THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM BIG BORE FORUMS


Moderators: jeffeosso
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Interarms Mark X Login/Join
 
One of Us
Picture of Badger Matt
posted
Any experience with this rifle? What sort of a reputation do they have for accuracy, handling and reliability? Are they CRF? Anything to look out for?
 
Posts: 1264 | Location: Simpsonville, SC | Registered: 25 June 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of 458Win
posted Hide Post
I have relied on one now for over twenty-five years and they are great by all your criteria.
Yes they are CRF.


Anyone who claims the 30-06 is ineffective has either not tried one, or is unwittingly commenting on their own marksmanship
Phil Shoemaker
Alaska Master guide
FAA Master pilot
NRA Benefactor www.grizzlyskinsofalaska.com
 
Posts: 4211 | Location: Bristol Bay | Registered: 24 April 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of ElCaballero
posted Hide Post
While they are quite utilitarian they work well.


As a general rule, people are nuts!
spinksranch.com
 
Posts: 2095 | Location: Missouri, USA | Registered: 02 March 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Isn't a Charles Daly an Interarms Mark-X?
 
Posts: 600 | Registered: 16 December 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I believe so or at least they were until Remington started buying them for their 798s & seem to have taken over the US rights to them, as I understand it.
Steve.
 
Posts: 540 | Location: Nelson, New Zealand | Registered: 07 March 2008Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Charles_Helm
posted Hide Post
Charles Daly imported them after Interarms and before Remington. Of course Daly imported a lot of things that are not Mark X actions as well.
 
Posts: 8773 | Location: Republic of Texas | Registered: 24 April 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
One of the best buys on the market if you can find the express models.
Even the standard or Alaskan versions are great shooters.
I like them because they are light and handle exactly as the Whitworths.
Frank
 
Posts: 6935 | Location: hydesville, ca. , USA | Registered: 17 March 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I own one in .375, and it is the most accurate big bore of the four I own. Chambers smoothe as silk. Would have no problem taking it on a one-gun safari.
 
Posts: 1443 | Registered: 09 February 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
The only thing to watch, at least on my 458, is that it needed cross-bolts and a bedding job -- and a recoil pad... and a recoil reducer -- it's for sale, BTW...


And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.
 
Posts: 863 | Location: Texas | Registered: 25 January 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Aglifter:
The only thing to watch, at least on my 458, is that it needed cross-bolts and a bedding job -- and a recoil pad... and a recoil reducer -- it's for sale, BTW...


I have a Charles Daly in 458WM. It has 1 cross bolt.
Are you saying it needs a second cross bolt?
 
Posts: 600 | Registered: 16 December 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
My interarms mk/x is a whitworth in 458 win

It's great, accurate, reliable...
Also it has been double cross bolted (additional bolt at rear) bedded, had the front sight replaced with a necg banded (factory front sight popped off) the barrel recoil lug has been re-fitted (wasn't square in it's recess, screws needed replacement too)

I think that anything in the price range would need similar attention.

I run 350gr snrn hornadys at 2450fps, moa accurate and consistent.



--Tinker


_________________________________
Self appointed Colonel, DRSS
 
Posts: 802 | Location: Palomino Valley, NV | Registered: 26 April 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Badger Matt
posted Hide Post
Thanks guys. Mine should be here next week in .458 Win Mag.
 
Posts: 1264 | Location: Simpsonville, SC | Registered: 25 June 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Just another good Mauser 98, how could that be bad? I have owned a number of them, mostly the Whitworths and they are an excellent rifle.


Ray Atkinson
Atkinson Hunting Adventures
10 Ward Lane,
Filer, Idaho, 83328
208-731-4120

rayatkinsonhunting@gmail.com
 
Posts: 42226 | Location: Twin Falls, Idaho | Registered: 04 June 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
/
 
Posts: 7857 | Registered: 16 August 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Alf,
Exactly, but how many of the Whitworths have blown up...I have seen many of them opened up in front for larger than intended calibers, including the factory models in .375 and .458 as they are also openned up totally in front, and none of them that I'm aware of have developed headspace or blew up, therefore I am pretty well convienced they have to be a pretty strong action..


Ray Atkinson
Atkinson Hunting Adventures
10 Ward Lane,
Filer, Idaho, 83328
208-731-4120

rayatkinsonhunting@gmail.com
 
Posts: 42226 | Location: Twin Falls, Idaho | Registered: 04 June 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of 458Win
posted Hide Post
I understand that Zastava actually made M-98 actions for Mauser, with Mauser banners, during the late 1970's. they seemed to think they were of OK quality.
No they don't have a C ring but, except in theory and for something to argue about over beers, or the web, it doesn't make much difference. They are a sound action.


Anyone who claims the 30-06 is ineffective has either not tried one, or is unwittingly commenting on their own marksmanship
Phil Shoemaker
Alaska Master guide
FAA Master pilot
NRA Benefactor www.grizzlyskinsofalaska.com
 
Posts: 4211 | Location: Bristol Bay | Registered: 24 April 2004Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia