THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM BIG BORE FORUMS


Moderators: jeffeosso
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
RSM factory stock Login/Join
 
One of Us
posted
My oldest RSM(current version) in 375H&H has always shot well straight out of the box. I opted not to bed it as I was of the opinion that the stock would hold up to 375HH recoil. I stayed on top of it breaking the rifle down yearly for inspection and I routinely checked the torque on the action screws. I put about a case of ammo through it a year.

During inspection I discovered that the stock has started to develop a crack in the web between the mag box and trigger. I've caught it early enough and it can easily be repaired, but I can see a major problem developing if left unchecked.

In the past I've posted an opinion that the RSM in this caliber should hold up fine w/out bedding. I have changed my position on this and now am of the opinion that an RSM in any caliber should be properly bedded to withstand regular use.

Gary
 
Posts: 1190 | Registered: 11 April 2004Reply With Quote
Moderator
Picture of jeffeosso
posted Hide Post
Gary,
thanks for the PSA... though bedding would NOT have helped a crack in the webbing infront of the trigger... in fact, that would have made it happen faster/worse...

when the rifle is fired, the recoil lugs drive the stock back, and the thicker parts of the stock resist... "inside" the action, were the stock is hollow, the sides expand like a belows, and the webbing in front of the trigger is the weakest part of the stock, in a horizonal "OUTWARD" thrust view.

the only thing that would have prevented that is crossbolts, either hidden or exposed, through the webbing...


in fact, from an engineering perspective, these are probably MORE important than a forward xbolt.

jeffe


opinions vary band of bubbas and STC hunting Club

Information on Ammoguide about
the416AR, 458AR, 470AR, 500AR
What is an AR round? Case Drawings 416-458-470AR and 500AR.
476AR,
http://www.weaponsmith.com
 
Posts: 40240 | Location: Conroe, TX | Registered: 01 June 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by jeffeosso:

the only thing that would have prevented that is crossbolts, either hidden or exposed, through the webbing...


in fact, from an engineering perspective, these are probably MORE important than a forward xbolt.

jeffe


Jeffe, I agree w/ you on that. I will install either a threaded stock pin (like Remington) or a second Ruger crossbolt (if enough room).

The RSM does not have a prominent wedge recoil lug (like the mkIIs) but a small boss that mates into a matching hole in a steel plate that is inletted and held into the forearm by one screw. Even w/ this recoil plate sandwiched between the stock and barreled receiver, I can see a bit of slop that has developed over time that may have attributed to additional stress on the webbing as you described above.

I think it would be a good idea to bed this recoil plate contraption to ensure a solid fit in addition to crosspin/bolt the web area.

Have you held one of these plates? I need to weigh mine as it feels like a lead brick. I would think one could shave off a half pound from their rifle and get better balance by machining slots (skeletonize) in the plate then bedding it into the forearm.

Gary
 
Posts: 1190 | Registered: 11 April 2004Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia