One of Us
| Wow. Didn't know about any of this news. Thanks LHeym500.
I'm hoping all goes well for Dakota. Love their rifles and own a number of them. |
| |
one of us
| Is "Roundhill" a proxy buyer for the original owners and possibly a shady deal ? Buy back their own assets cheaply and erase previous debts ? Fresher and lesser debt ? Let go 600+ employees in New York, with a few days notice, and not pay severance and other obligations to them ? What a mess has been made of Remington ! |
| |
One of Us
| All I know about Roundhill is they are a real estate investor group. I know nothing about them.
I love Dakota as an idea. I would rather have a 80s Dakota than a 2010s Holland and Holland. |
| Posts: 14812 | Location: Somewhere above Tennessee and below Kentucky | Registered: 31 July 2016 | 
IP
|
|
One of Us
| Remington’s old ownership may, it has been done before, be able to discharge any judgments or liens from the Sandy Hook lawsuits. |
| Posts: 14812 | Location: Somewhere above Tennessee and below Kentucky | Registered: 31 July 2016 | 
IP
|
|
One of Us
| Roundhill did buy the manufacturing facility for Remington, but I do not know about purchase of Dakota’s manufacturing facility. |
| Posts: 14812 | Location: Somewhere above Tennessee and below Kentucky | Registered: 31 July 2016 | 
IP
|
|
One of Us
| My gut is Remington becomes a contract manufacturing product company (asset light model). Someone makes the product for them and they stick their name on it.
Not sure there is much left for Dakota - the higher price point rifle market has moved past the wood and steel Dakota rifles.
Mike |
| Posts: 13145 | Location: Cocoa Beach, Florida | Registered: 22 July 2010 | 
IP
|
|
One of Us
| Why purchase the manufacturing facility if they are not going to manufacture?
I guess they could sell the New York property. |
| Posts: 14812 | Location: Somewhere above Tennessee and below Kentucky | Registered: 31 July 2016 | 
IP
|
|