmithing to the CZ, will even those numbers out.

Hog Killer


IGNORE YOUR RIGHTS AND THEY'LL GO AWAY!!!
------------------------------------
We Band of Bubbas & STC Hunting Club, The Whomper Club
 
Posts: 4553 | Location: Walker Co.,Texas | Registered: 05 September 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Since you mentioned PRODUCTION rifles, the only candidate is the Ruger RSM. You have the quarter rib, decent trigger out of the box, and most times very good wood to go with it. The only thing is to have the action smoothed over and check the claw extractor and remove all burrs and sharp corners. Some have had theirs bedded just for peace of mind also.


Lo do they call to me,
They bid me take my place
among them in the Halls of Valhalla,
Where the brave may live forever.
 
Posts: 2034 | Registered: 14 June 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I LOVE my RSM Lott but I would have a smith go over it. Flat bullets MAY hang up and the feed ramp might be adjusted accordingly. My floorplate latch gave up after a hundred rounds or so...no good in the bush.
Any rifle needs to have the rounds put through it to point out any weaknesses to be fixed. That being said, I think the Ruger RSMs are THE best buy out there. Good to great wood, a WONDERFUL quarter rib and fine accuracy make for a good purchase.

John


There are those that do, those that dream, and those that only read about it and then post their "expertise" on AR!
 
Posts: 831 | Location: Mount Vernon, WA | Registered: 18 November 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Thanks guys for the good detailed advice. I'll pass all this on to my buddy...
 
Posts: 71 | Registered: 28 September 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of crl
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 500grains:
I suggest that he get a good one built, such as at http://www.rbbigbores.com or http://www.johannsen-jagd.de/


The only problem is that it will cost $12,000 to get a gun from Ryan.

crl


The average man's love of liberty is nine-tenths imaginary. It takes a special sort of man to understand and enjoy liberty; and he is usually an outlaw in democratic societies.
 
Posts: 379 | Location: MN | Registered: 29 October 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Ruger-Tremendous action, and super strong.Ed.


MZEE WA SIKU
 
Posts: 27742 | Registered: 03 February 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of fla3006
posted Hide Post
Only thing I didn't like about my Ruger RSM was the limited magazine capacity, but it was a Rigby.


NRA Life Member, Band of Bubbas Charter Member, PGCA, DRSS.
Shoot & hunt with vintage classics.
 
Posts: 9487 | Location: Texas Hill Country | Registered: 11 January 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of DanEP
posted Hide Post
Ibeentherbefore,

Charley Helm posted what I figured you'd read. The extractor is a wide claw that is unlikely to fail. The ejector is a spring-loaded bar that slides into a slot in the bolt on the side of the bolt as the bolt is pulled back. Once the ejector has sprung into place, it acts like a block to the rearward moving cartridge, kicking it out of the port. The force of the spring never really engages the cartrige itself. The problem was that the spring didn't push hard enough, or have enough time, to get into place to kick the cartridge out when the bolt was pulled back too fast. That's why cutting the extractor groove in the bolt a little further back and a little deeper will give more time for the ejector to get into place.

The article on the PH school tests looks a little old -- it refers to the Winchester "Classic" line as "new." Ruger has moved to fix their ejector problem. The Win Classic is not so new anymore, and BRNO's are not as easy to find; CZ's have new stocks. The Zastava arms imports from Interarms are now being handled by Charles Daly, and does not produce .458 Lott.

The PH tests are grueling. It is fortunate that the failures are not as common in practice as they were under the test conditions... which is what you want from a test. It is definitely true that there's a lot of junk made in America (though I suspect some of that had been improved in the intervening time, with some notable exceptions)... but the glee that he seemed to take at pounding a guy's rifle with a hammer:
quote:

I’ll start with my least favourite rifle:- the Weatherby. We don’t often see them out here, thank goodness. The one we had this year exhibited the usual Weatherby failing of going off when the safety catch was disengaged. Like all I’ve seen with this problem, they work fine on the range. It is only after they have been bounced, bumped or jolted whilst loaded and on safe that they do this. I’m sure the problem is correctable and not all do it, however, this one would also not extract at all after the eighth round. It showed decidedly sticky extraction after the first three shots and finally died on number eight. It gives me great pleasure than to dig out my 2lb hammer and beat the bolt of a new rifle open whilst giving the owner a lecture on the benefits of reloading. Weatherby factory ammo always gives extraction problems and needs to be down loaded for use in hot conditions. The .460 is notorious and this .416 proved no different.

could be taken in a few different ways. Either he really wants to drive home the fact that a PH with an unreliable DGR is a tragedy waiting to happen, or else his comments might go a little better seasoned with some (just a little -- lives are at stake) salt.

Having noted that, overpacking, over-pressure, etc, have caused problems, not just with Weatherby, but with .458 win mags at their first introduction. The powder was packed so tightly, it would cake and give squibs. Together with thin-walled "solids" of the day, they performed quite badly. The .458 Lott was intended to fix that problem -- but it looks like Hornady loads these hot. I haven't heard of any complaints, though I'm keeping my ears open.

In any case, after enjoying my Ruger #1 in .458 win, noting that it is a non-DGR shooting a not-quite DG load (by some people's opinions), I finally got around to picking up the Ruger 77 in .458 Lott, along with dies and brass.

I hope you have as much fun with this stuff as I've been having!

Dan
 
Posts: 518 | Registered: 19 June 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by DanEP:
Ibeentherbefore,

Charley Helm posted what I figured you'd read. The extractor is a wide claw that is unlikely to fail. The ejector is a spring-loaded bar that slides into a slot in the bolt on the side of the bolt as the bolt is pulled back. Once the ejector has sprung into place, it acts like a block to the rearward moving cartridge, kicking it out of the port. The force of the spring never really engages the cartrige itself. The problem was that the spring didn't push hard enough, or have enough time, to get into place to kick the cartridge out when the bolt was pulled back too fast. That's why cutting the extractor groove in the bolt a little further back and a little deeper will give more time for the ejector to get into place.

The article on the PH school tests looks a little old -- it refers to the Winchester "Classic" line as "new." Ruger has moved to fix their ejector problem. The Win Classic is not so new anymore, and BRNO's are not as easy to find; CZ's have new stocks. The Zastava arms imports from Interarms are now being handled by Charles Daly, and does not produce .458 Lott.

The PH tests are grueling. It is fortunate that the failures are not as common in practice as they were under the test conditions... which is what you want from a test. It is definitely true that there's a lot of junk made in America (though I suspect some of that had been improved in the intervening time, with some notable exceptions)... but the glee that he seemed to take at pounding a guy's rifle with a hammer:
quote:

I’ll start with my least favourite rifle:- the Weatherby. We don’t often see them out here, thank goodness. The one we had this year exhibited the usual Weatherby failing of going off when the safety catch was disengaged. Like all I’ve seen with this problem, they work fine on the range. It is only after they have been bounced, bumped or jolted whilst loaded and on safe that they do this. I’m sure the problem is correctable and not all do it, however, this one would also not extract at all after the eighth round. It showed decidedly sticky extraction after the first three shots and finally died on number eight. It gives me great pleasure than to dig out my 2lb hammer and beat the bolt of a new rifle open whilst giving the owner a lecture on the benefits of reloading. Weatherby factory ammo always gives extraction problems and needs to be down loaded for use in hot conditions. The .460 is notorious and this .416 proved no different.

could be taken in a few different ways. Either he really wants to drive home the fact that a PH with an unreliable DGR is a tragedy waiting to happen, or else his comments might go a little better seasoned with some (just a little -- lives are at stake) salt.

Having noted that, overpacking, over-pressure, etc, have caused problems, not just with Weatherby, but with .458 win mags at their first introduction. The powder was packed so tightly, it would cake and give squibs. Together with thin-walled "solids" of the day, they performed quite badly. The .458 Lott was intended to fix that problem -- but it looks like Hornady loads these hot. I haven't heard of any complaints, though I'm keeping my ears open.

In any case, after enjoying my Ruger #1 in .458 win, noting that it is a non-DGR shooting a not-quite DG load (by some people's opinions), I finally got around to picking up the Ruger 77 in .458 Lott, along with dies and brass.

I hope you have as much fun with this stuff as I've been having!

Dan


The article you quoted is the one I was referencing. When I first saw it sometime ago, I tried to duplicate the "failure" using a brand new Ruger and a very understanding salesperson. I didn't fire the rifle, just tried to see if I could cause the failure by fast cycling. I'm sorry to say that I did.
 
Posts: 404 | Registered: 08 May 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I'd get a CZ and have a competent gunsmith attend to all the new gun bugs like:

Trigger,
Stock Bedding,
Cross Bolt Installed (for big kickers),
Feeding,
Adjusting Length of Pull (in conjunction with),
Better Recoil Pad Installed,
Floorplate Latch Tightened,
Get Extra Set of Sights & Magazine Spring
All Screws Lock-Tighted in Place

Over the years I’ve learned to do these basic things right off, even if it doesn’t look like they are always needed. The benefit of this is that out in the field where it all matters the most, my guns always work!


Cheers,

Rich
 
Posts: 123 | Registered: 04 January 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Hog Killer:
Sambar, the CZs run about $850, and the Rugers list for around $1300. The CZs are not 1/3 the cost of a Ruger. Gunsmithing to the CZ, will even those numbers out.

Hog Killer

O.K, from your perspective, that makes sense, especially since Ruger have solved the problems that had occurred on my rifle (early production, no BBL recoil lug), but here in OZ a Ruger in 458Lott will set you back about $3,000+, VS the $1100 or so for a CZ.
The good news is that both the Ruger distributors here have excess stock in these larger calibers, so good deals can be had by shopping around.
As for the ejection problems with the Ruger, my 'smith solved it by polishing all the burrs off the ejector and fitting a stronger spring, I don't know if he also recut the ejector groove as well, but now the rifle performs flawlessly.
That, a new stock, with a recoil lug brazed onto the BBL and bedded into the stock, 2 stock bolts, now no problems.
Other than that, I'd go with richierich1, and get the CZ, fire a bunch of rounds to get used to it, and attend to any problems.
I don't know about the relative pricing where you are but it's up to you, Ruger seem to have fixed the problems with initial run of RSMs, but CZ make a good reliable rifle, which will probably need some bedding work and an extra stock bolt.
It all depends on what your friend wants. The best way, of course, is to try one of each, and see which one you like the "feel" of. Then get one, have the work done, and go have fun!

Cheers, Dave.
Non Illegitium Carborundum.


Cheers, Dave.

Aut Inveniam Viam aut Faciam.
 
Posts: 6716 | Location: The Hunting State. | Registered: 08 March 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by crl:
quote:
Originally posted by 500grains:
I suggest that he get a good one built, such as at http://www.rbbigbores.com or http://www.johannsen-jagd.de/


The only problem is that it will cost $12,000 to get a gun from Ryan.



I am certain that jiangli's friend's life is worth far more than that, and since a PH's rifle is his life insurance policy, it is probably an excellent investment.
 
Posts: 18352 | Location: Salt Lake City, Utah USA | Registered: 20 April 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of HunterJim
posted Hide Post
I had the opportunity to visit with the author of the African Hunter articles on the Zim proficiency tests while I was in Harare '01 and '02. The rifle choices are what has been available in Zimbabwe, which is not the same as in the USA. We spent some time discussing the results.

A PH friend in Zim asked me to source a left-hand stopping rifle for him. I figured out it would be easy, not so. I have been working with Jim Brockman to spec out and build a suitable rifle for PHs and guides. The result is the "JimSquare" rifle (for the two Jims involved). The first rifle is at Gunsite for student use in their dangerous game shooting. I wanted to send it to Zim for use in the proficiency test, but the various arms control regulations stopped that.

Brockman can build your friend a .458 Lott for under $2,000. PM me for details.

jim


if you're too busy to hunt,you're too busy.
 
Posts: 4166 | Location: San Diego, CA USA | Registered: 14 November 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 500grains:
quote:
Originally posted by crl:
quote:
Originally posted by 500grains:
I suggest that he get a good one built, such as at http://www.rbbigbores.com or http://www.johannsen-jagd.de/


The only problem is that it will cost $12,000 to get a gun from Ryan.



I am certain that jiangli's friend's life is worth far more than that, and since a PH's rifle is his life insurance policy, it is probably an excellent investment.


How many PH's in Africa Use Guns in this price range ??

or do they use standard rifles such as cz's and Rugers and winchesters or whatever with some smithing to check for reliability. Confused
 
Posts: 7505 | Location: Australia | Registered: 22 May 2002Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Rifles  Hop To Forums  Big Bores    Best production rifle in .458 Lott

Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia