THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM BIG BORE FORUMS

Page 1 2 

Moderators: jeffeosso
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Ruger No 1 in 450/400 Login/Join
 
One of Us
Picture of Huvius
posted Hide Post
I get it and... um, no.
It’s chambered in the 3” 450/400 not the pretender 458Windbag.
 
Posts: 3402 | Location: Colorado U.S.A. | Registered: 24 December 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Huvius:
I get it and... um, no.
It’s chambered in the 3” 450/400 not the pretender 458Windbag.




Very nice, .400 S. Jeffery, eh?
Excellent wood! Great grain in the grip.
She must have been gorgeous in her day, still is, just a little honest wear that true love would never notice.

Do you own it or have access to the chambering designation on the barrel, and any idea of when it was made? Is it a W.J. Jeffery?

As for the "Pretender 458Windbag" moniker:
That is hilarious! animal

I live such a sheltered life I never heard that one before.
Did Ross Seyfried tell you that whopper? rotflmo

Why did I never think of that joke?
I guess it is because it is so far from the TRUTH
and I have no reason to try to dream up something like that, about my favorite rifle chambering.
tu2
Rip ...
 
Posts: 28032 | Location: KY | Registered: 09 December 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
458 Windbag?? I'll make a spot in the gun rack for it, in between the 270 Windbag and the 338 Windbag; which are just up from 30-30 Windbags.
 
Posts: 1421 | Location: WA St, USA | Registered: 28 August 2016Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Huvius
posted Hide Post
I own it.
It’s a Westley Richards 1897 patent from about 1905.




 
Posts: 3402 | Location: Colorado U.S.A. | Registered: 24 December 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
If I'm not mistaken.....this is a point of contention between Boddington and Seyfried and one of the reasons they don't get along. The question of which came first and which was most popular. Apparently, Craig had some influence on Ruger and Hornady on which cartridge to chamber/produce and Ross thought it should have been the other.
 
Posts: 1332 | Location: Western NC | Registered: 08 January 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Huvius
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Magnum Hunter1:
If I'm not mistaken.....this is a point of contention between Boddington and Seyfried and one of the reasons they don't get along. The question of which came first and which was most popular. Apparently, Craig had some influence on Ruger and Hornady on which cartridge to chamber/produce and Ross thought it should have been the other.


Smart for Ruger to choose the 3" version IMO.
I really like mine (other than the safety)
Here is a picture if Mr. Stoll is interested in what can be done with a Ruger.

 
Posts: 3402 | Location: Colorado U.S.A. | Registered: 24 December 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Huvius,

Very nice.

WESTLEY RICHARDS
HIGH VELOCITY NITRO
EXPRESS RIFLE .400 BORE

400 EX
CORDITE 60 -- 400 MAX

WR would call it anything rather than a .400 S. Jeffery.

That Ruger No.1 is sort of like lillying the gold.
tu2
Rip ...
 
Posts: 28032 | Location: KY | Registered: 09 December 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Magnum Hunter1:
If I'm not mistaken.....this is a point of contention between Boddington and Seyfried and one of the reasons they don't get along. The question of which came first and which was most popular. Apparently, Craig had some influence on Ruger and Hornady on which cartridge to chamber/produce and Ross thought it should have been the other.


Magnum Hunter 1,

Where did you hear that? Through the Hornady-Ruger grape vine?

Ross Seyfried is like a honey badger, HE DON'T CARE. He doesn't give a $#!& what millions of .458 WIN lovers think.
He just let that cobra bite him, then ate the cobra, took a nap, and moved on.

IMHO Seyfried is of most exalted rank among all living gun writers, head and shoulders above the commercial-minded Craig Boddington, best described as the Stormy Daniels of the gun rags.

I'll be looking for anything on a dispute between those two if it involves either timing of the evolution of, or desirability of the two 450/400's.

If Seyfried claims either that the 450/400 Magnum NE 3-1/4" came before the .400 S. Jeffery,
or that the 450/400 NE 3-1/4" would have been a better choice than the 450/400 NE 3", for the Ruger No.1,
then that is twice he has been wrong in all the years I have read him.

Craig Boddington has been repeatedly inaccurate in saying the 404 Jeffery arrived in 1909 instead of four or five years earlier.
He has been often inaccurate in that, writing the same stuff over and over as he does.

However, Craig Boddington must be right as rain on any argument with Seyfried over the 450/400 NE's, if I got the drift on this one.
tu2
Rip ...
 
Posts: 28032 | Location: KY | Registered: 09 December 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Bill/Oregon
posted Hide Post
Huvius, wonderful rifles as usual!


There is hope, even when your brain tells you there isn’t.
– John Green, author
 
Posts: 16700 | Location: Las Cruces, NM | Registered: 03 June 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of JeffreyPhD
posted Hide Post
Beautiful rifle, Huvius. Mind if I ask who did the work? Apologies if you are the custom builder and I'm just out of the loop.

Boddington as the Stormy Daniels of gun writers?! Seyfried as the honey badger?! LOL!
 
Posts: 1035 | Location: Central California Coast | Registered: 05 May 2007Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by JeffreyPhD:
Boddington as the Stormy Daniels of gun writers?! Seyfried as the honey badger?! LOL!

beer
Buy a donkey, buy a buy a donkey.
tu2
Rip ...
 
Posts: 28032 | Location: KY | Registered: 09 December 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Huvius
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by JeffreyPhD:
Beautiful rifle, Huvius. Mind if I ask who did the work? Apologies if you are the custom builder and I'm just out of the loop.


The stock and colors were done by Mike Tulowitski before he closed shop.
Don’t know what the heck is going on with him now but it doesn’t seem like a good situation for him.
 
Posts: 3402 | Location: Colorado U.S.A. | Registered: 24 December 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of JeffreyPhD
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Huvius:

The stock and colors were done by Mike Tulowitski before he closed shop.
Don’t know what the heck is going on with him now but it doesn’t seem like a good situation for him.


Sorry to hear that.
 
Posts: 1035 | Location: Central California Coast | Registered: 05 May 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
RIP,
The contention is mentioned on page 105 of Safari Rifles II by Boddington in which he states regarding the .450/400, "I will freely admit that i had a bit of influence on this project. Two decisions were required, one seemingly easy and the second difficult. The first, obviously was which version of the 450/400 to resurrect. The 450/400-3" Nitro Express. or the 400 Jeffery, was chosen. To me this seemed obvious, but colleague Ross Seyfried bitterly attacked Steve for choosing he shorter instead of the longer case length. Ross is definitely one of the top authorities on latter nineteenth -century and early twentieth century British firearms, and he believes that the 3 1/4" version was overwhelmingly more popular than Jeffery's 3" case. Honestly, most of the guys in my business get along well, but Ross' long standing problem with me is such that if I said the sky was blue on a clear day, he would be compelled to disagree just because I said it. However, i think he really believes the 3" version was the wrong choice. I don't agree."

He goes on about the choice but that is the info on the tiff with him and Seyfried.
 
Posts: 1332 | Location: Western NC | Registered: 08 January 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Magnum Hunter 1,

Thanks for that. I have the book, SR II, but never read it, just looked at the pictures after having read SR I previously.
I just read page 105 of SR II.
Now I gotta read the whole thing, and look at the pictures again.
Kudos to Boddington on getting that right.
Shame on Seyfried, again!
tu2
Rip ...
 
Posts: 28032 | Location: KY | Registered: 09 December 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
The 450-3-1/4 Has been a favorite caliber for me in double rifles, the 450/400-3" was what I used most..I wasn't fond or the 450-400-3-1/4. as brass was back then hard to find. The 450-400s are 40 caliber, perhaps they don't kill as good on paper but I never could tell one iota of difference between the two because thei is none from a hunters view....The facts however are Ruger no. 1 will take considerably more pressure than doubles and older SS and cranking the no. 1 up to 2500 FPS is no big deal, whereas the double rifle maxes out at 2100 to 2150 FPS. I always shot both calibers including the .470 at 2000 to 2100 FPS..I never felt the need for more, as all of these calibers are devastating on game..but I see no practical use for a double on the NA continent and prefer a .375 or .338 Win. for anything on this side of the pond. But just speaking for myself, to each his own on this subject, ones probably as good as the other.

Ross Seyfried is the most knowledgeable gun crank Ive ever known, and one of the finest gentlemen I have ever known..Not to mention he was a PH in Africa for as I recall about a dozen years and also guide in the USA for a number of years..With all respect to Craig Boddington, whose been there, seen the elepant, climbed the mountain, However I suspect Ross is the more qualified IMO..


Ray Atkinson
Atkinson Hunting Adventures
10 Ward Lane,
Filer, Idaho, 83328
208-731-4120

rayatkinsonhunting@gmail.com
 
Posts: 42322 | Location: Twin Falls, Idaho | Registered: 04 June 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I have learned so much from Ross Seyfried over the last 30+ years that it is quite amazing for him to need to learn a couple of things that I could teach him.
But if a light bulb is to be changed,
first it must want to change.
tu2
Rip ...
 
Posts: 28032 | Location: KY | Registered: 09 December 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Buglemintoday
posted Hide Post
This thread makes me wish I would have picked up the Craig Boddington .450-400 I had passed on for $699 a year or so ago


"Let me start off with two words: Made in America"
 
Posts: 3326 | Location: Permian Basin | Registered: 16 December 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I don't think you'll have any trouble getting that 360gr bullet to 2500fps in the Ruger #1.

My #1 in 450 Nitro will toss a 300gr Barnes to 3050fps and the Hornady 500gr to 2400+.

That action is a bit stronger than a double....

Tony
 
Posts: 135 | Location: Inola, OK | Registered: 08 July 2011Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Tony,
Actually the action of a #1 iS A HELL OF A LOT STRONGER THAN A DOUBLE RIFLE. tu2 but keep in mind the bullets for the most part are not tough enough for #1 velocity..I would opt for a premium such as a Barnes X or GS Customs..


Ray Atkinson
Atkinson Hunting Adventures
10 Ward Lane,
Filer, Idaho, 83328
208-731-4120

rayatkinsonhunting@gmail.com
 
Posts: 42322 | Location: Twin Falls, Idaho | Registered: 04 June 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of 470Evans
posted Hide Post
Love the Westley Huvius!

I wish I could still see well enough to shoot iron sighted rifles.
 
Posts: 1312 | Location: Texas | Registered: 29 August 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
In a double one can load the 450-400-3.25 to about 25 FPS maybe a tad more than the 3" model..

But the 3 inch is a healthy-er case meaning stronger and easier to purchase.

In a Ruger #1, that can be loaded big time in a a 3" case, the world is your oyster..That big strong action and those good 3" cases make finding a max load scary as hell..and it will shoot flat as a flitter to way out yonder, and still make hamburger!! Ive never played with a Ruger no 1 in the 3-1/4" case, it definatly has more powder space, but I would have to know the extent difference the thin wall and head of that case would make...?????


Ray Atkinson
Atkinson Hunting Adventures
10 Ward Lane,
Filer, Idaho, 83328
208-731-4120

rayatkinsonhunting@gmail.com
 
Posts: 42322 | Location: Twin Falls, Idaho | Registered: 04 June 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Correction of a typo below, should have read "1897" not "1987," of course!
Also noticed a dropped bolding-bracket:


quote:
Originally posted by RIP:
This is an excerpt from Pierre van der Walt's excellent work, African Dangerous Game Cartridges
I think he got it very close to right-on for this cartridge. A minor semantic issue only is claimed by me.
Quoted from the book, pp. 218-219:
***********************************************************************************************************************************************
*.450/400 Nitro Express 3" (Jeffery)*

Cartridge History
The history of the .450/400 Nitro Express 3" Jeffery starts with the .450/400 Magnum Nitro Express 3-1/4" first listed in Kynoch's 1884 catalogue. That cartridge was the standard .450 NE 3-1/4" necked down to .409" calibre,
(Not quite, they were both the old BP cartridges, not Nitro Express cartridges in 1884! Just a little snafu with the nomenclature, since smokeless powder, flake or Cordite, and NITRO EXPRESS loads had not yet arrived.
Pierre surely means that these two aboriginal BP, BPE, and NFBPE cases were simply identical in their case designs to the later NE cartridges, the .450/400 NE 3-1/4" and its forerunner, the .450 NE 3-1/4".)

but initially suffered from the fact that the original black powder case's walls were too thin to work reliably with the nitro loads that generated higher pressures.

Just as this very problem spawned Eley's .450 No.2 cartridge, it also spawned Jeffery's .450/400 Nitro Express 3". Designed with thicker case walls to handle the higher nitro pressures, its date of birth is often claimed as 1896, but the most respected authorities such as Hoyem and Barnes dispute that, while Datig offers no date or explanation. Although introduction actually took place in

1987

1897,

it is not impossible that work on the design started a year earlier.


Let's look into the events which led to its introduction. Rigby's .450 NE 3-1/4" was the first medium bore (old British classification) big game cartridge for use in double and Farquharson falling block rifles loaded with the then new British smokeless propellant Cordite. Cordite, unfortunately did not prove as perfect as had been hoped for by its developers. Early results were mixed because the steels of the day were hardly up to the new pressure levels generated. Many a bulged barrel and/or destroyed action resulted from excessive pressures. Due to these problems, black powder express rifles remained in use well into the 1900's. It was not until about 1897-1900 that the British achieved success with their early large bore nitro cartridges. The three most popular were Rigby's .450 NE 3-1/4", followed closely by Jeffery's .450/400 NE 3" and later the .500 NE 3". Jeffery's .600 Nitro Express also gained some following. When Jeffery designed his .450/400 NE 3", he based it on the 1/4" longer Rigby .450 Bore. Unlike the other two .450/400 cartridges which started off as black powder cartridges, the .400 S Jeffery as it is also known, was designed from the outset to work with nitro propellants.

The .450/400 NE 3" entry was made in the Jeffery ledger on the 8 November 1897 under the designation .400S for a rifle with serial number 5766. The letter 'S', inred ink, denoted its smokeless propellant. Like Jeffery was wont to do with cartridges, the .450/400 NE 3" was not kept as a proprietary cartridge, but released to the trade, which accounts for its widespread use and popularity.

The .450/400x3" struck a nice balance between bullet weight and the velocity considered suitable for a wide range of game and consequently went on to become a greatly admired African cartridge; not only because of availability, but because of its performance as well.
*********************************************************************************************************************************************

More from Crag Boddington in the A-Square BOOK, ANY SHOT YOU WANT p.502, agrees very well with van der Walt:
*********************************************************************************************************************************************
.450/.400 N.E. (3")

The two versions of the .450/.400, the 3-inch and the 3-1/4-inch, are not interchangeable, although in power they are indistinguishable. The .450/.400 N.E. (3"), also called the .400 Jeffery, was developed by Jeffery around 1896. It was probably the first large bore cartridge specifically designed for use with the higher pressures produced by smokeless powder. The 3-1/4-inch version was essentially a blackpowder case, and the weaker, thinner, rolled brass cases were reported to cause sticky extraction with cordite powder, especially in tropical climates. Stronger drawn cases quickly solved the problem, but by then the .450/.400 N.E. (3") was already a reality.

Jeffery indeed shortened the case on their version, but that's not the only change. The Jeffery version had a stronger, heavier case and a much thicker rim -- .060-inch vice .040. These changes make the two cartridges, although ballistically almost identical, absolutely non-interchangeable ...

... Collectively, the two versions of the .450/.400 were almost certainly the most common of all the "over-.40" Nitro Express cartridges, and the 3" version was probably more popular than the longer case.
**********************************************************************************************************************************************

Craig may have been a bit exuberant in his imaginings of the rolled case .450/.400 N.E. 3-1/4" deficiencies?

However, George A. Hoyem says of the .450/.400-3-1/4", on page 115 of THE HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENT OF SMALL ARMS AMMUNITION VOLUME III (BRITISH SPORTING CARTRIDGES):
*******************************************************************************************************************************************
This long cartridge is based on the .450-3-1/4" necked to the smaller caliber. It does not exist in the rolled case Boxer style, but evidently appeared during the 1880s. It is illustrated in the Kynoch 1884 catalog. The black powder charge was 110 grains, bullet 230 grains in express form with copper-tube hollow point, or 255-grain solid lead. In the nitro-for-black form, the charge was 40 grains of smokeless powder with a 270-grain metal-based bullet. This cartridge carried over into the nitro era Yes, AFTER THE .400 S. JEFFERY 3-Inch PIONEERED THE WAY, the 3-1/4-Inch BP brass was also strengthened, though it retained the thin rim in the 3-1/4"version!
and was available with 60 grains of smokeless and a 400-grain jacketed bullet of various constructions. It was widely used by various makers in all forms for the double rifle.
******************************************************************************************************************************************

I rest my case, the .400 S. Jeffery case, aka the 450/400 NE 3-Inch.
tu2
Rip ...


The .400 S. Jeffery was the first fully functional Nitro Express.
It was a Farquharson trade-rifle by W. J. Jeffery.
Now called the 450/400 NE 3-Inch, it may have been a result of brass-making technology shared by Kynoch,
spurred on by John Rigby's developments of the .450 S. Rigby brass for his double rifle .450 Special Rigby.
.400 Smokeless Jeffery, or .400 Special Jeffery?
Did Jeffery just call it .400 S. because he got wind of a .450 S. Rigby?
Or did Rigby call it a .450 S. because of the amazing success of the .400 S. Jeffery?
Industrial espionage?
tu2
Rip ...
 
Posts: 28032 | Location: KY | Registered: 09 December 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
So did the OP get a moose on his hunt? I can't skimmed the thread; more interested in the outcome of his hunt than the cartridge debate.


Don't Ever Book a Hunt with Jeff Blair
http://forums.accuratereloadin...821061151#2821061151

 
Posts: 7583 | Location: Arizona and off grid in CO | Registered: 28 July 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by AnotherAZWriter:
So did the OP get a moose on his hunt? I can't skimmed the thread; more interested in the outcome of his hunt than the cartridge debate.


YES!
We know who is eating crow.
That would be anyone who thought that the .400 S. Jeffery, aka the 450/400 N.E. 3-Inch, came along after the 450/400 Fake-Magnum-Thin-Rimmed N.E. 3-1/4-Inch.

So who is eating moose?
tu2
Rip ...
 
Posts: 28032 | Location: KY | Registered: 09 December 2001Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia