Will be ordering a Ruger in 416 Rigby for next years hunt for Cape Buffalo in Zimbabwe. My question is should I just buy the Leupold VX-III 1.5-5 or is it worth the extra $ to buy the Swavorski, or the new LP7 1.5-6. I've been very happy with the VX IIIs I have on 2 other hunting rifles, a 40mm 3.5-10, and the 2.5-8.
Also thoughts on quick detach rings, I had been thinking of the Warne.
The series 111 with index matched lenses are great value for money. I recently sold a Swaro and bought a new Leupy, it is certainly better value dollar for dollar and has all the clarity needed for big game hunting.
Posts: 1374 | Location: New Zealand | Registered: 10 February 2005
Greetings: My 416 Rigby RSM sports a 1.5-5 Leuopold and it is a very nice combo. Mine has a special order reticle called the German Reticle. Cost thirty $ more and worth it I think. Cheers, Luke
Posts: 399 | Location: pueblo, Co. USA | Registered: 01 July 2006
My CZ .416 Rigby wears a 1.5-5 Leupy IR scope. It has worked like gangbusters on Gembock, Hartebeast, Cape Buf, and American Bison. Is very good scope.
Mike
-------------- DRSS, Womper's Club, NRA Life Member/Charter Member NRA Golden Eagles ... Knifemaker, http://www.mstarling.com
Cb- My Ruger .416 Rigby has a Leupold 1.5-5X VXIII w/ Warne QD Rings. Although I did not have to take the scope off in Africa, I practiced without it beforehand and found the Warne rings did a good job of returning to center when I remounted it. I had a very good gunsmith mount the scope with the rings to make sure they were trued up. The Leupold is a top quality scope with GREAT eye relief and I highly recommend it on your Ruger. Good luck on your Buffalo hunt. You have ordered a great rifle. What bullets will you use? I loaded up 400 gr A-frames over H4831sc and had excellent results. Thanks. Brian
NRA Life Member SCI Life Member DRSS
Posts: 126 | Location: Montana | Registered: 19 March 2005
Yep leupold is the way to go. Snowey river is right on. I used 104 gr of 4831 and 400 gr A Frames to take my buffalo in tanz a few years ago. No problems. Good luck. You have made a nice choice on rifles.
Although cartridge selection is important there is nothing that will substitute for proper first shot placement. Good hunting, "D"
Posts: 1701 | Location: Western NC | Registered: 28 June 2000
Great to get all the input. I'll order everything this week, including the warne rings and the VXIII. I like the idea of the german reticle too. The $ saved should help with the cost of ammo, reloading dies and components.
I would say you are well suited to hunt africaa. I would like to thank you for buying products made in my neck of the woods. beaverton, or is the home of leupold, and they treat the employes there quite well. I recently deliverd some freight to warn in Tualitain oregon and I was impressed with the work force and the products I saw there too ! ...tj3006
Got the Ruger with the Leupold 1.5-5 and the Warne rings and sighted it in today. Great set up. Will be chatting with folks down the line about reloading. Thanks to all that commented, glad I saved $800 bucks for ammo, dies, etc.
Change the recoil pad and replace the front sight with one from NECG and your good to go. Check the wood fit behind the tang to be sure its not to close. If the wood is touching the metal a split is very possible.
Posts: 3073 | Location: Pittsburgh, PA | Registered: 11 November 2004
Originally posted by Camarillo Brillp: Will be ordering a Ruger in 416 Rigby for next years hunt for Cape Buffalo in Zimbabwe. My question is should I just buy the Leupold VX-III 1.5-5 or is it worth the extra $ to buy the Swavorski, or the new LP7 1.5-6. I've been very happy with the VX IIIs I have on 2 other hunting rifles, a 40mm 3.5-10, and the 2.5-8.
Also thoughts on quick detach rings, I had been thinking of the Warne.
thanks Cb
I use an old Leupold Compact 2.5X with post & crosshair reticle on my .416 Rigby, and a Leup. 2.5X-8X on my .375 H&H. But I hunt things like elk and big bears with the .375.....
"Bitte, trinks du nicht das Wasser. Dahin haben die Kuhen gesheissen."
Posts: 4386 | Location: New Woodstock, Madison County, Central NY | Registered: 04 January 2005
I would take a hard look at Trijicon "Accu-Pt" 1,25-4x24. Unless you need a dedicated ....x56 scope to shoot after dusk from a high seat Swarovski is a waste of money.
Originally posted by Paolo9,5x73: I would take a hard look at Trijicon "Accu-Pt" 1,25-4x24. Unless you need a dedicated ....x56 scope to shoot after dusk from a high seat Swarovski is a waste of money.
I'll disagree with Paolo here. I have three Leupold 1.5-5 scopes mounted on a 375 H&H, a 416 Rigby and a 404 Jeffery, and they work just fine. But the Swarovski Z6 1-6 power scope is a better scope for all-around use: it has true 1 power-both-eyes-open ability, is brighter (24mm rather than 20mm) and goes to 6X. It's true they cost more, but they are more. I'm getting one.
_________________________________
AR, where the hopeless, hysterical hypochondriacs of history become the nattering nabobs of negativisim.
Posts: 7047 | Location: Rambouillet, France | Registered: 25 June 2004