THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM BIG BORE FORUMS


Moderators: jeffeosso
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
411 Hawk Login/Join
 
new member
posted
I have a reamer and head space gauges for the 375 Hawk. The gauges are the same for the 411 Hawk. I have not seen who makes dies for the 411 Hawk. Zeglin, the Hawk cartridge designer, is no longer in operation, and I was thinking it would be cheaper to make a 411 Hawk than a 400 Whelen (since I already have the head space gauges) if I could source the dies without working from scratch. I had my 375 Hawk dies made up done by Huntingtons - they are on their special list.

I doubt if there is enough difference between the two cartridges, the 411 Hawk and 400 Whelen, to make much difference. The two Hawk rounds are designed to be made out of 35 Whelen brass, this is always easy to come by. You form an oversized false shoulder, and then run the case into a sizing die to just head space and fireform. I have been watching the conversation about the 400 Whelen and OAL. A .411 throater and a sample round with a seated bullet to work for magazine length would probably work the same SMALL magic on either round's performance.

Beyond nostalgia, these are both neat toys for the cast bullet shooter, and that is my goal. Any info that anyone can provide would be much appreciated.
 
Posts: 49 | Location: Elyria, Ohio USofA | Registered: 14 November 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of ramrod340
posted Hide Post
The 411 hawk gains you nothing over a proper 400 Whelen. 411 Hawk dies are going to be full custom. I would look to the 400 Whelen thread. Bet you can find reamer and dies for less than full custom dies. Anyway push come to shove a 400 Whelen would be easier to resale than the Hawk.

Remember this is from a 400PDK shooter. rotflmo


As usual just my $.02
Paul K
 
Posts: 12881 | Location: Mexico, MO | Registered: 02 April 2001Reply With Quote
new member
posted Hide Post
You have a point Paul. I'm just casting about.

Remember it takes gauges, a reamer, and dies. Non-special dies make the special reamer and special gauges worth more. As the PDK guy you know that.

Right now I'm just casting about for die sources, and thinking....

Thanks for your thoughts though. Experience always speaks loud.
 
Posts: 49 | Location: Elyria, Ohio USofA | Registered: 14 November 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Snellstrom
posted Hide Post
Did you check CH4D for dies?
When I bought my 400 Whelen dies from them they seemed to have a huge assortment, I don't recall if the "hawk" line was among them.
Good luck with your project.
 
Posts: 5604 | Location: Eastern plains of Colorado | Registered: 31 October 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of ramrod340
posted Hide Post
quote:
Non-special dies make the special reamer and special gauges worth more. As the PDK guy you know that

Confused But I haven't had coffee.

As Snellstrom stated ch4d had dies. RIP and others have already worked out the details for you. Not to mention enough loads to keep you busy for a while.

I bet you could beg, borrow, rent a reamer and gauge from someone on that thread.

Or http://4-dproducts.com/display...wid=671&tname=rental

Bottomline you need to build the rifle you want. Nothing worse than ending up with something wishing you had something else. But my 2 cents between the Hawk and Whelen the Whelen would be my choice.


As usual just my $.02
Paul K
 
Posts: 12881 | Location: Mexico, MO | Registered: 02 April 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of capoward
posted Hide Post
quote:
I bet you could beg, borrow, rent a reamer and gauge from someone on that thread.
Michael Petrov had a correct finish reamer and gauges that he loaned out to interested folks for their 400 Whelen builds. No idea who has them now or if they're even still available for loan due to his death. CH-4D had the correct reloading dies for this reamer.

Since you already have the 400 Hawk reamer and gauges, why not check with CH-4D to determine if they might have reloading dies.

Or you could always check with the reamer manufacturer to obtain a print and have reloading dies constructed from that print..


Jim coffee
"Life's hard; it's harder if you're stupid"
John Wayne
 
Posts: 4954 | Location: Central Texas | Registered: 15 September 2007Reply With Quote
new member
posted Hide Post
Thanks for all of the input gents.

I check CH4D and they have both the 400 Whelen and the 411 Hawk listed. I have the Hawk manual, and it is about inline with the Whelen data posted here. In the Hawk cartridge book they also tried some Ramshot powders. I'd have to dig it out to see the bullet weights listed in it.

The Hawk book list the dimensions of all of the Hawk cartridges. I will have to compare them to the Whelen listed here.

By the way, the last time I called down the CH4D old Dave, the empresario, was down in Argentina. I asked the guy who I spoke to what he was doing down there since they'd already caught and buried Mengele? We both laughed. Dave must be really getting up there. It seems like he was old and gray when I first met him, and started doing business with decades ago.
 
Posts: 49 | Location: Elyria, Ohio USofA | Registered: 14 November 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of capoward
posted Hide Post
Quality Cartridge offers the 411 Hawk brass; it's currently listed as "in stock".

Also just went back and reread your initial post...375 Hawk reamer and gauges...

Ok so you have gauges but need the 411 Hawk finish reamer and 4D doesn't offer the reamer for rent.

So back we go...
4D does offer the 400 Whelen Petrov finish reamer for rent as well as the relating gauges.
CH4D does offer the correct 400 Whelen Petrov reloading dies.
Quality Cartridge does offer 400 Whelen Basic Brass, it's cheaper than QC Hawk brass, and it is listed as "in stock".

If you're doing the work yourself or already have a gunsmith scheduled to do the work then go with the 4D rental of reamer and relating gauges, or have your 'smith rent them directly as you'll pay either way.
Order your 400 Whelen Prtrov reloading dies from CH4D.
Order 200-300 pieces of the 400 Whelen Basic Brass from QC (a few hundred more if the budget allows - may as well have an almost lifetime supply on hand).

You'll be good to go.

If you aren't doing the barrel work yourself and don't have a gunsmith lined out then I recommend you contact Ron Berry's 'smith Rusty (Rusty goes by 'roughone' here on the forums and has a number of posts in the 400 Whelen thread) to have the work done. Rusty has the correct finish reamer and gauges on hand.

Good luck...


Jim coffee
"Life's hard; it's harder if you're stupid"
John Wayne
 
Posts: 4954 | Location: Central Texas | Registered: 15 September 2007Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Rusty and I have shared cost on reamers, I cannot loan out the reamers at his shop.
He has reamers and gages for both these:
400 Whelen Petrov of 2003 (made by Dave Kiff of Pacific Tool & Gage)
400 Whelen Berry of 2013 (made by Dave Manson of Manson Precision)
Both are released to the gun trade. Wink
JGS also makes a reamer for the Michael Petrov version.

Both of these use the same dies from RCBS or CH4D, flawlessly.
Those dies were referred to as "G&H" by RCBS,
or "JGS" by CH4D, in the past.
I use the CH4D dies for the 400 Whelen-Petrov.
I use the RCBS dies for the 400 Whelen-Berry.

Both use the properly made Quality Cartridge basic cylindrical brass with "400 Whelen" headstamp.

I cannot arrange Rusty's services, but he is a genius mechanical engineer and gunsmith, and a good ol' boy whom I have nicknamed "Slick."
So he now calls me "Slip."
I got the "Rip" moniker from my taxidermist "Vip."
I do not think I will be changing my handle here to SLIP, however.

Rusty can do as little or as much as you want, if he wants.
Send him an action and a barrel and he can fit and chamber it for 400 Whelen and send it back, "slick" as you both please.
He is very reasonable in his charges and ships by USPS IIRC.
PM member "roughone" if interested, yep, that is "Slick."

 
Posts: 28032 | Location: KY | Registered: 09 December 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by ramrod340:
The 411 hawk gains you nothing over a proper 400 Whelen. 411 Hawk dies are going to be full custom. I would look to the 400 Whelen thread. Bet you can find reamer and dies for less than full custom dies. Anyway push come to shove a 400 Whelen would be easier to resale than the Hawk.

Then There is always the 400H&H which will launch a 400gr bullet at 2400 fps and a 300gr bullet at 2700 fps.

Remember this is from a 400H&H shooter rotflmo
Remember this is from a 400PDK shooter. rotflmo
 
Posts: 1630 | Location: Vermont | Registered: 27 March 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I also like the idea of the 400 Bateleur,
a .408/.338 Lapua Magnum,
which will launch a 400-grain bullet at 2700 fps and a 2700-grain bullet at 300 fps
if adequate pressure is attained. Wink
 
Posts: 28032 | Location: KY | Registered: 09 December 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of 416Tanzan
posted Hide Post
quote:
which will launch a 400-grain bullet at 2700 fps


Considering that the Lapua is a tad shorter than the Rigby, I'd say that 400gn at 2700fps is pushing it a bit. The 416Rigby will do 2700fps but most people stop around 2600-2625fps with the 400grainers. Weatherby is a different story, as always.

(Me?--I stick with the 350 grains at 2800-2825 because of a slow twist barrel, the traditional 16.5" that is maintained by CZ/Brno.)


+-+-+-+-+-+-+

"A well-rounded hunting battery might include:
500 AccRel Nyati, 416 Rigby or 416 Ruger, 375Ruger or 338WM, 308 or 270, 243, 223" --
Conserving creation, hunting the harvest.
 
Posts: 4253 | Registered: 10 June 2009Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by RIP:
I also like the idea of the 400 Bateleur,
a .408/.338 Lapua Magnum,
which will launch a 400-grain bullet at 2700 fps and a 2700-grain bullet at 300 fps
if adequate pressure is attained. Wink


quote:
Originally posted by 416Tanzan:
quote:
which will launch a 400-grain bullet at 2700 fps


Considering that the Lapua is a tad shorter than the Rigby, I'd say that 400gn at 2700fps is pushing it a bit. The 416Rigby will do 2700fps but most people stop around 2600-2625fps with the 400grainers. Weatherby is a different story, as always.

(Me?--I stick with the 350 grains at 2800-2825 because of a slow twist barrel, the traditional 16.5" that is maintained by CZ/Brno.)



416Tanzan,
You did not address the 2700-grain bullet at 300 fps part, nor the pressure for 400-grainer at 2700 fps.
Hey, this is a joking response to the 400 H&H highjack.

However, I do not think you will find any bullet and powder combination in the world that will get you to 2700 fps with 400-grainer in the .416 Rigby,
at less than 64,000 psi, which is a bit high, considering the antique CIP limit of about 48,000 psi.

But, the 400 Bateleur can do 68,000 psi with a C.O.L. longer than standard .416 Rigby,
the .416 Rigby cannot be loaded as long due to its standard zero-parallel-sided-free-bore-leade-only (ZPSFBLO) throat, Wink
and the 400 Bateleur has a Weatherby-ized throat that allows long C.O.L. or pressure let-off with short C.O.L.
But the .416 is a bigger bore than the .408,
though the .408 might have better BC and SD for 400-grainer,
so maybe it is a wash ...

Highjack off.

Sort of reminds me of the 400 Whelen Petrov of 2003,
improved by making neck-1 just .003" smaller (better shoulder results while preserving .001" of neck taper),
neck-2 remains the same in both cartridges (case mouth diameter),
and by lengthening the chamber max length by .008" (allows full 2.500" brass length use),
and lengthening the throat by 0.112" (with attendant benefits for use in either 3.4" or 3.6" magazine lengths),
all while preserving use of 400 Whelen Petrov of 2003, reloading dies,
which can give a more positive crimp in the 400 Whelen Berry of 2013.

The latest iteration of the 400 Whelen was for 3.6" box use arriving in mid 2014.
Michael Chris Petrov passed away in February of 2014.
My next 400 Whelen will have only a new C.O.L, and new brass maximum spec.

It will be called the "400 Whelen Petrov Berry of 2014" or "400 WPB."

I'll get it up at ammoguide.com after I shoot those new loads in it, and see if they will accept a third "400 Whelen" there.
It will be the second one to credit Michael Petrov for inspiration, based on his, with minor changes.

My problem with new specs is solved.
Rusty McGee is the keeper of the reamer.

Thanks, y'all, OP swarf, OT helpful responders, and highjackers, for goading me into thinking of this. tu2
 
Posts: 28032 | Location: KY | Registered: 09 December 2001Reply With Quote
new member
posted Hide Post
I hope everyone is having an excellent Memorial Day. I've been working on my basement. Taking a break.

I took the time to get out my Hawk Manual last night. There is an complete reprint of Mr. Petrov's two articles on the Whelen from Precision Shooting magazine.. This is just an FYI. The dimensions for both the 411 Hawk, and the 400 Whelen, per Petrov, are both in the manual; and I cannot see much difference. The Whelean'S shoulder is 0.0458, and the Hawk's is 0.454. The Whelen's shoulder angle is not specified. It would be interesting for someone to try and measure that if they have a FFed case. I cannot remember enough trig to dope it out without a headache tonight.

Zeglin, the ZHat, man states that the neck's of cases should be opened up over a 0.430 expander befor setting up the false shoulder to fire form. Since the bullet used is the same that dimension should work for either round, and the data listed for the 411 Hawk should be about valid for either cartridge - dependent on the components used as anyone here probably realizes.

This has been an interesting thread for me, and I would like to thank all for their thoughts.

By the way, I started to give some input into a thread on 24hourcampfir to a chap attempting to do his on gunsmithing. Butch Lambert is active in it. I think it is a good read fro anyone thinking about doing the same.

It contains my thoughts on running for Vice President.... I am also compiling a list for perspective wives. I think I am approaching the time in m y life when I need three: one to take care of me, one to take care of the house and yard, and one to go out and work and support us all. I haven't got the whole thing figured out yet but I'm working on it.

Thanks for the wool gathering help on this perspective project. Always cheaper to think first, and not repeat other's mistakes.
 
Posts: 49 | Location: Elyria, Ohio USofA | Registered: 14 November 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by swarf:
I hope everyone is having an excellent Memorial Day. I've been working on my basement. Taking a break.

I took the time to get out my Hawk Manual last night. There is an complete reprint of Mr. Petrov's two articles on the Whelen from Precision Shooting magazine.. This is just an FYI. The dimensions for both the 411 Hawk, and the 400 Whelen, per Petrov, are both in the manual; and I cannot see much difference. The Whelean'S shoulder is 0.0458, and the Hawk's is 0.454.

swarf,
you are comparing apples to oranges there. I have the Zeglin book. Chapter 11 is a reprint of Mr. Petrov's two articles on the 400 Whelen, which show the chamber cast of the G&H rifle that Michael petrov used to get the PT&G reamer made, as well as that reamer drawing from "Pacific Tool."
Both have a shoulder diameter of .458" which is considered the specified MINIMUM for the reamer.
Chapter 18 shows the .411 Hawk cartridge drawing on page 236, showing the shoulder MAXIMUM for the brass spec: .454".
This is the usual tolerance of .004" between the brass MAXIMUM and reamer MINIMUM.
The .411 Hawk has the same shoulder diameter as the 400 Whelen Petrov of 2003.
The .411 Hawk cartridge drawing has a brass MAXIMUM length specified of only 2.430", and a shorter neck than the 400 Whelen Petrov of 2003.
Mr. Petrov never produced a specification for max brass length, nor cartridge drawing, but his reamer MINIMUM length is 2.501".
Some have used brass out to 2.495" in the 400 Whelen Petrov of 2003, like Mart, in Alaska, and me. No problem.
I assume Mr. Zeglin did his short version (.411 Hawk) to make do with necked-up 30-06 or 35 Whelen brass more easily.

The cartridge drawing for the "400 Whelen" at www.ammoguide.com is my application of good principles to the reamer of Mr. Petrov, except I let the brass maximum for shoulder be 0.455" instead of the sloppier usual .454".
More acute angle and .001" bigger shoulder than the .411 Hawk, makes it a more positive shoulder on the 400 Whelen Petrov of 2003. Wink
It is the most accurate drawing of the 400 Whelen Petrov of 2003 CARTRIDGE that I have found.
Brass shoulder angle becomes 23 degrees and 10 minutes if all the neck taper of the original Petrov reamer is used: .004" difference between neck-1 and neck-2 of MINIMUMS of the reamer must be shown.

My little improvement of this was to reduce neck-1 by .003" and improve shoulder even more,
which also makes the brass shoulder angle exactly 23 degrees.


400 Whelen Petrov of 2003 Brass MAXIMUMS:


400 Whelen-Berry (2013) ..................................................................................................................................400 Whelen-Petrov (2003)

http://ammoguide.com/?catid=891
http://ammoguide.com/?catid=863




The Whelen's shoulder angle is not specified. It would be interesting for someone to try and measure that if they have a FFed case. I cannot remember enough trig to dope it out without a headache tonight.

No need to measure anything, it is spelled out in the reamer drawing for the 400 Whelen Petrov of 2003: 23 degrees for the shoulder hemi-angle, commonly called the "shoulder angle." Shoulder junction cone angle is of course twice that, 46 degrees.
The .411 Hawk shoulder angle is 17 degrees and 15 minutes, 17.25 degrees.

You can find all this about the 400 Whelen and more on the big 400 Whelen thread (brought back to top today by me),
http://forums.accuratereloadin...043/m/7511088471/p/1
including the journey from necking up brass (Rusty McGee made a tapered expander big enough for his use) and finally ending with the superior method: Use of basic cylindrical 30-06 brass, simply necked down, then annealed and fire-formed to perfection.


Zeglin, the ZHat, man states that the neck's of cases should be opened up over a 0.430 expander befor setting up the false shoulder to fire form. Since the bullet used is the same that dimension should work for either round, and the data listed for the 411 Hawk should be about valid for either cartridge - dependent on the components used as anyone here probably realizes.

This has been an interesting thread for me, and I would like to thank all for their thoughts.

By the way, I started to give some input into a thread on 24hourcampfir to a chap attempting to do his on gunsmithing. Butch Lambert is active in it. I think it is a good read fro anyone thinking about doing the same.

It contains my thoughts on running for Vice President.... I am also compiling a list for perspective wives. I think I am approaching the time in m y life when I need three: one to take care of me, one to take care of the house and yard, and one to go out and work and support us all. I haven't got the whole thing figured out yet but I'm working on it.

Thanks for the wool gathering help on this perspective project. Always cheaper to think first, and not repeat other's mistakes.


Stay tuned for the "400 Whelen Petrov Berry of 2014" cartridge drawing of brass maximums: NEW!!!
400 WPB is going to be a lot easier to type. Wink
 
Posts: 28032 | Location: KY | Registered: 09 December 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
The original 1923 400 Whelen of Townie Whelen had a brass shoulder diameter of .455",
though it used a bullet diameter of .409-caliber instead of the currently in-vogue .411-caliber.
At least the shoulder diameters of the 400 Whelen Petrov (2003) as drawn at ammoguide.com, and the 400 Whelen Berry (2013), are correct by that!
So will be the 400 WPB (2014).

Cartridge drawing of 400 Whelen published by NRA in 1923, notice shoulder diameter of .455 (brass MAXIMUM) and neck taper of .001":

 
Posts: 28032 | Location: KY | Registered: 09 December 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of capoward
posted Hide Post
Ron,

The 400 WPB reminds me of a larger-caliber longer-case .318 Westley Richards... I like it!

I wonder if you could get 7 or 8 rounds down with in a drop box configuration?


Jim coffee
"Life's hard; it's harder if you're stupid"
John Wayne
 
Posts: 4954 | Location: Central Texas | Registered: 15 September 2007Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by capoward:
Ron,

The 400 WPB reminds me of a larger-caliber longer-case .318 Westley Richards... I like it!


318 WR has a .330-caliber bullet with a case length of 2.390" and a C.O.L. of 3.400", and brass can be made from .30-06.
Interesting trivia: There was once a square-shouldered version of the 318 WR (90-degree shoulder hemi-angle, 180-degree shoulder junction cone angle, i.e. like the step of a belt at the shoulder) Eeker but it never caught on. That much increase in positivity of headspacing was not necessary. rotflmo

The 400 WPB has a .411-caliber bullet, with a case length of 2.503" (maximum)/2.500" (minimum) and a C.O.L. of 3.600" (maximum), and brass can be made from .30-06.

Yes, I see the long-nosed similarity, which is proportionally greater with the shorter-cased 318 WR than with the 400 WPB.
318 WR has 1.010" nose length at max specs.
400 WB has 0.997" nose length at max specs.
tu2

I wonder if you could get 7 or 8 rounds down with in a drop box configuration?

Well, just for giggles, the CZ 550 Magnum in .375 H&H will hold only 6 down, of the 400 WPB.
The CZ 550 Magnum .458 Lott will accept and retain 7 down with the non-ribbed box, but it is so tight the bolt cannot be closed without loading the top cartridge off the box.

Now I wonder how to get a CZ 550 Magnum with a 30-06-sized bolt face?
Wink
 
Posts: 28032 | Location: KY | Registered: 09 December 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of capoward
posted Hide Post
quote:
Now I wonder how to get a CZ 550 Magnum with a 30-06-sized bolt face?
Sounds like a "purpose build" need. Perhaps use a commercial FN M98 Mauser action with standard bolt face, opened for .375 H&H cartridge, use appropriate Wiebe' bottom metal with coffin (Rigby) style floorplate - good to go. Not necessarily the cheapest way to get there but definitely a run down nostalgia lane...

Perhaps a matching 338-06 (loaded to 3.6" COAL), rather than a .318 WR, in similar action/rifle build.

Both rifles built in a stalking/carry style appropriately adjusted for primarily scope use.

If I hadn't already used my FN actions it'd be tempting...


Jim coffee
"Life's hard; it's harder if you're stupid"
John Wayne
 
Posts: 4954 | Location: Central Texas | Registered: 15 September 2007Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Or Sunny Hill drop floorplate + McMillan drop-belly stock combo for Winchester M70.
That could be done to the rifle I already have,
just order those two parts.
Nice idea on the .338-06 with 3.6" box. tu2
 
Posts: 28032 | Location: KY | Registered: 09 December 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of capoward
posted Hide Post
Yep... How many will fit down?


Jim coffee
"Life's hard; it's harder if you're stupid"
John Wayne
 
Posts: 4954 | Location: Central Texas | Registered: 15 September 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of 416Tanzan
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by capoward:
Yep... How many will fit down?


Personally, my interest drops off significantly after the first shot.

Some people rate a rifle by adding up the footpounds of all the bullets in the magazine together.
I tend to think in terms of the first bullet only. If one gets a second shot or a third, great. Beyond that a person will invariably have time to top off the magazine and start afresh. Alot of times I only have one or at most two rounds in the magazine while taking a first shot. I just don't feel the need of maximal magazine carry, especially if able to decide whether to switch to solids at any one point or to insert a long-range expanding bullet on top of solids that were sitting in the magazine.

So I'd rather have a big accurate rifle with three shots than 6 shots of a significantly lesser calibre. In something close to this calibre, I'd rather have three handloaded 416Rigbys in a magazine than five 375H&H's. That's just my druthers.


+-+-+-+-+-+-+

"A well-rounded hunting battery might include:
500 AccRel Nyati, 416 Rigby or 416 Ruger, 375Ruger or 338WM, 308 or 270, 243, 223" --
Conserving creation, hunting the harvest.
 
Posts: 4253 | Registered: 10 June 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of capoward
posted Hide Post
Hey Tanz, Sometimes it’s just noodling going on…

And I’ve written and rewritten this at least five times so hopefully I’ve the jest of my noodling in cogent response…

Your high velocity handloaded .416 Rigby ammunition preference…
Obviously these loading levels are within your recoil tolerance and are accurate because you’ve used them out around 300yds, or so, on a regular basis. But most folks are not up to .416 Weatherby cartridge performance in a 9 lb dry weight un-scoped rifle. Heck a 500/416 3 ¼” NE DR, similar performance to the standard .416 Rigby loading, weighs in at about 12 lbs and I’ve read about guys wanting to add one or two mercury recoil suppressors to the stock.

Back to the thread…
The thread title relates to the 411 Hawk, a cartridge closely matching the performance of the original 400 Whelen cartridge. The original 400 Whelen was designed to match the ballistic performance of the 400 Jeffery cartridge, 2150fps with 400gr bullet, in a contemporary bolt action rifle at a cost more reasonable than the typical English DG BA rifle of the day and far less than the cost of a basic level DR. So we already are discussing a heavy-medium cartridge having an overall performance capability similar to the .416 Taylor or .416 B&M when using bullets of equal or similar SD; something well below the potential of the .416 Rigby cartridge…

The 400 Jeffery (aka: 450/400 3” NE) used historically in either a single shot or DR is reputed to be ‘soft on the shoulder’ recoil-wise and lighter in weight than larger caliber DRs making it a viable alternative for the slight of stature folks and the recoil intolerant. Performance wise the 400 Jeffery is reputed to be as long ranging and accurate as the competing .375 H&H Magnum cartridge and is reputed to be deadly against DG at close range due to factory loadings demonstrating exceptional penetration and overall bullet performance.

Throw modern bullets and powders into the mix and the original 400 Whelen, the 400Whelen Petrov, the 400 Whelen Berry, the new 400 WPB, and the 400 PDK all easily match or exceed the ballistics of the 400 Jeffery and the overall bullet performance of factory loaded ammunition.

The rational of how many cartridges does it hold…
After having searched the internet over the years for comparisons of how well the bolt rifle guy does against the DR guy, I’ve deduced the following requirements and resulting scenarios:
1) Two equally adept individuals with their rifle of choice.
2) Each rifle fully loaded in their traditional configuration. And
3) Each firing 6 shots – the equivalent of the ‘do really hitting the fan’.
This is how the sequence of the first six shots will be fired…
BA w/4 total rounds (3+1) and DR w/2 total rounds:
1st – Tie
2nd – DR
3rd – BA
4th – Tie
5th – DR
6th – DR
BA w/6 total rounds (5+1) and DR w/2 total rounds:
1st – Tie
2nd – DR
3rd – BA
4th – Tie
5th – BA
6th – Tie
The DR shots will be fired extremely close together and will always win the 2nd shot when compared to the BA. The BA starts winning every time the DR must be reloaded. BA DG rifles are very slow to reload so once empty they fall out of the race. Eliminate the equally proficient individuals in #1 and the above firing sequences goes out the door…

Bottom-line, when risks of 'the do hitting the fan big-time’ in the worst possible scenario – that being the DG charging/actively seeking the hunters – I believe it behooves the BA guy to be extra fully prepared which may require increasing the number of rounds readily available in the magazine if/when this is an option…

Anyway, just my 2¢…


Jim coffee
"Life's hard; it's harder if you're stupid"
John Wayne
 
Posts: 4954 | Location: Central Texas | Registered: 15 September 2007Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Jim,

That was way more than 2 cents worth. RIFLE needs to give Weeweeland the boot and give you the job,
if you would want it. beer

Sunny Hill & McMillan combo on the 12.7x68 Magnum 49-10 (really ought to be called the "50 Bateleur")
holds 6 of the 400 Whelen cartridges, and bolt closes over the sixth, and it feeds from the mag.

Of course that is a windowed box of .375 H&H length, but that windowing adds little capacity.


Safe to say Sunny Hill & McMillan combo will hold at least 5 down plus 1 in the chamber, 400 Whelen, it's a 6-shooter. Cool

I really like that combo on the "50 Bateleur" a perfectly functioning, accurate, and aesthetically pleasing rifle to my hilbily sensibilities.
 
Posts: 28032 | Location: KY | Registered: 09 December 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of capoward
posted Hide Post
Hey Ron,

I agree Weeweeland needs to be given the boot but I don't reckon I'd be a good replacement. Maybe swap him out with Michael though; that ought to perk up the readers! LOL... But thanks... beer

Yes the combination of M70 action, PacNor barrel, Sunny Hill bottom metal, windowed .375 length box (presume 300 RUM box), and McMillan stock is certainly an accurate combination chambered in the 12.7x68 Magnum, oops 50 Bateleur. And yes it is a good looking rifle...

Very nice to hear that six 400 Whelens will fit in the magazine with the bolt closing; so easily it's a 6-shooter if not a 7-shooter. Perhaps add a Rigby style coffin floorplate and turn it into an 8-shooter...


Jim coffee
"Life's hard; it's harder if you're stupid"
John Wayne
 
Posts: 4954 | Location: Central Texas | Registered: 15 September 2007Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Duane Wiebe's XRM box for .375 H&H will only hold 5-down and allow bolt to close over the 5th round. (illustrated on 400 Whelen thread)

Yes, why not use the Sunny Hill floor plate + M70 RUM box for the 400 WPB, it helps with the huge fat shoulder of the 400 Whelen. Big Grin
OK, it is a 6+1 so 7-shooter.
Holds three-down in 50 Bateleur, 6-down in 400 WPB.
I think that is plenty for each
(nod to 416Tanzan on the 4-shooter philosophy of cannon). BOOM
The coffin plate for more capacity would just ugly up the hilbily aesthetics.
Matching pair, 400 WPB and 50 Bateleur. tu2

But with current box, the M70 Winchester 400WPB is a 4+1 five-shooter.
and IIRC, B&C makes their Medalist stock for the M70 Winchester.
No drop belly or coffin plate required.

Well! I might just have to stick with the 5-shooter route to be able to use the B&C Medalist stock. Great stock. tu2
That is plenty of shots too, for so powerful a cartridge as the 400 WPB. BOOM
 
Posts: 28032 | Location: KY | Registered: 09 December 2001Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia